I have created Azure function app python. We have source system Guidewire which calls this Azure function app. We are planning to add security level to function app so that any system connecting to function app need to authenticate and authorize. Please let me know how to enable this and how to perform authentication/authorization function app(python).
Thanks
Azure Functions lets you access your function endpoints in different authorization scopes like System level, admin level, user level and anonymous level.
While function keys can help prevent unauthorized access, the only way to completely secure your function endpoints is to use affirmative authentication for all clients who visit your functions. You can then make authorization decisions based on identity.
By providing out-of-the-box authentication with federated identity providers, the built-in authentication functionality for App Service and Azure Functions can save you time and effort, allowing you to focus on the rest of your application.
When you enable authentication and authorization with one of these providers, its sign-in endpoint is available for user authentication and for validation of authentication tokens from the provider. You can provide your users with any number of these sign-in options.
Azure Functions uses Azure Active Directory (Azure AD) as the default identity and access management service.
Please refer the what are the built-in authentications provided and customization details, authorization scope of azure functions and azure function security system in base line for detailed information.
Related
I am trying to understand which authentication suits good for Azure Function app because I have to expose function app end point to external team.
I have enable Azure AD authentication and planning to share App registration client_id and client_secret (endpoint oauth2/v2.0/token) where they will generate bearer token to Authenticate and consume my endpoint.
I was wondering if there is any other best approach of authentication than Azure-AD because I am exposing to external team.
Please assist, Thank you.
the most secure option is to request access tokens trough the Azuthorization Grant Flow with PKCE. No secret is required, however if you need to use one, we recommend using certificate credentials which are asymmetric thus the exposure of the secret is more and better controlled.
You can also, configure token and enforce additional security measures trough Conditional Access policies. With them you can configure session lifetimes, require MFA for selected or all external users that access your application, that they authenticate from a compliant device, well known IP range or location, and more.
Also, and at the PAAS level, you can Set up Azure App Service access restrictions.
I have to design an IAM solution for a NodeJS microservice using Auth0. Objective is to allow third party mobile application users to access this microservice.
I understand OAuth and OpenID connect solution and one simple solution is third party application accesses APIs as a client using client credentials workflow.
Solution I have to design is allowing users to login and authenticate using their Enterprise IdP connected to our Auth0 Server. So that we can implement authorization and access control at user level.
At the same time customer application needs to be kept agnostic of Auth0 service.
What I mean by it is client should not be required to add any logic in their application for accommodating our Auth0 domain like we have in first party React application. user once logged in to customer application should get access to our API also by using SSO capability. I have read some documents about configuring customer IdP with our Auth0 server acting as a SAML SP. Still I could not understand hows of it and will Auth0 create an OAuth access token in this scenario.
I realise this requires an app to intermediate between customer's mobile app and our API service. Still, I am not able to understand data flow and communication between various components.
Also, I am not sure it is a common situation or requirement? If it is is there any technical term for it? This not seem like a standard B2B scenario.
have to design an IAM solution .. , I am not able to understand data flow and communication between various components ..
Before answering, the answer will points the asked specific questions, may not fit al your needs. SO is not really intended for writing tutorials or searching the documentation. Implementing an IdP (effecively a security module), one needs to do his homework and learn the details.
Maybe using an ready / out of box solution could be interesting. Using an open source IAM such as KeyCloak, WSO2IS could be a quick start. Or cloud services such as AWS Cognito, IBM AppId, Azure AD, .. could be a feasible solution too
a client using client credentials workflow .. access toked received by our API should be for user logged in
The client credentials grant is intended to authenticate only applications. That's it.
To authenticate users, other grant type is needed. For the user authentication the most common option is the authorization code or the implicit grant. The implicit grant is has its weaknesses and is being replaced by the code grant with PKCE (just search it).
End requirement is users of 3rd-party application not required to login again while 3rd-party application fetches data from our API .. Configuring their IdP (most probably Active directory) and our Auth0 servers for the same is all I need to understand
I see most common two options in use:
1. federated SSO authentication
This is the most commonly used option. The external (3rd party) IdP is configured as a "trusted" federated IdP. You often see the scenario when you have a service provider allowing to login with other IdP, often social networks (FB, Google, ...)
The login flow is as follows:
The client authorizes with the provider's (yours) IdP (let's call it IdP1).
IdP1 now acts as as Service Provider with IdP2 (IdP of the partner) and asks for the authorization (redirects the user to the IdP2).
User is authenticated and authorized with IdP2. If the user is already authenticated, the IdP2 doesn't need to ask the user's credentials again, this is how SSO works on this level
IdP2 returns to IdP1 (acting as a service provider).
IdP1 reads the user information (using the id_token, userinfo service - assuming using the OAuth2/OIDC protocol all the time there are other protocols too) and builds its own the user-level token. It may or may not create a local user (it is called user provisioning).
IdP1 returns to the client and the client can request a user-level token.
Then the client can call the API services with the token trusted by the API provider.
2. Assertion Framework for OAuth Authorization Grants
This option is built on top of the Assertion Framework for OAuth 2.0 Client Authentication and Authorization Grants, it is an optional extension of the OAuth2 protocol. I call this a token swap service
Basically the token service could validate the access or ID token of a trusted (partner) IdP and issue its own token based on the provided user information.
As you see there are a lot of information and to build a secure solution you ned to make sure that all steps are properly secured (signature, expiration, issuer, validity, audience, subject domain, .. are validated). Disclaimer - as my job we implement IAM/IDM solutions and a lot can get wrong if shortcuts are taken. So you may really consider using an out of box and proven solution.
In our organisation we use the Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE) to implement a micro-service architecture. As we are also G-Suite users, everyone in the organisation is guaranteed to have a Google account. In consequence we would like to use those accounts to manage authentication and authorization of micro services.
We have prototyped login using the angularfire2 client to authenticate against the Google Identity Platform. We also have Google Cloud Endpoints configured to control access to relevant services.
The piece we are missing is how to get from the identity in Google to an access token we can use on our services -- the access token coming back using the Firebase API has no claims in it, and the documentation on custom claims seems to make it quite clear that these go into the identity token.
My expectation would be to have JWTs with the appropriate audience (our backend), containing a sufficient set of claims to implement role based access control within the services. Ideally the infrastructure could validate a claim already -- some of our services are small enough to require only one role, which could be enforced outside the service. Or we could annotate our endpoints (Protobuf) with the required claims.
In the GCP environment, what is the standard process of creating access tokens to be used for accessing GKE services? Is there anything that supports this?
The piece we are missing is how to get from the identity in Google to
an access token we can use on our services -- the access token coming
back using the Firebase API has no claims in it, and the documentation
on custom claims seems to make it quite clear that these go into the
identity token.
Google OAuth Access Tokens do not have an identity in the sense that you want to use it. Identity is stored in the Identity Token. Add the scope "email" when authenticating the user. Google will return an ID Token. For some frameworks, you can request custom claims for the Identity Token.
In the GCP environment, what is the standard process of creating
access tokens to be used for accessing GKE services? Is there anything
that supports this?
There are two types of access excluding methods such as API keys. User Accounts and Service Accounts. Service-to-service typically uses service account Access Tokens (RBAC) or service account Identity Tokens (IBAC). In your case, you want to use Identity Platform which means User Accounts.
If I was designing this system, I would use User Accounts to authenticate with the system - Firebase is great for this purpose. I would look up what roles this identity supports/allows from my database (Firestore) and create a service account Access Token with the required scopes for GCP services. I would then use this Access Token for GCP service-to-service authorization. If I also required custom roles for my own services, I would create a custom Identity Token with my custom roles and include that as a custom HTTP header and include the Google Access Token in the standard HTTP "authorization: bearer" header. I would use the service account private key to sign my custom Identity Token or use a GCP IAM API to sign for me so that the other end can verify with the service account's public key. This method prevents data leakage at the client, no private keys are distributed, scopes/roles are not disclosed, etc.
I would suggest you follow this doc of authentication between services by using service account files.
I'm trying to setup an application to validate identity using Azure AD and acquire a token to allow access to a secure api. The front end application is written in angular and allows anonymous access. What can I use to access AAD authenticate and return an access token?
This will be an angular 6+ UI that is communicating to a secure .Net api using Azure AD for authentication. I have done a couple days research and everything points to a user logging in to authenticate using the login page. I need it to be by app and open the login page. I tried a couple examples where it utilized authentication/authorization and that didn't work because the app needs to authorization the user to talk to the api. I have seen where people were using Microsoft graph but once again it was user based and they were redirected to an azure login. I am looking for a solution that will allow me to setup an account in azure ad and authenticate the app on start to get an access token to allow communication to my secure api. If I have missed something somewhere in my research and test attempts let me know. This is my first Azure AD auth attempt and I feel like I am missing something for application authorization.
The problem is an Angular app is what we call a public client.
It cannot hold secrets and thus cannot prove its identity.
So, only user-based authentication flows should be used by public clients.
Confidential clients on the other hand can hold secrets as they run on servers that you control.
So for example, a back-end Web application or API would be a confidential client.
Those can use the client credentials flow to acquire access tokens and call APIs as themselves without a user being involved.
There is a bit of a fundamental issue in your question.
Your API requires authentication, but you want functionality to be available to anonymous users.
So you want to bypass authentication.
If you really want to bypass authentication for parts of the API, you could just make those endpoints available anonymously without a token.
I'm currently developing a API to commercialized in a B2B SAAS fashion.
The goal is to authenticate the worker of the company. We have an SDK that should be able to do that. There is the possibility to force each user to set credentials specific for our service, but that will hurt integration with companies applications.
The idea would be to have some kind of authentication (client independent) that make it easier to authenticate users.
The question is: There is a easy way to create an automatic process that does not depend on the client type of authentication methods, for this type of task?
Thanks in advance.
Have you taken a look at Azure AD? It specifically supports multi-tenant scenarios.
Tenants can use Azure AD Connect to sync their on-premise directory to the cloud. Clients can use ADAL to acquire a token which your service trusts. The issued token contains a tenant-id claim indicating via which tenant the user logged in.
Just to add to MvdD answer, in Azure AD support three ways to sign in:
Federated Single Sign-On enables applications to redirect to Azure AD
for user authentication instead of prompting for its own password.
This is supported for applications that support protocols such as SAML
2.0, WS-Federation, or OpenID Connect, and is the richest mode of single sign-on.
Password-based Single Sign-On enables secure application password
storage and replay using a web browser extension or mobile app. This
leverages the existing sign-in process provided by the application,
but enables an administrator to manage the passwords and does not
require the user to know the password.
Existing Single Sign-On enables Azure AD to leverage any existing
single sign-on that has been set up for the application, but enables
these applications to be linked to the Office 365 or Azure AD access
panel portals, and also enables additional reporting in Azure AD when
the applications are launched there.