Change SQL where clause based on a parameter? - sql

I need to alter a query to do something like this (following is generic pseudo-code):
if (tag list contains all tags in the database) {
select every product regardless of tag, even products with null tag
}
else { //tag list is only a few tags long
select only the products that have a tag in the tag list
}
I have tried doing stuff like this, but it doesn't work:
SELECT p.Id
FROM Tags t
JOIN Products p ON p.TagId = t.Id
WHERE ((EXISTS(select Id from Tags EXCEPT select item from dbo.SplitString(#tagList,',')) AND p.TagId in (select item from dbo.SplitString(#tagList,',')))
OR (p.TagId in (select item from dbo.SplitString(#tagList,',')) or p.TagId is null))
This will take place inside of a large query with a large WHERE clause, so putting two slightly different queries in an IF ELSE statement is not ideal.
What should I do to get this working?

First things first: you should use properly normalized input parameters. Ideally this would be a Table-Valued parameter, however if you cannot do that then you could insert the split values into a table variable
DECLARE #tags TABLE (TagId int PRIMARY KEY);
INSERT #tags (TagId)
SELECT item
FROM dbo.SplitString(#tagList, ',');
Next, the easiest way is probably to just find out first whether all tags match, and store that in a variable.
DECLARE #isAllTags bit = CASE WHEN EXISTS(
SELECT t.Id
FROM Tags t
EXCEPT
SELECT tList.Id
FROM #tags tList
) THEN 0 ELSE 1 END;
SELECT p.Id
FROM Products p
WHERE #isAllTags = 1
OR EXISTS (SELECT 1
FROM #tags tList
WHERE tList.TagId = p.TagId);
You could merge these queries, but it's unlikely to be more performant.
You could even do it in a very set-based fashion, but it's probably going to be really slow
SELECT p.Id
FROM Products p
WHERE EXISTS (SELECT 1
FROM Tags t
LEFT JOIN #tags tList ON tList.TagId = t.Id
CROSS APPLY (VALUES (CASE WHEN p.TagId = tList.TagId THEN 1 END )) v(ProductMatch)
HAVING COUNT(t.Id) = COUNT(tList.TagId) -- all exist
OR COUNT(v.ProductMatch) > 0 -- at least one match
);

Try this, this might work.
SELECT p.Id
FROM
Products p LEFT JOIN
Tags t ON p.TagId = t.Id
WHERE
t.Id is null
OR
(t.id is not null and
t.Id in (SELECT value FROM STRING_SPLIT(#tagList, ',')))
I just tested - works

Related

Recieving error when updating with subquery within SSMS

I've run into an error where my subquery returns more values than the permitted "1".
I'm trying to update Table [I] with the.QUERY value from Table [P].
Both tables are from different databases. They have the same value in column ID.
And I want to try out ID's 100-150 as a test first.
UPDATE I
SET I.metadata02 = (SELECT CAST([XML]AS xml)
.query(N'/inkoopfacturen/inkoopfactuur/jaar')
.value('.', 'varchar(30)')
FROM [Archive190404132717].[dbo].[tblArchiveInvoices])
FROM tblindex AS I
INNER JOIN [Archive190404132717].[dbo].[tblArchiveInvoices] AS P
ON I.ID = P.ID
WHERE
I.tasknumber BETWEEN '100' and '150'
OK, seems like what you are actually after is actually just this:
UPDATE I
SET I.metadata02 = CAST([XML] AS xml).query(N'/inkoopfacturen/inkoopfactuur/jaar').value('.', 'varchar(30)')
FROM tblindex I
INNER JOIN [Archive190404132717].[dbo].[tblArchiveInvoices] P ON I.ID = P.ID
WHERE I.tasknumber BETWEEN '100' AND '150';
There's no need for the subquery, and the 2nd reference to tblArchiveInvoices; you've already joined to it.
Why are you using both a subquery and join? I assume you want a correlated subquery:
UPDATE I
SET I.metadata02 = (SELECT CAST([XML]AS xml)
.query(N'/inkoopfacturen/inkoopfactuur/jaar')
.value('.', 'varchar(30)')
FROM [Archive190404132717].[dbo].[tblArchiveInvoices]
WHERE I.ID = P.ID
)
FROM tblindex I
WHERE I.tasknumber BETWEEN '100' and '150';
Also, a field called tasknumber should really be stored as a number. The comparison as strings can be misleading. If it is a number, drop the single quotes. If it is a string, you should realize that '10001 meets the WHERE conditions.
maybe you're trying something like this:
UPDATE I
SET metadata02 = X
FROM tblindex AS I
INNER JOIN (SELECT Id, CAST([XML]AS xml).query(N'/inkoopfacturen/inkoopfactuur/jaar').value('.', 'varchar(30)') AS X
FROM [Archive190404132717].[dbo].[tblArchiveInvoices] ) AS P
ON I.ID = P.ID
WHERE I.tasknumber BETWEEN '100' and '150'

Return single row on case statement on left outer joined table

I have the following (simplified) tables
Table Products
ID
Title
Table Data_Tags
ID
ForeignID
Tag
There are two tags added for product ID 1: 'solid' and 'strong'
Query below will return 2 rows and if I add DISTINCT it will only return 1 row as expected.
SELECT Products.ID, Products.Title
FROM Products LEFT OUTER JOIN Data_Tags ON Products.ID = Data_Tags.ForeignID
WHERE (Products.ID = 1)
I would like to add a CASE statement to the query to calculate a specific relevance to certain keywords
CASE WHEN CONTAINS(Data_tags.tag, 'solid') THEN 100 ELSE 0 END AS TagsMatch
Query will become this:
SELECT DISTINCT Products.ID, Products.Title, CASE WHEN CONTAINS(Data_tags.tag, 'solid') THEN 100 ELSE 0 END AS TagsMatch
FROM Products LEFT OUTER JOIN Data_Tags ON Products.ID = Data_Tags.ForeignID
WHERE (Products.ID = 1)
When running the query it will return two rows, which makes perfect sense as it will output 100 for tag 'solid' (match) and 0 for tag 'strong' (no match)
However I am unsure on how to modify the query to only return a single row with value 0 if none of the related tags are a match and 100 if any of the related tags is a match.
I would also like to avoid subqueries to keep performance best as possible.
I am using MS SQL Server 2014.
Please advise. Thank you very much!
I have been trying to find a solution for your question. It turns out 1000111 was correct. You cannot use Contains without full-text search... If you replace Contains() with like I think this should solve your problem. Here is what I did:
Declare #Products table
(ID int,
Title varchar(50))
insert into #Products values (1, 'Test')
Declare #Data_Tags table
(ID int,
ForeignID int,
Tag varchar(50))
insert into #Data_Tags values (1, 1, 'solid')
insert into #Data_Tags values (2, 1, 'strong')
SELECT DISTINCT Products.ID, Products.Title, max(CASE WHEN Data_tags.tag like '%stttt%' THEN 100 ELSE 0 END) AS TagsMatch
FROM #Products Products LEFT OUTER JOIN #Data_Tags Data_Tags ON Products.ID = Data_Tags.ForeignID
WHERE (Products.ID = 1)
group by Products.ID, Products.Title
The above return 0, when you change '%stttt%' to '%solid%' it returns 100.
Let me know if this helped.
SELECT Products.ID, Products.Title, max(CASE WHEN Data_tags.tag = 'solid' THEN 100 ELSE 0 END) AS TagsMatch
FROM #Products Products
LEFT OUTER JOIN #Data_Tags Data_Tags
ON Products.ID = Data_Tags.ForeignID
WHERE (Products.ID = 1)
group by Products.ID, Products.Title

How can I perform the Count function with a where clause?

I have my database setup to allow a user to "Like" or "Dislike" a post. If it is liked, the column isliked = true, false otherwise (null if nothing.)
The problem is, I am trying to create a view that shows all Posts, and also shows a column with how many 'likes' and 'dislikes' each post has. Here is my SQL; I'm not sure where to go from here. It's been a while since I've worked with SQL and everything I've tried so far has not given me what I want.
Perhaps my DB isn't setup properly for this. Here is the SQL:
Select trippin.AccountData.username, trippin.PostData.posttext,
trippin.CategoryData.categoryname, Count(trippin.LikesDislikesData.liked)
as TimesLiked from trippin.PostData
inner join trippin.AccountData on trippin.PostData.accountid = trippin.AccountData.id
inner join trippin.CategoryData on trippin.CategoryData.id = trippin.PostData.categoryid
full outer join trippin.LikesDislikesData on trippin.LikesDislikesData.postid =
trippin.PostData.id
full outer join trippin.LikesDislikesData likes2 on trippin.LikesDislikesData.accountid =
trippin.AccountData.id
Group By (trippin.AccountData.username), (trippin.PostData.posttext), (trippin.categorydata.categoryname);
Here's my table setup (I've only included relevant columns):
LikesDislikesData
isliked(bit) || accountid(string) || postid(string
PostData
id(string) || posttext || accountid(string)
AccountData
id(string) || username(string)
CategoryData
categoryname(string)
Problem 1: FULL OUTER JOIN versus LEFT OUTER JOIN. Full outer joins are seldom what you want, it means you want all data specified on the "left" and all data specified on the "right", that are matched and unmatched. What you want is all the PostData on the "left" and any matching Likes data on the "right". If some right hand side rows don't match something on the left, then you don't care about it. Almost always work from left to right and join results that are relevant.
Problem 2: table alias. Where ever you alias a table name - such as Likes2 - then every instance of that table within the query needs to use that alias. Straight after you declare the alias Likes2, your join condition refers back to trippin.LikesDislikesData, which is the first instance of the table. Given the second one in joining on a different field I suspect that the postid and accountid are being matched on the same row, therefore it should be AND together, not a separate table instance. EDIT reading your schema closer, it seems this wouldn't be needed at all.
Problem 3: to solve you Counts problem separate them using CASE statements. Count will add the number of non NULL values returned for each CASE. If the likes.liked = 1, then return 1 otherwise return NULL. The NULL will be returned if the columns contains a 0 or a NULL.
SELECT trippin.PostData.Id, trippin.AccountData.username, trippin.PostData.posttext,
trippin.CategoryData.categoryname,
SUM(CASE WHEN likes.liked = 1 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) as TimesLiked,
SUM(CASE WHEN likes.liked = 0 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) as TimesDisLiked
FROM trippin.PostData
INNER JOIN trippin.AccountData ON trippin.PostData.accountid = trippin.AccountData.id
INNER JOIN trippin.CategoryData ON trippin.CategoryData.id = trippin.PostData.categoryid
LEFT OUTER JOIN trippin.LikesDislikesData likes ON likes.postid = trippin.PostData.id
-- remove AND likes.accountid = trippin.AccountData.id
GROUP BY trippin.PostData.Id, (trippin.AccountData.username), (trippin.PostData.posttext), (trippin.categorydata.categoryname);
Then "hide" the PostId column in the User Interface.
Instead of selecting Count(trippin.LikesDislikesData.liked) you could put in a select statement:
Select AccountData.username, PostData.posttext, CategoryData.categoryname,
(select Count(*)
from LikesDislikesData as likes2
where likes2.postid = postdata.id
and likes2.liked = 'like' ) as TimesLiked
from PostData
inner join AccountData on PostData.accountid = AccountData.id
inner join CategoryData on CategoryData.id = PostData.categoryid
USE AdventureWorksDW2008R2
GO
SET NOCOUNT ON
GO
/*
Default
*/
SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL READ COMMITTED
GO
BEGIN TRAN
IF OBJECT_ID('tempdb.dbo.#LikesDislikesData') IS NOT NULL
BEGIN
DROP TABLE #LikesDislikesData
END
CREATE TABLE #LikesDislikesData(
isLiked bit
,accountid VARCHAR(50)
,postid VARCHAR(50)
);
IF OBJECT_ID('tempdb.dbo.#PostData') IS NOT NULL
BEGIN
DROP TABLE #PostData
END
CREATE TABLE #PostData(
postid INT IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL
,accountid VARCHAR(50)
,posttext VARCHAR(50)
);
IF OBJECT_ID('tempdb.dbo.#AccountData') IS NOT NULL
BEGIN
DROP TABLE #AccountData
END
CREATE TABLE #AccountData(
accountid INT
,username VARCHAR(50)
);
IF OBJECT_ID('tempdb.dbo.#CategoryData') IS NOT NULL
BEGIN
DROP TABLE #CategoryData
END
CREATE TABLE #CategoryData(
categoryname VARCHAR(50)
);
INSERT INTO #AccountData VALUES ('1', 'user1')
INSERT INTO #PostData VALUES('1','this is a post')
INSERT INTO #LikesDislikesData (isLiked ,accountid, postid)
SELECT '1', P.accountid, P.postid
FROM #PostData P
WHERE P.posttext = 'this is a post'
SELECT *
FROM #PostData
SELECT *
FROM #LikesDislikesData
SELECT *
FROM #AccountData
SELECT COUNT(L.isLiked) 'Likes'
,P.posttext
,A.username
FROM #PostData P
JOIN #LikesDislikesData L
ON P.accountid = L.accountid
AND L.IsLiked = 1
JOIN #AccountData A
ON P.accountid = A.accountid
GROUP BY P.posttext, A.username
SELECT X.likes, Y.dislikes
FROM (
(SELECT COUNT(isliked)as 'likes', accountid
FROM #LikesDislikesData
WHERE isLiked = 1
GROUP BY accountid
) X
JOIN
(SELECT COUNT(isliked)as 'dislikes', accountid
FROM #LikesDislikesData
WHERE isLiked = 0
GROUP BY accountid) Y
ON x.accountid = y.accountid)
IF (XACT_STATE() = 1 AND ERROR_STATE() = 0)
BEGIN
COMMIT TRAN
END
ELSE IF (##TRANCOUNT > 0)
BEGIN
ROLLBACK TRAN
END
How do you think about the solution? We create a new table SummaryReport(PostID,AccountID,NumberOfLikedTime,NumberOfDislikedTimes).
An user clicks on LIKE or DISLIKE button we update the table. After that, you can query as you desire. Another advantage, the table can be served reporting purpose.

Is there a good way to do this in SQL?

I am trying to solve the following problem entirely in SQL (ANSI or TSQL, in Sybase ASE 12), without relying on cursors or loop-based row-by-row processing.
NOTE: I already created a solution that accomplishes the same goal in application layer (therefore please refrain from "answering" with "don't do this in SQL"), but as a matter of principle (and hopefully improved performance) I would like to know if there is an efficient (e.g. no cursors) pure SQL solution.
Setup:
I have a table T with the following 3 columns (all NOT NULL):
---- Table T -----------------------------
| item | tag | value |
| [int] | [varchar(10)] | [varchar(255)] |
The table has unique index on item, tag
Every tag has a form of a string "TAG##" where "##" is a number 1-99
Existing tags are not guaranteed to be contiguous, e.g. item 13 may have tags "TAG1", "TAG3", "TAG10".
TASK: I need to insert a bunch of new rows into the table from another table T_NEW, which only have items and values, and assign new tag to them so they don't violate unique index on item, tag.
Uniqueness of values is irrelevant (assume that item+value is always unique already).
---- Table T_NEW --------------------------
| item | tag | value |
| [int] | STARTS AS NULL | [varchar(255)] |
QUESTION: How can I assign new tags to all rows in table T_NEW, such that:
All item+tag combinations in a union of T and T_NEW are unique
Newly assigned tags should all be in the form "TAG##"
Newly assigned tags should ideally be the smallest available for a given item.
If it helps, you can assume that I already have a temp table #tags, with a "tag" column that contains 99 rows containing all the valid tags (TAG1..TAG99, one per row)
I started a fiddle that will get you the list of available "open" tags by item. It does this using the #tags (AllTags) and doing an outer-join-where-null. You could use that to insert new tags from T_New...
with T_openTags as (
select
items.item,
openTagName = a.tag
from
(select distinct item from T) items
cross join AllTags a
left outer join T on
items.item = T.item
and T.tag = a.tag
where
T.item is null
)
select * from T_openTags
or see this updated fiddle to do an update on T_New table. Essentially adds a row_number so we can pick the correct open tag to use in a single update statement. I padded the Tag names with a leading zero to simplify the sorting.
with T_openTags as (
select
items.item,
openTagName = a.tag,
rn = row_number() over(partition by items.item order by a.tag)
from
(select distinct item from T) items
cross join AllTags a
left outer join T on
items.item = T.item
and T.tag = a.tag
where
T.item is null
), T_New_numbered as (
select *,
rn = row_number() over(partition by item order by value)
from T_New
)
update tnn set tag = openTagName
from T_New_numbered tnn
inner join T_openTags tot on
tot.item = tnn.item
and tot.rn = tnn.rn
select * from T_New
updated fiddle with poor mans row_number replacement that only works with distinct T_New values
Try this:
DECLARE #T TABLE (ITEM INT, TAG VARCHAR(10), VALUE VARCHAR(255))
INSERT INTO #T VALUES
(1,'TAG1', '100'),
(2,'TAG2', '200')
DECLARE #T_NEW TABLE (ITEM INT, TAG VARCHAR(10), VALUE VARCHAR(255))
INSERT INTO #T_NEW VALUES
(3,NULL, '500'),
(4,NULL, '600')
INSERT INTO #T
SELECT
ITEM,
('TAG' + CONVERT(VARCHAR(20),ITEM)) AS TAG,
VALUE
FROM
#T_NEW
SELECT * FROM #T
OK, here's a correct solution, tested to work on Sybase (H/T: big thanks to #ypercube for providing a solid basis for it)
declare #c int
select #c = 1
WHILE (#c > 0)
BEGIN
UPDATE
t_new
SET
tag =
( SELECT min(tags.tag)
FROM #tags tags
LEFT JOIN t o
ON tags.tag = o.tag
AND o.item = t_new.item
LEFT JOIN t_new n3
ON tags.tag = n3.tag
AND n3.item = t_new.item
WHERE o.tag IS NULL
AND n3.tag IS NULL
)
WHERE tag IS NULL
-- and here's the main magic for only updating one item at a time
AND NOT EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM t_new n2 WHERE t_new.value > n2.value
and n2.tag IS NULL and n2.item=t_new.item)
SELECT #c = ##rowcount
END
Inserting directly to t:
INSERT INTO t
(item, tag, value)
SELECT
item,
( SELECT MIN(tags.tag)
FROM #tags AS tags
LEFT JOIN t AS o
ON tags.tag = o.tag
AND o.item_id = n.item_id
WHERE o.tag IS NULL
) AS tag,
value
FROM
t_new AS n ;
Updating t_new:
UPDATE
t_new AS n
SET
tag =
( SELECT MIN(tags.tag)
FROM #tags AS tags
LEFT JOIN t AS o
ON tags.tag = o.tag
AND o.item_id = n.item_id
WHERE o.tag IS NULL
) ;
Correction
UPDATE
n
SET
n.tag = w.tag
FROM
( SELECT item_id,
tag,
ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY item_id ORDER BY value) AS rn
FROM t_new
) AS n
JOIN
( SELECT di.item_id,
tags.tag,
ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY di.item_id ORDER BY tags.tag) AS rn
FROM
( SELECT DISTINCT item_id
FROM t_new
) AS di
CROSS JOIN
#tags AS tags
LEFT JOIN
t AS o
ON tags.tag = o.tag
AND o.item_id = di.item_id
WHERE o.tag IS NULL
) AS w
ON w.item_id = n.item_id
AND w.rn = n.rn ;

SQL Text Matching Query Tuning

I'm trying to do some free text search matching, and wondering if I can improve this query (using MSSQL 2008):
#FreeText is a table, where each row is a search word
DECLARE #WordCount = (SELECT COUNT(*) from #FreeText)
SELECT p.ID
FROM Product p
OUTER APPLY
(
SELECT COUNT(ID) as MatchCount
FROM Product pm
INNER JOIN #FreeText ft
ON pm.txt like '%'+ft.text+'%'
WHERE pm.ID = p.ID
AND (SELECT TOP 1 [text] FROM #FreeText) IS NOT NULL
)MC
WHERE MatchCount = #WordCount
So I'm wondering if there is any way to avoid the "FROM Product pm" in the outer apply?
I cannot always INNER JOIN #FreeText because sometimes we don't use free text searching.
Any thoughts or tips would be greatly appreciated, also let me know if I can clarify anything. Thanks in advance.
P.S. I do know that MS SQL has a FREETEXT() search, but I unfortunately cannot use that at the moment.
Here's a query without OUTER APPLY, that returns all results when there are no search critera.
DECLARE #FreeText TABLE
(
[text] varchar(200)
)
INSERT INTO #FreeText SELECT 'a'
INSERT INTO #FreeText SELECT 'c'
-- what, null? No.
DELETE FROM #FreeText WHERE [text] is null
DECLARE #WordCount int
SET #WordCount = (SELECT Count(*) FROM #FreeText)
SELECT p.ID
FROM Product p
LEFT JOIN #FreeText ft
ON p.txt like '%' + ft.text + '%'
WHERE ft.text is not null OR #WordCount = 0
GROUP BY p.ID
HAVING COUNT(*) = #WordCount OR #WordCount = 0
Note: it would be my preference to not use the "freetext" query when there is not any freetext criteria - instead use another query (simpler). If you choose to go that route - go back to an INNER JOIN and drop the OR #WordCount = 0 x2.