Optimizers with moment in custom training loop - tensorflow

If I am creating a personal training loop from scratch, does the Adam optimizer will apply correctly?
I doubt this because the optimizer is applied manually at each batch. No lines tell the program to remember the previous gradients. I wonder whether in this case Adam degenerates to a simple one-step gradient descent method.
Here is the example codes adapted from https://www.tensorflow.org/guide/keras/writing_a_training_loop_from_scratch. I simply change their SGD optimizer to Adam
import tensorflow as tf
from tensorflow import keras
from tensorflow.keras import layers
import numpy as np
inputs = keras.Input(shape=(784,), name="digits")
x1 = layers.Dense(64, activation="relu")(inputs)
x2 = layers.Dense(64, activation="relu")(x1)
outputs = layers.Dense(10, name="predictions")(x2)
model = keras.Model(inputs=inputs, outputs=outputs)
# Instantiate an optimizer.
optimizer = keras.optimizers.Adam(learning_rate=1e-3)
# Instantiate a loss function.
loss_fn = keras.losses.SparseCategoricalCrossentropy(from_logits=True)
# Prepare the training dataset.
batch_size = 64
(x_train, y_train), (x_test, y_test) = keras.datasets.mnist.load_data()
x_train = np.reshape(x_train, (-1, 784))
x_test = np.reshape(x_test, (-1, 784))
# Reserve 10,000 samples for validation.
x_val = x_train[-10000:]
y_val = y_train[-10000:]
x_train = x_train[:-10000]
y_train = y_train[:-10000]
# Prepare the training dataset.
train_dataset = tf.data.Dataset.from_tensor_slices((x_train, y_train))
train_dataset = train_dataset.shuffle(buffer_size=1024).batch(batch_size)
# Prepare the validation dataset.
val_dataset = tf.data.Dataset.from_tensor_slices((x_val, y_val))
val_dataset = val_dataset.batch(batch_size)
epochs = 2
for epoch in range(epochs):
print("\nStart of epoch %d" % (epoch,))
# Iterate over the batches of the dataset.
for step, (x_batch_train, y_batch_train) in enumerate(train_dataset):
# Open a GradientTape to record the operations run
# during the forward pass, which enables auto-differentiation.
with tf.GradientTape() as tape:
# Run the forward pass of the layer.
# The operations that the layer applies
# to its inputs are going to be recorded
# on the GradientTape.
logits = model(x_batch_train, training=True) # Logits for this minibatch
# Compute the loss value for this minibatch.
loss_value = loss_fn(y_batch_train, logits)
# Use the gradient tape to automatically retrieve
# the gradients of the trainable variables with respect to the loss.
grads = tape.gradient(loss_value, model.trainable_weights)
# Run one step of gradient descent by updating
# the value of the variables to minimize the loss.
optimizer.apply_gradients(zip(grads, model.trainable_weights))

Related

"No gradients provided for any variable" error when trying to use GradientTape mechanism

I'm trying to use GradientTape mechanism for the first time. I've looked at some examples but I'm getting the "No gradients provided for any variable" error and was wondering how to overcome this?
I want to define some complex loss functions, so I tried using GradientTape to produce its gradient for the CNN training. What was I doing wrong and can I fix it?
Attached is a run-able example code that demonstrates my problem:
# imports
import numpy as np
import tensorflow as tf
import sklearn
from tensorflow import keras
from tensorflow.keras import layers
from sklearn.model_selection import train_test_split
from sklearn.svm import SVC
tf.config.run_functions_eagerly(True)
#my loss function
def my_loss_fn(y_true, y_pred):
` # train SVM classifier
VarC=1E6
VarGamma='scale'
clf = SVC(kernel='rbf', C=VarC, gamma=VarGamma, probability=True )
clf.fit(y_pred, y_true)
y_pred = clf.predict_proba(y_pred)
scce = tf.keras.losses.SparseCategoricalCrossentropy()
return scce(y_true, y_pred)
`
#creating inputs to demontration
X0=0.5*np.ones((12,12))
X0[2:12:4,:]=0
X0[3:12:4,:]=0
X1=0.5*np.ones((12,12))
X1[1:12:4,:]=0
X1[2:12:4,:]=0
X1=np.transpose(X1)
X=np.zeros((2000,12,12))
for i in range(0,1000):
X[i]=X0+np.random.rand(12,12)
for i in range(1000,2000):
X[i]=X1+np.random.rand(12,12)
y=np.zeros(2000, dtype=int)
y[1000:2000]=1
x_train, x_val, y_train, y_val = train_test_split(X, y, train_size=0.5)
x_val, x_test, y_val, y_test = train_test_split(x_val, y_val, train_size=0.5)
x_train = tf.convert_to_tensor(x_train)
x_val = tf.convert_to_tensor(x_val)
x_test = tf.convert_to_tensor(x_test)
y_train = tf.convert_to_tensor(y_train)
y_val = tf.convert_to_tensor(y_val)
y_test = tf.convert_to_tensor(y_test)
inputs = keras.Input((12,12,1), name='images')
x0 = tf.keras.layers.Conv2D(8,4,strides=4)(inputs)
x0 = tf.keras.layers.AveragePooling2D(pool_size=(3, 3), name='pooling')(x0)
outputs = tf.keras.layers.Flatten(name='predictions')(x0)
model = keras.Model(inputs=inputs, outputs=outputs)
optimizer=tf.keras.optimizers.Adam(learning_rate=0.001)
# Instantiate a loss function.
loss_fn = my_loss_fn
# Prepare the training dataset.
batch_size = 256
train_dataset = tf.data.Dataset.from_tensor_slices((x_train, y_train))
train_dataset = train_dataset.shuffle(buffer_size=1024).batch(batch_size)
epochs = 100
for epoch in range(epochs):
print('Start of epoch %d' % (epoch,))
# Iterate over the batches of the dataset.
for step, (x_batch_train, y_batch_train) in enumerate(train_dataset):
# Open a GradientTape to record the operations run
# during the forward pass, which enables autodifferentiation.
with tf.GradientTape() as tape:
tape.watch(model.trainable_weights)
# Run the forward pass of the layer.
# The operations that the layer applies
# to its inputs are going to be recorded
# on the GradientTape.
logits = model(x_batch_train, training=True) # Logits for this minibatch
# Compute the loss value for this minibatch.
loss_value = loss_fn(y_batch_train, logits)
# Use the gradient tape to automatically retrieve
# the gradients of the trainable variables with respect to the loss.
grads = tape.gradient(loss_value, model.trainable_weights)
# Run one step of gradient descent by updating
# the value of the variables to minimize the loss.
optimizer.apply_gradients(zip(grads, model.trainable_weights))
# Log every 200 batches.
if step % 200 == 0:
print('Training loss (for one batch) at step %s: %s' % (step, float(loss_value)))
print('Seen so far: %s samples' % ((step + 1) * 64))
And when running, I get:
ValueError: No gradients provided for any variable: (['conv2d_2/kernel:0', 'conv2d_2/bias:0'],). Provided grads_and_vars is ((None, <tf.Variable 'conv2d_2/kernel:0' shape=(4, 4, 1, 8) dtype=float32, nump
If I use some standard loss function:
For example the following model and loss function
inputs = keras.Input((12,12,1), name='images')
x0 = tf.keras.layers.Conv2D(8,4,strides=4)(inputs)
x0 = tf.keras.layers.AveragePooling2D(pool_size=(3, 3), name='pooling')(x0)
x0 = tf.keras.layers.Flatten(name='features')(x0)
x0 = layers.Dense(16, name='meta_features')(x0)
outputs = layers.Dense(2, name='predictions')(x0)
model = keras.Model(inputs=inputs, outputs=outputs)
loss_fn = keras.losses.SparseCategoricalCrossentropy(from_logits=True)
Everything works fine and converges well.
What am I doing wrong and can I fix it?

Why is tensorflow having a worse accuracy than keras in direct comparison?

I made a direct comparison between TensorFlow vs Keras with the same parameters and the same dataset (MNIST).
The strange thing is that Keras achieves 96% performance in 10 epochs, while TensorFlow achieves about 70% performance in 10 epochs. I have run this code many times in the same instance and this inconsistency always occurs.
Even setting 50 epochs for TensorFlow, the final performance reaches 90%.
Code:
import keras
from keras.datasets import mnist
(x_train, y_train), (x_test, y_test) = mnist.load_data()
# One hot encoding
from keras.utils import np_utils
y_train = np_utils.to_categorical(y_train)
y_test = np_utils.to_categorical(y_test)
# Changing the shape of input images and normalizing
x_train = x_train.reshape((60000, 784))
x_test = x_test.reshape((10000, 784))
x_train = x_train.astype('float32') / 255
x_test = x_test.astype('float32') / 255
import keras
from keras.models import Sequential
from keras.layers import Dense, Dropout, Activation
# Creating the neural network
model = Sequential()
model.add(Dense(30, input_dim=784, kernel_initializer='normal', activation='relu'))
model.add(Dense(30, kernel_initializer='normal', activation='relu'))
model.add(Dense(10, kernel_initializer='normal', activation='softmax'))
# Optimizer
optimizer = keras.optimizers.Adam()
# Loss function
model.compile(loss='categorical_crossentropy', optimizer=optimizer, metrics=['acc'])
# Training
model.fit(x_train, y_train, epochs=10, batch_size=200, validation_data=(x_test, y_test), verbose=1)
# Checking the final accuracy
accuracy_final = model.evaluate(x_test, y_test, verbose=0)
print('Model Accuracy: ', accuracy_final)
TensorFlow code: (x_train, x_test, y_train, y_test are the same as the input for the Keras code above)
import tensorflow as tf
# Epochs parameters
epochs = 10
batch_size = 200
# Neural network parameters
n_input = 784
n_hidden_1 = 30
n_hidden_2 = 30
n_classes = 10
# Placeholders x, y
x = tf.placeholder(tf.float32, [None, n_input])
y = tf.placeholder(tf.float32, [None, n_classes])
# Creating the first layer
w1 = tf.Variable(tf.random_normal([n_input, n_hidden_1]))
b1 = tf.Variable(tf.random_normal([n_hidden_1]))
layer_1 = tf.nn.relu(tf.add(tf.matmul(x,w1),b1))
# Creating the second layer
w2 = tf.Variable(tf.random_normal([n_hidden_1, n_hidden_2]))
b2 = tf.Variable(tf.random_normal([n_hidden_2]))
layer_2 = tf.nn.relu(tf.add(tf.matmul(layer_1,w2),b2))
# Creating the output layer
w_out = tf.Variable(tf.random_normal([n_hidden_2, n_classes]))
bias_out = tf.Variable(tf.random_normal([n_classes]))
output = tf.matmul(layer_2, w_out) + bias_out
# Loss function
cost = tf.reduce_mean(tf.nn.softmax_cross_entropy_with_logits(logits = output, labels = y))
# Optimizer
optimizer = tf.train.AdamOptimizer().minimize(cost)
# Making predictions
predictions = tf.equal(tf.argmax(output, 1), tf.argmax(y, 1))
# Accuracy
accuracy = tf.reduce_mean(tf.cast(predictions, tf.float32))
# Variables that will be used in the training cycle
train_size = x_train.shape[0]
total_batches = train_size / batch_size
# Initializing the variables
init = tf.global_variables_initializer()
# Opening the session
with tf.Session() as sess:
sess.run(init)
# Training cycle
for epoch in range(epochs):
# Loop through all batch iterations
for i in range(0, train_size, batch_size):
batch_x = x_train[i:i + batch_size]
batch_y = y_train[i:i + batch_size]
# Fit training
sess.run(optimizer, feed_dict={x: batch_x, y: batch_y})
# Running accuracy (with test data) on each epoch
acc_val = sess.run(accuracy, feed_dict={x: x_test, y: y_test})
# Showing results after each epoch
print ("Epoch: ", "{}".format((epoch + 1)))
print ("Accuracy_val = ", "{:.3f}".format(acc_val))
print ("Training Completed!")
# Checking the final accuracy
checking = tf.equal(tf.argmax(output, 1), tf.argmax(y, 1))
accuracy_final = tf.reduce_mean(tf.cast(checking, tf.float32))
print ("Model Accuracy:", accuracy_final.eval({x: x_test, y: y_test}))
I'm running everything in the same instance. Can anyone explain this inconsistency?
I think it's the initialization that's the culprit. For example, one real difference is that you initialize bias in TF with random_normal which isn't the best practice, and in fact Keras defaults to initializing the bias to zero, which is the best practice. You don't override this, since you only set kernel_initializer, but not bias_initializer in your Keras code.
Furthermore, things are worse for the weight initializers. You are using RandomNormal for Keras, defined like so:
keras.initializers.RandomNormal(mean=0.0, stddev=0.05, seed=None)
But in TF you use tf.random.normal:
tf.random.normal(shape, mean=0.0, stddev=1.0, dtype=tf.dtypes.float32, seed=None, name=None)
I can tell you that using standard deviation of 0.05 is reasonable for initialization, but using 1.0 is not.
I suspect that if you changed these parameters, things would look better. But if they don't, I'd suggest dumping the TensorFlow graph for both models and just checking by hand to see the differences. The graphs are small enough in this case to double-check.
To some extent this highlights the difference in philosophy between Keras and TF. Keras tries hard to set good defaults for NN training that correspond to what is known to work. But TensorFlow is completely agnostic - you have to know those practices and explicitly code them in. The standard deviation thing is a stellar example: of course it should be 1 by default in a mathematical function, but 0.05 is a good value if you know it will be used to initialize an NN layer.
Answer originally provided by Dmitriy Genzel on Quora.

Pycharm: Changes made have no effect, how to explain this behaviour?

This problem only happens in Pycharm:
I made a very simple NN based on TF2.0 website tutorial. The weird thing about it is when I change batch_size, it keeps going with the old one as if I did nothing. In fact, everything I do is irrelevant.
import tensorflow as tf
from tensorflow import keras
from tensorflow.keras import layers
(x_train, y_train), (x_test, y_test) = keras.datasets.mnist.load_data()
x_train = x_train.reshape(60000, 784).astype('float32') / 255
class Prototype(tf.keras.models.Model):
def __init__(self, **kwargs):
super(Prototype, self).__init__(**kwargs)
self.l1 = layers.Dense(64, activation='relu', name='dense_1')
self.l2 = layers.Dense(64, activation='relu', name='dense_2')
self.l3 = layers.Dense(10, activation='softmax', name='predictions')
def call(self, ip):
x = self.l1(ip)
x = self.l2(x)
return self.l3(x)
model = Prototype()
model.build(input_shape=(None, 784,))
optimizer = keras.optimizers.SGD(learning_rate=1e-3)
loss_fn = keras.losses.SparseCategoricalCrossentropy()
batch_size = 250
train_dataset = tf.data.Dataset.from_tensor_slices((x_train, y_train)).batch(batch_size)
def train_one_epoch():
for step, (x_batch_train, y_batch_train) in enumerate(train_dataset):
print(x_batch_train.shape)
with tf.GradientTape() as tape:
logits = model(x_batch_train) # Logits for this minibatch
loss_value = loss_fn(y_batch_train, logits)
grads = tape.gradient(loss_value, model.trainable_weights)
optimizer.apply_gradients(zip(grads, model.trainable_weights))
I run the train_one_epoch(), it trains for one epoch. Then I change batch size and consequently dataset object to give new chunk sizes, BUT when I run train_one_epoch() again, it keeps going with the old batch_size.
Proof:

implement one RNN layer in deep DAE seems worse performance

I was trying to implement one RNN layer in deep DAE which is shown in the figure:
DRDAE:
My code is modified based on the DAE tutorial, I change one layer to basic LSTM RNN layer. It somehow can works. The noise in output among different pictures seems lies in same places.
However, compared to both only one layer of RNN and the DAE tutorial, the performance of the structure is much worse. And it requires much more iteration to reach a lower cost.
Can someone help why does the structure got worse result? Below is my code for DRDAE.
# -*- coding: utf-8 -*-
from __future__ import division, print_function, absolute_import
import tensorflow as tf
from tensorflow.contrib import rnn
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
from tensorflow.examples.tutorials.mnist import input_data
mnist = input_data.read_data_sets("MNIST_data", one_hot=True)
# Parameters
learning_rate = 0.0001
training_epochs = 50001
batch_size = 256
display_step = 500
examples_to_show = 10
total_batch = int(mnist.train.num_examples/batch_size)
# Network Parameters
n_input = 784 # data input
n_hidden_1 = 392 # 1st layer num features
n_hidden_2 = 196 # 2nd layer num features
n_steps = 14
# tf Graph input
X = tf.placeholder("float", [None, n_input])
Y = tf.placeholder("float", [None, n_input])
weights = {
'encoder_h1': tf.Variable(tf.random_normal([n_input, n_hidden_1])),
'encoder_h2': tf.Variable(tf.random_normal([n_hidden_1, n_hidden_2])),
'decoder_h1': tf.Variable(tf.random_normal([n_hidden_2, n_hidden_1])),
'decoder_h2': tf.Variable(tf.random_normal([n_hidden_1, n_input])),
}
biases = {
'encoder_b1': tf.Variable(tf.random_normal([n_hidden_1])),
'encoder_b2': tf.Variable(tf.random_normal([n_hidden_2])),
'decoder_b1': tf.Variable(tf.random_normal([n_hidden_1])),
'decoder_b2': tf.Variable(tf.random_normal([n_input])),
}
def RNN(x, size, weights, biases):
# Prepare data shape to match `rnn` function requirements
# Current data input shape: (batch_size, n_steps, n_input)
# Required shape: 'n_steps' tensors list of shape (batch_size, n_input)
# Unstack to get a list of 'n_steps' tensors of shape (batch_size, n_input)
x = tf.split(x,n_steps,1)
# Define a lstm cell with tensorflow
lstm_cell = rnn.BasicLSTMCell(size, forget_bias=1.0)
# Get lstm cell output
outputs, states = rnn.static_rnn(lstm_cell, x, dtype=tf.float32)
# Linear activation, using rnn inner loop last output
return tf.matmul(outputs[-1], weights) + biases
# Building the encoder
def encoder(x):
# Encoder Hidden layer with sigmoid activation #1
layer_1 = tf.nn.sigmoid(tf.add(tf.matmul(x, weights['encoder_h1']), biases['encoder_b1']))
# Decoder Hidden layer with sigmoid activation #2
layer_2 = tf.nn.sigmoid(tf.add(tf.matmul(layer_1, weights['encoder_h2']), biases['encoder_b2']))
return layer_2
# Building the decoder
def decoder(x):
# Encoder Hidden layer with sigmoid activation #1
layer_1 = RNN(x, n_hidden_2, weights['decoder_h1'],biases['decoder_b1'])
# Decoder Hidden layer with sigmoid activation #2
layer_2 = tf.nn.sigmoid(tf.add(tf.matmul(layer_1, weights['decoder_h2']), biases['decoder_b2']))
return layer_2
# Construct model
encoder_op = encoder(X)
decoder_op = decoder(encoder_op)
# Prediction
y_pred = decoder_op
# Targets (Labels) are the original data.
y_true = Y
# Define loss and optimizer, minimize the squared error
cost = tf.reduce_mean(tf.pow(y_true - y_pred, 2))
optimizer = tf.train.RMSPropOptimizer(learning_rate).minimize(cost)
# Evaluate model
correct_pred = tf.equal(tf.argmax(y_pred,1), tf.argmax(y_true,1))
accuracy = tf.reduce_mean(tf.cast(correct_pred, tf.float32))
# Initializing the variables
init = tf.global_variables_initializer()
# Launch the graph
with tf.Session() as sess:
#with tf.device("/cpu:0"):
sess.run(init)
# Training cycle
for epoch in range(training_epochs):
# Loop over all batches
for i in range(total_batch):
batch, _ = mnist.train.next_batch(batch_size)
origin = batch
# Run optimization op (backprop) and cost op (to get loss value)
sess.run(optimizer, feed_dict={X: batch, Y: origin})
# Display logs per epoch step
if epoch % display_step == 0:
c, acy = sess.run([cost, accuracy], feed_dict={X: batch, Y: origin})
print("Epoch:", '%05d' % (epoch+1), "cost =", "{:.9f}".format(c), "accuracy =", "{:.3f}".format(acy))
print("Optimization Finished!")
# Applying encode and decode over test set
encode_decode = sess.run(
y_pred, feed_dict={X: mnist.test.images[:examples_to_show]})
# Compare original images with their reconstructions
f, a = plt.subplots(2, 10, figsize=(10, 2))
for i in range(examples_to_show):
a[0][i].imshow(np.reshape(mnist.test.images[i], (28, 28)))
a[1][i].imshow(np.reshape(encode_decode[i], (28, 28)))

Tensorflow Autoencoder - How To Calculate Reconstruction Error?

I've implemented the following Autoencoder in Tensorflow as shown below. It basically takes MNIST digits as inputs, learns the structure of the data and reproduces the input at its output.
from __future__ import division, print_function, absolute_import
import tensorflow as tf
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
# Import MNIST data
from tensorflow.examples.tutorials.mnist import input_data
mnist = input_data.read_data_sets("MNIST_data", one_hot=True)
# Parameters
learning_rate = 0.01
training_epochs = 20
batch_size = 256
display_step = 1
examples_to_show = 10
# Network Parameters
n_hidden_1 = 256 # 1st layer num features
n_hidden_2 = 128 # 2nd layer num features
n_input = 784 # MNIST data input (img shape: 28*28)
# tf Graph input (only pictures)
X = tf.placeholder("float", [None, n_input])
weights = {
'encoder_h1': tf.Variable(tf.random_normal([n_input, n_hidden_1])),
'encoder_h2': tf.Variable(tf.random_normal([n_hidden_1, n_hidden_2])),
'decoder_h1': tf.Variable(tf.random_normal([n_hidden_2, n_hidden_1])),
'decoder_h2': tf.Variable(tf.random_normal([n_hidden_1, n_input])),
}
biases = {
'encoder_b1': tf.Variable(tf.random_normal([n_hidden_1])),
'encoder_b2': tf.Variable(tf.random_normal([n_hidden_2])),
'decoder_b1': tf.Variable(tf.random_normal([n_hidden_1])),
'decoder_b2': tf.Variable(tf.random_normal([n_input])),
}
# Building the encoder
def encoder(x):
# Encoder Hidden layer with sigmoid activation #1
layer_1 = tf.nn.sigmoid(tf.add(tf.matmul(x, weights['encoder_h1']),
biases['encoder_b1']))
# Decoder Hidden layer with sigmoid activation #2
layer_2 = tf.nn.sigmoid(tf.add(tf.matmul(layer_1, weights['encoder_h2']),
biases['encoder_b2']))
return layer_2
# Building the decoder
def decoder(x):
# Encoder Hidden layer with sigmoid activation #1
layer_1 = tf.nn.sigmoid(tf.add(tf.matmul(x, weights['decoder_h1']),
biases['decoder_b1']))
# Decoder Hidden layer with sigmoid activation #2
layer_2 = tf.nn.sigmoid(tf.add(tf.matmul(layer_1, weights['decoder_h2']),
biases['decoder_b2']))
return layer_2
# Construct model
encoder_op = encoder(X)
decoder_op = decoder(encoder_op)
# Prediction
y_pred = decoder_op
# Targets (Labels) are the input data.
y_true = X
# Define loss and optimizer, minimize the squared error
cost = tf.reduce_mean(tf.pow(y_true - y_pred, 2))
optimizer = tf.train.RMSPropOptimizer(learning_rate).minimize(cost)
# Initializing the variables
init = tf.global_variables_initializer()
# Launch the graph
with tf.Session() as sess:
sess.run(init)
total_batch = int(mnist.train.num_examples/batch_size)
# Training cycle
for epoch in range(training_epochs):
# Loop over all batches
for i in range(total_batch):
batch_xs, batch_ys = mnist.train.next_batch(batch_size)
# Run optimization op (backprop) and cost op (to get loss value)
_, c = sess.run([optimizer, cost], feed_dict={X: batch_xs})
# Display logs per epoch step
if epoch % display_step == 0:
print("Epoch:", '%04d' % (epoch+1),
"cost=", "{:.9f}".format(c))
print("Optimization Finished!")
# Applying encode and decode over test set
encode_decode = sess.run(
y_pred, feed_dict={X: mnist.test.images[:examples_to_show]})
# Compare original images with their reconstructions
f, a = plt.subplots(2, 10, figsize=(10, 2))
for i in range(examples_to_show):
a[0][i].imshow(np.reshape(mnist.test.images[i], (28, 28)))
a[1][i].imshow(np.reshape(encode_decode[i], (28, 28)))
f.show()
plt.draw()
plt.waitforbuttonpress()
When I am encoding and decoding over the test set, how do I calculate the reconstruction error (i.e. the Mean Squared Error/Loss) for each sample?
In other words I'd like to see how well the Autoencoder is able to reconstruct its input so that I can use the Autoencoder as a single-class classifier.
Many thanks in advance.
Barry
You can take the output of the decoder and take the difference with the true image and take the average.
Say y is the output of the decoder and the original test image is x then you can do something like for each of the examples and take an average over it:
tf.square(y-x)
This will be your reconstruction cost for the test set.