I am just starting to play around with video.js and really like it. I currently have some code where I have two players showing two different HLS streams in a single browser page.
However, HLS inherently has high latency and that may not work for my project. So I am wondering if video.js can receive and play MPEG2-TS/UDP streams which would have less latency (I can easily change the format of all of my source video steams).
My basic requirement is to have 2 players in a single browser page, one player showing the video stream sent from a particular network node, and the second showing how a different network node received that same stream. So the two video.js players on the browser page are showing 2 video streams that are actually the same video so they are highly correlated. This is why the latency is a critical requirement for this project.
Thanks,
-Andres
Related
For the welcome screen of my app, we are trying to serve up a webpage in a webview that consists of a video and some text. (We want to go this route so that we could quickly update the welcome screen and test changes on the fly, versus having to submit and get approval each time.)
The video is only 8.6mB and is currently being played via HTML5 , hosted on an S3 and served via CloudFront. However, the playback still tends to be a bit choppy at times. Does anyone have any recommendations as to an optimal way to host and serve up the video to make it play smoothly? Are there any specific settings for the S3 or CloudFront anyone would recommend that could help?
Thanks in advance for any help anyone can provide.
The most common technique currently is to use ABR in parallel with a CDN to provide smooth playback.
ABR, Adaptive Bit Rate, involves making multiple copies of the video at different bit rates, from low to high and hosting these on the server.
The client receives an index file for the videos, e.g. an m3u8 manifest file, and then chooses the best bit rate for the current conditions to allow smooth playback without buffering.
If network conditions improve the client will 'step up' bit rates and if it gets worse it will 'step down' bit rates.
Typically a low or medium bit rate is chosen as the first one to allow quick and smooth start up.
You can see this effect on services like Netflix as they start up, and you can also see it on YouTube if you right click the video and select 'Stats for Nerds'.
Some links for ABR in AWS Elastic transcoding - you can set the bit rates you want, for e.g. see the note below from their FAQ re HLS jobs:
Specify that the transcoding job create a playlist that references the outputs. You should order your bit rates from lowest to highest, with the audio only stream last, since this order will be maintained in the generated playlist file. Once your transcoding job has completed, the output bucket will contain a proper arrangement of your master and individual M3U8 playlists, and MPEG-2 TS media stream fragments.
Take a look at the sample request on this page here which includes two different bit rates (video service providers will generally have more than 2 but this gives you a feel for the approach):
http://docs.aws.amazon.com/elastictranscoder/latest/developerguide/create-job.html
Azure Media Services has a built in "Adaptive Streaming" preset that is content-adaptive and can adjust the encoding settings to meet your content that is coming in.
See the following - https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/media-services/media-services-autogen-bitrate-ladder-with-mes
I have developed a site that hosts user videos. I store the video files in AWS S3, I deliver them through AWS Cloudfront and I use video.js as the site's player with HTML5 as default and flash as fallback.
Generally the video streaming seems to work fine but in some cases I receive complaints from users for slow or choppy video playback. I want to create some tests to measure the performance of streaming in order to be able to distinguish user problems (e.g. slow connection at the user side) or with my service.
Are there any best practices or tools to collect video delivery metrics? I'm interested in open source solutions or something that I can implement myself because it's just a personal project, but I don't want to rediscover the wheel.
Testing progressive download implies checking the transmission bandwidth and its continuity. For example for a high transmission rate the initial client buffer will be filled faster and the playback will start sooner. However, losing that transmission capacity at some later time can cause re-buffering. The total transmission time of your file must be lower than the video duration.
To identify potential issues you can start with the S3 bucket logs and the CloudFront cache statistics and access logs.
There's a load testing tool written in Java called Apache JMeter. It cannot use JavaScript so it must be configured to request the files directly.
The disadvantage of using a load test tool in a single location is pretty evident. Different geographical areas and carriers have different characteristics and test results will be different.
There are online, non open-source tools that can load test from multiple locations but they are generally paid though some offer free trials.
Here's another way to look at this.
but in some cases I receive complaints from users for slow or choppy video playback.
If you're using an Adaptive HLS stream, and you're CloudFront, and the video is still choppy to some users, that's probably because of their own internet connection speeds.
In that case, you can encode your video in multiple resolutions (using just one AWS MediaConvert job, btw) - like 1080p, 720p, 360p, 240p, 144p etc.
And then Videojs has a stream switcher plugin that will 1) automatically start playing the highest possible resolution - and no higher - that's right for the viewer's connection and 2) give the user the option via a "Settings" (gear) icon in the control bar that they can use to switch resolutions manually.
That way, even those with really poor internet connections should be able to watch your video.
Of course, the other alternative is to use progressive download videos that the viewer can simply click play, then immediately click pause, and wait for the video to buffer, and then play it after it's fully downloaded.
Check out the Videojs Resolution Switcher demo here.
-- Ravi Jayagopal
What is required to use SMIL file to utilize adaptive streaming in a videojs player. I have created the SMIL file in my wowza application and it is creating my 4 separate streams and making them available. However I cannot get my webpage, that uses videojs, to correctly play the SMIL file. Hints on that coding or where to go to find the correct documentation would be greatly appreciated.
There aren't many implementations of SMIL players. I'm sure I've seen wowza URLs that suggest it will output the SMIL as other formats, something like whatever.smil/manifest.m3u8. That's HLS which could be played on mobile and Safari natively and with videojs-contrib-hls elsewhere.
I know the question is old, but I've been struggling with this recently, so I want to share my experience in case anyone is interested. My scenario is very similar: want to deliver adaptive bitrate streaming from Wowza to clients using videojs.
There is a master link that explains how to setup and run Wowza Transcoder for live streaming, and how to set up your Adaptive Bitrate Streams using an SMIL file. Following the video in there you can achieve to have a stream that uses ABS, but the SMIL file is attached to the stream name, so it is not a solution if you have streams that come to Wowza from another Media Server origin and that need to be transcoded before being served to the clients. In the article there are a few key things mentioned (like the Stream Name Groups), but somehow things doesn't seem pretty clear, at least to me. So here is some clarification from what I understood from all articles I read and what I did to achieve ABS:
You can achieve ABS in Wowza either with SMIL files or with Stream Name Groups (NGRP). NGRP refres to a block of streams that is defined in the Transcoder template that can be played back using multi-bitrate streaming (dynamically) (<- this is what I used). And SMIL files are used to create a "static" list of streams for multi-bitrate VOD streaming. If you are using Wowza Origin-Edge Delivery you'll need the .smil file, because NGRP do not get forwarded to the edge. (Source for all this information: here).
In case you need the SMIL file, you probably need to generate a new one for every stream, and probably you want to do that in an automated way, so best way would be through an HTTP request (in the link above it is explained how to achieve this).
In case you can live with NGRP, things are a bit easier:
You need to enable Wowza Transcoder (this is pretty easy and steps are in the video I mention above).
You should create your own Transcoder Template with the different stream presets you want to deliver, as an example you can check the default ones that are already there. The more presets you add, the more work Wowza will need to do whenever a stream comes, since it will need to generate a new stream for every preset that you have defined.
Now is when we generate the NGRPs. In your Transcoder Template, you can generate as many NGRPs as you want (to clarify: these are like groups of streams, that you will be able to set in your clients video player. Each NGRP contains the streams that the video will be able to use when doing the adaptive bitrate streaming). For instance, these are the default NGRPs:
If you play the ngrp "_mobile" in the clients video player, the ABS algorithm in the player will be able to adapt itself to play either the 240p or the 160p streams based on the client capabilities.
So imagine you have these two NGRP. In order to play them in videoJS, you will need to set the source to:
http://[wowza-ip-address]:1935/<name-of-your-application>/ngrp:myStream_all/playlist.m3u8
or
http://[wowza-ip-address]:1935/<name-of-your-application>/ngrp:myStream_mobile/playlist.m3u8
... based on how many options you want to provide to the client player to use for the ABS. (For instance: if your targets are old mobile devices, you probably just want to offer a couple of low bitrate streams).
(This would be in case you're delivering an HLS stream. If other format, the extension would change, for instance if you are delivering a DASH stream you would have "/manifest.mpd" instead of "playlist.m3u8").
That is all, there is also a very helpful link in video.js documentation explaining how it does the bitrate switching: here.
I hope it helps someone! At least clarifying things! :)
I have a few live streams that my video player (JWplayer) is used to play. I want a mechanism to automatically load a live stream to test if the live stream loads in JWplayer or not - this needs to happen backend on the server side - preferably a unix flavoured machine.
For example, the live stream URL may change or there may be a cross domain error. Ultimately, if this happens, I want to remove the live stream from my database automatically.
Is it possible to do this automatically? Note that an m3u8 URL may play in quicktime but not in Flash because of m3u8 errors.
I would like a similar tracking mechanism linked to a HTML 5 player (that supports live m3u8 streams) - say quicktime (or maybe ffplay?)
Is this possible? If so, how?
Thanks a lot!
Trying to roll out a video to a client with limited bandwidth. The client is concerned that the video will eat up all the bandwidth at their field office. In testing, I've discovered that even though my video is encoded at 420kbps, when downloading the client it still utilizes about 1.5mbps. Is there a way to control the maximum bandwidth used by video.js or the video tag?
Unfortunately no. The html5 video element doesn't have any throttling options. It's completely up to the browser to decide how to fetch the video data. Some will download the whole thing at once, others will download pieces as you need them. All I think will use as much of the pipe as you give them.
The media source extensions proposal hopes to add some ability here, but that won't be available for a while.
I would find somewhere else besides the office to host the video, like Amazon S3.