I have a program which uses several DLL files. Most are from nuget source. I used to check (within main_Load()), if the dll files are present locally and in case of missing dll files, I download them from an own webserver. This works fine. Now I have added a reference to a custom DLL file (because these functions should be shared among serveral programs from several developers). However, I an not able to check this DLLs presence. Even before Program start I get a .NET Framework error: System.IO.FileNotFoundException
Any suggestions?
Related
I am using JSON.Net to get my Console application to translate sentences with Google Translate. My code fully works fine with absolutely no errors when I run it in Visual Studio. But when I take the .exe out of the "[project_name]\bin\debug" folder and copy it to the desktop to run it returns the following exeception.
Unhandled Exception: System.IO.FileNotFoundException: Could not load file or assembly 'Newtonsoft.Json, Version=12.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=30ad4fe6b2a6aeed' or one of its dependencies. The system cannot find the file specified....
I noticed that in my "[project_name]\bin\debug" folder there is the .dll file that I am using, but not only this, I am also using a .dll that I referenced somewhere else.
When I drag this .dll file with the exe onto the desktop and run it, it works. How do I make it so that I don't need the .dll with the .exe on the desktop? Or is this something that is necessary? I am sure that I have referenced everything properly.
If your application makes use of a library then that library has to be there to make use of. There are basically two ways to make libraries available to .NET applications. The library needs to either be in the same folder as the application or it needs to be installed in the GAC (Global Assembly Cache). The GAC is a common location for libraries so that multiple applications can access them. Unless you intend to ensure that JSON.NET is installed in the GAC on every machine you plan to run your app on, you need to make sure that the library is deployed along with your app. This is how applications work. There is no magic solution.
I have a file-translation library in the form of a Win32 EXE and a stub DLL that feeds parameters to it. I have written a lightweight (~500 lines) VB.net app that creates the file to be translated, then calls the DLL to launch the EXE. Unfortunately, this results in my EXE, their EXE, the DLL and another supporting file. I'd prefer to have a single file.
Following the basic idea here doesn't seem to help - I need to have all three files able to see each other, and it's not clear how to do this from those examples. I've also seen this, but again, this appears to be running an EXE that is "beside" the .net code, not embedded within it.
So, is there a way to run the EXE/DLL/supporting file "in situ"? Are the Assemblies ultimately a directory structure where I can run the EXE? And if so, how does one find/refer to these files?
I am working for a company that registers a lot of COM DLLs in the System32 folder/SYSWOW64 folder. I recall a question some time ago where Hans Passent said that this is wrong as the folders specified are for Windows DLLs. I cannot find the post so I want to check that this is correct?
Also if I want to register a COM DLL or a TypeLibrary in a foreign folder then can I just use the following command (for COM):
regsvr32 app.dll
Finally I was reading about the CODEBASE flag of Regasm: http://www.vbforums.com/showthread.php?597928-RESOLVED-How-to-delete-a-VB6-Reference. Do you have to use this flag if you want to register a TypeLibrary (.TLB)? What happens if you .NET assembly uses a third party library that is not signed?
If you are talking about installing COM DLLs in the System folder, then you are correct. All applications, and their support libraries, should be installed under the Program Files folders, or the Common Program Files folders.
You are also correct that REGSVR32.EXE can be used to manually register DLLs and OCX. "Foreign folder" is not a Windows concept - you can register a component anywhere in the file system, including the Windows and Windows System folders. By the way, if you use an installer, then you shouldn't have to use REGSVR32.EXE.
However, TLB files cannot be registered with REGSVR32.EXE, because that application basically loads the DLL/OCX, and calls an exported function on the library, so effectively the library registers itself. Instead, you need another tool, e.g. REGTLIB.
You don't use /CODEBASE to register a raw type library, because REGASM is used for registering .NET DLLs as COM components, not TLB files.
Is there any way in VB.NET to DllImport a dll file from the resources?
I really don't want to add the dll with the executable path.
You can embed a DLL into an executable:
Jeffrey Richter: Excerpt #2 from CLR via C#, Third Edition
Many applications consist of an EXE file that depends on many DLL
files. When deploying this application, all the files must be
deployed. However, there is a technique that you can use to deploy
just a single EXE file. First, identify all the DLL files that your
EXE file depends on that do not ship as part of the Microsoft .NET
Framework itself. Then add these DLLs to your Visual Studio project.
For each DLL file you add, display its properties and change its
“Build Action” to “Embedded Resource.” This causes the C# compiler to
embed the DLL file(s) into your EXE file, and you can deploy this one
EXE file.
At runtime, the CLR won’t be able to find the dependent DLL
assemblies, which is a problem. To fix this, when your application
initializes, register a callback method with the AppDomain’s
ResolveAssembly event.
We have a Powerbuilder 10 application that is using .Net COM assemblies. We are trying to embed the manifest in the PB application (to invoke COM assemblies without registration). The merged manifest file has added sections for dependecies on the .Net COM assemblies. We have tries various tools to inject the new manifest with different results
- using GenMan32 to inject truncates the application from 6MB to 45KB.
- using ResourceTuner, the file size looks okay, but trying to launch application gives "Fatal Disk Error".
Any suggestions on invoked .Net ComEnabled assembly from PB without registration?
Have you tried it with an external manifest and ensured that works? If an external manifest doesn't work, then the manifest information isn't correct.
Once you have a valid external manifest, you might try the Manifest Tool (MT.EXE) from the .Net SDK. It works well with true EXE files. As Terry noted though, the PB generated executable contains additional information that tools that manipulate the EXE need to respect or they will break it.
http://blogs.msdn.com/patricka/archive/2009/12/09/answers-to-several-application-manifest-mysteries-and-questions.aspx
This is more a redirection than an answer. One thing you need to be aware of is that PowerBuilder produces executables that do not follow standards for Windows executable files. Essentially they are a bootstrap routine to load the PowerBuilder virtual machine, plus a collection of class definitions (objects). The cases you've brought up are not the first I've heard of where utilities meant to modify executables don't work on PowerBuilder executables.
As for a positive contribution on what other directions to follow, I don't really know enough to give qualified advice. If it were me, I'd try to register the COM object if ConnectToNewObject() fails, but I've got no idea if that possible or if that route is a dead end.
Good luck,
Terry.