Plot from multiple files imported with glob - pandas

I need to process hundreds of data files and I want to plot the results in a single graph. I'm using glob with a for loop to read and store the data, but I have no idea how to plot them with plotly.
import pandas as pd
import plotly.express as px
import plotly.graph_objects as go
import plotly.io as pio
import glob
pio.renderers.default = 'browser'
files = glob.glob('GIRS12_L_8V_0.95bar.*')
traces = []
for file in files:
dat = pd.read_csv(file, sep=' ')
dat.columns = ['time','v(t)']
fig = go.Figure()
traces.append(go.Scatter(x = dat['time'], y = dat['v(t)']))
px.scatter(data_frame = traces)
Is it right to call px.scatter(...)? I was using fig.show() at the end but I don't know why it does not show anything in the graph.

have generated 100s of CSVs to demonstrate
pathlib is more pythonic / OO approach to interacting with file system and hence glob()
simplest approach with plotly is to use Plotly Express to generate all of the traces. Have taken approach of preparing all data into a single pandas data frame to make this super simple
per comments, a figure with so many traces and hence such a long legend may not be best visualisation for what you are trying to achieve. Consider what you need to visualise and tune solution to achieve a better visualisation
from pathlib import Path
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
import plotly.express as px
# location where files exist
p = Path.cwd().joinpath("SO_csv")
if not p.is_dir():
p.mkdir()
# generate 100s of files
for i in range(400):
pd.DataFrame(
{
"time": pd.date_range("00:00", freq="30min", periods=47),
"v(t)": pd.Series(np.random.uniform(1, 5, 47)).sort_values(),
}
).to_csv(p.joinpath(f"GIRS12_L_8V_0.95bar.{i}"), index=False)
# read and concat all the CSVs into one dataframe, creating additional column that is the filename
# scatter this dataframe, a scatter / color per CSV
px.scatter(
pd.concat(
[pd.read_csv(f).assign(name=f.name) for f in p.glob("GIRS12_L_8V_0.95bar.*")]
),
x="time",
y="v(t)",
color="name",
)

Related

How to access a dataframe from a Python dataframe list through a cell from a date column in the dataframe

I have created a list (df) which contains some dataframes after importing csv files. Instead of accessing this dataframes using df[0], df[1] etc, I would like to access them in a much easier way with something like df[20/04/22] or df[date=='20/04/22] or something similar. I am really new to Python and programming, thank you very much in advance. I attach the simplified code (contains only 2 items in the list) for simplyfying reasons.
I came up with two ways of achieving that but each time I have some trouble realising them.
Through my directory path names. Each csv (dataframe) file name includes the date in each original name file, something like : "5f05d5d83a442d4f78db0a19_2022-04-01.csv"
Each csv (dataframe), includes a date column (object type) which I have changed to datetime64 type so I can work with plots. So, I thought that maybe through this column what I ask would be possible.
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
import matplotlib
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import matplotlib.dates as mdates
import datetime
from datetime import date
from datetime import time
from pandas.tseries.offsets import DateOffset
import glob
import os
path = "C:/Users/dsdadsdsaa/"
all_files = glob.glob(path + '*.csv')
df = []
for filename in all_files:
dataframe = pd.read_csv(filename, index_col=None, header=0)
df.append(dataframe)
for i in range(0,2):
df[i]['date'] = pd.to_datetime(df[i]['date'])
df[i]['time'] = pd.to_datetime(df[i]['time'])
df[0]

Stack dataframes vertically ignoring rows with duplicate timestamps [duplicate]

I would like to read several CSV files from a directory into pandas and concatenate them into one big DataFrame. I have not been able to figure it out though. Here is what I have so far:
import glob
import pandas as pd
# Get data file names
path = r'C:\DRO\DCL_rawdata_files'
filenames = glob.glob(path + "/*.csv")
dfs = []
for filename in filenames:
dfs.append(pd.read_csv(filename))
# Concatenate all data into one DataFrame
big_frame = pd.concat(dfs, ignore_index=True)
I guess I need some help within the for loop?
See pandas: IO tools for all of the available .read_ methods.
Try the following code if all of the CSV files have the same columns.
I have added header=0, so that after reading the CSV file's first row, it can be assigned as the column names.
import pandas as pd
import glob
import os
path = r'C:\DRO\DCL_rawdata_files' # use your path
all_files = glob.glob(os.path.join(path , "/*.csv"))
li = []
for filename in all_files:
df = pd.read_csv(filename, index_col=None, header=0)
li.append(df)
frame = pd.concat(li, axis=0, ignore_index=True)
Or, with attribution to a comment from Sid.
all_files = glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "*.csv"))
df = pd.concat((pd.read_csv(f) for f in all_files), ignore_index=True)
It's often necessary to identify each sample of data, which can be accomplished by adding a new column to the dataframe.
pathlib from the standard library will be used for this example. It treats paths as objects with methods, instead of strings to be sliced.
Imports and Setup
from pathlib import Path
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
path = r'C:\DRO\DCL_rawdata_files' # or unix / linux / mac path
# Get the files from the path provided in the OP
files = Path(path).glob('*.csv') # .rglob to get subdirectories
Option 1:
Add a new column with the file name
dfs = list()
for f in files:
data = pd.read_csv(f)
# .stem is method for pathlib objects to get the filename w/o the extension
data['file'] = f.stem
dfs.append(data)
df = pd.concat(dfs, ignore_index=True)
Option 2:
Add a new column with a generic name using enumerate
dfs = list()
for i, f in enumerate(files):
data = pd.read_csv(f)
data['file'] = f'File {i}'
dfs.append(data)
df = pd.concat(dfs, ignore_index=True)
Option 3:
Create the dataframes with a list comprehension, and then use np.repeat to add a new column.
[f'S{i}' for i in range(len(dfs))] creates a list of strings to name each dataframe.
[len(df) for df in dfs] creates a list of lengths
Attribution for this option goes to this plotting answer.
# Read the files into dataframes
dfs = [pd.read_csv(f) for f in files]
# Combine the list of dataframes
df = pd.concat(dfs, ignore_index=True)
# Add a new column
df['Source'] = np.repeat([f'S{i}' for i in range(len(dfs))], [len(df) for df in dfs])
Option 4:
One liners using .assign to create the new column, with attribution to a comment from C8H10N4O2
df = pd.concat((pd.read_csv(f).assign(filename=f.stem) for f in files), ignore_index=True)
or
df = pd.concat((pd.read_csv(f).assign(Source=f'S{i}') for i, f in enumerate(files)), ignore_index=True)
An alternative to darindaCoder's answer:
path = r'C:\DRO\DCL_rawdata_files' # use your path
all_files = glob.glob(os.path.join(path, "*.csv")) # advisable to use os.path.join as this makes concatenation OS independent
df_from_each_file = (pd.read_csv(f) for f in all_files)
concatenated_df = pd.concat(df_from_each_file, ignore_index=True)
# doesn't create a list, nor does it append to one
import glob
import os
import pandas as pd
df = pd.concat(map(pd.read_csv, glob.glob(os.path.join('', "my_files*.csv"))))
Almost all of the answers here are either unnecessarily complex (glob pattern matching) or rely on additional third-party libraries. You can do this in two lines using everything Pandas and Python (all versions) already have built in.
For a few files - one-liner
df = pd.concat(map(pd.read_csv, ['d1.csv', 'd2.csv','d3.csv']))
For many files
import os
filepaths = [f for f in os.listdir(".") if f.endswith('.csv')]
df = pd.concat(map(pd.read_csv, filepaths))
For No Headers
If you have specific things you want to change with pd.read_csv (i.e., no headers) you can make a separate function and call that with your map:
def f(i):
return pd.read_csv(i, header=None)
df = pd.concat(map(f, filepaths))
This pandas line, which sets the df, utilizes three things:
Python's map (function, iterable) sends to the function (the
pd.read_csv()) the iterable (our list) which is every CSV element
in filepaths).
Panda's read_csv() function reads in each CSV file as normal.
Panda's concat() brings all these under one df variable.
Easy and Fast
Import two or more CSV files without having to make a list of names.
import glob
import pandas as pd
df = pd.concat(map(pd.read_csv, glob.glob('data/*.csv')))
The Dask library can read a dataframe from multiple files:
>>> import dask.dataframe as dd
>>> df = dd.read_csv('data*.csv')
(Source: https://examples.dask.org/dataframes/01-data-access.html#Read-CSV-files)
The Dask dataframes implement a subset of the Pandas dataframe API. If all the data fits into memory, you can call df.compute() to convert the dataframe into a Pandas dataframe.
I googled my way into Gaurav Singh's answer.
However, as of late, I am finding it faster to do any manipulation using NumPy and then assigning it once to a dataframe rather than manipulating the dataframe itself on an iterative basis and it seems to work in this solution too.
I do sincerely want anyone hitting this page to consider this approach, but I don't want to attach this huge piece of code as a comment and making it less readable.
You can leverage NumPy to really speed up the dataframe concatenation.
import os
import glob
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
path = "my_dir_full_path"
allFiles = glob.glob(os.path.join(path,"*.csv"))
np_array_list = []
for file_ in allFiles:
df = pd.read_csv(file_,index_col=None, header=0)
np_array_list.append(df.as_matrix())
comb_np_array = np.vstack(np_array_list)
big_frame = pd.DataFrame(comb_np_array)
big_frame.columns = ["col1", "col2"....]
Timing statistics:
total files :192
avg lines per file :8492
--approach 1 without NumPy -- 8.248656988143921 seconds ---
total records old :1630571
--approach 2 with NumPy -- 2.289292573928833 seconds ---
A one-liner using map, but if you'd like to specify additional arguments, you could do:
import pandas as pd
import glob
import functools
df = pd.concat(map(functools.partial(pd.read_csv, sep='|', compression=None),
glob.glob("data/*.csv")))
Note: map by itself does not let you supply additional arguments.
If you want to search recursively (Python 3.5 or above), you can do the following:
from glob import iglob
import pandas as pd
path = r'C:\user\your\path\**\*.csv'
all_rec = iglob(path, recursive=True)
dataframes = (pd.read_csv(f) for f in all_rec)
big_dataframe = pd.concat(dataframes, ignore_index=True)
Note that the three last lines can be expressed in one single line:
df = pd.concat((pd.read_csv(f) for f in iglob(path, recursive=True)), ignore_index=True)
You can find the documentation of ** here. Also, I used iglobinstead of glob, as it returns an iterator instead of a list.
EDIT: Multiplatform recursive function:
You can wrap the above into a multiplatform function (Linux, Windows, Mac), so you can do:
df = read_df_rec('C:\user\your\path', *.csv)
Here is the function:
from glob import iglob
from os.path import join
import pandas as pd
def read_df_rec(path, fn_regex=r'*.csv'):
return pd.concat((pd.read_csv(f) for f in iglob(
join(path, '**', fn_regex), recursive=True)), ignore_index=True)
Inspired from MrFun's answer:
import glob
import pandas as pd
list_of_csv_files = glob.glob(directory_path + '/*.csv')
list_of_csv_files.sort()
df = pd.concat(map(pd.read_csv, list_of_csv_files), ignore_index=True)
Notes:
By default, the list of files generated through glob.glob is not sorted. On the other hand, in many scenarios, it's required to be sorted e.g. one may want to analyze number of sensor-frame-drops v/s timestamp.
In pd.concat command, if ignore_index=True is not specified then it reserves the original indices from each dataframes (i.e. each individual CSV file in the list) and the main dataframe looks like
timestamp id valid_frame
0
1
2
.
.
.
0
1
2
.
.
.
With ignore_index=True, it looks like:
timestamp id valid_frame
0
1
2
.
.
.
108
109
.
.
.
IMO, this is helpful when one may want to manually create a histogram of number of frame drops v/s one minutes (or any other duration) bins and want to base the calculation on very first timestamp e.g.
begin_timestamp = df['timestamp'][0]
Without, ignore_index=True, df['timestamp'][0] generates the series containing very first timestamp from all the individual dataframes, it does not give just a value.
Another one-liner with list comprehension which allows to use arguments with read_csv.
df = pd.concat([pd.read_csv(f'dir/{f}') for f in os.listdir('dir') if f.endswith('.csv')])
Alternative using the pathlib library (often preferred over os.path).
This method avoids iterative use of pandas concat()/apped().
From the pandas documentation:
It is worth noting that concat() (and therefore append()) makes a full copy of the data, and that constantly reusing this function can create a significant performance hit. If you need to use the operation over several datasets, use a list comprehension.
import pandas as pd
from pathlib import Path
dir = Path("../relevant_directory")
df = (pd.read_csv(f) for f in dir.glob("*.csv"))
df = pd.concat(df)
If multiple CSV files are zipped, you may use zipfile to read all and concatenate as below:
import zipfile
import pandas as pd
ziptrain = zipfile.ZipFile('yourpath/yourfile.zip')
train = []
train = [ pd.read_csv(ziptrain.open(f)) for f in ziptrain.namelist() ]
df = pd.concat(train)
Based on Sid's good answer.
To identify issues of missing or unaligned columns
Before concatenating, you can load CSV files into an intermediate dictionary which gives access to each data set based on the file name (in the form dict_of_df['filename.csv']). Such a dictionary can help you identify issues with heterogeneous data formats, when column names are not aligned for example.
Import modules and locate file paths:
import os
import glob
import pandas
from collections import OrderedDict
path =r'C:\DRO\DCL_rawdata_files'
filenames = glob.glob(path + "/*.csv")
Note: OrderedDict is not necessary, but it'll keep the order of files which might be useful for analysis.
Load CSV files into a dictionary. Then concatenate:
dict_of_df = OrderedDict((f, pandas.read_csv(f)) for f in filenames)
pandas.concat(dict_of_df, sort=True)
Keys are file names f and values are the data frame content of CSV files.
Instead of using f as a dictionary key, you can also use os.path.basename(f) or other os.path methods to reduce the size of the key in the dictionary to only the smaller part that is relevant.
import os
os.system("awk '(NR == 1) || (FNR > 1)' file*.csv > merged.csv")
Where NR and FNR represent the number of the line being processed.
FNR is the current line within each file.
NR == 1 includes the first line of the first file (the header), while FNR > 1 skips the first line of each subsequent file.
In case of an unnamed column issue, use this code for merging multiple CSV files along the x-axis.
import glob
import os
import pandas as pd
merged_df = pd.concat([pd.read_csv(csv_file, index_col=0, header=0) for csv_file in glob.glob(
os.path.join("data/", "*.csv"))], axis=0, ignore_index=True)
merged_df.to_csv("merged.csv")
You can do it this way also:
import pandas as pd
import os
new_df = pd.DataFrame()
for r, d, f in os.walk(csv_folder_path):
for file in f:
complete_file_path = csv_folder_path+file
read_file = pd.read_csv(complete_file_path)
new_df = new_df.append(read_file, ignore_index=True)
new_df.shape
Consider using convtools library, which provides lots of data processing primitives and generates simple ad hoc code under the hood.
It is not supposed to be faster than pandas/polars, but sometimes it can be.
e.g. you could concat csv files into one for further reuse - here's the code:
import glob
from convtools import conversion as c
from convtools.contrib.tables import Table
import pandas as pd
def test_pandas():
df = pd.concat(
(
pd.read_csv(filename, index_col=None, header=0)
for filename in glob.glob("tmp/*.csv")
),
axis=0,
ignore_index=True,
)
df.to_csv("out.csv", index=False)
# took 20.9 s
def test_convtools():
table = None
for filename in glob.glob("tmp/*.csv"):
table_ = Table.from_csv(filename, header=False)
if table is None:
table = table_
else:
table = table.chain(table_)
table.into_csv("out_convtools.csv", include_header=False)
# took 15.8 s
Of course if you just want to obtain a dataframe without writing a concatenated file, it will take 4.63 s and 10.9 s correspondingly (pandas is faster here because it doesn't need to zip columns for writing it back).
import pandas as pd
import glob
path = r'C:\DRO\DCL_rawdata_files' # use your path
file_path_list = glob.glob(path + "/*.csv")
file_iter = iter(file_path_list)
list_df_csv = []
list_df_csv.append(pd.read_csv(next(file_iter)))
for file in file_iter:
lsit_df_csv.append(pd.read_csv(file, header=0))
df = pd.concat(lsit_df_csv, ignore_index=True)
This is how you can do it using Colaboratory on Google Drive:
import pandas as pd
import glob
path = r'/content/drive/My Drive/data/actual/comments_only' # Use your path
all_files = glob.glob(path + "/*.csv")
li = []
for filename in all_files:
df = pd.read_csv(filename, index_col=None, header=0)
li.append(df)
frame = pd.concat(li, axis=0, ignore_index=True,sort=True)
frame.to_csv('/content/drive/onefile.csv')

pd.read_csv, when changing separator data type changes?

My dataframe is originally a text file, where the columns are separated by a tab.
I first changed these tabs to spaces by hand (sep=" "), loaded and plotted the data, my plot looked the way it should.
Since I have multiple files to plot, its not really handy to change the separator of each file. That's why I changed the seper<tor to sep="\s+".
Suddenly the x-axis of my new plot takes every single position value and overlaps them.
Anyone knows why this is happening and how to prevent it?
My first code looked like:
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
from functools import reduce
data1500 = pd.read_csv('V026-15.000-0.1.txt', sep = " ", index_col='Position')
plt.plot(data_merged1.ts1500, label="ts 15.00")
and the second:
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
from functools import reduce
from matplotlib import pyplot as plt
data1500 = pd.read_csv('V025-15.000-0.5.txt', sep = "\s+", index_col='Position')
plt.plot(data_merged2.ts1500, label="ts 15.00")
you could do this to import a tab-delimited file:
import re
with open('V026-15.000-0.1.txt.txt') as f:
data = [re.split('\t',x) for x in f.read().split('\n')]
or do this:
import csv
with open('data.txt', newline = '') as mytext:
data = csv.reader(mytext, delimiter='\t')
then to plot your data you should do as follow:
Read each line in the file using for loop.
Append required columns into a list.
After reading the whole file, plot the required data
something like this:
for row in data:
x.append(row[0])
y.append(row[1])
plt.plot(x, y)

can't create a graph with matplotlib from a csv file / data type issue

I'm hoping to get some help here. I'm trying to create some simple bar/line graphs from a csv file, however, it gives me an empty graph until I open this csv file manually in excel and change the data type to numeric. I've tried changing the data type with pd.to_numeric but it still gives an empty graph.
The csv that I'm trying to visualise is web data that I scraped using Beautiful Soup, I used .text method do get rid of all of the HTML tags so maybe it's causing the issue?
Would really appreciate some help. thanks!
Data file: https://dropmefiles.com/AYTUT
import numpy
import matplotlib
from matplotlib import pyplot as plt
import pandas as pd
import csv
my_data = pd.read_csv('my_data.csv')
my_data_n = my_data.apply(pd.to_numeric)
plt.bar(x=my_data_n['Company'], height=my_data_n['Market_Cap'])
plt.show()
Your csv file is corrupt. There are commas at the end of each line. Remove them and your code should work. pd.to_numeric is not required for this sample dataset.
Test code:
from matplotlib import pyplot as plt
import pandas as pd
my_data = pd.read_csv('/mnt/ramdisk/my_data.csv')
fig = plt.bar(x=my_data['Company'], height=my_data['Market_Cap'])
plt.tick_params(axis='x', rotation=90)
plt.title("Title")
plt.tight_layout()
plt.show()

matplotlib - seaborn - the numbers on the correlation plots are not readable

The plot below shows the correlation for one column. The problem is that the numbers are not readable, because there are many columns in it.
How is it possible to show only 5 or 6 most important columns and not all of them with very low importance?
plt.figure(figsize=(20,3))
sns.heatmap(df.corr()[['price']].sort_values('price', ascending=False).iloc[1:].T, annot=True,
cmap='Spectral_r', vmax=0.9, vmin=-0.31)
You can limit the cells shown via .iloc[1:7]. If you also want to show the highest negative values, you could create a second plot with .iloc[-6:]. To have both together, you could use numpy's slicing function and write .iloc[np.r_[1:4, -3:0]].
import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import seaborn as sns
df = pd.DataFrame(np.random.rand(7, 27), columns=['price'] + [*'abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz'])
plt.figure(figsize=(20, 3))
sns.heatmap(df.corr()[['price']].sort_values('price', ascending=False).iloc[1:7].T,
annot=True, annot_kws={'rotation':90, 'size': 20},
cmap='Spectral_r', vmax=0.9, vmin=-0.31)
plt.show()
annot can also be a list of labels. Using this, you can define a string matrix that you use to display the desired numbers and set the others to an empty string.
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import numpy as np; np.random.seed(0)
import seaborn as sns; sns.set_theme()
import pandas as pd
from string import ascii_letters
# generate random data
rs = np.random.RandomState(33)
df = pd.DataFrame(data=rs.normal(size=(100, 26)),
columns=list(ascii_letters[26:]))
importance_index = 5 # until which idx to hide values
data = df.corr()[['A']].sort_values('A', ascending=False).iloc[1:].T
labels = data.astype(str) # make a str-copy
labels.iloc[0,:importance_index] = ' ' # mask columns that you want to hide
sns.heatmap(data, annot=labels, cmap='Spectral_r', vmax=0.9, vmin=-0.31, fmt='', annot_kws={'rotation':90})
plt.show()
The output on some random data:
This works but it has its limits, particulary with setting fmt='' (can't use it to conveniently format decimals anymore, need to do it manually now). I would also question whether your approach is even the best one to take here. I think consistency in plots is quite important. I would rather evaluate if we can't rotate the heatmap labels (I've included it above) or leave them out completely since it is technically redundant due to the color-coding. Alternatively, you could only plot the cells with the "important" values.