I need to train a new model(keras+tensorflow) and I was asking myself if there is any difference between
Providing a bunch of images containing only the object of interest(cropped from the original image)
Providing bigger images with object annotations(coordinates of the bounding box and the class)
My logic tells my that most probably internally the training should be done only on the cropped part, so technically there shouldn`t be a difference.
Regards
The two approaches are you describing are commonly referred to as image classification (where a model needs to only classify the image) and object detection (where a model needs to detect the location of an object in an image and classify it). Sometimes simply differentiated as "classification" and "detection". These two approaches require different techniques, and different models have been developed to handle each approach. In general, image classification is an easier problem as you may have intuited.
Which approach to use depends on your end application. If you only need to know, "does an object exist in this image" then you can use classification techniques. If you need to know "where in this image is the object" or "how many of these objects are in the image", then you should use detection techniques.
What may be non-intuitive is that object detection is not simply an extension of image classification, so if you need object detection it is best to start with object detection models instead of building an image classifier that you then extend to object detection. This article provides some intuition on this topic.
Related
I am currently testing out custom object detection using the Tensorflow API. But I don't quite seem to understand the theory behind it.
So if I for example download a version of MobileNet and use it to train on, lets say, red and green apples. Does it forget all the things that is has already been trained on? And if so, why does it then benefit to use MobileNet over building a CNN from scratch.
Thanks for any answers!
Does it forget all the things that is has already been trained on?
Yes, if you re-train a CNN previously trained on a large database with a new database containing fewer classes it will "forget" the old classes. However, the old pre-training can help learning the new classes, this is a training strategy called "transfert learning" of "fine tuning" depending on the exact approach.
As a rule of thumb it is generally not a good idea to create a new network architecture from scratch as better networks probably already exist. You may want to implement your custom architecture if:
You are learning CNN's and deep learning
You have a specific need and you proved that other architectures won't fit or will perform poorly
Usually, one take an existing pre-trained network and specialize it for their specific task using transfert learning.
A lot of scientific literature is available for free online if you want to learn. you can start with the Yolo series and R-CNN, Fast-RCNN and Faster-RCNN for detection networks.
The main concept behind object detection is that it divides the input image in a grid of N patches, and then for each patch, it generates a set of sub-patches with different aspect ratios, let's say it generates M rectangular sub-patches. In total you need to classify MxN images.
In general the idea is then analyze each sub-patch within each patch . You pass the sub-patch to the classifier in your model and depending on the model training, it will classify it as containing a green apple/red apple/nothing. If it is classified as a red apple, then this sub-patch is the bounding box of the object detected.
So actually, there are two parts you are interested in:
Generating as many sub-patches as possible to cover as many portions of the image as possible (Of course, the more sub-patches, the slower your model will be) and,
The classifier. The classifier is normally an already exisiting network (MobileNeet, VGG, ResNet...). This part is commonly used as the "backbone" and it will extract the features of the input image. With the classifier you can either choose to training it "from zero", therefore your weights will be adjusted to your specific problem, OR, you can load the weigths from other known problem and use them in your problem so you won't need to spend time training them. In this case, they will also classify the objects for which the classifier was training for.
Take a look at the Mask-RCNN implementation. I find very interesting how they explain the process. In this architecture, you will not only generate a bounding box but also segment the object of interest.
For my next TF2-based computer vision project I need to classify images to a pre-defined set of classes. However, multiple objects of different classes can occur on one such image. That sounds like an object detection task, so I guess I could go for that.
But: I don't need to know where on an image each of these objects are, I just need to know which classes of objects are visible on an image.
Now I am thinking which route I should take. I am in particular interested in a high accuracy/quality of the solution. So I would prefer the approach that leads to better results. Thus from your experience, should I still go for an object detector, even though I don't need to know the location of the detected objects on the image, or should I rather build an image classifier, which could output all the classes that are located on an image? Is this even an option, can a "normal" classifier output multiple classes?
Since you don't need the object localization, stick to classification only.
Although you will be tempted to use the standard off-the-shelf network of multi-class multi-label object detection because of its re-usability, but realize that you are asking the model to do more things. If you have tons of data - not a problem. Or if your objects are similar to the ones used in ImageNet/COCO etc, you can simply use standard off-the-shelf object detection architecture and fine-tune on your dataset.
However, if you have less data and you need to train from scratch (e.g. medical images, weird objects), then object detection will be an overkill and will give you inferior results.
Remember, most of the object detection networks re-cycle the classification architectures with modifications added to last layers to incorporate additional outputs for object detection coordinates. There is a loss function associated with those additional outputs. During training in order to get best loss value, some of the classification accuracy is compromised for the sake of getting better object localization coordinates. You don't need that compromise. So, you can modify the last layer of object detection network and remove the outputs for coordinates.
Again, all this hassle is worth only if you have less data and you really need to train from scratch.
I'm trying to build a detection + classification model that will recognize an object in an image and classify it. Every image will contain at most 1 object among my 10 classes (i.e. same image cannot contains 2 classes). An image can, however, contain none of my classes/objects. I'm struggling with the general approach to this problem, especially due to the nature of my problem; my objects have different sizes. This is what I have tried:
Trained a classifier with images that only contains my objects/classes, i.e. every image is the object itself with background pre-removed. Now, since the objects/images have different shapes (aspect ratios) I had to reshape the images to the same size (destroying the aspect ratios). This would work just fine if my purpose was to only build a classifier, but since I also need to detect the objects, this didn't work so good.
The second approach was similar to (1), except that I didn't reshape the objects naively, but kept the aspect ratios by padding the image with 0 (black). This completely destroyed my classifiers ability to perform well (accuracy < 5%).
Mask RCNN - I followed this blogpost to try build a detector + classifier in the same model. The approach took forever and I wasn't sure it was the right approach. I even used external tools (RectLabel) to generate annotated image files containing information about the bounding boxes.
Question:
How should I approach this problem, on a general level:
Should I build 2 separate models? (One for detection/localization and one for classification?)
Should I be annotating my images using annotations file as in approach (3)?
Do I have to reshape my images at any stage?
Thanks,
PS. In all of my approaches, I augmented the images to generate ~500-1000 images per class.
To answer your questions:
No, you don't have to build two separate models. What you are describing is called Object detection, which is classification along with localization. There are many models which do this: Mask_RCNN, Yolo, Detectron, SSD, etc..
Yes, you do need to annotate your images for training a model for your custom classes. Each of the models mentioned above has needs a different way of annotation.
No, you don't need to do any image resizing. Most of the time it is done when the model loads the data for training or inference.
You are on the right track with trying MaskRCNN.
Other than MaskRCNN, you could also try Yolo. There is also an accompanying easy-to-use annotating tool Yolo-Mark.
If you go through this tutorial, you would understand what you care about.
How to train your own Object Detector with TensorFlow’s Object Detector API
The SSD model is small so that it would not take so much time for training.
There are some object detection models.
On RectLabel, you can save bounding boxes in the PASCAL VOC format.
You can export TFRecord for Tensorflow.
https://rectlabel.com/help#tf_record
at the moment I study neural network. I tried to use different models to recognize people and came across one very interesting question for me. I used yolo v3, mask r-cnn, but all of them in the photos taken from an indirect angle missed people in the photo. Which of the existing models is the most accurate and effective ?
This is the main problem with deep learning models. For every instance of an object you want to detect, there should be at least one similar object to it (in case of angle, size, color, shape, etc) in the training set. The more similar objects in the training data, the higher probability of the object to be detected.
In case of speed and accuracy, YOLO V3 is currently one of the best. Mask RCNN is also one of the best models if you want the exact boundaries of the object (segmentation). If there is no need for the exact boundaries of the objects, I would recommend using YOLO for its efficiency, You can work on your training data and try to add multiple instances of people with different sizes, angles, shapes, and also include cases of truncation and occlusion (when just parts of a person is visible) to get more generalization in the model's performance.
Open CV provides a simple API to detect and extract faces from given images. ( I do not think it works perfectly fine though because I experienced that it cuts frames from the input pictures that have nothing to do with face images. )
I wonder if tensorflow API can be used for face detection. I failed finding relevant information but hoping that maybe an experienced person in the field can guide me on this subject. Can tensorflow's object detection API be used for face detection as well in the same way as Open CV does? (I mean, you just call the API function and it gives you the face image from the given input image.)
You can, but some work is needed.
First, take a look at the object detection README. There are some useful articles you should follow. Specifically: (1) Configuring an object detection pipeline, (3) Preparing inputs and (3) Running locally. You should start with an existing architecture with a pre-trained model. Pretrained models can be found in Model Zoo, and their corresponding configuration files can be found here.
The most common pre-trained models in Model Zoo are on COCO dataset. Unfortunately this dataset doesn't contain face as a class (but does contain person).
Instead, you can start with a pre-trained model on Open Images, such as faster_rcnn_inception_resnet_v2_atrous_oid, which does contain face as a class.
Note that this model is larger and slower than common architectures used on COCO dataset, such as SSDLite over MobileNetV1/V2. This is because Open Images has a lot more classes than COCO, and therefore a well working model need to be much more expressive in order to be able to distinguish between the large amount of classes and localizing them correctly.
Since you only want face detection, you can try the following two options:
If you're okay with a slower model which will probably result in better performance, start with faster_rcnn_inception_resnet_v2_atrous_oid, and you can only slightly fine-tune the model on the single class of face.
If you want a faster model, you should probably start with something like SSDLite-MobileNetV2 pre-trained on COCO, but then fine-tune it on the class of face from a different dataset, such as your own or the face subset of Open Images.
Note that the fact that the pre-trained model isn't trained on faces doesn't mean you can't fine-tune it to be, but rather that it might take more fine-tuning than a pre-trained model which was pre-trained on faces as well.
just increase the shape of the input, I tried and it's work much better