I'm trying to scrape my own banking information by automating the process using Selenium in Ruby.
I'm running into a bizarre situation where performing the exact same sequence in the browser (whether just the normal browser or private/incognito) works fine, but when I try to log in under a Selenium-controlled browser I get back a strange 500 error from the server.
I've noticed the browser console logs also look different in terms of certain logging messages related to cookies, JS errors, libraries being loaded, etc.
I have found an answer on SO mentioning one possible difference in Chrome being a specific "cdc" string that might be detectable, but is there some kind of corresponding difference in Firefox/Geckodriver that could be used to detect the fact that I'm trying to automate the browser?
I'm not really sure where to look, because my understand was that running via Selenium should basically have identical behaviour to running via the browser itself.
Would love some guidance on what mechanisms may be in play to explain the difference in behaviour!
Related
I'm using MS Edge browser (Version 109.0.1518.78) along with Selenium to do some automated UI testing with my corp environment.
Trouble is, the tests are always prompting challenging me to login.
Now here's the confusion: when i use Edge normally, the browser uses my profile settings to auto-authenticate me. However, when running the tests (via Visual Studio), an Edge browser instance is started WITHOUT my profile.
First thing I tried:
I have tried following various example without any success, such as this one from SO. Using this example i added these 2 arguments like this:
This didn't do anything. So I'm wondering if maybe the arguments have changed? The edge driver documentation is worthless when it comes to this.
Second thing I tried:
I tried creating edge driver service with arguments of my edge driver path.
Unfortunately, i get a driver initialization error saying something about "msedge.exe".
Summary
The summarize, my problem is that my selenium tests are starting an edge browser instance without my default corp profile. therefore i am forced to manually login, which is what i want to avoid.
Note that occassionally things will work fine as expected. Then suddenly the next day it reverts to this default behavior again. I am no sure what is going on!
Currently I'm trying to run a load test which walks through a uniquely created URL. I know JMeter is often used for load testing, but I was specifically asked to do it through something like Selenium that uses real browsers to create the URL then open that URL and complete the steps within the URL. I have created a Selenium script that can easily do this, but I need to do this 100 times concurrently and can't find a good way to do.
Is there a way to do this? I've looked into Selenium Grid but I'm not sure if I even have enough nodes to run 100 browsers concurrently. Please if you have recommendations for software or a different method of doing this I would love to hear it. Thank you!
JMeter can be integrated with Selenium using WebDriver Sampler so you can re-use your code and rely on JMeter's multithreading capabilities.
If one machine won't be powerful enough to kick off 100 browsers - you can consider going for Distributed Testing
In general be aware that browsers don't do any magic, they just send HTTP requests, wait for responses and render them. JMeter is not capable only of rendering the page, but if you need to load test the backend - it can mimic browser's network footprint with 100% accuracy, just make sure to configure JMeter accordingly in order to behave like a real browser
JavaScript execution time and page rendering speed can be checked either using single WebDriver Sampler or a separate solution like Lighthouse
I'm working on a monitoring tool for my website to log data. The actual logging is made on server. My goal is to calculate stats based on how long the user stays on the website.
Main question: I used chrome headless command --remote-debugging-port=80. I got logs for up to 10 minutes. Works perfectly. But how long will it work if left working? Is there a default timeout? If yes, how can I change it? If I want to run it exactly 30 minutes after page finished loading?
I'm trying to do the same on firefox (tried using PhantomJS but it wasn't loading the page correctly even though useragent was set to firefox) but firefox just throws an bank page when I'm trying to start a headless mode. I used "firefox -headless" and tried capturing an screenshot. It was just exiting my currently open firefox tabs without capturing any image. Any idea?
Using firefox quantum 59.0. I don't want to use selenium.
Also PhantomJS solution would be great. Currently I just want to collect logs. So, it only have to run all javascript (an jquery) code on the page which then sends the data using ajax. I tried page.onLoadFinished and then a wait function to make it stay on the page for the exact time after page loading.
Since no one answered, I will try to answer my own question after even more research and logical thinking.
Main question: Seems that there is no timeout but if need can be used --timeout X. Even though it's not perfect because it runs independently if the page if fully loaded or not.
As for the firefox, it's buggy. -new-instance (make headless run while you are already on firefox) is not working and -no-remote didn't help. Firefox is only working if running only one instance. So, if it's the PC you are working on and you want to run tests too, firefox is not for you. Headless runs only when no other instances of firefox are running, while chrome runs fine.
PhantomJS didn't work even though tried multiple solutions.
Best solution? Use chrome. Need portable? Use chromium and use headless. Or write your soft to use cefsharp which is based on chromium. Your browser with all libs will be around 120-200MB. Pretty big for portable but do it's work. Same as portable chrome or chromium. CefSharp have a privilege of integrating whatever you like into the browser since it's a... browser.
I've seen this question has been asked a few times, and lots of solutions get suggested - but none of them seem to work for the RemoteWebDriver (ie: using Selenium Grid). They're usually centered around using the local ChromeDriver/FirefoxDriver/IEDriver classes.
I am using the .NET bindings, by the way :).
What I want to do is fairly simple (in terms of requirement). I have a Selenium Server setup, and am currently using the RemoteWebDriver to perform automated UI tests on various sites. This setup is working fine.
However, some sites use NTLM/Windows Authentication, and we need to start writing automated tests for these. However, as far as I can tell, there is no solution for this.
I have seen the following "solutions", but - unless someone can correct me - they either don't work consistently, or will not work using RemoteWebDriver:
Using the IAlert functionality (like here). However, this isn't implemented in the .NET bindings, and doesn't work for all browsers as far as I can tell.
Using the Robot API to interact with the popup (like here). But this is for running on your local machine, and not supported by RemoteWebDriver.
Using AutoIt to do a similar thing to the Robot API. However, this won't work using RemoteWebDriver.
Passing the credentials in the URL (eg: http://username:password#example.com). However, this doesn't work for Windows Authentication - just normal HTTP Basic Authentication.
I can't actually see any other solutions, unless anyone else can help?
A workaround currently is to log onto the Selenium server, go to the sites in each browser, and save the credentials. But this isn't ideal, and adds a level of manual interaction to each test.
Any help would be appreciated :).
It appears I have found my own solution - use a proxy which adds the NTLM negotiation/authorisation automatically. Pretty simple to setup :).
http://cntlm.sourceforge.net/
I have a system to test, which is a video ads distribution technology. I need to load every video like 1-2 mins to serve the ads. The videos are played in a Flash client and streamed as FLV streams like in YouTube.
The reason why I need to test it only via browsers -- and every other method won't work -- is to stress test both the video streaming servers and the ads servers simultaneously and displaying ads in real-time.
I have used Selenium, WatiN, Automation Anywhere and many other automation tools. However, when I am trying to start like 10000 browsers on my machine (32GB RAM, 16-core CPU), none of them are able to do the job.
With Selenium, I am able to start the maximum FireFox instances so far, but that's still too low: half of the instances don't run the test.
Any suggestions to do with Selenium?
You aren't going to run 10,000 browsers on your machine. That would give 3.2MB of physical memory per browser instance and I'm pretty sure FireFox just won't like that.
You could create a JMeter script that hits your server with many threads. It won't interact with the UI but would simulate the load of many clients hitting whatever URLs you tell it. I believe it also includes the ability to record a session and play it back for easy setup of your sessions.
Selenium isn't really optimized for load/stress testing, especially if you're running your browsers locally. Running 1000+ browsers is going to choke even the beefiest server. Though RAM is an obvious bottleneck, you also have limited CPU resources and bandwidth. The latter being a primary concern if you are loading videos.
Not to mention you'd be testing from a single IP with 10k browsers, so load balancing may not kick in properly, as well as the actual distribution of video ads to specific virtual users.
If you want to stick with existing Selenium tests, I've had good experiences with BrowserMob. They basically have a huge grid to do real browser load-testing, distributed across AWS.
Another recommendation would be an actual performance testing tool. I'd recommend Soasta CloudTest. They have a free version that runs 100 users so you can see if it will be a good fit for you. I have found that scripting for CloudTest is relatively simple.
Disclaimer: My experiences with both companies have been as a paying customer and I have never worked for either.
If you are using Windows machine then as per my experience there is a limit on number of browser window instances to be opened. As per my test last time, it does restrict between 100-150 browser windows.
I would recommend you using headless robot, which doesn't require opening browser window. I think latest version of Selenium has that capability. But it seems to be more like a load test as you are trying to simulate 10,000+ user instances, I would recommend you using load testing tool like JMeter or LoadRunner.
It looks to me that you are trying to verify what the client will see based on high traffic, no?
In that case, Joel is quite correct. If you absolutely have to see what the client sees, you could use threaded hits and just dump the results in a database. That'll show you anything the client would see anyway, and it's a lot easier to sort through than thousands of browser instances.
Either way, your client will not see errors if there are no errors present on the server side. If you're testing functionality in bandwidth restricted environments, CPU-intensive environments, or memory-intensive environments, those are much easier achieved than running thousands of browser instances.
Your post smells of some form of ad-based fraud to me, but either way: have you considered using different web browsers besides Firefox? PhantomJS is a headless webkit-based browser that is compatible with Selenium. It supports all the core browser features like DOM handling, CSS selectors, Javascript and Canvas. I do not know if it supports Flash.
This post has a decent list of other headless and automatable web-browsers that you might consider.
Also, if each browser instance is instantiating a Flash plugin, don't neglect the possibility that the issue could be with Flash and not Firefox. Alternatively, why instantiate several different Firefox processes? Can you accomplish what you want through the use of tabs instead?
The in-house way to this wiht selenium is using browsermob proxy and multiple broswser agents to recreate the experience of different users, changing the ip is more difficult because it requires changing your home network.
Here is a good example