Related
I am trying to fix how python plots my data.
Say:
x = [0,5,9,10,15]
y = [0,1,2,3,4]
matplotlib.pyplot.plot(x,y)
matplotlib.pyplot.show()
The x axis' ticks are plotted in intervals of 5. Is there a way to make it show intervals of 1?
You could explicitly set where you want to tick marks with plt.xticks:
plt.xticks(np.arange(min(x), max(x)+1, 1.0))
For example,
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
x = [0,5,9,10,15]
y = [0,1,2,3,4]
plt.plot(x,y)
plt.xticks(np.arange(min(x), max(x)+1, 1.0))
plt.show()
(np.arange was used rather than Python's range function just in case min(x) and max(x) are floats instead of ints.)
The plt.plot (or ax.plot) function will automatically set default x and y limits. If you wish to keep those limits, and just change the stepsize of the tick marks, then you could use ax.get_xlim() to discover what limits Matplotlib has already set.
start, end = ax.get_xlim()
ax.xaxis.set_ticks(np.arange(start, end, stepsize))
The default tick formatter should do a decent job rounding the tick values to a sensible number of significant digits. However, if you wish to have more control over the format, you can define your own formatter. For example,
ax.xaxis.set_major_formatter(ticker.FormatStrFormatter('%0.1f'))
Here's a runnable example:
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import matplotlib.ticker as ticker
x = [0,5,9,10,15]
y = [0,1,2,3,4]
fig, ax = plt.subplots()
ax.plot(x,y)
start, end = ax.get_xlim()
ax.xaxis.set_ticks(np.arange(start, end, 0.712123))
ax.xaxis.set_major_formatter(ticker.FormatStrFormatter('%0.1f'))
plt.show()
Another approach is to set the axis locator:
import matplotlib.ticker as plticker
loc = plticker.MultipleLocator(base=1.0) # this locator puts ticks at regular intervals
ax.xaxis.set_major_locator(loc)
There are several different types of locator depending upon your needs.
Here is a full example:
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import matplotlib.ticker as plticker
x = [0,5,9,10,15]
y = [0,1,2,3,4]
fig, ax = plt.subplots()
ax.plot(x,y)
loc = plticker.MultipleLocator(base=1.0) # this locator puts ticks at regular intervals
ax.xaxis.set_major_locator(loc)
plt.show()
I like this solution (from the Matplotlib Plotting Cookbook):
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import matplotlib.ticker as ticker
x = [0,5,9,10,15]
y = [0,1,2,3,4]
tick_spacing = 1
fig, ax = plt.subplots(1,1)
ax.plot(x,y)
ax.xaxis.set_major_locator(ticker.MultipleLocator(tick_spacing))
plt.show()
This solution give you explicit control of the tick spacing via the number given to ticker.MultipleLocater(), allows automatic limit determination, and is easy to read later.
In case anyone is interested in a general one-liner, simply get the current ticks and use it to set the new ticks by sampling every other tick.
ax.set_xticks(ax.get_xticks()[::2])
if you just want to set the spacing a simple one liner with minimal boilerplate:
plt.gca().xaxis.set_major_locator(plt.MultipleLocator(1))
also works easily for minor ticks:
plt.gca().xaxis.set_minor_locator(plt.MultipleLocator(1))
a bit of a mouthfull, but pretty compact
This is a bit hacky, but by far the cleanest/easiest to understand example that I've found to do this. It's from an answer on SO here:
Cleanest way to hide every nth tick label in matplotlib colorbar?
for label in ax.get_xticklabels()[::2]:
label.set_visible(False)
Then you can loop over the labels setting them to visible or not depending on the density you want.
edit: note that sometimes matplotlib sets labels == '', so it might look like a label is not present, when in fact it is and just isn't displaying anything. To make sure you're looping through actual visible labels, you could try:
visible_labels = [lab for lab in ax.get_xticklabels() if lab.get_visible() is True and lab.get_text() != '']
plt.setp(visible_labels[::2], visible=False)
This is an old topic, but I stumble over this every now and then and made this function. It's very convenient:
import matplotlib.pyplot as pp
import numpy as np
def resadjust(ax, xres=None, yres=None):
"""
Send in an axis and I fix the resolution as desired.
"""
if xres:
start, stop = ax.get_xlim()
ticks = np.arange(start, stop + xres, xres)
ax.set_xticks(ticks)
if yres:
start, stop = ax.get_ylim()
ticks = np.arange(start, stop + yres, yres)
ax.set_yticks(ticks)
One caveat of controlling the ticks like this is that one does no longer enjoy the interactive automagic updating of max scale after an added line. Then do
gca().set_ylim(top=new_top) # for example
and run the resadjust function again.
I developed an inelegant solution. Consider that we have the X axis and also a list of labels for each point in X.
Example:
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
x = [0,1,2,3,4,5]
y = [10,20,15,18,7,19]
xlabels = ['jan','feb','mar','apr','may','jun']
Let's say that I want to show ticks labels only for 'feb' and 'jun'
xlabelsnew = []
for i in xlabels:
if i not in ['feb','jun']:
i = ' '
xlabelsnew.append(i)
else:
xlabelsnew.append(i)
Good, now we have a fake list of labels. First, we plotted the original version.
plt.plot(x,y)
plt.xticks(range(0,len(x)),xlabels,rotation=45)
plt.show()
Now, the modified version.
plt.plot(x,y)
plt.xticks(range(0,len(x)),xlabelsnew,rotation=45)
plt.show()
Pure Python Implementation
Below's a pure python implementation of the desired functionality that handles any numeric series (int or float) with positive, negative, or mixed values and allows for the user to specify the desired step size:
import math
def computeTicks (x, step = 5):
"""
Computes domain with given step encompassing series x
# params
x - Required - A list-like object of integers or floats
step - Optional - Tick frequency
"""
xMax, xMin = math.ceil(max(x)), math.floor(min(x))
dMax, dMin = xMax + abs((xMax % step) - step) + (step if (xMax % step != 0) else 0), xMin - abs((xMin % step))
return range(dMin, dMax, step)
Sample Output
# Negative to Positive
series = [-2, 18, 24, 29, 43]
print(list(computeTicks(series)))
[-5, 0, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45]
# Negative to 0
series = [-30, -14, -10, -9, -3, 0]
print(list(computeTicks(series)))
[-30, -25, -20, -15, -10, -5, 0]
# 0 to Positive
series = [19, 23, 24, 27]
print(list(computeTicks(series)))
[15, 20, 25, 30]
# Floats
series = [1.8, 12.0, 21.2]
print(list(computeTicks(series)))
[0, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25]
# Step – 100
series = [118.3, 293.2, 768.1]
print(list(computeTicks(series, step = 100)))
[100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600, 700, 800]
Sample Usage
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
x = [0,5,9,10,15]
y = [0,1,2,3,4]
plt.plot(x,y)
plt.xticks(computeTicks(x))
plt.show()
Notice the x-axis has integer values all evenly spaced by 5, whereas the y-axis has a different interval (the matplotlib default behavior, because the ticks weren't specified).
Generalisable one liner, with only Numpy imported:
ax.set_xticks(np.arange(min(x),max(x),1))
Set in the context of the question:
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
fig, ax = plt.subplots()
x = [0,5,9,10,15]
y = [0,1,2,3,4]
ax.plot(x,y)
ax.set_xticks(np.arange(min(x),max(x),1))
plt.show()
How it works:
fig, ax = plt.subplots() gives the ax object which contains the axes.
np.arange(min(x),max(x),1) gives an array of interval 1 from the min of x to the max of x. This is the new x ticks that we want.
ax.set_xticks() changes the ticks on the ax object.
xmarks=[i for i in range(1,length+1,1)]
plt.xticks(xmarks)
This worked for me
if you want ticks between [1,5] (1 and 5 inclusive) then replace
length = 5
Since None of the above solutions worked for my usecase, here I provide a solution using None (pun!) which can be adapted to a wide variety of scenarios.
Here is a sample piece of code that produces cluttered ticks on both X and Y axes.
# Note the super cluttered ticks on both X and Y axis.
# inputs
x = np.arange(1, 101)
y = x * np.log(x)
fig = plt.figure() # create figure
ax = fig.add_subplot(111)
ax.plot(x, y)
ax.set_xticks(x) # set xtick values
ax.set_yticks(y) # set ytick values
plt.show()
Now, we clean up the clutter with a new plot that shows only a sparse set of values on both x and y axes as ticks.
# inputs
x = np.arange(1, 101)
y = x * np.log(x)
fig = plt.figure() # create figure
ax = fig.add_subplot(111)
ax.plot(x, y)
ax.set_xticks(x)
ax.set_yticks(y)
# which values need to be shown?
# here, we show every third value from `x` and `y`
show_every = 3
sparse_xticks = [None] * x.shape[0]
sparse_xticks[::show_every] = x[::show_every]
sparse_yticks = [None] * y.shape[0]
sparse_yticks[::show_every] = y[::show_every]
ax.set_xticklabels(sparse_xticks, fontsize=6) # set sparse xtick values
ax.set_yticklabels(sparse_yticks, fontsize=6) # set sparse ytick values
plt.show()
Depending on the usecase, one can adapt the above code simply by changing show_every and using that for sampling tick values for X or Y or both the axes.
If this stepsize based solution doesn't fit, then one can also populate the values of sparse_xticks or sparse_yticks at irregular intervals, if that is what is desired.
You can loop through labels and show or hide those you want:
for i, label in enumerate(ax.get_xticklabels()):
if i % interval != 0:
label.set_visible(False)
I want to make 4 imshow subplots but all of them share the same colormap. Matplotlib automatically adjusts the scale on the colormap depending on the entries of the matrices. For example, if one of my matrices has all entires as 10 and the other one has all entries equal to 5 and I use the Greys colormap then one of my subplots should be completely black and the other one should be completely grey. But both of them end up becoming completely black. How to make all the subplots share the same scale on the colormap?
To get this right you need to have all the images with the same intensity scale, otherwise the colorbar() colours are meaningless. To do that, use the vmin and vmax arguments of imshow(), and make sure they are the same for all your images.
E.g., if the range of values you want to show goes from 0 to 10, you can use the following:
import pylab as plt
import numpy as np
my_image1 = np.linspace(0, 10, 10000).reshape(100,100)
my_image2 = np.sqrt(my_image1.T) + 3
plt.subplot(1, 2, 1)
plt.imshow(my_image1, vmin=0, vmax=10, cmap='jet', aspect='auto')
plt.subplot(1, 2, 2)
plt.imshow(my_image2, vmin=0, vmax=10, cmap='jet', aspect='auto')
plt.colorbar()
When the ranges of data (data1 and data2) sets are unknown and you want to use the same colour bar for both/all plots, find the overall minimum and maximum to use as vmin and vmax in the call to imshow:
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
fig, axes = plt.subplots(nrows=1, ncols=2)
# generate randomly populated arrays
data1 = np.random.rand(10,10)*10
data2 = np.random.rand(10,10)*10 -7.5
# find minimum of minima & maximum of maxima
minmin = np.min([np.min(data1), np.min(data2)])
maxmax = np.max([np.max(data1), np.max(data2)])
im1 = axes[0].imshow(data1, vmin=minmin, vmax=maxmax,
extent=(-5,5,-5,5), aspect='auto', cmap='viridis')
im2 = axes[1].imshow(data2, vmin=minmin, vmax=maxmax,
extent=(-5,5,-5,5), aspect='auto', cmap='viridis')
# add space for colour bar
fig.subplots_adjust(right=0.85)
cbar_ax = fig.add_axes([0.88, 0.15, 0.04, 0.7])
fig.colorbar(im2, cax=cbar_ax)
It may be that you don't know beforehand the ranges of your data, but you may know that somehow they are compatible. In that case, you may prefer to let matplotlib choose those ranges for the first plot and use the same range for the remaining plots. Here is how you can do it. The key is to get the limits with properties()['clim']
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
my_image1 = np.linspace(0, 10, 10000).reshape(100,100)
my_image2 = np.sqrt(my_image1.T) + 3
fig, axes = plt.subplots(nrows=1, ncols=2)
im = axes[0].imshow(my_image1)
clim=im.properties()['clim']
axes[1].imshow(my_image2, clim=clim)
fig.colorbar(im, ax=axes.ravel().tolist(), shrink=0.5)
plt.show()
I've spent entirely too long researching how to get two subplots to share the same y-axis with a single colorbar shared between the two in Matplotlib.
What was happening was that when I called the colorbar() function in either subplot1 or subplot2, it would autoscale the plot such that the colorbar plus the plot would fit inside the 'subplot' bounding box, causing the two side-by-side plots to be two very different sizes.
To get around this, I tried to create a third subplot which I then hacked to render no plot with just a colorbar present.
The only problem is, now the heights and widths of the two plots are uneven, and I can't figure out how to make it look okay.
Here is my code:
from __future__ import division
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import numpy as np
from matplotlib import patches
from matplotlib.ticker import NullFormatter
# SIS Functions
TE = 1 # Einstein radius
g1 = lambda x,y: (TE/2) * (y**2-x**2)/((x**2+y**2)**(3/2))
g2 = lambda x,y: -1*TE*x*y / ((x**2+y**2)**(3/2))
kappa = lambda x,y: TE / (2*np.sqrt(x**2+y**2))
coords = np.linspace(-2,2,400)
X,Y = np.meshgrid(coords,coords)
g1out = g1(X,Y)
g2out = g2(X,Y)
kappaout = kappa(X,Y)
for i in range(len(coords)):
for j in range(len(coords)):
if np.sqrt(coords[i]**2+coords[j]**2) <= TE:
g1out[i][j]=0
g2out[i][j]=0
fig = plt.figure()
fig.subplots_adjust(wspace=0,hspace=0)
# subplot number 1
ax1 = fig.add_subplot(1,2,1,aspect='equal',xlim=[-2,2],ylim=[-2,2])
plt.title(r"$\gamma_{1}$",fontsize="18")
plt.xlabel(r"x ($\theta_{E}$)",fontsize="15")
plt.ylabel(r"y ($\theta_{E}$)",rotation='horizontal',fontsize="15")
plt.xticks([-2.0,-1.5,-1.0,-0.5,0,0.5,1.0,1.5])
plt.xticks([-2.0,-1.5,-1.0,-0.5,0,0.5,1.0,1.5])
plt.imshow(g1out,extent=(-2,2,-2,2))
plt.axhline(y=0,linewidth=2,color='k',linestyle="--")
plt.axvline(x=0,linewidth=2,color='k',linestyle="--")
e1 = patches.Ellipse((0,0),2,2,color='white')
ax1.add_patch(e1)
# subplot number 2
ax2 = fig.add_subplot(1,2,2,sharey=ax1,xlim=[-2,2],ylim=[-2,2])
plt.title(r"$\gamma_{2}$",fontsize="18")
plt.xlabel(r"x ($\theta_{E}$)",fontsize="15")
ax2.yaxis.set_major_formatter( NullFormatter() )
plt.axhline(y=0,linewidth=2,color='k',linestyle="--")
plt.axvline(x=0,linewidth=2,color='k',linestyle="--")
plt.imshow(g2out,extent=(-2,2,-2,2))
e2 = patches.Ellipse((0,0),2,2,color='white')
ax2.add_patch(e2)
# subplot for colorbar
ax3 = fig.add_subplot(1,1,1)
ax3.axis('off')
cbar = plt.colorbar(ax=ax2)
plt.show()
Just place the colorbar in its own axis and use subplots_adjust to make room for it.
As a quick example:
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
fig, axes = plt.subplots(nrows=2, ncols=2)
for ax in axes.flat:
im = ax.imshow(np.random.random((10,10)), vmin=0, vmax=1)
fig.subplots_adjust(right=0.8)
cbar_ax = fig.add_axes([0.85, 0.15, 0.05, 0.7])
fig.colorbar(im, cax=cbar_ax)
plt.show()
Note that the color range will be set by the last image plotted (that gave rise to im) even if the range of values is set by vmin and vmax. If another plot has, for example, a higher max value, points with higher values than the max of im will show in uniform color.
You can simplify Joe Kington's code using the axparameter of figure.colorbar() with a list of axes.
From the documentation:
ax
None | parent axes object(s) from which space for a new colorbar axes will be stolen. If a list of axes is given they will all be resized to make room for the colorbar axes.
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
fig, axes = plt.subplots(nrows=2, ncols=2)
for ax in axes.flat:
im = ax.imshow(np.random.random((10,10)), vmin=0, vmax=1)
fig.colorbar(im, ax=axes.ravel().tolist())
plt.show()
This solution does not require manual tweaking of axes locations or colorbar size, works with multi-row and single-row layouts, and works with tight_layout(). It is adapted from a gallery example, using ImageGrid from matplotlib's AxesGrid Toolbox.
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
from mpl_toolkits.axes_grid1 import ImageGrid
# Set up figure and image grid
fig = plt.figure(figsize=(9.75, 3))
grid = ImageGrid(fig, 111, # as in plt.subplot(111)
nrows_ncols=(1,3),
axes_pad=0.15,
share_all=True,
cbar_location="right",
cbar_mode="single",
cbar_size="7%",
cbar_pad=0.15,
)
# Add data to image grid
for ax in grid:
im = ax.imshow(np.random.random((10,10)), vmin=0, vmax=1)
# Colorbar
ax.cax.colorbar(im)
ax.cax.toggle_label(True)
#plt.tight_layout() # Works, but may still require rect paramater to keep colorbar labels visible
plt.show()
Using make_axes is even easier and gives a better result. It also provides possibilities to customise the positioning of the colorbar.
Also note the option of subplots to share x and y axes.
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import matplotlib as mpl
fig, axes = plt.subplots(nrows=2, ncols=2, sharex=True, sharey=True)
for ax in axes.flat:
im = ax.imshow(np.random.random((10,10)), vmin=0, vmax=1)
cax,kw = mpl.colorbar.make_axes([ax for ax in axes.flat])
plt.colorbar(im, cax=cax, **kw)
plt.show()
As a beginner who stumbled across this thread, I'd like to add a python-for-dummies adaptation of abevieiramota's very neat answer (because I'm at the level that I had to look up 'ravel' to work out what their code was doing):
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
fig, ((ax1,ax2,ax3),(ax4,ax5,ax6)) = plt.subplots(2,3)
axlist = [ax1,ax2,ax3,ax4,ax5,ax6]
first = ax1.imshow(np.random.random((10,10)), vmin=0, vmax=1)
third = ax3.imshow(np.random.random((12,12)), vmin=0, vmax=1)
fig.colorbar(first, ax=axlist)
plt.show()
Much less pythonic, much easier for noobs like me to see what's actually happening here.
Shared colormap and colorbar
This is for the more complex case where the values are not just between 0 and 1; the cmap needs to be shared instead of just using the last one.
import numpy as np
from matplotlib.colors import Normalize
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import matplotlib.cm as cm
fig, axes = plt.subplots(nrows=2, ncols=2)
cmap=cm.get_cmap('viridis')
normalizer=Normalize(0,4)
im=cm.ScalarMappable(norm=normalizer)
for i,ax in enumerate(axes.flat):
ax.imshow(i+np.random.random((10,10)),cmap=cmap,norm=normalizer)
ax.set_title(str(i))
fig.colorbar(im, ax=axes.ravel().tolist())
plt.show()
As pointed out in other answers, the idea is usually to define an axes for the colorbar to reside in. There are various ways of doing so; one that hasn't been mentionned yet would be to directly specify the colorbar axes at subplot creation with plt.subplots(). The advantage is that the axes position does not need to be manually set and in all cases with automatic aspect the colorbar will be exactly the same height as the subplots. Even in many cases where images are used the result will be satisfying as shown below.
When using plt.subplots(), the use of gridspec_kw argument allows to make the colorbar axes much smaller than the other axes.
fig, (ax, ax2, cax) = plt.subplots(ncols=3,figsize=(5.5,3),
gridspec_kw={"width_ratios":[1,1, 0.05]})
Example:
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import numpy as np; np.random.seed(1)
fig, (ax, ax2, cax) = plt.subplots(ncols=3,figsize=(5.5,3),
gridspec_kw={"width_ratios":[1,1, 0.05]})
fig.subplots_adjust(wspace=0.3)
im = ax.imshow(np.random.rand(11,8), vmin=0, vmax=1)
im2 = ax2.imshow(np.random.rand(11,8), vmin=0, vmax=1)
ax.set_ylabel("y label")
fig.colorbar(im, cax=cax)
plt.show()
This works well, if the plots' aspect is autoscaled or the images are shrunk due to their aspect in the width direction (as in the above). If, however, the images are wider then high, the result would look as follows, which might be undesired.
A solution to fix the colorbar height to the subplot height would be to use mpl_toolkits.axes_grid1.inset_locator.InsetPosition to set the colorbar axes relative to the image subplot axes.
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import numpy as np; np.random.seed(1)
from mpl_toolkits.axes_grid1.inset_locator import InsetPosition
fig, (ax, ax2, cax) = plt.subplots(ncols=3,figsize=(7,3),
gridspec_kw={"width_ratios":[1,1, 0.05]})
fig.subplots_adjust(wspace=0.3)
im = ax.imshow(np.random.rand(11,16), vmin=0, vmax=1)
im2 = ax2.imshow(np.random.rand(11,16), vmin=0, vmax=1)
ax.set_ylabel("y label")
ip = InsetPosition(ax2, [1.05,0,0.05,1])
cax.set_axes_locator(ip)
fig.colorbar(im, cax=cax, ax=[ax,ax2])
plt.show()
New in matplotlib 3.4.0
Shared colorbars can now be implemented using subfigures:
New Figure.subfigures and Figure.add_subfigure allow ... localized figure artists (e.g., colorbars and suptitles) that only pertain to each subfigure.
The matplotlib gallery includes demos on how to plot subfigures.
Here is a minimal example with 2 subfigures, each with a shared colorbar:
fig = plt.figure(constrained_layout=True)
(subfig_l, subfig_r) = fig.subfigures(nrows=1, ncols=2)
axes_l = subfig_l.subplots(nrows=1, ncols=2, sharey=True)
for ax in axes_l:
im = ax.imshow(np.random.random((10, 10)), vmin=0, vmax=1)
# shared colorbar for left subfigure
subfig_l.colorbar(im, ax=axes_l, location='bottom')
axes_r = subfig_r.subplots(nrows=3, ncols=1, sharex=True)
for ax in axes_r:
mesh = ax.pcolormesh(np.random.randn(30, 30), vmin=-2.5, vmax=2.5)
# shared colorbar for right subfigure
subfig_r.colorbar(mesh, ax=axes_r)
The solution of using a list of axes by abevieiramota works very well until you use only one row of images, as pointed out in the comments. Using a reasonable aspect ratio for figsize helps, but is still far from perfect. For example:
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
fig, axes = plt.subplots(nrows=1, ncols=3, figsize=(9.75, 3))
for ax in axes.flat:
im = ax.imshow(np.random.random((10,10)), vmin=0, vmax=1)
fig.colorbar(im, ax=axes.ravel().tolist())
plt.show()
The colorbar function provides the shrink parameter which is a scaling factor for the size of the colorbar axes. It does require some manual trial and error. For example:
fig.colorbar(im, ax=axes.ravel().tolist(), shrink=0.75)
To add to #abevieiramota's excellent answer, you can get the euqivalent of tight_layout with constrained_layout. You will still get large horizontal gaps if you use imshow instead of pcolormesh because of the 1:1 aspect ratio imposed by imshow.
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
fig, axes = plt.subplots(nrows=2, ncols=2, constrained_layout=True)
for ax in axes.flat:
im = ax.pcolormesh(np.random.random((10,10)), vmin=0, vmax=1)
fig.colorbar(im, ax=axes.flat)
plt.show()
I noticed that almost every solution posted involved ax.imshow(im, ...) and did not normalize the colors displayed to the colorbar for the multiple subfigures. The im mappable is taken from the last instance, but what if the values of the multiple im-s are different? (I'm assuming these mappables are treated in the same way that the contour-sets and surface-sets are treated.) I have an example using a 3d surface plot below that creates two colorbars for a 2x2 subplot (one colorbar per one row). Although the question asks explicitly for a different arrangement, I think the example helps clarify some things. I haven't found a way to do this using plt.subplots(...) yet because of the 3D axes unfortunately.
If only I could position the colorbars in a better way... (There is probably a much better way to do this, but at least it should be not too difficult to follow.)
import matplotlib
from matplotlib import cm
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import numpy as np
from mpl_toolkits.mplot3d import Axes3D
cmap = 'plasma'
ncontours = 5
def get_data(row, col):
""" get X, Y, Z, and plot number of subplot
Z > 0 for top row, Z < 0 for bottom row """
if row == 0:
x = np.linspace(1, 10, 10, dtype=int)
X, Y = np.meshgrid(x, x)
Z = np.sqrt(X**2 + Y**2)
if col == 0:
pnum = 1
else:
pnum = 2
elif row == 1:
x = np.linspace(1, 10, 10, dtype=int)
X, Y = np.meshgrid(x, x)
Z = -np.sqrt(X**2 + Y**2)
if col == 0:
pnum = 3
else:
pnum = 4
print("\nPNUM: {}, Zmin = {}, Zmax = {}\n".format(pnum, np.min(Z), np.max(Z)))
return X, Y, Z, pnum
fig = plt.figure()
nrows, ncols = 2, 2
zz = []
axes = []
for row in range(nrows):
for col in range(ncols):
X, Y, Z, pnum = get_data(row, col)
ax = fig.add_subplot(nrows, ncols, pnum, projection='3d')
ax.set_title('row = {}, col = {}'.format(row, col))
fhandle = ax.plot_surface(X, Y, Z, cmap=cmap)
zz.append(Z)
axes.append(ax)
## get full range of Z data as flat list for top and bottom rows
zz_top = zz[0].reshape(-1).tolist() + zz[1].reshape(-1).tolist()
zz_btm = zz[2].reshape(-1).tolist() + zz[3].reshape(-1).tolist()
## get top and bottom axes
ax_top = [axes[0], axes[1]]
ax_btm = [axes[2], axes[3]]
## normalize colors to minimum and maximum values of dataset
norm_top = matplotlib.colors.Normalize(vmin=min(zz_top), vmax=max(zz_top))
norm_btm = matplotlib.colors.Normalize(vmin=min(zz_btm), vmax=max(zz_btm))
cmap = cm.get_cmap(cmap, ncontours) # number of colors on colorbar
mtop = cm.ScalarMappable(cmap=cmap, norm=norm_top)
mbtm = cm.ScalarMappable(cmap=cmap, norm=norm_btm)
for m in (mtop, mbtm):
m.set_array([])
# ## create cax to draw colorbar in
# cax_top = fig.add_axes([0.9, 0.55, 0.05, 0.4])
# cax_btm = fig.add_axes([0.9, 0.05, 0.05, 0.4])
cbar_top = fig.colorbar(mtop, ax=ax_top, orientation='vertical', shrink=0.75, pad=0.2) #, cax=cax_top)
cbar_top.set_ticks(np.linspace(min(zz_top), max(zz_top), ncontours))
cbar_btm = fig.colorbar(mbtm, ax=ax_btm, orientation='vertical', shrink=0.75, pad=0.2) #, cax=cax_btm)
cbar_btm.set_ticks(np.linspace(min(zz_btm), max(zz_btm), ncontours))
plt.show()
plt.close(fig)
## orientation of colorbar = 'horizontal' if done by column
This topic is well covered but I still would like to propose another approach in a slightly different philosophy.
It is a bit more complex to set-up but it allow (in my opinion) a bit more flexibility. For example, one can play with the respective ratios of each subplots / colorbar:
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import numpy as np
from matplotlib.gridspec import GridSpec
# Define number of rows and columns you want in your figure
nrow = 2
ncol = 3
# Make a new figure
fig = plt.figure(constrained_layout=True)
# Design your figure properties
widths = [3,4,5,1]
gs = GridSpec(nrow, ncol + 1, figure=fig, width_ratios=widths)
# Fill your figure with desired plots
axes = []
for i in range(nrow):
for j in range(ncol):
axes.append(fig.add_subplot(gs[i, j]))
im = axes[-1].pcolormesh(np.random.random((10,10)))
# Shared colorbar
axes.append(fig.add_subplot(gs[:, ncol]))
fig.colorbar(im, cax=axes[-1])
plt.show()
The answers above are great, but most of them use the fig.colobar() method applied to a fig object. This example shows how to use the plt.colobar() function, applied directly to pyplot:
def shared_colorbar_example():
fig, axs = plt.subplots(nrows=3, ncols=3)
for ax in axs.flat:
plt.sca(ax)
color = np.random.random((10))
plt.scatter(range(10), range(10), c=color, cmap='viridis', vmin=0, vmax=1)
plt.colorbar(ax=axs.ravel().tolist(), shrink=0.6)
plt.show()
shared_colorbar_example()
Since most answers above demonstrated usage on 2D matrices, I went with a simple scatter plot. The shrink keyword is optional and resizes the colorbar.
If vmin and vmax are not specified this approach will automatically analyze all of the subplots for the minimum and maximum value to be used on the colorbar. The above approaches when using fig.colorbar(im) scan only the image passed as argument for min and max values of the colorbar.
Result:
I am trying to fix how python plots my data.
Say:
x = [0,5,9,10,15]
y = [0,1,2,3,4]
matplotlib.pyplot.plot(x,y)
matplotlib.pyplot.show()
The x axis' ticks are plotted in intervals of 5. Is there a way to make it show intervals of 1?
You could explicitly set where you want to tick marks with plt.xticks:
plt.xticks(np.arange(min(x), max(x)+1, 1.0))
For example,
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
x = [0,5,9,10,15]
y = [0,1,2,3,4]
plt.plot(x,y)
plt.xticks(np.arange(min(x), max(x)+1, 1.0))
plt.show()
(np.arange was used rather than Python's range function just in case min(x) and max(x) are floats instead of ints.)
The plt.plot (or ax.plot) function will automatically set default x and y limits. If you wish to keep those limits, and just change the stepsize of the tick marks, then you could use ax.get_xlim() to discover what limits Matplotlib has already set.
start, end = ax.get_xlim()
ax.xaxis.set_ticks(np.arange(start, end, stepsize))
The default tick formatter should do a decent job rounding the tick values to a sensible number of significant digits. However, if you wish to have more control over the format, you can define your own formatter. For example,
ax.xaxis.set_major_formatter(ticker.FormatStrFormatter('%0.1f'))
Here's a runnable example:
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import matplotlib.ticker as ticker
x = [0,5,9,10,15]
y = [0,1,2,3,4]
fig, ax = plt.subplots()
ax.plot(x,y)
start, end = ax.get_xlim()
ax.xaxis.set_ticks(np.arange(start, end, 0.712123))
ax.xaxis.set_major_formatter(ticker.FormatStrFormatter('%0.1f'))
plt.show()
Another approach is to set the axis locator:
import matplotlib.ticker as plticker
loc = plticker.MultipleLocator(base=1.0) # this locator puts ticks at regular intervals
ax.xaxis.set_major_locator(loc)
There are several different types of locator depending upon your needs.
Here is a full example:
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import matplotlib.ticker as plticker
x = [0,5,9,10,15]
y = [0,1,2,3,4]
fig, ax = plt.subplots()
ax.plot(x,y)
loc = plticker.MultipleLocator(base=1.0) # this locator puts ticks at regular intervals
ax.xaxis.set_major_locator(loc)
plt.show()
I like this solution (from the Matplotlib Plotting Cookbook):
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import matplotlib.ticker as ticker
x = [0,5,9,10,15]
y = [0,1,2,3,4]
tick_spacing = 1
fig, ax = plt.subplots(1,1)
ax.plot(x,y)
ax.xaxis.set_major_locator(ticker.MultipleLocator(tick_spacing))
plt.show()
This solution give you explicit control of the tick spacing via the number given to ticker.MultipleLocater(), allows automatic limit determination, and is easy to read later.
In case anyone is interested in a general one-liner, simply get the current ticks and use it to set the new ticks by sampling every other tick.
ax.set_xticks(ax.get_xticks()[::2])
if you just want to set the spacing a simple one liner with minimal boilerplate:
plt.gca().xaxis.set_major_locator(plt.MultipleLocator(1))
also works easily for minor ticks:
plt.gca().xaxis.set_minor_locator(plt.MultipleLocator(1))
a bit of a mouthfull, but pretty compact
This is a bit hacky, but by far the cleanest/easiest to understand example that I've found to do this. It's from an answer on SO here:
Cleanest way to hide every nth tick label in matplotlib colorbar?
for label in ax.get_xticklabels()[::2]:
label.set_visible(False)
Then you can loop over the labels setting them to visible or not depending on the density you want.
edit: note that sometimes matplotlib sets labels == '', so it might look like a label is not present, when in fact it is and just isn't displaying anything. To make sure you're looping through actual visible labels, you could try:
visible_labels = [lab for lab in ax.get_xticklabels() if lab.get_visible() is True and lab.get_text() != '']
plt.setp(visible_labels[::2], visible=False)
This is an old topic, but I stumble over this every now and then and made this function. It's very convenient:
import matplotlib.pyplot as pp
import numpy as np
def resadjust(ax, xres=None, yres=None):
"""
Send in an axis and I fix the resolution as desired.
"""
if xres:
start, stop = ax.get_xlim()
ticks = np.arange(start, stop + xres, xres)
ax.set_xticks(ticks)
if yres:
start, stop = ax.get_ylim()
ticks = np.arange(start, stop + yres, yres)
ax.set_yticks(ticks)
One caveat of controlling the ticks like this is that one does no longer enjoy the interactive automagic updating of max scale after an added line. Then do
gca().set_ylim(top=new_top) # for example
and run the resadjust function again.
I developed an inelegant solution. Consider that we have the X axis and also a list of labels for each point in X.
Example:
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
x = [0,1,2,3,4,5]
y = [10,20,15,18,7,19]
xlabels = ['jan','feb','mar','apr','may','jun']
Let's say that I want to show ticks labels only for 'feb' and 'jun'
xlabelsnew = []
for i in xlabels:
if i not in ['feb','jun']:
i = ' '
xlabelsnew.append(i)
else:
xlabelsnew.append(i)
Good, now we have a fake list of labels. First, we plotted the original version.
plt.plot(x,y)
plt.xticks(range(0,len(x)),xlabels,rotation=45)
plt.show()
Now, the modified version.
plt.plot(x,y)
plt.xticks(range(0,len(x)),xlabelsnew,rotation=45)
plt.show()
Pure Python Implementation
Below's a pure python implementation of the desired functionality that handles any numeric series (int or float) with positive, negative, or mixed values and allows for the user to specify the desired step size:
import math
def computeTicks (x, step = 5):
"""
Computes domain with given step encompassing series x
# params
x - Required - A list-like object of integers or floats
step - Optional - Tick frequency
"""
xMax, xMin = math.ceil(max(x)), math.floor(min(x))
dMax, dMin = xMax + abs((xMax % step) - step) + (step if (xMax % step != 0) else 0), xMin - abs((xMin % step))
return range(dMin, dMax, step)
Sample Output
# Negative to Positive
series = [-2, 18, 24, 29, 43]
print(list(computeTicks(series)))
[-5, 0, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45]
# Negative to 0
series = [-30, -14, -10, -9, -3, 0]
print(list(computeTicks(series)))
[-30, -25, -20, -15, -10, -5, 0]
# 0 to Positive
series = [19, 23, 24, 27]
print(list(computeTicks(series)))
[15, 20, 25, 30]
# Floats
series = [1.8, 12.0, 21.2]
print(list(computeTicks(series)))
[0, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25]
# Step – 100
series = [118.3, 293.2, 768.1]
print(list(computeTicks(series, step = 100)))
[100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600, 700, 800]
Sample Usage
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
x = [0,5,9,10,15]
y = [0,1,2,3,4]
plt.plot(x,y)
plt.xticks(computeTicks(x))
plt.show()
Notice the x-axis has integer values all evenly spaced by 5, whereas the y-axis has a different interval (the matplotlib default behavior, because the ticks weren't specified).
Generalisable one liner, with only Numpy imported:
ax.set_xticks(np.arange(min(x),max(x),1))
Set in the context of the question:
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
fig, ax = plt.subplots()
x = [0,5,9,10,15]
y = [0,1,2,3,4]
ax.plot(x,y)
ax.set_xticks(np.arange(min(x),max(x),1))
plt.show()
How it works:
fig, ax = plt.subplots() gives the ax object which contains the axes.
np.arange(min(x),max(x),1) gives an array of interval 1 from the min of x to the max of x. This is the new x ticks that we want.
ax.set_xticks() changes the ticks on the ax object.
xmarks=[i for i in range(1,length+1,1)]
plt.xticks(xmarks)
This worked for me
if you want ticks between [1,5] (1 and 5 inclusive) then replace
length = 5
Since None of the above solutions worked for my usecase, here I provide a solution using None (pun!) which can be adapted to a wide variety of scenarios.
Here is a sample piece of code that produces cluttered ticks on both X and Y axes.
# Note the super cluttered ticks on both X and Y axis.
# inputs
x = np.arange(1, 101)
y = x * np.log(x)
fig = plt.figure() # create figure
ax = fig.add_subplot(111)
ax.plot(x, y)
ax.set_xticks(x) # set xtick values
ax.set_yticks(y) # set ytick values
plt.show()
Now, we clean up the clutter with a new plot that shows only a sparse set of values on both x and y axes as ticks.
# inputs
x = np.arange(1, 101)
y = x * np.log(x)
fig = plt.figure() # create figure
ax = fig.add_subplot(111)
ax.plot(x, y)
ax.set_xticks(x)
ax.set_yticks(y)
# which values need to be shown?
# here, we show every third value from `x` and `y`
show_every = 3
sparse_xticks = [None] * x.shape[0]
sparse_xticks[::show_every] = x[::show_every]
sparse_yticks = [None] * y.shape[0]
sparse_yticks[::show_every] = y[::show_every]
ax.set_xticklabels(sparse_xticks, fontsize=6) # set sparse xtick values
ax.set_yticklabels(sparse_yticks, fontsize=6) # set sparse ytick values
plt.show()
Depending on the usecase, one can adapt the above code simply by changing show_every and using that for sampling tick values for X or Y or both the axes.
If this stepsize based solution doesn't fit, then one can also populate the values of sparse_xticks or sparse_yticks at irregular intervals, if that is what is desired.
You can loop through labels and show or hide those you want:
for i, label in enumerate(ax.get_xticklabels()):
if i % interval != 0:
label.set_visible(False)
I am trying to make a bunch of polar view plots using the same colorbar. However, the colorbars differ after setting the plotting limits. In the code snippet below, I randomly created 5 maps but plotted in a fixed range, but the output figures are still different in colorbar.
from numpy import linspace, pi, ndarray, random
import matplotlib
matplotlib.use('Agg')
from matplotlib.pyplot import figure
lon = linspace(start=0, stop=2*pi, num=100)
colat = linspace(start=0, stop=9, num=10)
emission = ndarray(shape=(10, 100, 5), dtype=float)
for t in range(5):
emission[:, :, t] = random.rand(10, 100)
fig = figure(num='emission', figsize=(15, 15))
em_pos = [0.05, 0.1, 0.8, 0.8]
emc_pos = [0.9, 0.1, 0.05, 0.8]
for t in range(5):
fig.clear()
ax = fig.add_subplot(121, polar=True, position=em_pos)
axcont = ax.contourf(lon, colat, emission[:, :, t], vmin=0, vmax=2)
axc = fig.add_subplot(122, position=emc_pos)
fig.colorbar(mappable=axcont, cax=axc)
fig.savefig(fname='emission{0:d}.png'.format(t), format='png')
The problem seems to be solved. It is not a problem of colorbar, but a problem of contourf. When I replaced
ax.contourf(lon, colat, emission[:, :, t], vmin=0, vmax=2)
with
ax.pcolormesh(lon, colat, emission[:, :, t], vmin=0, vmax=2)
Then the colorbar shows the proper range. Indeed it is not a full solution, pcolormesh differs in some aspects from contourf, but it meets my needs.