Hello !
I know there already are a lot of topics about URL rewritting and I honestly swear I've spent a lot of time trying to apply them to my problem but I can't see any of them perfectly applying to my situation (if you find otherwise, please give the link).
-----
Here's the problem :
I'm learning MVC model and URL rewriting and I have my URL like this :
http://localhost/blahblahblah/mywebsite/index.php?param1=value1¶m2=value2¶m3=value3 ... etc ...
What I want (for some MVC template goals) is to have this kind of URL :
http://localhost/blahblahblah/mywebsite/value1/value2/value3 ... etc ...
-----
Whatever are the names of the parameters and whatever are the values.
This is the most essential thing I can't find a solution for.
(Also don't mind the localhost blahblahblah, this has to work even on distant websites but I trust it will work fine on online website has this part of URL may have no importance in what I want to do)
Thanks a lot for your time if you can help me seeing clearer in what I need to do.
If the .htaccess file is located in the document root (ie. effectively at http://localhost/.htaccess) then you would need to do something like the following using mod_rewrite:
RewriteEngine On
RewriteRule ^(blahblahblah/mywebsite)/(\w+)$ $1/index.php?param1=$2 [L]
RewriteRule ^(blahblahblah/mywebsite)/(\w+)/(\w+)$ $1/index.php?param1=$2¶m2=$3 [L]
RewriteRule ^(blahblahblah/mywebsite)/(\w+)/(\w+)/(\w+)$ $1/index.php?param1=$2¶m2=$3¶m3=$4 [L]
# etc.
Where $n is a backreference to the corresponding captured group in the preceding RewriteRule pattern (1st argument).
UDPATE: \w is a shorthand character class that matches a-z, A-Z, 0-9 and _ (underscore).
A new directive is required for every number of parameters. You could combine them into a single (complex) directive but you would have lots of empty parameters when only a few parameters were passed (rather than not passing those parameters at all).
I'm assuming your URLs do not end in a trailing slash.
If, however, the .htaccess file is located in the /blahblahblah/mywebsite directory then then directives could be simplified a bit:
RewriteRule ^(\w+)$ index.php?param1=$1 [L]
RewriteRule ^(\w+)/(\w+)$ index.php?param1=$1¶m2=$2 [L]
RewriteRule ^(\w+)/([\w]+)/([\w]+)$ index.php?param1=$1¶m2=$2¶m3=$3 [L]
# etc.
Don't use URL parameters (alternative method)
An alternative approach is to not convert the path segments into URL parameters in .htaccess and instead just pass everything to index.php and let your PHP script split the URL into parameters. This allows for any number of parameters.
For example, your .htaccess file then becomes rather more simple:
RewriteRule ^\w+(/\w+)*$ index.php [L]
(This assumes the .htaccess file is located in /blahblahblah/mywebsite directory, otherwise you need to add the necessary directory prefix as above.)
The RewriteRule pattern simply validates the request URL is of the form /value1 or /value1/value2 or /value1/value2/value3 etc. And the request is rewritten to index.php (the front-controller) to handle everything.
In index.php you then examine $_SERVER['REQUEST_URI'] and parse the requested URL.
Related
I have below Rewrite rule in .htaccess:
# /m/yyy rule
RewriteRule ^m/([\w-]+)/?$ accounts/$1/index.php [L,NC]
# /m/yyy/abc rule
RewriteRule ^m/([\w-]+)/([\w-]+)$ accounts/$1/$2.php [L,NC]
# /m/yyy/abc/ rule
RewriteRule ^m/([\w-]+)/([\w-]+)/$ accounts/$1/$2/index.php [L,NC]
I want to execute the PHP script view.php if the URL is https://example.com/m/mya/view.php, I expect accounts/mya/view.php to be executed.
Please advise how I can do.
I assume your existing rules are being used for other purposes, since none of them will match the stated URL.
To internally rewrite the request /m/mya/view.php to /accounts/mya/view.php (as stated) then you would add the following before (or after) your existing rules:
RewriteRule ^m/(mya/view\.php)$ accounts/$1 [L]
To make this more generic and rewrite the request /m/<file> to /accounts/<file>, but only if /accounts/<file> exists then you can do something like the following instead before (or after) your existing rules:
RewriteCond %{DOCUMENT_ROOT}/accounts/$1 -f
RewriteRule ^m/([\w/-]+\.\w{2,5})$ accounts/$1 [L]
UPDATE: The regex part \.\w{2,5} matches, what looks-like, a file extension. ie. a dot followed by between 2 and 5 word characters. If you are only matching .php files then you can change this to \.php to hardcode the .php extension. Use a regex testing tool such as regex101.com to test this and get a detailed explanation of the regex (this is not unique to Apache - Apache uses the same regex engine as PHP and other languages, ie. PCRE).
The preceding RewriteCond (condition) directive then checks that this file exists at the intended destination before actually rewriting the request. Without this, the request is rewritten unconditionally, regardless of whether the target file exists or not. eg. /m/abc/xyz/does-not-exist.php would be internally rewritten to /accounts/abc/xyz/does-not-exist.php which then triggers a 404 later (potentially exposing the accounts subdirectory - depending on how you are handling your 404s).
The order of these rules in relation to your existing rules as posted does not matter since the regex (RewriteRule patterns) do not conflict when making a request for a file (that contains a dot before the file extension).
I'm trying to rewrite the below URL but the URLs just don't change, no errors.
Current URL:
https://example.com/test/news/?c=value1&s=value2&id=9876
Expected URL:
https://example.com/test/news/value1/value2
My .htaccess
RewriteEngine On
RewriteRule ^test/news/([^/]*)/([^/]*)$ /test/news/?c=$1&s=$2&id=1 [L]
but I've seen many articles where a url such as example.com/display_article.php?articleId=my-article can be rewritten as example.com/articles/my-article for example with .htaccess
But the important point here (that I think you are missing) is that the URL must already have been changed internally in your application - in all your internal links. It is a common misconception that .htaccess alone can be used to change the format of the URL. Whilst .htaccess is an important part of this, it is only part of it.
Yes, you can implement a redirect in .htaccess to redirect from the old to new URL - and this is essential to preserve SEO (see below), but it is not critical to your application working. If you don't first change the URL in your internal links then:
The "old" URL is still exposed in the HTML source. When a user hovers over or copies the link, they are seeing and copying the "old" URL.
Every time a user clicks one of your internal links they are externally redirected to the "new" URL. This is slow for your users, bad for SEO (you should never link to a URL that is redirected) and bad for your server, as it potentially doubles the number of requests hitting your server (OK, 301s are cached locally).
To quote from #IMSoP's answer to this reference question on the subject:
Rewrite rules don't make ugly URLs pretty, they make pretty URLs ugly
So, once you have changed your internal links to the "new" (expected) format, eg. /test/news/value1/value2 (or should that be /test/news/value1/value2/id or even /test/news/id/value1/value2? See below), then you can do as follows...
RewriteRule ^test/news/([^/]*)/([^/]*)$ /test/news/?c=$1&s=$2&id=1 [L]
This internally rewrites a request from /test/news/<value1>/<value2> to /test/news/?c=<value1>&s=<value2>&id=1. However, there are a couple of issues with this:
/test/news/ is not itself a valid endpoint. This requires further rewriting. Perhaps you are serving a DirectoryIndex document (eg. index.php)? This might appear seamless to you, but this requires an additional internal subrequest and makes the rule dependent on other elements of the config. You should rewrite directly to the file that handles the request. eg. /test/news/index.php?c=<value1>&s=<value2>&id=1 (remember, this is entirely hidden from the user).
You are hardcoding the id=1 parameter? Should every URL have the same id? Or should this be passed in the "new" URL (which is what I would expect)? What does the id represent? If this is critical to the routing of the URL then the id should appear earlier in the URL-path, in case the URL gets accidentally truncated when copy/pasted/shared.
If the id is required then it needs to be passed in the "new" URL. We only have the "new" URL to route the request, so the information can't be hidden.
So, if the "new" URL is now /test/news/<id>/<value1>/<value2> then the rewrite would need to be like this instead:
# Rewrite new URLs to old/actual URL
# "/test/news/<id>/<value1>/<value2>" to "/test/news/?c=<value1>&s=<value2>&id=<id>"
RewriteRule ^test/news/(\d+)/([^/]+)/([^/]+)$ /test/news/?c=$2&s=$3&id=$1 [L]
Then (optionally*1) you can implement an external redirect in order to preserve SEO. This is for search engines that have indexed the "old" URLs or third party inbound links that cannot be updated - these need to be corrected to inform search engines of the change and get the user on the "new" canonical URL having followed an out-of-date inbound link.
(*1 It's not "optional" if you are changing an existing URL, but optional with regards to your application being functional.)
This "redirect" goes before the above rewrite:
# Redirect old URLs to the new "canonical" URL
# "/test/news/?c=<value1>&s=<value2>&id=<id>" to "/test/news/<id>/<value1>/<value2>"
RewriteCond %{ENV:REDIRECT_STATUS} ^$
RewriteCond %{QUERY_STRING} ^c=([^&]+)&s=([^&]+)&id=(\d+)
RewriteRule ^test/news/$ /$0%3/%1/%2 [QSD,R=301,L]
The $0 backreference contains the full match from the RewriteRule pattern, ie. test/news/ in this case - this simply saves repetition.
The %1, %2 and %3 backreferences contain the values captured from the preceding condition. ie. the values of the c, s and id URL parameters respectively.
Note that the URL parameters / path segments should not be optional as in your original directive (ie. ([^/]*)). If they are optional and they are omitted, then the resulting URL becomes ambiguous. eg. <value2> becomes <value1> if <value1> is omitted.
Note that the URL parameters must be in the order as stated. If you have a mismatch of "old" URLs with these params in a different order (or even intermixed with other params) then this can be accounted for with additional complexity. (It may be easier to perform this redirect in your server-side script, instead of .htaccess.)
The first condition that checks against the REDIRECT_STATUS environment variable ensures that we only redirect direct requests and not rewritten requests by the later rewrite (which would otherwise result in a redirect loop). An alternative on Apache 2.4 is to use the END flag on the RewriteRule instead.
The QSD flag (Apache 2.4) discards the original query string from the request.
You should test first with a 302 (temporary) redirect to avoid potential caching issues and only change to a 301 (permanent) redirect once you have tested that everything works as intended. 301s are cached persistently by the browser so can make testing problematic.
Summary
Your complete .htaccess file should look something like this:
Options -MultiViews +FollowSymLinks
# If relying on the DirectoryIndex to handle the request
DirectoryIndex index.php
RewriteEngine On
# Redirect old URLs to the new "canonical" URL
# "/test/news/?c=<value1>&s=<value2>&id=<id>" to "/test/news/<id>/<value1>/<value2>"
RewriteCond %{ENV:REDIRECT_STATUS} ^$
RewriteCond %{QUERY_STRING} ^c=([^&]+)&s=([^&]+)&id=(\d+)
RewriteRule ^test/news/$ /$0%3/%1/%2 [QSD,R=301,L]
# Rewrite new URLs to old/actual URL
# "/test/news/<id>/<value1>/<value2>" to "/test/news/?c=<value1>&s=<value2>&id=<id>"
RewriteRule ^test/news/(\d+)/([^/]+)/([^/]+)$ /test/news/?c=$2&s=$3&id=$1 [L]
i am making a website. where i have a php script that takes care of serving the page based on what parameters it gets through a get request.
If someone types in http://test.com/blog it should be redirected to a php file, and it does. if someone types in http://test.com/blog/test it should be redirected to the same file with the parameter test. This does also work.
The thing i canĀ“t figure out is, if someone types in http://test.com/blog/test/something/something_else it should be redirected to the script with test/something/something_else as a parameter. But it does only produce a 404 error.
Here is my htacces file:
RewriteEngine on
RewriteRule ^blog/?$ /home/blog/index.php [NC,L]
RewriteRule ^blog/([A-Za-z0-9-]+)/?$ /home/blog/index.php?params=$1 [NC,L]
You have not included the forward slash (/) in the regex group.
Change ([A-Za-z0-9-]+) to ([A-Za-z0-9-/]+) or, better yet, ([\w-/]+). \w means 'match one or more alphanumeric character'.
I'm having some difficulty with a super simple htaccess redirect.
All I want to do is rewrite absolutely everything, except a couple files.
htaccess looks like this:
RewriteEngine On
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !sitemap
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !robots
RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://example.com/$1 [L,R=301]
The part that works is that everything gets redirected to new domain as it should be. And I can also access robots.txt without being forwarded, but not with sitemap.xml. If I try to go to sitemap.xml, the domain forwards along anyway and opens the sitemap file on the new domain.
I have this exact same issue when trying to "ignore" index.html. I can ignore robots, I can ignore alternate html or php files, but if I want to ignore index.html, the regex fails.
Since I can't actually SEE what is in the REQUEST_URI variable, my guess is that somehow index.html and sitemap.xml are some kind of "special" files that don't end up in REQUEST_URI? I know this because of a stupid test. If I choose to ignore index.html like this:
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !index.html
Then if I type example.com/index.html I will be forwarded. But if I just type example.com/ the ignore actually works and it shows the content of index.html without forwarding!
How is it that when I choose to ignore the regex "index.html", it only works when "index.html" is not actually typed in the address bar!?!
And it gets even weirder! Should I type something like example.com/index.html?option=value, then the ignore rule works and I do NOT get forwarded when there are attributes like this. But index.html by itself doesn't work, and then just having the slash root, the rule works again.
I'm completely confused! Why does it seem like REQUEST_URI is not able to see some filenames like index.html and sitemap.xml? I've been Googling for 2 days and not only can I not find out if this is true, but I can't seem to find any websites which actually give examples of what these htaccess server variables actually contain!
Thanks!
my guess is that somehow index.html and sitemap.xml are some kind of "special" files that don't end up in REQUEST_URI?
This is not true. There is no such special treatment of any requested URL. The REQUEST_URI server variable contains the URL-path (only) of the request. This notably excludes the scheme + hostname and any query string (which are available in their own variables).
However, if there are any other mod_rewrite directives that precede this (including the server config) that rewrite the URL then the REQUEST_URI server variable is also updated to reflect the rewritten URL.
index.html (Directory Index)
index.html is possibly a special case. Although, if you are explicitly requesting index.html as part of the URL itself (as you appear to be doing) then this does not apply.
If, on the other hand, you are requesting a directory, eg. http://example.com/subdir/ and relying on mod_dir issuing an internal subrequest for the directory index (ie. index.html), then the REQUEST_URI variable may or may not contain index.html - depending on the version of Apache (2.2 vs 2.4) you are on. On Apache 2.2 mod_dir executes first, so you would need to check for /subdir/index.html. However, on Apache 2.4, mod_rewrite executes first, so you simply check for the requested URL: /subdir/. It's safer to check for both, particularly if you have other rewrites and there is possibility of a second pass through the rewrite engine.
Caching problems
However, the most probable cause in this scenario is simply a caching issue. If the 301 redirect has previously been in place without these exceptions then it's possible these redirections have been cached by the browser. 301 (permanent) redirects are cached persistently by the browser and can cause issues with testing (as well as your users that also have these redirects cached - there is little you can do about that unfortunately).
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !(sitemap|index|alternate|alt) [NC]
RewriteRule .* alternate.html [R,L]
The example you presented in comments further suggests a caching issue, since you are now getting different results for sitemap than those posted in your question. (It appears to be working as intended in your second example).
Examining Apache server variables
#zzzaaabbb mentioned one method to examine the value of the Apache server variable. (Note that the Apache server variable REQUEST_URI is different to the PHP variable of the same name.) You can also assign the value of an Apache server variable to an environment variable, which is then readable in your application code.
For example:
RewriteRule ^ - [E=APACHE_REQUEST_URI:%{REQUEST_URI}]
You can then examine the value of the APACHE_REQUEST_URI environment variable in your server-side code. Note that if you have any other rewrites that result in the rewritting process to start over then you could get multiple env vars, each prefixed with REDIRECT_.
With the index.html problem, you probably just need to escape the dot (index\.html). You are in the regex pattern-matching area on the right-hand side of RewriteCond. With the un-escaped dot in there, there would need to be a character at that spot in the request, to match, and there isn't, so you're not matching and are getting the unwanted forward.
For the sitemap not matching problem, you could check to see what REQUEST_URI actually contains, by just creating an empty dummy file (to avoid 404 throwing) and then do a redirect at top of .htaccess. Then, in browser URL, type in anything you want to see the REQUEST_URI for -- it will show in address bar.
RewriteCond %{QUERY_STRING} ^$
RewriteRule ^ /test.php?var=%{REQUEST_URI} [NE,R,L]
Credit MrWhite with that easy test method.
Hopefully that will show that sitemap in URL ends up as something else, so will at least partially explain why it's not pattern-matching and preventing redirect, when it should be pattern-matching and preventing redirect.
I would also test by being sure that the server isn't stepping in front of things with custom 301 directive that for whatever reason makes sitemap behave unexpectedly. Put this at the top of your .htaccess for that test.
ErrorDocument 301 default
I have been developing a shop, which uses mod_rewrite to allow us to make the URIs more readable, for instance:
http://www.example.com/shop/Tools
Will be rewritten to
http://www.example.com/index.php?area=shop&folder=Tools
My rewrite rule is as follows:
RewriteRule ^shop/([^?#]+) index.php?area=shop&folder=$1 [NC,QSA,L]
However, this breaks when the folder name ends in . (dot), as I discovered when testing with a folder name ending in "etc."
It seems any trailing dots are totally removed before $_GET has been populated. If I put another character after the dot, it's fine, if the URI ends in any number of dots, they are removed
Is there a way to stop this from happening?
You don't need to exclude "?" and "#" in RewriteRule since it operates only on URI (path), without query-string or anchor.
So, this is enough:
RewriteRule ^shop/(.+) index.php?area=shop&folder=$1 [NC,QSA,L]
That being said, this does not change the fact that dots get stripped.
This may be a result of MultiViews being on. This option makes Apache try and resolve the URIs disregarding extensions.
So, add this as well:
Options -Multiviews