Downloaded the AHK-StudioMaster.zip from Github
AHK-Studio directory-- https://ibb.co/r4QK2x2
Stuck at this download screen -- https://ibb.co/M5nLptC
using Win 7 64bit.
AHK version 1.1.33.09
You need to let the main AutoHotkey executable (or AHK-Studio.exe if it's compiled) through your firewall so that it can update and download its dependencies. It does this on every startup, but you can disable it by creating an empty file called NoUpdate.txt in AHK-Studio's directory (where AHK-Studio.ahk is located)—but you'll probably want to let it update at least once after a fresh install, or else the themes and languages won't be set correctly and you might not be able to see/read it.
Try this link: https://github.com/maestrith/AHK-Studio/archive/master.zip
This link works for me, the other one may be down atm
Since this only happens with Windows 7 fresh installs (or without security updates).
Here's how to fix:
Install 2019 security updates
Some other updates provided by ProtonVPN (while installing it will automatically install required updates)
These 5 updates in order.
After installing these three, AHK-Studio can now access internet connection and complete downloading process.
Mission accomplished!
Related
I have come across this particular problem several times across several versions of the IAR embedded workbench (EW430 5.40.7 [EW 6.0], EW430 5.51.2 [EW 6.4], EW430 6.20.1 [EW 7.0]), but each time only after a long period of having no problems. The problem doesn't seem to have affected the other firmware developers in the office, so no help can be offered there. I'm currently on Windows 10, but the problems first occurred when I was on Windows 8.1 (same PC.)
The problem is that, for no obvious trigger, the IAR ide will start to hang until terminated (or it will just crash on one of the EW versions) on any attempt to change the active build configuration in MSP430 projects using the emulator.
From my testing, it appears to be directly related to something the IDE is doing with the emulator, as when the build configuration is changed, I can see the emulator menu in the menu bar disappear, then the hang happens. Under normal circumstances, the menu will disappear, but then reappear once the other debug configuration is completely loaded.
I have tried the default project "flashing the LED" to see if it was only my project - but if I select the msp430x4xx (C) - Debug, right click it and select "Set as Active" from the context menu, to make this the active project, the IDE also hung. I then reopened the EW IDE, and opened the LED flashing project again. The original 1xx asm project was the active project.
I then changed the settings of the 4xx (C) Debug project (without making it the active project) from the emulator to the simulator, and clicked OK. The program did NOT crash.
I then set the 4xx (C) Debug project as the active project and it did NOT crash. The simulator even runs without problems.
The version of the FET firmware didn't change from when the IDE worked correctly to when it didn't, and the FET is not even used at this point. It can be completely disconnected and the same results will occur.
I have tried the following, without success:
erasing the files in my project folder's settings subfolder
erasing the *.dep files in the project folder.
deleting the IarIdePm.ini file from AppData\Roaming\IAR Embedded Workbench
making sure none of the project files are read-only
reinstalling the program to the same location
removing and reinstalling the program to the same location.
What does solve the problem (until it reoccurs) is to reinstall the program, but to a different directory (for e.g., the default directory will be in program files (x86)\IAR Systems\Embedded Workbench x.x. Installing again into program files (x86)\IAR Systems\EWx (just so it is different) allowed that installation to work, but the old installation continued to fail.
Best advice so far (from our support person) has been to do the above, install to another directory and live with it, as it doesn't happen often.
Since it has happened to me on 3 occasions with 3 different versions of the program, I would like to know how to fix or prevent it! If anyone could offer anything to try (or even better, a straight solution :)) that would be greatly appreciated!
Cheers!
Since newer versions and updates on W10, it seems that old compatibilities are being removed from this OS. I have no direct solution for this problem since Microsoft does not promise support for old software and hardware. Even I tried to find a solution for that problem, and I found on the IAR website a list of IDE's and their compatible versions. (remember, old versions are not compatible)
( https://www.iar.com/knowledge/support/technical-notes/ide/windows-10-and-iar-embedded-workbench/ )
You will need to update your IDE and program version to a newer version if you plan to continue to use this IDE natively on Windows 10 or you may use Virtual machines with an old operational system (like Windows 7) to compile your program on old IDE.
P.S.1 I manually uninstalled KB4592449 recently updated and the program return to work natively. Probably it will continue working until this update (or other similar) being installed again on the computer, but probably there is any vulnerability that the computer will be exposed to, and in this case, I'm paying the price.
P.S.2 KB4580325 promotes the same behavior in IAR 5.11 on windows 10. Both KB's implement securities about the flash player - that I Don't use - then, I can securely uninstall it.
P.S.3 Since I updated my windows up to Windows 10 version 21H1 (compilation 19043.1165) AND I configured Windows defender to not be monitoring IAR IDE (IarIdePM.exe) disabling all protections available, everything works fine. But Remember: my program is original, not cracked or altered by anything, then I am secure to do what I did.
It is a 'natural' that software problem. Not found way of fixing it. The solution temporary is modify manually the file .eww for change of project active. The ultimate solution is to use another development environment.
I have a .nsi file I use to create my installation exe. I had given my file the follow execution level in the past (and it worked successfully):
RequestExecutionLevel user
This was so that it could be installed as a local user version or by admin on all accounts.
I was recently releasing another file with the same layout (i.e. copy files to install folder/create start menu short cut/HKCU register for install) it now requires RequestExecutionLevel to be set to admin or highest. When I checked with my other installer I found this was the case there as well now.
Why does my installer NOW require a higher execution level?
Has a recent windows update changed the RequestExecutionLevel required?
The RequestExecutionLevel NSIS attribute just sets the RequestedExecutionLevel node in the manifest and should work exactly the same in 7, 8 and 10 so there must be something else going on.
Have you tried watching the installer with Process Monitor to verify that you are writing to the correct location?
Problem
I want to both use stable versions of KRE and the bleeding edge nightly built KRE. One ASP.NET5 application may be beta2, but another I may want to be beta4. So what I did was install both in powershell as found here.
What happened is that the stable KVM installed in C:/Users/derp/.kre and the nightly build KVM installed in C:/Users/derp/.k
Worse yet, I can only see this now
Attempts
I tried kvm install KRE-CLR-x86.1.0.0-beta2 and it failed
Shall I try moving the packages from /kre file to the /.k file? This seems hacky and like a really bad idea
RTFM - Tried to use the install feature and including the -a, but failed.
I'm doing something the hard way and can't see the obvious.
I search on here
I feel if there is an answer to what I am trying to do above, it is worth being on here for others to find as well. Thank you all for your patience.
ASP.NET 5 is under development and there is no guarantee that changes between different pre-release version are backward compatible (sorry!).
The /.kre -> ./k rename is not backward compatible and you cannot have both the old and the new kvm simultaneously on the PATH. However, you can get can have two versions of kvm on your machine but you will have to use the full path for at least one of them.
I think the key is the path environment variable of your system. You have to use two set of "kvm", one for night builds, one for public beta, to download and set correct path environment variable.
For instance, I get one kvm from Entity Framework 7 repository, which can download and use beta 4 builds. I also have another kvm from Home repository which can download and use public beta builds.
You can use either kvm with "upgrade" or "use" command to set correct path environment variable, then run your application on the runtime you need. I think even Visual Studio 2015 CTP runs your projects based on the Runtime specified in your path environment variable. For the time being, only beta 3 run times can display in the project property dialog of VS 2015 CTP, but when hitting ctrl + F5, my website starts to load beta 4 runtime and assemblies, I can see the loading in output window, I think this is because I have .k folder prior to the .kre folder in the path environment variable.
Can you try the following?
$cmd-prompt>kpm Install KRE-CLR-x86
It worked for me.
I downloaded the community edition of IntelliJ as ideaIC-14.0.2.exe.
I ran ideaIC-14.0.2.exe with evelated rights on a Windows 7 64 laptop with the 32 bit version of Java 6 installed.
I notice that two copies of ideaIC-14.0.2.exe appears in task explorer when none were previously present.
Both tasks go away without the setup wizard ever appearing5. I saw nothing related in the Event log.
Do you know how I might be able to overcome this issue and install this app?
Disabling the Firewall was previously suggested and tried.Usually, I run every setup program with elevated rights. I was told that I never need Admin rights to install. This time, I added myself to the Admin user group (which you would think shouldn't be possible!) and then ran setup after once again disabling my firewall. And this time, it worked! I suppose it's possible that I did not disable all of the firewall options last time, but I believe I did. If so, elevated rights must have been insufficient. I forgot to try unchecking the Unblock property on the file-that was a good suggestion, though.
Just getting ready to upgrade from 5.1 to 6.3. We have never performed an upgrade before.
About the upgrade path: When installing the updates, do I need to install the hotfixes, or just the major releases? (My gut says only major releases).
I found the documentation here:
http://www.sitefinity.com/documentation/documentationarticles/upgrading-you-sitefinity-5.1-project-to-the-latest-version
Is this documentation enough to make a smooth upgrade?
Yeah, just follow the documentation in the link you posted.
My process is to take full backups of the site files and database then perform the upgrade locally. Do the first step in the upgrade path then run through the site to test, back end and front end, then run the next step in the upgrade, and so on. I suppose if you want to be extra careful you could take additional backups between each upgrade step but that's probably overkill.
When making the web.config changes, there is an option to have Project Manager merge them for you but I end up just using Beyond Compare to compare the _EmptyProject folder in the extracted Project Manger files to my local files and do the web.config changes through a file compare. It cuts down on the differences in files from upgrade to upgrade and shows you whats been changed. The _EmptyProject folder is essentially the vanilla Sitefinty site files for that version.
Once the site is fully upgraded locally, I just publish the site in Visual Studio, copy the files over to the live site and overwrite the live database with a backup of my locally upgraded database.
Hope that helps.
I have upgraded Sitefinity 5.1 to 6.0, on a website which is in production (which included going through a couple of steps for the versions between).
I just followed the guidelines, and it went fine.
Now there are a couple of things you need to be aware of :
Source control
If your Sitefinity solution is on "Source Control", you should create a new duplicate of your solution, and disconnect this one(newly created) from "Source Control" before starting the upgrade. And of course you do the upgrade on the solution which is not in Source Control. Because you will probably have a lot of dll's to integrate, and if you have the project manager, your sitefinity project will run correctly, even though the new dll's aren't properly integrated in your solution and possibly "source control".
Unexpected behaviours of previously working elements
Secondly, I didn't test the frontend and backend during the different steps (Sitefinity versions within upgrade), but I tested everything once my solution had reached the last Sitefinity version. I thought I had checked everything, but it wasn't the case, and some of my custom Widgets didn't work properly on the latest version of Sitefinity. Next time I'll go more in detail on all custom parts, since from a working version of Sitefinity, you can end up with a newer version that breaks some behaviours. If you notice this, you might better wait a bit more for a fix, or the next release which might fix the problems.
Outside access to website during upgrade.
Furthermore, once you need to do the upgrade on the production database/website, the website shouldn't be accessed by people, since the upgrade of database might take some time.
Time needed for upgrading everything
One more thing I would like to add, it takes time to perform upgrade of several versions.
The first time I upgraded (I needed to go through 2 versions), and having to upgrade locally, to a development database, deploy the website on developement environment, then make it again on test. I took about 4 hours before everything was fully working. Make sure you have enough time, because it can be more tricky if you need to stop everything then come back to it.