Range of testing accuracy is large in CNN - tensorflow

I have trained my dataset's accuracy above 0.8.
But testing data's accuracy sometimes can be 0.7, and sometimes just 0.2.
(My training dataset and testing dataset are the same.)
What's wrong with my CNN model?
Thank you.
This is my training model.
inputs = tf.keras.layers.Input(shape=(64,64,3))
conv_layer1 = Conv2D(32,(3,3),padding='same')(inputs)
LR1 = LeakyReLU(alpha=0.3)(conv_layer1)
conv_layer2 = Conv2D(32,(3,3),padding='same')(LR1)
LR2 = LeakyReLU(alpha=0.3)(conv_layer2)
max_layer1 = MaxPooling2D(pool_size=(2,2))(LR2)
conv_layer3 = Conv2D(64,(3,3),padding='same')(max_layer1)
LR3 = LeakyReLU(alpha=0.3)(conv_layer3)
conv_layer4 = Conv2D(64,(3,3),padding='same')(LR3)
LR4 = LeakyReLU(alpha=0.3)(conv_layer4)
max_layer2 = MaxPooling2D(pool_size=(2,2))(LR4)
conv_layer5 = Conv2D(128,(3,3),padding='same',activation='relu')(max_layer2)
max_layer3 = MaxPooling2D(pool_size=(2,2))(conv_layer5)
conv_layer6 = Conv2D(256,(3,3),padding='same',activation='relu')(max_layer3)
max_layer4 = MaxPooling2D(pool_size=(2,2))(conv_layer6)
flatten = Flatten()(max_layer4)
dence2 = Dense(64,activation='relu')(flatten)
f1 = Dense(11, activation='softmax', name='prediction_one')(dence2)
f2 = Dense(11, activation='softmax', name='prediction_two')(dence2)
f3 = Dense(11, activation='softmax', name='prediction_third')(dence2)
model2 = Model(outputs=[f1,f2,f3], inputs=inputs)
model2.summary()
model2.compile(loss=['categorical_crossentropy','categorical_crossentropy','categorical_crossentropy'],optimizer='adam',metrics=['accuracy'])
history = model2.fit(X_train,[co1_train,co2_train,co3_train],64,epochs=10,validation_data=(X_valid,[co1_valid,co2_valid,co3_valid]))

Related

TensorFlow get stuck after use concatenate layer

I have the next model:
import tensorflow as tf
input1 = tf.keras.layers.Input(shape = (10, 300, 1))
input2 = tf.keras.layers.Input(shape = (24, ))
x = tf.keras.layers.Conv2D(64, (3,3), activation='relu')(input1)
x = tf.keras.layers.MaxPooling2D(2,2)(x)
x = tf.keras.layers.Dropout(0.25)(x)
x = tf.keras.layers.Conv2D(128, (2,2), activation='relu')(x)
x = tf.keras.layers.MaxPooling2D(2,2)(x)
x = tf.keras.layers.Dropout(0.25)(x)
x = tf.keras.layers.Flatten()(x)
x = tf.keras.layers.Dense(512, activation = 'relu')(x)
x = tf.keras.layers.Dropout(0.25)(x)
x = tf.keras.layers.Concatenate()([x, input2])
x = tf.keras.layers.Dense(128, activation = 'relu')(x)
x = tf.keras.layers.Dropout(0.25)(x)
output = tf.keras.layers.Dense(1, activation='sigmoid')(x)
model = tf.keras.models.Model(inputs = [input1,input2], outputs = output)
model.summary()
model.compile(optimizer = 'rmsprop',
loss ='binary_crossentropy',
metrics = ['acc'])
history = model.fit([X_train, X_features], y_train,
batch_size=64,
epochs=100)
But when I try to fit it, get stuck and only appears Epoch 1/100 and nothing more happens even if i let it run for hours. But when I remove the concatenate layer, everything go well. I'm using Google colab. Why is this happening?

Add extra kernel to a CNN layer while maintaining the weights learned for the other kernels

I'm training a simple feed forward conv neural network on the cifar10 dataset. After running a few epochs, I want to increase the kernel count in the 2nd conv layer from 16 to some number k.
How do I do this while keeping the trained weights for the other kernels and layers in the model intact?
def conv_layer(inp, fltrs):
inp = Conv2D(filters = fltrs, kernel_size = 3, strides = 1, padding = 'valid')(inp)
inp = BatchNormalization()(inp)
inp = Dropout(0.25)(inp)
inp = Activation('relu')(inp)
return inp
inp = Input(shape = (32, 32, 3))
x0 = conv_layer(inp, 8)
x1 = conv_layer(x0, 16)
x2 = MaxPooling2D(pool_size= 2, strides=None, padding='valid', data_format=None)(x1)
x3 = conv_layer(x2, 32)
x4 = conv_layer(x3, 48)
x5 = conv_layer(x4, 64)
x6 = MaxPooling2D(pool_size= 2, strides=None, padding='valid', data_format=None)(x5)
x7 = Flatten()(x6)
x8 = Dense(512)(x7)
x9 = BatchNormalization()(x8)
x10 = Dropout(0.25)(x9)
x11 = Activation('relu')(x10)
x12 = Dense(num_classes, activation='softmax')(x11)
model = Model(inputs = [inp], outputs = [x12])

How to avoid dying weights/gradients in custom LSTM cell in tensorflow. What shall be ideal loss function?

I am trying to train a name generation LSTM network. I am not using pre-defined tensorflow cells (like tf.contrib.rnn.BasicLSTMCell, etc). I have created LSTM cell myself. But the error is not reducing beyond a limit. It only decreases 30% from what it is initially (when random weights were used in forward propagation) and then it starts increasing. Also, the gradients and weights become very small after few thousand training steps.
I think the reason for non-convergence can be one of two:
1. The design of tensorflow graph i have created OR
2. The loss function i used.
I am feeding one hot vectors of each character of the word for each time-step of the network. The code i have used for graph generation and loss function is as follows. Tx is the number of time steps in RNN, n_x,n_a,n_y are length of the input vectors, LSTM cell vector and output vector respectively.
Will be great if someone can help me in identifying what i am doing wrong here.
n_x = vocab_size
n_y = vocab_size
n_a = 100
Tx = 50
Ty = Tx
with open("trainingnames_file.txt") as f:
examples = f.readlines()
examples = [x.lower().strip() for x in examples]
X0 = [[char_to_ix[x1] for x1 in list(x)] for x in examples]
X1 = np.array([np.concatenate([np.array(x), np.zeros([Tx-len(x)])]) for x in X0], dtype=np.int32).T
Y0 = [(x[1:] + [char_to_ix["\n"]]) for x in X0]
Y1 = np.array([np.concatenate([np.array(y), np.zeros([Ty-len(y)])]) for y in Y0], dtype=np.int32).T
m = len(X0)
Wf = tf.get_variable(name="Wf", shape = [n_a,(n_a+n_x)])
Wu = tf.get_variable(name="Wu", shape = [n_a,(n_a+n_x)])
Wc = tf.get_variable(name="Wc", shape = [n_a,(n_a+n_x)])
Wo = tf.get_variable(name="Wo", shape = [n_a,(n_a+n_x)])
Wy = tf.get_variable(name="Wy", shape = [n_y,n_a])
bf = tf.get_variable(name="bf", shape = [n_a,1])
bu = tf.get_variable(name="bu", shape = [n_a,1])
bc = tf.get_variable(name="bc", shape = [n_a,1])
bo = tf.get_variable(name="bo", shape = [n_a,1])
by = tf.get_variable(name="by", shape = [n_y,1])
X_input = tf.placeholder(dtype = tf.int32, shape = [Tx,None])
Y_input = tf.placeholder(dtype = tf.int32, shape = [Ty,None])
X = tf.one_hot(X_input, axis = 0, depth = n_x)
Y = tf.one_hot(Y_input, axis = 0, depth = n_y)
X.shape
a_prev = tf.zeros(shape = [n_a,m])
c_prev = tf.zeros(shape = [n_a,m])
a_all = []
c_all = []
for i in range(Tx):
ac = tf.concat([a_prev,tf.squeeze(tf.slice(input_=X,begin=[0,i,0],size=[n_x,1,m]))], axis=0)
ct = tf.tanh(tf.matmul(Wc,ac) + bc)
tug = tf.sigmoid(tf.matmul(Wu,ac) + bu)
tfg = tf.sigmoid(tf.matmul(Wf,ac) + bf)
tog = tf.sigmoid(tf.matmul(Wo,ac) + bo)
c = tf.multiply(tug,ct) + tf.multiply(tfg,c_prev)
a = tf.multiply(tog,tf.tanh(c))
y = tf.nn.softmax(tf.matmul(Wy,a) + by, axis = 0)
a_all.append(a)
c_all.append(c)
a_prev = a
c_prev = c
y_ex = tf.expand_dims(y,axis=1)
if i == 0:
y_all = y_ex
else:
y_all = tf.concat([y_all,y_ex], axis=1)
loss = tf.reduce_mean(tf.nn.softmax_cross_entropy_with_logits_v2(labels=Y,logits=y_all,dim=0))
opt = tf.train.AdamOptimizer()
train = opt.minimize(loss)
init = tf.global_variables_initializer()
with tf.Session() as sess:
sess.run(init)
o = sess.run(loss, feed_dict = {X_input:X1,Y_input:Y1})
print(o.shape)
print(o)
sess.run(train, feed_dict = {X_input:X1,Y_input:Y1})
o = sess.run(loss, feed_dict = {X_input:X1,Y_input:Y1})
print(o)

How to deal with many columns in Tensorflow

I am studying Tensorflow, and I have a question.
Original code is that
Columns = ['size' , 'room', 'price']
x1 = tf.Variable(np.array(columns['size']).astype(np.float32))
x2 = tf.Variable(np.array(columns['room']).astype(np.float32))
y = tf.Variable(np.array(columns['price']).astype(np.float32))enter code here
train_X1 = np.asarray([i[1] for i in data.loc[:,['size']].to_records()],dtype="float")
train_X2 = np.asarray([i[1] for i in data.loc[:,['room']].to_records()],dtype="float")
train_X = np.asarray([i[1] for i in data.loc[:,'size':'room'].to_records()],dtype="float")
train_Y = np.asarray([i[1] for i in data.loc[:,['price']].to_records()],dtype="float")
n_samples = train_X.shape[0]
X1 = tf.placeholder("float")
X2 = tf.placeholder("float")
Y = tf.placeholder("float")
W1 = tf.Variable(rng.randn(), name="weight1")
W2 = tf.Variable(rng.randn(), name="weight2")
b = tf.Variable(rng.randn(), name="bias")
sum_list = [tf.multiply(X1,W1),tf.multiply(X2,W2)]
pred_X = tf.add_n(sum_list)
pred = tf.add(pred_X,b)
cost = tf.reduce_sum(tf.pow(pred-Y, 2))/(2*n_samples)
If I have many columns like that
Columns = ['price','lotsize','bedrooms','bathrms', 'stories', 'garagepl', 'driveway', 'recroom', \
'fullbase', 'gashw', 'airco', 'prefarea']
How do i deal with many columns in Tensorflow?
(Independent variable = 'price', dependent variable = else)
Do I have to make each train_set and W with columns?

MNIST Classification: low accuracy (10%) and no change in loss

I'm learning TensorFlow and tired to apply on mnist database.
My question is (see attached image) :
what could cause such output for accuracy (improving and then degrading!) & Loss (almost constant!)
the accuracy isn't that great just hovering around 10%
Despite:
5 layer network (incl. output layer), with 200/10/60/30/10 neurons respectively
Is the network not learning ? despite 0.1 learning rate (which is quite high I believe)
Full code: https://github.com/vibhorj/tf > mnist-2.py
1) here's how the layers are defined:
K,L,M,N=200,100,60,30
""" Layer 1 """
with tf.name_scope('L1'):
w1 = tf.Variable(initial_value = tf.truncated_normal([28*28,K],mean=0,stddev=0.1), name = 'w1')
b1 = tf.Variable(initial_value = tf.truncated_normal([K],mean=0,stddev=0.1), name = 'b1')
""" Layer 2 """
with tf.name_scope('L2'):
w2 = tf.Variable(initial_value =tf.truncated_normal([K,L],mean=0,stddev=0.1), name = 'w2')
b2 = tf.Variable(initial_value = tf.truncated_normal([L],mean=0,stddev=0.1), name = 'b2')
""" Layer 3 """
with tf.name_scope('L3'):
w3 = tf.Variable(initial_value = tf.truncated_normal([L,M],mean=0,stddev=0.1), name = 'w3')
b3 = tf.Variable(initial_value = tf.truncated_normal([M],mean=0,stddev=0.1), name = 'b3')
""" Layer 4 """
with tf.name_scope('L4'):
w4 = tf.Variable(initial_value = tf.truncated_normal([M,N],mean=0,stddev=0.1), name = 'w4')
b4 = tf.Variable(initial_value = tf.truncated_normal([N],mean=0,stddev=0.1), name = 'b4')
""" Layer output """
with tf.name_scope('L_out'):
w_out = tf.Variable(initial_value = tf.truncated_normal([N,10],mean=0,stddev=0.1), name = 'w_out')
b_out = tf.Variable(initial_value = tf.truncated_normal([10],mean=0,stddev=0.1), name = 'b_out')
2) loss function
Y1 = tf.nn.sigmoid(tf.add(tf.matmul(X,w1),b1), name='Y1')
Y2 = tf.nn.sigmoid(tf.add(tf.matmul(Y1,w2),b2), name='Y2')
Y3 = tf.nn.sigmoid(tf.add(tf.matmul(Y2,w3),b3), name='Y3')
Y4 = tf.nn.sigmoid(tf.add(tf.matmul(Y3,w4),b4), name='Y4')
Y_pred_logits = tf.add(tf.matmul(Y4, w_out),b_out,name='logits')
Y_pred_prob = tf.nn.softmax(Y_pred_logits, name='probs')
error = -tf.matmul(Y
, tf.reshape(tf.log(Y_pred_prob),[10,-1]), name ='err')
loss = tf.reduce_mean(error, name = 'loss')
3) optimization function
opt = tf.train.GradientDescentOptimizer(0.1)
grads_and_vars = opt.compute_gradients(loss)
ctr = tf.Variable(0.0, name='ctr')
z = opt.apply_gradients(grads_and_vars, global_step=ctr)
4) Tensorboard code:
evt_file = tf.summary.FileWriter('/Users/vibhorj/python/-tf/g_mnist')
evt_file.add_graph(tf.get_default_graph())
s1 = tf.summary.scalar(name='accuracy', tensor=accuracy)
s2 = tf.summary.scalar(name='loss', tensor=loss)
m1 = tf.summary.merge([s1,s2])
5) run the session (test data is mnist.test.images & mnist.test.labels
with tf.Session() as sess:
sess.run(tf.variables_initializer(tf.global_variables()))
for i in range(300):
""" calc. accuracy on test data - TENSORBOARD before iteration beings """
summary = sess.run(m1, feed_dict=test_data)
evt_file.add_summary(summary, sess.run(ctr))
evt_file.flush()
""" fetch train data """
a_train, b_train = mnist.train.next_batch(batch_size=100)
train_data = {X: a_train , Y: b_train}
""" train """
sess.run(z, feed_dict = train_data)
Appreciate your time to provide any insight into it. I'm completely clueless hwo to proceed further (even tried initializing w & b with random_normal, played with learning rates [0.1,0.01, 0.001])
Cheers!
Please consider
Initializing biases to zeros
Using ReLU units instead of sigmoid - avoid saturation
Using Adam optimizer - faster learning
I feel that your network is quite large. You could do with a smaller network.
K,L,M,N=200,100,60,30
""" Layer 1 """
with tf.name_scope('L1'):
w1 = tf.Variable(initial_value = tf.truncated_normal([28*28,K],mean=0,stddev=0.1), name = 'w1')
b1 = tf.zeros([K])#tf.Variable(initial_value = tf.truncated_normal([K],mean=0,stddev=0.01), name = 'b1')
""" Layer 2 """
with tf.name_scope('L2'):
w2 = tf.Variable(initial_value =tf.truncated_normal([K,L],mean=0,stddev=0.1), name = 'w2')
b2 = tf.zeros([L])#tf.Variable(initial_value = tf.truncated_normal([L],mean=0,stddev=0.01), name = 'b2')
""" Layer 3 """
with tf.name_scope('L3'):
w3 = tf.Variable(initial_value = tf.truncated_normal([L,M],mean=0,stddev=0.1), name = 'w3')
b3 = tf.zeros([M]) #tf.Variable(initial_value = tf.truncated_normal([M],mean=0,stddev=0.01), name = 'b3')
""" Layer 4 """
with tf.name_scope('L4'):
w4 = tf.Variable(initial_value = tf.truncated_normal([M,N],mean=0,stddev=0.1), name = 'w4')
b4 = tf.zeros([N])#tf.Variable(initial_value = tf.truncated_normal([N],mean=0,stddev=0.1), name = 'b4')
""" Layer output """
with tf.name_scope('L_out'):
w_out = tf.Variable(initial_value = tf.truncated_normal([N,10],mean=0,stddev=0.1), name = 'w_out')
b_out = tf.zeros([10])#tf.Variable(initial_value = tf.truncated_normal([10],mean=0,stddev=0.1), name = 'b_out')
Y1 = tf.nn.relu(tf.add(tf.matmul(X,w1),b1), name='Y1')
Y2 = tf.nn.relu(tf.add(tf.matmul(Y1,w2),b2), name='Y2')
Y3 = tf.nn.relu(tf.add(tf.matmul(Y2,w3),b3), name='Y3')
Y4 = tf.nn.relu(tf.add(tf.matmul(Y3,w4),b4), name='Y4')
Y_pred_logits = tf.add(tf.matmul(Y4, w_out),b_out,name='logits')
loss = tf.reduce_mean(tf.nn.softmax_cross_entropy_with_logits(labels=Y, logits=Y_pred_logits, name='xentropy'))
opt = tf.train.GradientDescentOptimizer(0.01)
grads_and_vars = opt.compute_gradients(loss)
ctr = tf.Variable(0.0, name='ctr', trainable=False)
train_op = opt.minimize(loss, global_step=ctr)
for v in tf.trainable_variables():
print v.op.name
with tf.Session() as sess:
sess.run(tf.variables_initializer(tf.global_variables()))
for i in range(3000):
""" calc. accuracy on test data - TENSORBOARD before iteration beings """
#summary = sess.run(m1, feed_dict=test_data)
#evt_file.add_summary(summary, sess.run(ctr))
#evt_file.flush()
""" fetch train data """
a_train, b_train = mnist.train.next_batch(batch_size=100)
train_data = {X: a_train , Y: b_train}
""" train """
l = sess.run(loss, feed_dict = train_data)
print l
sess.run(train_op, feed_dict = train_data)