I am working on implementing a face detection model on the wider face dataset. I learned it was built into Tensorflow datasets and I am using it.
However, I am facing an issue while batching the data. Since, an Image can have multiple faces, therefore the number of bounding boxes output are different for each Image. For example, an Image with 2 faces will have 2 bounding box, whereas one with 4 will have 4 and so on.
But the problem is, these unequal number of bounding boxes is causing each of the Dataset object tensors to be of different shapes. And in TensorFlow afaik we cannot batch tensors of unequal shapes ( source - Tensorflow Datasets: Make batches with different shaped data). So I am unable to batch the dataset.
So after loading the following code and batching -
ds,info = tfds.load('wider_face', split='train', shuffle_files=True, with_info= True)
ds1 = ds.batch(12)
for step, (x,y,z) in enumerate(ds1) :
print(step)
break
I am getting this kind of error on run Link to Error Image
In general any help on how can I batch the Tensorflow object detection datasets will be very helpfull.
It might be a bit late but I thought I should post this anyways. The padded_batch feature ought to do the trick here. It kind of goes around the issue by matching dimension via padding zeros
ds,info = tfds.load('wider_face', split='train', shuffle_files=True, with_info= True)
ds1 = ds.padded_batch(12)
for step, (x,y,z) in enumerate(ds1) :
print(step)
break
Another solution would be to process not use batch and process with custom buffers with for loops but that kind of defeats the purpose. Just for posterity I'll add the sample code here as an example of a simple workaround.
ds,info = tfds.load('wider_face', split='train', shuffle_files=True, with_info= True)
batch_size = 12
image_annotations_pair = [x['image'], x['faces']['bbox'] for n, x in enumerate(ds) if n < batch_size]
Then use a train_step modified for this.
For details one may refer to - https://www.kite.com/python/docs/tensorflow.contrib.autograph.operators.control_flow.dataset_ops.DatasetV2.padded_batch
Related
I am so confused as to why it's been so hard for me to find the answer to this. I want to be able to shuffle a dataset one time. After shuffling, I then split the dataset into train/val/test splits. I can't find a way to do this without the train/val/test data being all reshuffled together anytime I iterate over the split datasets.
I guess because the train/val/test dataset are all pointing to locations in a dataset which is being shuffled each time.
Here's an example of my code that is trying to do this.
dataset = tf.data.Dataset.from_tensor_slices((x, y))
dataset = dataset.shuffle(buffer_size=len(x))
train, val, test = split_tf_dataset(dataset, len(x), test_pct=0.1, val_pct=0.1)
train, val, test = train.batch(batch_size=50, drop_remainder=True), val.batch(batch_size=50, drop_remainder=True), test.batch(batch_size=50, drop_remainder=True)
'split_tf_dataset' is just performing take and skip operations, no randomness added there.
My workaround so far has been to shuffle the data before I create the Dataset, but does Dataset have this functionality that I'm missing? The option 'reshuffle_each_iteration' doesn't seem to do anything in this case.
I would expect setting reshuffle_each_iteration to False to fix this problem, however it seems to have no effect. I've also tried calling Dataset.sample_from_datasets, however with one dataset it only
bounces your input back to you, doing nothing.
This is the numpy code that does what I'm expecting tensorflow should be able to do:
x = x[np.random.choice(np.arange(0, len(x)), size=len(x))]
I've downloaded and installed the Tensorflow Object Detection API and downloaded one of the EfficientDet models. As I want to do some work on the raw scores directly before Non-Max Suppression reduces it to class output, my first goal was to try and get the same final outputs from the raw scores, using the downloaded model config as a guide.
post_processing {
batch_non_max_suppression {
score_threshold: 9.99999993922529e-09
iou_threshold: 0.5
max_detections_per_class: 100
max_total_detections: 100
}
score_converter: SIGMOID
As the Object Detection API has no score converter method under postprocessing, I'm not sure what this does, but the only batch NMS method in utils seems to be batch_multiclass_non_max_suppression.
So, having fed an image into the network and got an output detections, to try and replicate its results:
result = post_processing.batch_multiclass_non_max_suppression(tf.expand_dims(detections['raw_detection_boxes'], 2), detections['raw_detection_scores'], 9.99999993922529e-09, 0.5, 100, max_total_size=100)
detections['detection_boxes'] = result[0]
detections['detection_scores'] = result[1]
detections['detection_classes'] = result[2]
i.e., substitute the relevant scores in the detections with the output of NMS, and insert the dimension needed for the batch function to work. This is then visualised following per the TensorFlow Hub colab.
The problem is that whilst the input image (this from the MSCOCO dataset) should produce this:
It instead produces this:
The bounding boxes are all (seemingly) shifted upwards and the categories are simply off, which suggests there's more processing being done between the raw scores, NMS, and output, but it's entirely unclear what. The scores are correct, so it appears to be pruning correctly.
Edit: I suspect, after looking at the SSD model template, that the problem with the misaligned bounding boxes is because I'm not passing the resized image dimensions along to NMS, which is generated by the preprocessing step, which should be easy enough to address via generating the image resize function. However, after applying the slice operation to remove a background class doesn't address the incorrect labels:
Instead, it seems to have lost the person class entirely--this makes sense; it isn't configured to include a background class of any sort and if Person (id 1) is instead coming out as index 0, then this would cut them off.
EDIT 2: I looked at the original meta-architecture further and copied the image-resizing function, i.e.:
from object_detection.protos import image_resizer_pb2
from object_detection.utils import config_util as c
from object_detection.utils import shape_utils
config = c.get_configs_from_pipeline_file(r"C:\Users\Person\.keras\datasets\efficientdet_d7_coco17_tpu-32\pipeline.config")
image_config = c.get_image_resizer_config(config['model'])
resize = image_resizer_builder.build(image_config)
def compute_clip_window(preprocessed_images, true_image_shapes):
# identical to the meta-arch definition
# image resizing
im = tf.cast(input_tensor, tf.float32)
channel_offset = [0.485, 0.456, 0.406]
channel_scale = [0.229, 0.224, 0.225]
im = ((im / 255.0) - [[channel_offset]]) / [[channel_scale]]
resized = shape_utils.resize_images_and_return_shapes(im, resize)
clip = compute_clip_window(resized[0], resized[1])
Therefore allowing the clip argument to be supplied to NMS. However, this doesn't change anything, and it still returns the same mis-aligned boxes as the second image. This is incredibly confusing, as this seems like it should replicate everything the model needs in both the preprocessing and postprocessing steps to generate its own output: the image is normalized and resized; the true image size is retained alongside the resized image; no further processing of the raw boxes or raw scores happens before they get passed to the NMS (the returned versions of the raw values are identical to the values passed to NMS except with one dimension and the model itself doesn't interfere with the post-processing at all--and the call signature calls preprocessing, prediction, and postprocessing in turn, so nothing else should be happening in the interim.
Edit 3: I added another line was added (to no effect)--setting the multiclass scores in the NMS additional fields to the detection scores with backgrounds (i.e., the raw scores). By adding +1 to all the label classes, I got the following image:
Whilst this is correct, this only corrects for the earlier parts of the dataset, i.e. where the only empty class is the 0th. It still appears that there must be some mapping step I'm not following, alongside whatever is causing the image misalignment.
The easiest solution in my case was to load the model from the checkpoint and configs, rather than use the saved model directly, in order to access the original preprocess, predict, and postprocess methods, rather than having a single function call.
Problem
I'm working on training and deploying an instance segmentation model using TF's object detection API. I'm able to successfully train the model, package it into a TF Serving Docker image (latest tag as of Oct 2020), and process inference requests via the REST interface. However, the amount of data returned from an inference request is very large (hundreds of Mb). This is a big problem when the inference request and processing don't happen on the same machine because all that returned data has to go over the network.
Is there a way to trim down the number of outputs (either during model export or within the TF Serving image) so allow faster round trip times during inference?
Details
I'm using TF OD API (with TF2) to train a Mask RCNN model, which is a modified version of this config. I believe the full list of outputs is described in code here. The list of items I get during inference is also pasted below. For a model with 100 object proposals, that information is ~270 Mb if I just write the returned inference as json to disk.
inference_payload['outputs'].keys()
dict_keys(['detection_masks', 'rpn_features_to_crop', 'detection_anchor_indices', 'refined_box_encodings', 'final_anchors', 'mask_predictions', 'detection_classes', 'num_detections', 'rpn_box_predictor_features', 'class_predictions_with_background', 'proposal_boxes', 'raw_detection_boxes', 'rpn_box_encodings', 'box_classifier_features', 'raw_detection_scores', 'proposal_boxes_normalized', 'detection_multiclass_scores', 'anchors', 'num_proposals', 'detection_boxes', 'image_shape', 'rpn_objectness_predictions_with_background', 'detection_scores'])
I already encode the images within my inference requests as base64, so the request payload is not too large when going over the network. It's just that the inference response is gigantic in comparison. I only need 4 or 5 of the items out of this response, so it'd be great to exclude the rest and avoid passing such a large package of bits over the network.
Things I've tried
I've tried setting the score_threshold to a higher value during the export (code example here) to reduce the number of outputs. However, this seems to just threshold the detection_scores. All the extraneous inference information is still returned.
I also tried just manually excluding some of these inference outputs by adding the names of keys to remove here. That also didn't seem to have any effect, and I'm worried this is a bad idea because some of those keys might be needed during scoring/evaluation.
I also searched here and on tensorflow/models repo, but I wasn't able to find anything.
I was able to find a hacky workaround. In the export process (here), some of the components of the prediction dict are deleted. I added additional items to the non_tensor_predictions list, which contains all keys that will get removed during the postprocess step. Augmenting this list cut down my inference outputs from ~200MB to ~12MB.
Full code for the if self._number_of_stages == 3 block:
if self._number_of_stages == 3:
non_tensor_predictions = [
k for k, v in prediction_dict.items() if not isinstance(v, tf.Tensor)]
# Add additional keys to delete during postprocessing
non_tensor_predictions = non_tensor_predictions + ['raw_detection_scores', 'detection_multiclass_scores', 'anchors', 'rpn_objectness_predictions_with_background', 'detection_anchor_indices', 'refined_box_encodings', 'class_predictions_with_background', 'raw_detection_boxes', 'final_anchors', 'rpn_box_encodings', 'box_classifier_features']
for k in non_tensor_predictions:
tf.logging.info('Removing {0} from prediction_dict'.format(k))
prediction_dict.pop(k)
return prediction_dict
I think there's a more "proper" way to deal with this using signature definitions during the creation of the TF Serving image, but this worked for a quick and dirty fix.
I've ran into the same problem. In the exporter_main_v2 code there is stated that the outputs should be:
and the following output nodes returned by the model.postprocess(..):
* `num_detections`: Outputs float32 tensors of the form [batch]
that specifies the number of valid boxes per image in the batch.
* `detection_boxes`: Outputs float32 tensors of the form
[batch, num_boxes, 4] containing detected boxes.
* `detection_scores`: Outputs float32 tensors of the form
[batch, num_boxes] containing class scores for the detections.
* `detection_classes`: Outputs float32 tensors of the form
[batch, num_boxes] containing classes for the detections.
I've submitted an issue on the tensorflow object detection github repo, I hope we will get feedback from the tensorflow dev team.
The github issue can be found here
If you are using exporter_main_v2.py file to export your model, you can try this hack way to solve this problem.
Just add following codes in the function _run_inference_on_images of exporter_lib_v2.py file:
detections[classes_field] = (
tf.cast(detections[classes_field], tf.float32) + label_id_offset)
############# START ##########
ignored_model_output_names = ["raw_detection_boxes", "raw_detection_scores"]
for key in ignored_model_output_names:
if key in detections.keys(): del detections[key]
############# END ##########
for key, val in detections.items():
detections[key] = tf.cast(val, tf.float32)
Therefore, the generated model will not output the values of ignored_model_output_names.
Please let me know if this can solve your problem.
Another approach would be to alter the signatures of the saved model:
model = tf.saved_model.load(path.join("models", "efficientdet_d7_coco17_tpu-32", "saved_model"))
infer = model.signatures["serving_default"]
outputs = infer.structured_outputs
for o in ["raw_detection_boxes", "raw_detection_scores"]:
outputs.pop(o)
tf.saved_model.save(
model,
export_dir="export",
signatures={"serving_default" : infer},
options=None
)
I am wondering if YOLO (any version, specially the one with accuracy, not speed) can be trained on the text data. What I am trying to do is to find the Region in the text image where any equation is present.
For example, I want to find the 2 of the Gray regions of interest in this image so that I can outline and eventually, crop the equations separately.
I am asking this questions because :
First of all I have not found a place where the YOLO is used for text data.
Secondly, how can we customise for low resolution unlike the (416,416) as all the images are either cropped or horizontal mostly in (W=2H) format.
I have implemented the YOLO-V3 version for text data but using OpenCv which is basically for CPU. I want to train the model from scratch.
Please help. Any of the Keras, Tensorflow or PyTorch would do.
Here is the code I used for implementing in OpenCv.
net = cv2.dnn.readNet(PATH+"yolov3.weights", PATH+"yolov3.cfg") # build the model. NOTE: This will only use CPU
layer_names = net.getLayerNames() # get all the layer names from the network 254 layers in the network
output_layers = [layer_names[i[0] - 1] for i in net.getUnconnectedOutLayers()] # output layer is the
# 3 output layers in otal
blob = cv2.dnn.blobFromImage(image=img, scalefactor=0.00392, size=(416,416), mean=(0, 0, 0), swapRB=True,)
# output as numpy array of (1,3,416,416). If you need to change the shape, change it in the config file too
# swap BGR to RGB, scale it to a threshold, resize, subtract it from the mean of 0 for all the RGB values
net.setInput(blob)
outs = net.forward(output_layers) # list of 3 elements for each channel
class_ids = [] # id of classes
confidences = [] # to store all the confidence score of objects present in bounding boxes if 0, no object is present
boxes = [] # to store all the boxes
for out in outs: # get all channels one by one
for detection in out: # get detection one by one
scores = detection[5:] # prob of 80 elements if the object(s) is/are inside the box and if yes, with what prob
class_id = np.argmax(scores) # Which class is dominating inside the list
confidence = scores[class_id]
if confidence > 0.1: # consider only those boxes which have a prob of having an object > 0.55
# grid coordinates
center_x = int(detection[0] * width) # centre X of grid
center_y = int(detection[1] * height) # Center Y of grid
w = int(detection[2] * width) # width
h = int(detection[3] * height) # height
# Rectangle coordinates
x = int(center_x - w / 2)
y = int(center_y - h / 2)
boxes.append([x, y, w, h]) # get all the bounding boxes
confidences.append(float(confidence)) # get all the confidence score
class_ids.append(class_id) # get all the clas ids
Being an object detector Yolo can be used for specific text detection only, not for detecting any text that might be present in the image.
For example Yolo can be trained to do text based logo detection like this:
I want to find the 2 of the Gray regions of interest in this image so
that I can outline and eventually, crop the equations separately.
Your problem statement talks about detecting any equation (math formula) that's present in the image so it can't be done using Yolo alone. I think mathpix is similar to your use-case. They will be using OCR (Optical Character Recognition) system trained and fine tuned towards their use-case.
Eventually to do something like mathpix, OCR system customised for your use case is what you need. There won't be any ready ready made solution out there for this. You'll have to build one.
Proposed Methods:
Mathematical Formula Detection in Heterogeneous Document Images
A Simple Equation Region Detector for Printed Document Images in Tesseract
Note: Tesseract as it is can't be used because it is a pre-trained model trained for reading any character. You can refer 2nd paper to train tesseract towards fitting your use case.
To get some idea about OCR, you can read about it here.
EDIT:
So idea is to build your own OCR to detect something that constitutes equation/math formula rather than detecting every character. You need to have data set where equations are marked. Basically you look for region with math symbols(say summation, integration etc.).
Some Tutorials to train your own OCR:
Tesseract training guide
Creating OCR pipeline using CV and DL
Build OCR pipeline
Build Your OCR
Attention OCR
So idea is that you follow these tutorials to get to know how to train
and build your OCR for any use case and then you read research papers
I mentioned above and also some of the basic ideas I gave above to
build OCR towards your use case.
For example, the comments for the Tensorflow image captioning example model state:
NOTE: This script will consume around 100GB of disk space because each image
in the MSCOCO dataset is replicated ~5 times (once per caption) in the output.
This is done for two reasons:
1. In order to better shuffle the training data.
2. It makes it easier to perform asynchronous preprocessing of each image in
TensorFlow.
The primary goal of this question is to see if there is an alternative to this type of duplication. In my use case, storing the data in this way would require each image to be duplicated in the TFRecord files many more times, on the order of 20 - 50 times.
I should note first that I have already fed the images through VGGnet to extract 4096 dim features, and I have these stored as a mapping between filename and the vectors.
Before switching over to Tensorflow, I had been feeding batches containing filename strings and then looking up the corresponding vector on a per-batch basis. This allows me to store all of the image data in ~15GB without needing to duplicate the data on disk.
My first attempt to do this in in Tensorflow involved storing indices in the TFExample buffers and then doing a "preprocessing" step to slice into the corresponding matrix:
img_feat = pd.read_pickle("img_feats.pkl")
img_matrix = np.stack(img_feat)
preloaded_images = tf.Variable(img_matrix)
first_image = tf.slice(preloaded_images, [0,0], [1,4096])
However, in this case, Tensorflow disallows a variable larger than 2GB. So my next thought was to partition this across several variables:
img_tensors = []
for i in range(NUM_SPLITS):
with tf.Graph().as_default():
img_tensors.append(tf.Variable(img_matrices[i], name="preloaded_images_%i"%i))
first_image = tf.concat(1, [tf.slice(t, [0,0], [1,4096//NUM_SPLITS]) for t in img_tensors])
In this case, I'm forced to store each partition on a separate graph, because it seems any one graph cannot be this large either. However, now the concat fails because each tensor I am concatenating is on a separate graph.
Any advice on incorporating a large amount (~15GB) of preloaded into the Tensorflow graph.
Potentially related is this question; however in this case I'd like to override the decoding of the actual JPEG file with the preprocessed value in a tensor op.