Running below query and not getting the output. Can someone please tell whats wrong in it?
Select distinct (table.datex)
from table
where table.datex =
(
CASE when extract( day from sysdate) >=19
then last_day(add_months(sysdate, -1))
else last_day(add_months(sysdate, -2))
END
)
Sample data
Datex
ID
30-JUN-21
A
31-MAY-21
B
29-JUN-21
C
Expected result
Datex
30-JUN-21
When I am passing the value hard-coded(calculated by the case) to where clause it's working fine, but when I apply the case it's not working. No error. No output is coming.
Date or datetime?
Oracle's LAST_DAY doesn't do what the name suggests, and the docs (https://docs.oracle.com/en/database/oracle/oracle-database/21/sqlrf/LAST_DAY.html#GUID-296C7C02-7FB9-4AAC-8927-6A79320CE0C6) fail to explain that, too.
Unlike several other DBMS Oracle doesn't have a date type. It only has a datetime type and they even call that inappropriately DATE. This means that a "date" in Oracle always has a time part. A date with its time part set to 00:00:00 can be considered a day's midnight (i.e. the very beginning of the day) or the whole day.
The function SYSDATE gives us a date in the sense of the DATE datatype, not in the sense of a real day, i.e. it gives us the datetime of "now", e.g. 2021-07-20 14:38:00. ADD_MONTHS changes the month in that datetime (and sometimes the year and sometimes even the day), i.e. leaves the time part untouched. LAST_DAY, too, changes the date part to get to the last day of the month, but leaves the time part untouched.
Your CASE expression hence results in something like TIMESTAMP '2021-07-20 14:38:00' and not in DATE '2021-07-20' as one might expect.
You say that you tried your query with the date you computed wth your case expression, and it worked. Did you compute the resulting day in your head or with a query? If the latter: The tool you are using may be set to only display a datetime's date part and omit the time part. This would explain why you only saw 30-JUN-21 when checking the CASE expression.
Solution
Truncate the datetime down to a whole day
Select distinct datex
from mytable
where (extract(day from sysdate) >=19 and datex = trunc(last_day(add_months(sysdate, -1))))
or (extract(day from sysdate) < 19 and datex = trunc(last_day(add_months(sysdate, -2))))
It doesn't matter whether you apply TRUNC late as in my example or right away on SYSDATE (with TRUNC(SYSDATE)) by the way. The only aim is to get rid of the time part at some point in the expression.
Don't use case in where clauses. Boolean logic can handle that.
And take a look if it is really the condition you want
Select distinct datex
from your_table
where
(
extract(day from sysdate) >=19
and datex = last_day(add_months(sysdate,-1))
)
or
(
extract(day from sysdate) < 19
and datex = last_day(add_months(sysdate,-2))
)
Related
I always have an issue with date transformation. Can someone guide and help me understanding the date transformation.
I am using the below code in Oracle Fusion HCM Extract tool and I am getting the correct output
APPROVAL_STATUS_CD='APPROVED'
AND ABSENCE_STATUS_CD in ('SUBMITTED','ORA_WITHDRAWN')
and typetl.name != 'Banked Time - Disbursement'
and (TO_DATE(trunc(start_date) ,'YYYY-MM-DD')
>= TO_DATE((select trunc((sysdate),'month') as FirstDay from dual),'YYYY-MM-DD'))
but it is giving me data that has start_date as '4712-12-31' as well. I do not want this in my output. as soon as i add the below condition -
and (TO_DATE(trunc(start_date) ,'YYYY') != TO_DATE('YYYY','4712'))
I am not getting any output. How do I restrict the 4712 date in the start_Date column i.e. whichever data has 31-12-4712 in start_date should not come in output.
Assuming that there will be no higher values then you want:
AND start_date < DATE '4712-12-31'
Note: NEVER use TO_DATE on a value that is already a DATE data type.
Which would make your query:
WHERE APPROVAL_STATUS_CD='APPROVED'
AND ABSENCE_STATUS_CD in ('SUBMITTED','ORA_WITHDRAWN')
AND typetl.name != 'Banked Time - Disbursement'
AND start_date >= TRUNC(SYSDATE,'MM')
AND start_date < DATE '4712-12-31'
If you don't supply all the date elements then Oracle defaults to the first day of the current month; so TO_DATE('YYYY','4712') evaluates to 4712-04-01, not 4712-12-31 or 4712-01-01.
If you want a fixed date then it's easier to use a literal: DATE '4712-12-31', or possibly - given the range of valid dates Oracle allows - you really want DATE '-4712-01-01' (or DATE '-4712-12-31'). I'd check the full actual value you have in your data with TO_CHAR(start_date, 'SYYYY-MM-DD'). That will show you if it's BC/BCE (with a negative value) or AD/CE (with a positive value).
Also, do not use TO_DATE() for a value that is already a date; it might work, or it might do odd things. You don't need to do that. When you do TO_DATE(trunc(start_date) ,'YYYY-MM-DD') you're implicitly doing TO_DATE(TO_CHAR(trunc(start_date), <NLS_DATE_FORMAT>) ,'YYYY-MM-DD') - which relies on the current session's NLS settings. Even if it works today, for you, it will break one day someone else.
Just trunc(start_date) and `trunc(sysdate, 'month') is enough. Though there's no point truncating the start_date really - if the truncated value is after the start of the month, so is the original non-truncated value.
I need to analyze an SQL query (and construct its equivalent in MDX). I'm not familiar with SQL and can't access the database, so there are 5 simple things I can't figure out:
What does the part WHERE idate BETWEEN trunc(SYSDATE, 'iw')-7 AND trunc(SYSDATE, 'iw')-3 mean? Specifically:
What does subtracting 7 from trunc(SYSDATE, 'iw') do? Subtract 7 weeks or 7 days? I understand the trunc(...) expression is a value 0-53 corresponding to the week of the year, but it seems to clash with the label "previous week" and stated purpose of the query.
How does SQL compare dates? Are the values from trunc(...) evaluated as dates during comparison?
The query seems to group rows together if they happened in the same minute. However, the few rows of output I can see have 10-minute granularity (00:00, 00:10, 00:20, etc.) Is there something in the query that groups rows into 10 minute intervals, or is this a result of the input data?
Why are calls to substr() and to_char() and needed in the group by condition? What would happen if trunc(idate, 'HH24:MI') was used instead?
What does the pm do? There is also a cm that seems to have a similar function. Are these part of the temporary table names?
Finally, how do the hash marks (#) affect this query? I read it might be to signify temporary tables. If so, are these temporary tables created manually, or does something in the query cause them to be created?
For reference here is the query. (On a Oracle database, if it makes any difference.) Its purpose is to "analyze how firewall accept events are trending compared to last week":
SELECT 'Previous Week Average' AS term ,
Substr(To_char(idate, 'HH24:MI'), 0, 4)
|| '0' AS event_time ,
Round(Avg(tot_accept)) AS cnt
FROM (
SELECT *
FROM st_event_100_#yyyymm-1m#
WHERE idate BETWEEN trunc(SYSDATE, 'iw')-7 AND trunc(SYSDATE, 'iw')-3 #stat_monitor_group_query#
UNION ALL
SELECT *
FROM st_event_100_#yyyymm#
WHERE idate BETWEEN trunc(SYSDATE, 'iw')-7 AND trunc(SYSDATE, 'iw')-3 #stat_monitor_group_query# ) pm
GROUP BY substr(to_char(idate, 'HH24:MI'), 0, 4)
|| '0'
UNION ALL
SELECT 'Today' AS term ,
substr(to_char(idate, 'HH24:MI'), 0, 4)
|| '0' AS event_time ,
round(avg(tot_accept)) AS cnt
FROM st_event_100_#yyyymm# cm
WHERE idate >= trunc(SYSDATE) #stat_monitor_group_query#
GROUP BY substr(to_char(idate, 'HH24:MI'), 0, 4)
|| '0'
ORDER BY term DESC,
event_time ASC
iw truncates the date to the first day of the calendar week as defined by the ISO 8601 standard, which is Monday. When you subtract numbers from the date, it is always the number of days. So, idate BETWEEN trunc(SYSDATE, 'iw')-7 AND trunc(SYSDATE, 'iw')-3 gives you those dates that fall between previous week's Monday and Friday.
to_char(idate, 'HH24:MI') gives you the time(hour and minute) part in 24hr format. Ex: 14:33. By using substrin to extract only 4 characters, you are actually getting 14:3. So yes, this groups with a granularity of 10 mins.
You cannot write trunc(idate, 'HH24:MI'). It can only have 1 precision specifier.
If you write trunc(idate,'HH24'), it truncates to the hour. If you use MI, it truncates to the minute. So, to truncate it to 10 mins is a little tricky.
pm is just an alias for the whole subquery.
SELECT *
FROM st_event_100_#yyyymm-1m#
......
WHERE idate BETWEEN trunc(SYSDATE, 'iw')-7 AND trunc(SYSDATE, 'iw')-3 #stat_monitor_group_query#
# is part of the table anme in your query. It has no significance as such. But, it might be project/company specific.
This query:
select count(*), trim(data_date)
from man
where data_status = 'received' and data_date > sysdate-7
group by trim(data_date);
gives result like:
199 05-APR-16
But this query:
select count(*), trim(data_date)
from man
where data_status = 'received' and trunc(data_date) = date '2016-04-05'
group by trim(data_date);
gives results like:
347 05-APR-16
Why are the queries giving different results for the same day?
Because your man_date_sub values are not all at midnight. If you keep running the first query the number of records returned will (probably) gradually reduce. That is only happening to the count for the 5th as that is a week ago. Your sysdate - 7 is a moving target, not just as you move from day to day, but as time passes during the day.
You can check the times with:
select to_char(man_date_sub, 'YYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS'),
to_char(sysdate - 7, 'YYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS'),
man_date_sub - (sysdate - 7)
from man
where trunc(man_date_sub) = date '2016-04-05';
You'll see that some have times before the current sysdate time, while others have times after it. The third, generated, column will show some positive and some negative values.
In your second query you're comparing trunc(man_date_sub), which sets the time part to midnight, with date '2016-04-05', which is also at midnight; so all the records at any time on that day now match.
You can go back to midnight on your 7-day range, and get an equivalent result, by truncating sysdate:
select count(*), trim(man_date_sub)
from man
where man_status = 'SUBMITTED' and man_date_sub > trunc(sysdate)-7
group by trim(man_date_sub);
Your use of the trim() function is a bit odd; all you're doing is removing leading and trailing whitespace from the string '05-APR-16', which isn't actually doing anything. You're also relying on implcit conversion of the date to a string using your session NLS_DATE_FORMAT. It would be better to specify the format:
select count(*), to_char(man_date_sub, 'YYYY-MM-DD')
from man
where man_status = 'SUBMITTED' and man_date_sub > trunc(sysdate)-7
group by to_char(man_date_sub, 'YYYY-MM-DD');
If you ran your original query in a session that had an NLS_DATE_FORMAT that included time elements then you wouldn't get the result you expect.
I'm not sure if you're confusing it with trunc(), though clearly you're using that elsewhere. Truncating a date sets the time portion to midnight (by default; it can do other things), but leaves it as a date, which would be suitable for grouping but should still be formatted explicitly for display.
I want to be able to do something like
SELECT cast(my_date_col AS int) FROM my_table;
I would like to get the integer which MonetDB uses internally, i.e. the value you'd find if you looked into the BAT structure and got the appropriate element in code in MonetDB's GDK. Now, AFAICT, this internal value is the number of days since the Epoch, being Jan 1st on "Year 0" (so January 3rdt year 2 would be 366+365+2 = 732).
The best I could actually manage is
SELECT my_date_col AS int - cast('1-1-1' AS date) - 366 FROM my_table;
As MonetDB won't accept "Year zero" dates. This is rather an ugly hack, I'd like to do better. Help me?
If you're trying to get the number of days between "my_date_col" and 1970-01-01, in standard SQL you'd just subtract the one from the other. Your platform, monetdb, seems to support this syntax, but I don't have it installed. I wrote these examples in PostgreSQL.
select current_date - date '1970-01-01' as num_days;
num_days
--
16213
Check that result by adding 16213 days to the current date (2014-05-23).
select cast ((date '1970-01-01' + interval '16213' day) as date) as target_date
target_date
--
2014-05-23
The cast is necessary, because the result of this addition is a timestamp, not a date.
In your case, you want a column name instead of "current_date". So you're looking for something along these lines.
select my_date_col - date '1970-01-01' as num_days
from your-table-name;
I have a problem when running this Oracle SQL statement:
SELECT *
FROM tbl_content
WHERE last_updated >= (systimestamp - INTERVAL '1' month(1))
ORDER BY last_updated desc
And this error:
java.sql.SQLException: ORA-01839: date not valid for month specified
at oracle.jdbc.driver.DatabaseError.throwSqlException(DatabaseError.java:111)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.T4CTTIoer.processError(T4CTTIoer.java:330)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.T4CTTIoer.processError(T4CTTIoer.java:287)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.T4C8Oall.receive(T4C8Oall.java:742)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.T4CPreparedStatement.doOall8(T4CPreparedStatement.java:212)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.T4CPreparedStatement.executeForRows(T4CPreparedStatement.java:951)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleStatement.executeMaybeDescribe(OracleStatement.java:1053)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.T4CPreparedStatement.executeMaybeDescribe(T4CPreparedStatement.java:835)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleStatement.doExecuteWithTimeout(OracleStatement.java:1123)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.OraclePreparedStatement.executeInternal(OraclePreparedStatement.java:3284)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.OraclePreparedStatement.executeQuery(OraclePreparedStatement.java:3328)
at com.vtdd.sms.content.xskt.XsktService.getKQXSFollowArea(XsktService.java:4044)
at com.vtdd.sms.content.xskt.XsktService.getMessages(XsktService.java:421)
at com.vht.sms.content.ContentAbstract.getSubmitMessages(ContentAbstract.java:47)
at com.vht.sms.content.ContentFactory.getSubmitMessages(ContentFactory.java:335)
at com.vht.sms.content.ContentFactory.run(ContentFactory.java:62)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662)
Could you tell me what is wrong?
Firstly, why are you using systimestamp? If you want this to the month then surely sysdate is exact enough? Secondly, I like - i.e. it's personal preference - to make it extremely clear what's happening. Oracle has an add_months function, which will do what you want. So your query could easily be:
SELECT *
FROM tbl_content
WHERE last_updated >= add_months(sysdate, -1)
ORDER BY last_updated desc
What is actually wrong is that interval arithmetic doesn't adjust days - see the 6th bullet in the link:
When interval calculations return a datetime value, the result must be an actual datetime value or the database returns an error.
ADD_MONTHS does; as that link says:
If date is the last day of the month or if the resulting month has fewer days than the day component of date, then the result is the last day of the resulting month.
So, ADD_MONTHS(DATE '2011-12-31', -1) gives you 2011-11-30, while DATE '2011-12-31' - INTERVAL '1' MONTH tries to give you 2011-11-31, which as the message says, isn't a valid date.
(It's debatable if this behaviour is actually wrong; it's unexpected, but I believe it's conforming to ANSI. There may be times you want it to work this way, though I can't think of any...)