I am trying to create a library that holds some utilities that facilitate SSRS reporting inside either winform or .net framework websites.
I have used the code on 2 projects, now looking to use it on a third. that's about the time i usually stop and break the code out into something reusable.
My issue is that I need to make a couple references to SSRS classes
Public Warnings() As SSRS_E.Warning = Nothing
Public credentials() As SSRS_.DataSourceCredentials = Nothing
The SSRS_E reference resolves to SSRS_ReportExecution2005
and the SSRS_ reference resolves to SSRS_reportservice2010
These are valid in my old projects because I have service references to a specific SSRS service.
Is it possible to locate these assemblies outside of a specific installation?
I do not want to get into a situation where I have to 'fix' the reference everytime I open the utility dll in a different project...
Related
In a simple windows form application on VS 2010 I have put a ovalShape using power packs.
The simple Form
Now automatically this action puts the reference of Microsoft.VisualBasic.PowerPacks.Vs in to project properties.
when deploying this in different PC obviously the (a)powerpacks needed to be installed if this application doesn't work, (b) or it can set to "copy local = true" in reference properties so that it should sit to next with the application.
assuming (b) is not an option, since it is a solitary executable, (a) is the only option. in this way if the target machine does not have powerpacks the requirement is to notify it to the user in the first place.
apparently the dll will be deployed in when using the "VisualBasicPowerPacksSetup"
C:\Windows\assembly\GAC_MSIL\Microsoft.VisualBasic.PowerPacks.Vs\10.0.0.0__b03f5f7f11d50a3a\Microsoft.VisualBasic.PowerPacks.Vs.dll
so the blind approach is just to check if the above file not exist then prompt user to install "VisualBasicPowerPacksSetup". but i feel its more accurate if the application able to actually check in registry level.
in registry "Microsoft.VisualBasic.PowerPacks" records in several location, thus makes a confusion.
how to identify the correct key and what should be correct way of checking this reference in vb ?
You could just try to create an object defined in the dependency and catch the resulting exception.
Handling this you could ask the user to install the package. This is probably not considered good practice but should get the job done.
I am trying to develop a small utility program that will be deployed with other application that we already have. In order to make the utility work, I need to know the connectionString used by the application to access the database.
Since I have old and new applications, they have different ways to connect to the database. So I figured the way I would do it is something like that
All project will need to implement a dll named "Connect.dll"
This dll will include one public function name GetConnString. This function will return a string which correspond to the connection string to use to connect to the main database.
What I wanted to do was to simply include the utility in the same folder as the application and use the Connect.dll found within the folder. So far though, unless I copy the original dll found within my utility project, the utility will crash. Is there any way to do this ?
Regards,
Create a non signed assembly and enforce that all the clients use the same assembly version with (of course) the same signature.
In your utility set the property "Specific Version" to False.
This should do the trick.
When I debug the following code, I receive the message "System.TypeLoadException was caught" when I perform the Delete().
Using db As New ScholarshipEntities
db.ApplicationHistories.Where(Function(h) h.HistoryTypeId = 0).Delete()
db.SaveChanges()
End Using
I am using EF 6.1 in Visual Studio 2013. I also have the EntityFramework.Extended library installed.
I have no trouble querying results. I thought the bug might occur when the Where method has no results, but that is not the case. I also have no problem adding new models (.edmx), which was a problem some people with this exception had.
I just recently upgraded to EF 6.1 and installed the Extended library. This is my first time using one of the extended methods. I've un-installed and re-installed the nuget packages with no success.
IntelliTrace shows the following exceptions from the Delete() call (in order):
'EntityFramework.Reflection.DynamicProxy' does not contain a definition for 'InternalQuery'
Cannot implicitly convert type 'EntityFramework.Reflection.DynamicProxy' to 'System.Data.Entity.Core.Objects.ObjectQuery<Scholarship.ApplicationHistory>'
Could not load type 'System.Data.Entity.Core.Mapping.EntityContainerMapping'
I've added an issue on the Extended library's github.
Update
I've reinstalled EF and the EF.Extended library with no luck. I am able to use RemoveRange in its place. I am able to create a new project, install the packages, add a model mapped to the same database, and successfully use Delete. Obviously, the problem is in my current solution.
In my solution, I have an ASP.NET project and a regular library project. In the ASP project, a page's code behind calls a method in the library RemoveHistory. The library contains classes for the business logic and data access. Both classes implement interfaces. The actual Delete occurs in the data access class. My model also resides in this library project.
I may be able to create a completely new project and bring everything over, but that will take quite some time. Even if I did, I want to understand why it doesn't work in the first place, so that I don't have to repeat this process.
If you want to delete certain rows do it like that:
Using db As New ScholarshipEntities
db.ApplicationHistories.RemoveRange(db.ApplicationHistories.Where(Function(h) h.HistoryTypeId = 0))
db.SaveChanges()
End Using
If you want to remove single entity do it like that:
Using db As New ScholarshipEntities
db.ApplicationHistories.Remove(db.ApplicationHistories.Single(Function(h) h.HistoryTypeId = 0))
db.SaveChanges()
End Using
I "solved" the issue some time ago. I'll eventually go back to try and reproduce the problem to confirm my suspicions.
There were multiple versions of Entity Framework installed in the solution. This didn't appear to affect basic EF functionality, though I'm sure it did in some subtle, potentially buggy fashion.
Every time the solution was opened, NuGet would state that it couldn't complete uninstallation. Uninstalling and restoring via NuGet was unsuccessful, and the packages had to be deleted manually. Once completely removed, I installed the packages again. This resolved the issue.
I wish I could give a more technical answer, though the basic reason was forgetting to look closer at the packages folder and configuration.
I have a DLL that is a logging component that we use in many different projects. This logging component is designed to be entirely self-contained, and thus it must have its database connection string internal to it. In this project, it is completely unacceptable to require that its connection string be copied to the app.config of any project that uses it.
This has been working great for years, but now we have found that mixing its older ADO tech with new apps that use EF results in horrible performance when the logging is being done. For example, adding a single log entry when the application starts results in a > 30 second delay before the app opens.
So to combat this, I have re-written this component to use EF.
The problem is under the current EF (version 4.4 since we are targeting .Net Framework 4.0) does not offer a constructor to DBContext that allows you to specify the entire connection string. The code attempts to change the Database.Connection.ConnectionString, but the DBContext object insists on looking in the App.Config for the connection string even though we are giving it a new one.
I must get around this behavior.
I have a .NET customer framework that functions much like a Workflow. It uses reflection to get a listing of all of the processes it is capable of from a specific folder, and starts them via reflection with a known start point (all of them have a method called "Process"). Since these files are only called to do the processing and not part of the compile... is there a way for me to be able to drop in a new reference library (DLL) for one of the processes that is being updated without restarting the whole process?
Here is my flow...
START
Load list of references
Load work, assign to references
After X Time, refresh references (or
on WCF refresh command being sent)
Is it possible to do this, or do I do I need to actually stop and restart the assembly base to be able to recognized the new reference file?
Yes you can with Assembly.Load but I think you need to look at MEF first.