I have recently started seeing an error when i simply run
SELECT * FROM region-eu.INFORMATION_SCHEMA.JOBS_BY_PROJECT
Field name dml_stats does not exist in STRUCT<...
Excluding field dml_stats doesn't seem to work either.
Anyone else spotted this?
Cheers.
There are already 2 issues reported in the public issue tracker.
https://issuetracker.google.com/issues/193159258
https://issuetracker.google.com/issues/193437397
This seems to be a bug on the Google side. Hopefully, they will fix it soon.
Related
My company is working on converting from ColdFusion to NodeJS with Express, I'm running into an error trying to update some data in SQLAnywhere.
I have one update function working with 5 pieces of data. I'm working on my second, with 23 data points, but I'm running into an error stating:
"Error: Code: -2006 Msg: Can not bind parameter(s)."
I can't find any information about this online, not even using the error code. Any help, or pointing me in the right direction, would be appreciated.
Turns out it was trying to save integers into "char" fields on the database. Odd that we never had this issue with ColdFusion, but using "String(…)" around the values seemed to solve the issue.
I'm Kind new in Cloudsim and CloudReports Extension so i don't know why
when running the CloudReports simulator it gives this Error:
nullpointerexception at org.cloudbus.cloudsim.power.powerdatacenter.processcloudletsubmit(powerdatacenter.java:269)
I was adding a cloudlet scheduling Algorithm to the Extension
All I can see that the error happens with cloudlets Migration.
I tried searching alot about how to Fix it but didn't find something that will help me.
the Error is like this:
java.lang.NullPointerException
at org.cloudbus.cloudsim.Datacenter.processCloudletSubmit(Datacenter.java:761)
at org.cloudbus.cloudsim.power.PowerDatacenter.processCloudletSubmit(PowerDatacenter.java:269)
at org.cloudbus.cloudsim.Datacenter.processEvent(Datacenter.java:159)
at org.cloudbus.cloudsim.core.SimEntity.run(SimEntity.java:406)
at org.cloudbus.cloudsim.core.CloudSim.runClockTick(CloudSim.java:471)
at org.cloudbus.cloudsim.core.CloudSim.run(CloudSim.java:835)
at org.cloudbus.cloudsim.core.CloudSim.startSimulation(CloudSim.java:151)
at cloudreports.simulation.Simulation.runSimulation(Simulation.java:157)
at cloudreports.simulation.Simulation.runAllSimulations(Simulation.java:129)
at cloudreports.simulation.Simulation.run(Simulation.java:98)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
plz Advise;
Regards.
I ran into the same problem while I was following the simulation examples provided in the CloudSim project. After debugging figured out that the problem was with setting the UserID of the created cloudlet. I was setting a random value as the userId while the simulation retrieves the cloudlet using the brokerId. So setting the userId with the brokerId that was created did the trick for me.
// dataCenterBroker is the instance of the broker which you created
int brokerId = dataCenterBroker.getId();
//setting the userId after creating the cloudlet
cloudLet.setUserId(brokerId)
Our team can't use the DAG right now.
When trying to add an item with the provider DagBankSeCUrityQA - Bank (14748) I get a refresh error code 517.
Example itemID: 15466424
Please assist.
Thanks,
Michael.
If you are still getting this error let us know, it seems like you might be getting this error due to some temporary issue during that time.
I'm having an issue with Quickfixn and I'm hoping someone with more experience working with it can shed some light on an issue I'm facing. For some reason, messages are getting rejected by the QuickFix engine because of repeating tags... I expect to have repeating tags and so I set the UseDataDictionary flag = Y in my config file but messages are still getting rejected. Has anyone experienced a similar issue ?
The message I'm receiving looks like :
8=FIXT.1.1 9=421 35=AE 34=8 1128=8 49=XXX 56=YYY 52=20130501-15:45:53 552=1 54=2 37=130501-5 11=NOREF 826=0 78=1 79=default 80=1000000.00 5967=12167800.00 453=4 448=ITXT 452=3 447=D 448=TEST 452=1 447=D 448=LMEB 452=16 447=D 448=FRTB 452=11 447=D 571=6718487 150=F 32=1000000.00 15=USD 1056=12167800.00 31=12.1678 194=12.1678 195=0 64=20130503 63=0 60=20130501-00:00:00 75=20130501 1057=Y 460=4 167=FOR 65=SP 55=USD/MXN 10=203
8=FIXT.1.1 9=124 35=3 34=8 49=XXX 52=20130501-15:45:54.209 56=YYY 45=8 58=Tag appears more than once 371=448 372=AE 373=13 10=210
my config file looks like this:
[DEFAULT]
ConnectionType=initiator
HeartBtInt=30
ReconnectInterval=10
SocketReuseAddress=Y
FileStorePath=D:\Store
FileLogPath=D:\Log
[SESSION]
BeginString=FIXT.1.1
SenderCompID=XXX
TargetCompID=YYY
DefaultApplVerId = FIX.5.0SP1
UseDataDictionary=Y
AppDataDictionary=D:\Interface\FIX50SP1.xml
StartDay=sunday
StartTime=20:55:00
EndTime=06:05:00
EndDay=saturday
SocketConnectHost=1.1.1.1
SocketConnectPort=8443
Any help would be greatly appreciated! Thank you.
Often this happens because there is a field in a repeating group that is not specified in the DataDictionary. The parser sees the field and assumes the repeating group has ended. It continues parsing fields as if they are not part of a group. If it sees a duplicate field in this context, the parser will report an error.
You may clone and modify FIX Data Dictionary (D:\Interface\FIX50SP1.xml) to fit your needs, if you need to process "invalid" messages. Or you may disable message validation.
My fix engine keeps rejecting messages and I was hoping someone could help me figure out why... I'm receiving the following sample message:
8=FIXT.1.1 9=518 35=AE 34=4 1128=8 49=XXXXXXX 56=YYYYYYY 52=20130322-17:58:37 552=1 54=1 37=Z00097H4ON 11=NOREF 826=0 78=1 79=NOT SPECIFIED 80=100000.000000 5967=129776.520000 453=5 448=BCART6 452=3 447=D 448=BARX 452=1 447=D 448=BARX 452=16 447=D 448=bcart6 452=11 447=D 448=ABCDEFGHI 452=12 447=D 571=6611540 150=F 17=Z00097H4ON 32=100000.000000 38=100000.000000 15=EUR 1056=129776.520000 31=1.2977652 194=1.298120 195=-3.5480 64=20130409 63=W2 60=20130322-17:26:50 75=20130322 1057=Y 460=4 167=FOR 65=OR 55=EUR/USD 10=121
8=FIXT.1.1 9=124 35=3 34=4 49=XXXXXXX 52=20130322-17:58:37.917 56=YYYYYYY 45=4 58=Tag appears more than once 371=448 372=AE 373=13 10=216
But as you can see it's being rejected by the quickfix engine. I am using the 5.0sp1 data dictionary and have configured it in my config file:
[DEFAULT]
ConnectionType=initiator
HeartBtInt=30
ReconnectInterval=10
SocketReuseAddress=Y
FileStorePath=D:\XXX\Interface\ReutersStore
FileLogPath=D:\XXX\Interface\ReutersLog
[SESSION]
BeginString = FIXT.1.1
SenderCompID = XXXXX
TargetCompID= YYYYY
DefaultApplVerId = FIX.5.0
UseDataDictionary=Y
AppDataDictionary=FIX50SP1.xml
StartDay=sunday
StartTime=20:55:00
EndTime=06:05:00
EndDay=saturday
SocketConnectHost= A.B.C.D
SocketConnectPort= 123
Does anyone have any idea why the Engine would be rejecting this message? I know that quickfix is normally able to handle messages with repeating groups, is it a config thing? Any help would be greatly appreciated!
Your message seems to be in order. Try putting this in your config file.
ValidateFieldsOutOfOrder=N
Quickfix by default puts that as Y and the underlying structure storing the tab and field values is unable to see the count before. 453 > 448.
As a sidenote always check these fields. They should point you to the source of the problem.
58=Tag appears more than once
371=448
Maybe it's a shot in the dark, but I had a similar a problem when using a 5.0sp2 dictionary.
I resolved using an updated version of the quickfix library compiled from the library SVN repository. If I remember correctly this was the bug.
It seems that the quickfix library has not been updated since a long time, and for newer version of fix I suggest you to use the "trunk" of the repo.
I had the same problem and i resolved it by tweaking my DataDictionary like the following in message AE TradeCaptureReport