regarding test plan not saving .
I right clicked at test plan->choose save selection as ..->any window/popup box should open but getting no response..
I am using "jdk-16.0.1_windows-x64_bin".and
"apache-jmeter-5.4.1"
As indicated in this screenshoti clicked but get nothing
Just simply change to the e.g. System look and view instead of Dark.
If you pay attention to upper right corner of your JMeter GUI you will see that there are 32 errors, most probably one of them can explain what's going on if you look into jmeter.log file
Most probably you're suffering from JMeter Bug 65300 so the options are in:
Downgrade to Java 8
Try out Nightly Build of JMeter
Try switching to another Look and Feel
Related
So I am developing a VR app in Unreal and I'd like to give the user the ability to take a screenshot in game through the click of a button.
I am currently taking a screenshot through a console command but, it doesn't allow me to change the file location of where it goes. I don't think it will be intuitive enough to users to look into the AppData folder.
Is there a way to change this file location?
Does anyone know of any other ways to take a screenshot in game in Unreal Engine and save it to a folder or something similar?
Is there a function library or anything I can utilize?
Check this thread out:
Unreal Engine 4 In-game Screenshot
You should continue to use the console command; it's the easiest way to do this in my opinion. In C++, you can expose your screenshot default folder with ProjectSavedDir(). That being said, you can get references of your screenshots and move them to another FPath location. For a bit of a better translation, take a look at these macros: https://docs.unrealengine.com/en-US/API/Runtime/Core/Misc/FPaths/index.html
I found a really easy way to change where the screenshot gets saved at. I was really surprised how easy it was actually. Essentially, all you have to do is add an argument to the console command.
HighResShot 1920x1080 filename="D:/Screenshots/screenshot.png"
However, you need to ensure that the file name is unique, otherwise it will just overwrite the screenshot every time.
I ended up just grabbing Time Now and appending the date inside of the screenshot name. So that it ended up looking something like this:
HighResShot 1920x1080 filename="D:/Screenshots/screenshot_2020-6-5-8-40-01.png"
I use TDD quite a lot, and I was wondering if there is a way to show the Run Tool window only when there are failed tests?
Or to be more generic, for any run configuration, I would like the Run Tool window to be shown only when something goes wrong. Otherwise I would prefer the little non-obtrusive green pop-up to appear. Like when you run a lot of tests and you minimize the Run Tool by clicking on the "down arrow" in its top-right corner. When the tests are done, a little green pop-up appears over the minimized window.
I would also compromise for an answer that tells me how to keep the Run Tool always minimized, and only see little pop-ups, regardless if they are green or red.
This is probably not exactly the answer you wanted but if you look in the RunConfiguration (Run->Edit Configurations -> JUnit) for your test run you should see a checkbox called 'Activate tool window'. If that box is ticked then the Run Tool window will pop open even if its minimised. When it's not ticked then the Run Tool window will stay minimised.
So, for any individual existing test run you can change the check box value to prevent the tool window appearing. If you're doing TDD that could mean you have many configurations for specific test cases / suites etc, which you would need to change individually.
In the longer term, you probably want to avoid future run configurations popping up the test. You can do that through the Defaults -> JUnit section in the RunConfigurations window.
Also, in the tab "Logs" you can check the option "Show console when a message is printed to standard error stream"
When this option is checked the window is opened automatically if some test fails.
I am executing a simple recorded script in Selenium , in which i just search a page in Google and then click it , but when Run that recorded script it is giving me the "Error [error] Element link not found".
And following is the Script which i am running,any help would be very useful.
New Test
New Test
open
/
type
q
Bill Gates
click
link=Bill Gates: Chairman
click
link=Bill Gates: Chairman
I got the same error message while going through the tutorials online. I found out that the scripts were running too fast for FF to load the links. If you slow down the playback by moving the green button on the Fast-Slow bar to somewhere in the middle the scripts run without any errors.
I guess I know the answer. It might be bcz of any javascript error(you can see that on the status bar at the
Right corner(IE)) or that link element might not be placed correctly in the box(box model).
Here you can use
Selenium.focus("link=text")
:selenium.keyPressNative("10") . It presses the enter key.but while selenium is executing this statement
Do not change the focus from your AUT (don't touch the mouse).
In IDE ,just paste the above statement on click().
Well, I don't think you have to slow the speed down. You know the problem is caused by clicking on the link before it is available, so you could add an extra command waitForVisible (e.g. link=Bill Gates: Chairman) before the clickAndWait command.
Im assuming you are using Google instant as there is no "click search button" command, the link is probably not preset because selenium is not waiting for Google instant to respond or the javascript to render the link. If you manually add in a click command to search it should solve it.
My solution is almost the same as Cuongs. Though I change the speed by using a command and change it back afterwards.
Before you click the link, you can set the speed to slow:
Command: setSpeed
Target: 3000
You can change the speed afterwards again to ~1000
I also had same problem. I did two things which fixed the problem. I changed the speed in Selenium IDE from fast to slow (located at top left of IDE), and I minimized the IDE after hitting play button. I guess for people using only one monitor, minimizing Selenium IDE would help the test find the thing it is looking for; for ppl with two screens, opening Selenium IDE in one screen, and opening browser in another screen would be best.
Info: Installing this plug-in (Selenium IDE: Flow Control) fixed lots of unexpected errors for me while playing with Selenium IDE:-
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/flow-control/?src=dp-dl-othersby
I searched around and couldn't find how to test a file download box using capybara/cucumber?
The following image asks the question much clearer.
This was similar to another question I just answered, hope it helps Anybody have idea how to test file download using cucumber?
#Millisami Capybara::NotSupportedByDriverError Fixed for me!
What i had to do is removing the #javascript tag from my cucumber test, which was included. I mean:
#search
Scenario: Recieving a file
...
instead of
#search
#javascript
Scenario: Recieving a file
...
Hope it helps :-)
The download box is a function of the browser. Capybara simulates a browser but without all the UI etc.. (e.g. it looks like a browser to your application, so using it you'd mostly skip over the whole file download UI stuff. It would look to the browser like someone did whatever they needed to in order to tell the browser where to put the file and start the download)
If you are trying to test a download box, (beyond clicks needed to start the download) you are now testing the browser, not your application. As yourself if that's part of your charter and worth your time.
To actually test the download box you are going to have to have a browser instance going, and use a tool like Firewatir/Watir or Selenium, to actually 'drive' the browser, and some other gem to actually automate up at the OS UI level (on windows we usually use autoit) in order to click things and fill in values of the browser's file download UI.
Can Selenium or any other automated tool check for the proper positioning of elements on a web page?
For example, when you look at OnStartups.com in IE 6, the main content that is supposed to be to the right of the menu is below it instead and you have to scroll down to read it. Can you query and get the coordinates of the div as they are actually displayed, and can you get the coordinates of the viewport to verify that the top left corner is actually within the viewable area?
I think comparing screenshots is the best thing you can do and I'm afraid there aren't robust tools for that, yet.
If I were you, I would create a script that navigates through every page of the site capturing a picture on each and then I would open a folder with all the results and it would probably take less than a minutes to check 20 or 30 of them. Sounds really dumb, but sometimes the easier alternative ends up being the best...
I'm afraid the best you could do is select a standard browser and than compare screenshots of other browser with the reference one.
I can't remember the specific one but some tool like Araxis merge was able to compare screenshots in a pretty intelligent way.
Selenium has assertions to check an element's position and size:
assertElementHeight(locator,pattern)
assertElementWidth(locator,pattern)
assertElementPositionLeft(locator,pattern)
assertElementPositionTop(locator,pattern)
A simple test to check the rendering in the OPs example could be to write
assertElementPositionTop(//*[#id='main_content'],0)
thus checking whether #main_content is rendered at the top or somewhere else.