I am using serverless framework to deploy react web application. I've set up a CI/CD pipeline for deployment. when serverless template gets executed I am receiving several deprecation warnings.
Serverless: Deprecation warning: Detected ".env" files. In the next major release variables from ".env" files will be automatically loaded into the serverless build process. Set "useDotenv: true" to adopt that behavior now.
More Info: https://www.serverless.com/framework/docs/deprecations/#LOAD_VARIABLES_FROM_ENV_FILES
Serverless: Deprecation warning: Variables resolver reports following resolution errors:
- Cannot resolve variable at "provider.profile": Value not found at "env" source
From a next major this will be communicated with a thrown error.
Set "variablesResolutionMode: 20210326" in your service config, to adapt to new behavior now
More Info: https://www.serverless.com/framework/docs/deprecations/#NEW_VARIABLES_RESOLVER
The way I understand these warnings, it is trying to load environment variables from .env file from the serverless directory. But I've stored my variables from other files(abc.config) and loading them to the serverless template through that file and not from the .env file. and for this reason I am getting these warnings.
Also I've used serverless-dotenv-plugin to use environment variables in .env file for local deployment and that's why the .env file has to be there in the serverless directory. But for now loading variables from abc.config file is working fine and in the future, I want to load variables from the same file(abc.config). But in the future, if I use the same approach for environment variables, that will throw an error instead of giving a warning.
Questions 1: I am not sure how would I tackle this issue. because in the upcoming serverless version release this will throw an error.
Question 2: What if I install a specific serverless version. for example; npm install -g serverless#2.45.0 in that case, in the future will I still get these deprecation warnings? In theory, I'll be still using the old serverless version and this version supports loading variables from other files. So I should not be getting these warnings. I can be wrong. but what should be the ideal approach to resolve these warnings ahead of time?
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you.
You should set the deprecation variables in your serverless.yml file and verify that serverless deploy is successful and the framework interpolates your variables as you intend.
The warning messages explain the process. Simply add the rules to your serverless.yml file:
useDotenv: true
variablesResolutionMode: 20210326
The second warning message will be an error, provider.profile wasn't able to be resolved. You can solve this with a conditional, ie:
${provider.profile, 'default'}
Or you can ensure that provider.profile is always set. It's not possible to help further without seeing the serverless.yml file.
Related
I'm building a ReactJS/NextJS website and I was going to deploy it online using Vercel.
During the build I have some warnings as this one:
warning package-lock.json found. Your project contains lock files generated by tools other than Yarn. It is advised not to mix package managers in order to avoid resolution inconsistencies caused by unsynchronized lock files. To clear this warning, remove package-lock.json.
But then I get this fatal error, saying it can't read properties of undefined.
I'm not sure where to look at, something worth noticing is when I run yarn run build on my local machine, it does successfully compile as shown below
It's my first try experimenting with this tech so any hint would be appreciated!
Thanks
I duplicated an existing build configuration in my Xcode project called Direct and named it Setapp.
I didn't modify anything regarding the new build config Setapp, however, when I build using the Setapp build config, I am getting an error.
It says the library Ensembles cannot be found. It's a library that I installed via Cocoapods.
I can't figure why I am getting this error. Since I am using an exact copy of a build configuration that works (Direct in this case), I don't see how Direct builds fine but Setapp doesn't.
Just as extra information, I am specifying to build using the Setapp build configure using Scheme like this:
Any ideas?
Turns out I need to run pod install again.
I have configured a TFS(2017) build pipeline to compile a VS extension with debug mode for a specific requirement which require .pdb files.
The build solution task fails for "debug" configuration with below error, however same pipeline works for the release configuration.
I have tried the approach mentioned in the following discussion as well, howewer it doesn't resolve my issue.
https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/vstudio/en-US/fd220999-5761-475a-bf86-98dff6b35218/unable-to-compile-vsix-project-that-is-a-part-of-my-solution-using-amd64-msbuild-from-vs2015?forum=msbuild
Appreciate if someone can help me to resolve this issue.
Following is the build configuration used for the Build Solution task:
Following build variables are used to configure build parameters.
Build Error message:
packages\Microsoft.VSSDK.BuildTools.15.1.192\tools\VSSDK\Microsoft.VsSDK.targets
(633, 5)
packages\Microsoft.VSSDK.BuildTools.15.1.192\tools\VSSDK\Microsoft.VsSDK.targets(633,5):
Error VSSDK1077: Unable to locate the extensions directory. "Value
cannot be null. Parameter name: path1". Process 'msbuild.exe' exited
with code '1'.
Update your Microsoft.VSSDK.BuildTools NuGet package to latest version 15.9.3032, just in case it is a problem already solved.
Release configurations can also generate PDB files (Project properties, Build tab, Advanced...button, Output > Debugging information). So, if the Release configuration works for you, you can keep using it while also generating a pdb file with full debug information.
The error is happening when, once compiled correctly, the generated VSIX output file is going to be deployed to the folder for extensions of the experimental VS instance, which is a required step to debug the VSIX file. A possible explanation of the different behavior for Debug/Release configurations is that maybe your .csproj specifies <DeployExtension>False</DeployExtension> for the Release configuration. By default, if not set, that property is set to true in the Microsoft.VsSDK.targets file:
<DeployExtension Condition="'$(DeployExtension)' == ''">true</DeployExtension>
Since likely you don't need to deploy the VSIX to the VS experimental instance when building on a build server (because you are not going to debug it), you can set that property to False to skip the deployment. This can be done with a 3rd build configuration (ex: "DebugBuildServer"), for which you specify DeployExtension to False in the .csproj file, or sticking to two build configurations but passing the /p:DeployExtension=false in the MSBuild arguments of the Visual Studio Build task of your build pipeline.
I am getting a strange error on the build server, this does NOT happen locally.
Error during file generation. The target file 'C:...\AcceptanceTest\Features\HelloWorld.feature.cs'
is read-only, but different from the transformation result. This
problem can be a sign of an inconsistent source code package. Compile
and check-in the current version of the file from the development
environment or remove the read-only flag from the generation result.
To compile a solution that contains messaging project on a build
server, you can also exclude the messaging project from the
build-server solution or set the msbuild
project parameter to 'true' in the messaging project file.
I'm not sure what to do to fix this, I don't have a "messaging" project (or know what is being referred too). And the code is the latest
This is the full message (some folder names have been obfuscated):
13>C:\Builds\2\Services\PService\src\packages\SpecRun.Excel.1.1.0\tools\TechTalk.SpecFlow-buildfix.targets(47,5):
error : Error during file generation. The target file
'C:\Builds\2\Services\PService\src\PService\Test\PService.AcceptanceTest\Features\HelloWorld.feature.cs'
is read-only, but different from the transformation result. This
problem can be a sign of an inconsistent source code package. Compile
and check-in the current version of the file from the development
environment or remove the read-only flag from the generation result.
To compile a solution that contains messaging project on a build
server, you can also exclude the messaging project from the
build-server solution or set the msbuild
project parameter to 'true' in the messaging project file.
[C:\Builds\2\Services\PService\src\PService\Test\PService.AcceptanceTest\PService.AcceptanceTest.csproj]
13>C:\Builds\2\Services\PService\src\packages\SpecRun.Excel.1.1.0\tools\TechTalk.SpecFlow-buildfix.targets(47,5):
error : Could not find file
'C:\Users\tfsbuild\AppData\Local\Temp\tmpPWithData.feature.xlsx.cs'.
[C:\Builds\2\Services\PService\src\PService\Test\PService.AcceptanceTest\PService.AcceptanceTest.csproj]
13>C:\Builds\2\Services\PService\src\PService\Test\PService.AcceptanceTest\Features\PWithData.feature.xlsx
: error : Generation error: Could not find file
'C:\Users\tfsbuild\AppData\Local\Temp\tmpPWithData.feature.xlsx.cs'.
[C:\Builds\2\Services\PService\src\PService\Test\PService.AcceptanceTest\PService.AcceptanceTest.csproj]
Delete HelloWorld.feature.cs from source control.
TFS will checkout files as read-only during a build and so SpecFlow fails to re-generate the file because it already exists and SpecFlow doesn't overwrite read-only files.
I created a new request for SpecFlow to not automatically add the file to source control here: https://github.com/techtalk/SpecFlow/issues/592
I'm not sure what the messaging project refers to, that's something I haven't seen before.
However the error reads as if the problem is due to an issue with the generation of the *.feature.cs from the *.feature file, but I am confused as to why this should be happening on the build server. Normally the generation of *.feature.cs occurs in the IDE when you save the *.feature file. This gets checked in and with some version control systems (VCS) you may end up with a read-only file status.
Your error reads as the build server is trying to re-generate the *.feature.cs file and cannot overwrite it.
Some things to check;
What VCS are you running? Does it leave checked-in files as read-only?
How are you building the files on the build server? Is there a custom step involved, or is it just a simple compile?
Can you replicate this error on your machine by setting the *.feature.cs to read-only and running the same build script on your local machine?
Good luck.
Simple question. How do I set the build configuration to something other than Debug?
Setting /P:Configuration=Staging in the Command line parameters box, leads to this error:
TeamCity says to use "Build Parameters" instead of "/property:" in an MSBuild step. What does that mean?
So how is it done? I need to build MSDeploy packages for all configurations, I can get the packages to build but everything is Debug.
The way you're doing it is fine -- although perhaps use a lowercase /p:. Our team does it this way too. TeamCity isn't throwing an error, it's just trying to provide some helpful information.
JetBrains provides some documentation for its preferred method at the bottom of the page under Using System Properties in Build Scripts.