I am trying to add some personal static analysis to my testcafe tests according to different features I am testing. I found there is getTypeScriptTestList in the following API, https://github.com/DevExpress/testcafe/blob/fcd93e8dbee76ea70786ee3aee4fb35990260e2a/src/embedding-utils.js#L66 (I am using Typescript), and I can get list of the tests with very basic info without running all the tests, however, there seems no information getting the skipped tests, wondering if I miss anything or if there is another better way?
I also had a look into https://github.com/hdorgeval/testcafe-static-analyser which is cool, but I hope to do something simpler and hopefully from testcafe's API.
Any help is really appreciated!
Unfortunately, this functionality is not supported at present.
Just in case someone searches this issue, it's fixed now, it can get skipped tests in embedding-utils.js
Related
Does anyone know if it's possible to identify production methods that are only referenced by unit test class methods?
I can see if a method has production or test uses by using the Find Usages option but I want to scan my whole codebase.
Thanks.
Unfortunately this feature is not yet implemented, but there is an issue for it, please follow:
https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/IDEA-212420
Azure Pipelines has a way of displaying test results after builds, described here. This seems to be very limited, however, and doesn't display much of the stuff we want.
We're using NUnit 3 with a .NET Core project, and NUnit outputs a bunch of stuff for test results. We specifically want to display FQN of the test at a minimum, but being able to easily view tests by category would suffice as well. This doesn't seem to be possible with the default Tests tab.
My question: Does DevOps support doing something like this or do I need to make my own site/API for viewing test results? I'm open to pretty much anything, we just want to avoid anything that requires manual offline processing.
As per the Microsoft comment to the question, this is not currently possible. I added a suggestion on their tracker here.
So, I am trying to create some sort of bot to interact with Twitter. I am familiar with Cypress and wouldn´t be a problem at all learn how to deal with Selenium, but my point is: for what I´ve been reading, they´re both specific for testing, and what I want to do is not exactly testing, but keep an algorithm running for as long as I want.
I can obviously make a loop on the Cypress or the Selenium code, but I don´t see it as the easier way to deal with the problem.
So my question is: is there some ideal framework to keep pressing buttons or typing stuff for a few days on a webpage, not for testing, but to automatically interact with other accounts?
What you need is what is called an autoclicker.
Although this can be done with Selenium, there are simpler and faster alternatives like this Chrome extension: Auto Click/Auto Fill.
A search for autoclickers can help you figure out the best alternatives for your use case and there are plenty of approaches in many different languages.
How automated test works and how can I try one? How tools for automated testing works and what they do?
If possible please post with examples to clarify the ideas.
Any help on this topic is very welcome! Thanks.
Automated testing means writing a script for the tasks that we test manually.
Tools include softwares where we write a few lines of code in a sequence as we wish to perform a partiular test. Then running that script to perform the tests and generate results.
Automated testing saves the hours that we manually spend in repeating a series of test cases for a particular test.
Probably the best place to start is the xUnit libraries (JUnit, PHPUnit, jsUnit, etc.). If you're interested in testing of Web interfaces, there's something called Selenium. They provide lots of code examples to look at. These tools allow you to set up some input values, run some code, and then it allows you to verify the final output of that code matches your expectations (aka assertions).
In more sophisticated development teams, these automated tests are run every time new code gets submitted to the project to make sure no new bugs are introduced. As Priyanka mentioned, they save lots of time and eliminate the possibility of human error because the tests are run automatically where they would otherwise be done manually.
I'm sorry for not being more specific. This is a very broad topic of discussion.
I'm looking for some tool which will provide me the code coverage of my functional tests (Not the unit testing code coverage ). To elaborate more, assume QA team executes their tests suites using selenium. At the end of the tests, I would like to know the amount of code (target code , not the test code base) got invoked / tested .
I found a similar post for .Net , but in my case the webserver is Apache and application server is jBoss
Coverage analysis for Functional Tests
Also, we have never done this type of analysis before, is this worth the effort, anyone who tried it ?
I used to do code coverage testing on assembly code and Java code. It is definitely worth it. You will find as you get the coverage close to 100% that it gets more and more difficult to construct tests for the remaining code.
You may even find code that you can prove can never be executed. You will find code on the fringes that has never been tested and you will be forced to run multi user tests to force race conditions to occur, assuming that the code had taken these into account.
On the assembly code, I had a 3000 line assembly program that took several months to test, but ran for 9 years without any bugs. Coverage testing proved its worth in that case as this code was deep inside a language interpreter.
As far as Java goes I used Clover: http://www.atlassian.com/software/clover/overview
This post: Open source code coverage libraries for JDK7? recommends Jacoco, but I've never tried it.
Thanks for the pointers #Peter Wooster. I did a lot of digging into the clover documentation but unfortunately there is not even a good indication that functional / integration is supported by clover, leave alone a good documentation.
Lucky I got to a link within the clover documentation itself which talks about this and looks promising (Thanks to Google search). I was using the ant so didn't even search in this Maven2 area. This talks about ant as well though :)
https://confluence.atlassian.com/display/CLOVER/Using+Clover+in+various+environment+configurations
I will be trying this , will update more on this soon !