Requirement is that I have MVC & WebAPI in the project. MVC views will be delivered for initial
rendering like Login, base views of features (ex:- Users/Index, Dashboard/Index etc..) Web APIs will be used for other work within these views via AJAX with JWT.
I am using Asp.Net core Identity for user management related work running on .Net 5.0
I am confused with configuring multiple identity schemes and the proper configuration of authentication/authorization pipeline in conigureservices() & configure() in startup.
To configure multiple auth schemes I referred to https://stackoverflow.com/a/64887479/2058413 since it's done using same versions that I use. So my startup methods are below which is similar to the code in that thread.
public void ConfigureServices(IServiceCollection services)
{
string connectionString = Configuration.GetConnectionString("default");
services.AddDbContext<AppDBContext>(c => c.UseSqlServer(connectionString));
services.AddIdentity<IdentityUser, IdentityRole>()
.AddEntityFrameworkStores<AppDBContext>();
services.AddAuthentication(CookieAuthenticationDefaults.AuthenticationScheme)
.AddCookie(x =>
{
x.LoginPath = "/Account/Login";
x.ExpireTimeSpan = TimeSpan.FromMinutes(10d);
x.AccessDeniedPath = "/Account/Register";
})
.AddJwtBearer(x =>
{
x.RequireHttpsMetadata = false;
x.SaveToken = true;
x.TokenValidationParameters = new TokenValidationParameters
{
ValidateIssuerSigningKey = true,
IssuerSigningKey = new SymmetricSecurityKey(Encoding.ASCII.GetBytes("123456")),
ValidateIssuer = false,
ValidateAudience = false
};
});
services.AddAuthorization(options =>
{
var defaultAuthorizationPolicyBuilder = new AuthorizationPolicyBuilder(CookieAuthenticationDefaults.AuthenticationScheme, JwtBearerDefaults.AuthenticationScheme);
defaultAuthorizationPolicyBuilder = defaultAuthorizationPolicyBuilder.RequireAuthenticatedUser();
options.DefaultPolicy = defaultAuthorizationPolicyBuilder.Build();
});
services.AddControllersWithViews();
}
My App configure method is below
public void Configure(IApplicationBuilder app, IWebHostEnvironment env)
{
if (env.IsDevelopment())
{
app.UseDeveloperExceptionPage();
}
else
{
app.UseExceptionHandler("/Home/Error");
}
app.UseStaticFiles();
app.UseRouting();
app.UseAuthentication();
app.UseAuthorization();
app.UseEndpoints(endpoints =>
{
endpoints.MapControllerRoute(
name: "default",
pattern: "{controller=Home}/{action=Index}/{id?}");
});
}
Then the test method in controller(where user should get redirected to after authentication) is below
[Authorize(AuthenticationSchemes = CookieAuthenticationDefaults.AuthenticationScheme)]
public IActionResult Index()
{
return View();
}
To my understanding the order of the pipeline configuration is correct. Now here are the problems I face.
As specified in .AddCookie(option=>) , user doesn't get redirected to login page. However, if I remove the JwtBearerDefaults.AuthenticationScheme from the services.AddAuthorization(…) it gets redirected to login page properly. Why is that?
So I remove JwtBearerDefaults.AuthenticationScheme; which takes me to login and after successful login I can see that HttpContext.User.Identity.IsAuthenticated is set to true. But it doesn't redirect to Home/Index. No errors thrown and in browser console [network tab] it shows a 302 and redirect back to login. Since I have added [Authorize(AuthenticationSchemes = CookieAuthenticationDefaults.AuthenticationScheme)] to Index method in HomeController, I tried removing the scheme and adding [Authorize] and tried again. Still it gets redirected to login page. This is another thing I am confused about.
So I removed everything related to dual scheme authentication and left the ConfigureService() with below code
string connectionString = Configuration.GetConnectionString("default");
services.AddDbContext<AppDBContext>(c => c.UseSqlServer(connectionString));
services.AddIdentity<IdentityUser, IdentityRole>()
.AddEntityFrameworkStores<AppDBContext>();
services.AddControllersWithViews();
Now everything works fine (redirection to login if not authenticated and also redirects to /Home/Index after authorization).
I went through below links as well about multi scheme authentication, but I am still confused with this pipeline configuration.
ASP.NET Core WebAPI Cookie + JWT Authentication
https://wildermuth.com/2017/08/19/Two-AuthorizationSchemes-in-ASP-NET-Core-2
https://mitchelsellers.com/blog/article/using-multiple-authentication-authorization-providers-in-asp-net-core
I need help only to this multi-scheme authentication pipeline configuration part.
Ok, after some research the main issue was;
I have mixed up old ways of registering services in StartUp (asp.net core 3.x). So had to clear up all those. Resources that helped me to do that;
Migrate from ASP.NET Core 3.1 to 5.0
ASP.NET Core Middleware
This cleaned up a lot of unnecessary code since in .Net 5 there were some shortcuts that could be used.
Order of service registrations. This may depend on what kind of services you are using, but in my case the order was something like below:
AddIdentity
setup Cookie & JWT authentication c)
My Multitenant stuff
AddCors
AddModules (will be option for some of you. I use it to load plugins dynamically)
Other stuff (However, even in these places the order might matter depending on
what you do)
The other thing was, I had to remove ConfigureApplicationCookie() since AddIdentity seems to be doing that. Also in AddAuthorization() earlier I had code to specify what are the default schemes i wanted to use (Cookie & JWT). But now I had to remove all that. Reason is Identity takes over the cookie scheme and when I specify below, JWTAuth takes over.
[Authorize(AuthenticationSchemes = JwtBearerDefaults.AuthenticationScheme)]
Generally setting up Startup properly seems to be tricky depending on different services you use. Order will matter
Related
Odd behavior in VS Code using Kestrel. In the Claims transformer I can get the identity.Name as the logged in user...me. But in the Role Handler the claims come up null and no user name. I would think if Windows authentication weren't working then it wouldn't work at all. Works in ASP.NET Core 5 with Visual Studio 2019 but not in ASP.NET Core 6 in VS Code. Yes, I understand that Visual Studio is using IIS Express and VS Code is using Kestrel.
UPDATE: I have looked at the request in Fiddler and it seems like the second request is actually being authenticated, I see a valid Authorization header in the request with Negotiate. So that would seem to indicate that the Windows auth part of this is working. I then see a 400 error which means that the request is badly formed. I'll have to take a look at that.
Further update. The real issue was authentication. I created a service principal name and got it working.
The explicit message in Fiddler is:
Authorization Header (Negotiate) appears to contain a Kerberos ticket:
services.AddAuthentication(NegotiateDefaults.AuthenticationScheme)
.AddNegotiate();
public Task<ClaimsPrincipal> TransformAsync(ClaimsPrincipal principal)
{
ClaimsIdentity identity = principal.Identity as ClaimsIdentity;
string userName = identity.Name.ToLower();
bool auth = identity.IsAuthenticated;
string[] roles = new string[]{"admin"};
foreach (string role in roles)
{
identity.AddClaim(new Claim(ClaimTypes.Role, role));
}
return Task.FromResult(principal);
}
public class AuthenticatedRoleHandler : AuthorizationHandler<AuthenticatedRequirement>
{
protected override Task HandleRequirementAsync(AuthorizationHandlerContext context,AuthenticatedRequirement requirement)
{
ClaimsPrincipal user = context.User;
if (user != null && user.Identity.IsAuthenticated) {
context.Succeed(requirement);
} else {
context.Fail();
}
return Task.CompletedTask;
}
}
I'm adding the Program.cs code.
string CorsPolicy = "CorsPolicy";
WebApplicationBuilder? builder = WebApplication.CreateBuilder(args);
builder.WebHost.UseKestrel();
ConfigurationManager _configuration = builder.Configuration;
// Add services to the container.
IServiceCollection? services = builder.Services;
services.AddTransient<IActiveDirectoryUserService,
ActiveDirectoryUserService>();
services.AddAuthentication(NegotiateDefaults.AuthenticationScheme)
.AddNegotiate();
services.AddControllersWithViews();
services.AddScoped<IClaimsTransformation, MyClaimsTransformer>();//only
runs if authenticated, not being authenticated here
services.AddAuthorization(options =>
{
options.FallbackPolicy = options.DefaultPolicy;
options.AddPolicy("AuthenticatedOnly", policy => {
policy.Requirements.Add(new AuthenticatedRequirement(true));
});
});
services.AddSingleton<IAuthorizationHandler, AppUserRoleHandler>();
services.AddSingleton<IAuthorizationHandler, AuthenticatedRoleHandler>
();
services.AddCors(options =>
{
options.AddPolicy(CorsPolicy,
builder => builder
.WithOrigins("https://localhost:7021","https://localhost:44414") //Note: The URL must be specified without a trailing slash (/).
.AllowAnyMethod()
.AllowAnyHeader()
.AllowCredentials());
});
WebApplication app = builder.Build();
// Configure the HTTP request pipeline.
if (!app.Environment.IsDevelopment())
{
app.UseHsts();
}
app.UseAuthentication();
app.UseHttpsRedirection();
app.UseStaticFiles();
app.UseRouting();
According to my test, it works well when I am using the Kestrel(.net 6) inside the VS(its same as run the application inside the Kestrel like VS code). The only difference between the windows authentication for the IIS express and the Kestrel is if you enable the windows authentication for the IIS express, all the request which come to the application will firstly need the authentication which means all the request come to the AuthenticatedRoleHandler has already been authenticated.
But if you use services.AddAuthentication(NegotiateDefaults.AuthenticationScheme)
.AddNegotiate();`, the request will not firstly be authenticated, if the application find it doesn't contain any authentication relatede information, then it will return response to let the client put in the windows credential. This makes the AuthenticatedRoleHandler fired twice. The first one is authentication user name is null, but after the user typed in the credential, we could get the user name inside it.
My test result like below:
If this still not work at your side, please update the whole codes which related with how you register the requirement and how you use it.
Using the .NET Core 3.1 framework, I'm trying to configure a web platform with the following setup:
A Razor Pages application, that acts as the landing page for the platform with features/pages such as advertising the platform, cookie consent, privacy policy, contacts, and the pages that come with Identity (e.g., login, register, manage account).
Authentication for the Razor Pages application is performed in the standard Identity way.
An Angular SPA, that is only accessible after the user is logged in.
OIDC configuration with Identity Server in order to add authentication and authorisation to the Angular SPA.
All of these three components (Razor Pages + Angular + Identity Server) are bundled into one single .NET Core web project. I have also scaffolded Identity so that I am able to customise the look and behaviour of the pages.
I was able to almost configure the application the way I want it, by basically mixing the code of the startup templates of the Razor Pages option (with user accounts stored locally) and the Angular template option (with user accounts stored locally) and with a bit of trial and error and investigation.
The current status of my application is:
The user logs in in the Razor Pages application.
The login is successful and the email is displayed on the navigation bar.
When we navigate to the SPA, my Angular app tries to silently login and is successful:
localhost:5001/Dashboard (Angular SPA home route)
If we navigate to a part of the Razor Pages application that does not have the /Identity route (which is only used for the pages that come with Identity) the cookies appear to no longer contain the right information and I have no session in those routes. This means that, for example, if I am using the SignInManager.IsSignedIn(User) to only display a navigation option to an Administration page that is protected with an options.Conventions.AuthorizePage($"/Administration"), if I am in a URL that has the Identity route, the navigation tab will be displayed, otherwise it will not be displayed:
localhost:5001/Identity/Account/Login
localhost:5001 (Razor Pages application home route)
However, even though the Administration navigation tab is being displayed when I am on a URL that has the /Identity route, if I click on it I will get a 401 unauthorised error, because the Administration page is not preceded by the /Identity route:
localhost:5001/Administration
I have managed to trace the problem to the the AddIdentityServerJwt(). Without this, the login for the Razor Pages application works as intended, but I am obviously unable to use authentication and authorisation with the Angular application afterwards.
I went to check the source code for that method and it turns out that it creates a new IdentityServerJwtPolicySchemeForwardSelector that forwards the JWT policy scheme to the DefaultIdentityUIPathPrefix which, as you might have guessed it, contains only the value "/Identity".
I have configured my Startup class in the following way:
Startup.cs
public void ConfigureServices(IServiceCollection services)
{
JwtSecurityTokenHandler.DefaultInboundClaimTypeMap.Clear();
services.Configure<CookiePolicyOptions>(options =>
{
options.CheckConsentNeeded = context => true;
options.MinimumSameSitePolicy = SameSiteMode.None;
});
services
.AddDbContext<ApplicationDbContext>(optionsBuilder =>
{
DatabaseProviderFactory
.CreateDatabaseProvider(configuration, optionsBuilder);
});
services
.AddDefaultIdentity<IdentityUser>(options => options.SignIn.RequireConfirmedAccount = true)
.AddRoles<IdentityRole>()
.AddEntityFrameworkStores<ApplicationDbContext>();
services
.AddIdentityServer()
.AddApiAuthorization<IdentityUser, ApplicationDbContext>();
services
.AddAuthentication()
.AddIdentityServerJwt();
services
.AddControllersWithViews();
services
.AddRazorPages()
.AddRazorPagesOptions(options =>
{
options.Conventions.AuthorizePage($"/Administration");
});
services
.AddSpaStaticFiles(configuration =>
{
configuration.RootPath = "ClientApp/dist";
});
services.AddTransient<IEmailSender, EmailSenderService>();
services.Configure<AuthMessageSenderOptions>(configuration);
services.AddTransient<IProfileService, ProfileService>();
}
public void Configure(IApplicationBuilder applicationBuilder, IWebHostEnvironment webHostEnvironment)
{
SeedData.SeedDatabase(applicationBuilder, configuration);
if (webHostEnvironment.IsDevelopment())
{
applicationBuilder.UseDeveloperExceptionPage();
applicationBuilder.UseDatabaseErrorPage();
}
else
{
applicationBuilder.UseExceptionHandler("/Error");
applicationBuilder.UseHsts();
}
applicationBuilder.UseHttpsRedirection();
applicationBuilder.UseStaticFiles();
applicationBuilder.UseCookiePolicy();
if (!webHostEnvironment.IsDevelopment())
{
applicationBuilder.UseSpaStaticFiles();
}
applicationBuilder.UseRouting();
applicationBuilder.UseAuthentication();
applicationBuilder.UseIdentityServer();
applicationBuilder.UseAuthorization();
applicationBuilder.UseEndpoints(endpoints =>
{
endpoints.MapControllerRoute(
name: "default",
pattern: "{controller}/{action=Index}/{id?}");
endpoints.MapRazorPages();
});
applicationBuilder.UseSpa(spa =>
{
spa.Options.SourcePath = "ClientApp";
if (webHostEnvironment.IsDevelopment())
{
if (bool.Parse(configuration["DevelopmentConfigurations:UseProxyToSpaDevelopmentServer"]))
{
spa.UseProxyToSpaDevelopmentServer(configuration["DevelopmentConfigurations:ProxyToSpaDevelopmentServerAddress"]);
}
else
{
spa.UseAngularCliServer(npmScript: configuration["DevelopmentConfigurations:AngularCliServerNpmScript"]);
}
}
});
}
How can I configure my application so that the session is available across my entire application and not just on URLs that have the "/Identity" route while maintaining both authentication and authorisation for the Razor Pages application and the Angular application?
I had the same problem and solved it by adding my own PolicyScheme that decides which type of authentication should be used based on the request path. All my razor pages have a path starting with "/Identity" or "/Server" and all other requests should use JWT.
I set this up in ConfigureServices using the collowing coding:
// Add authentication using JWT and add a policy scheme to decide which type of authentication should be used
services.AddAuthentication()
.AddIdentityServerJwt()
.AddPolicyScheme("ApplicationDefinedAuthentication", null, options =>
{
options.ForwardDefaultSelector = (context) =>
{
if (context.Request.Path.StartsWithSegments(new PathString("/Identity"), StringComparison.OrdinalIgnoreCase) ||
context.Request.Path.StartsWithSegments(new PathString("/Server"), StringComparison.OrdinalIgnoreCase))
return IdentityConstants.ApplicationScheme;
else
return IdentityServerJwtConstants.IdentityServerJwtBearerScheme;
};
});
// Use own policy scheme instead of default policy scheme that was set in method AddIdentityServerJwt
services.Configure<AuthenticationOptions>(options => options.DefaultScheme = "ApplicationDefinedAuthentication");
I'm trying deploy my application to our internal server with Nginx. It's an ASP.NET Core 2.2 Razor Pages site. I was asked to include some authentication for logging purposes. Eventually everything was working fine on my computer. I used this site to add cookie based authentication:
https://www.mikesdotnetting.com/article/335/simple-authentication-in-razor-pages-without-a-database
I did some modifications to handle a few more users within the OnPost() method. Though I don't think that would be the problem.
It might be important to mention this is not the only .net core app running on the server. The setup is similar to this:
app1: our.domain.com
app2: our.domain.com/app2 (this is the one I have problems with)
everything works properly except the login. When I try to log in, if the password and username is correct it gets redirected to the proper page, however it seems like there is no identity or it cannot find it afterwards.
On my first attempt, I found the following error in the kestrel service log:
fail: Microsoft.AspNetCore.Antiforgery.Internal.DefaultAntiforgery[7]
I could make that disappear with using services.AddDataProtection(), however the problem is still the same, I get redirected - or get the error message if the login attempt is incorrect - but still can't access the authorised folder and e.g. the HttpContext.User.Claims.FirstOrDefault(x => x.Type == ClaimTypes.GivenName)?.Value returns null or empty.
I did a quick test and added the same login page and an authorised folder, and the other dependencies to the other app. And there it works. I didn't even included services.AddDataProtection() in the startup.cs. The login works perfectly. Though it's using .net core 2.1.
So it might have to do something with the rooting? Or I don't know. I'm totally lost. I'm not a full time developer, more like a hobbyist and I'm completely stuck at this moment. Maybe I messed up something within the startup.cs? Or I should add something else? Or is it something with the cookies handling? I did make a lot of searching, no luck so far.
Here is the relevant part of my startup.cs:
public IConfiguration Configuration { get; }
// This method gets called by the runtime. Use this method to add services to the container.
public void ConfigureServices(IServiceCollection services)
{
services.AddEntityFrameworkNpgsql()
.AddDbContext<Models.UserAccessDbContext>(options =>
options.UseNpgsql(Configuration.GetConnectionString("appConnection")))
.BuildServiceProvider();
services.Configure<CookiePolicyOptions>(options =>
{
// This lambda determines whether user consent for non-essential cookies is needed for a given request.
options.CheckConsentNeeded = context => true;
options.MinimumSameSitePolicy = SameSiteMode.None;
});
// https://hanselman.com/blog/DealingWithApplicationBaseURLsAndRazorLinkGenerationWhileHostingASPNETWebAppsBehindReverseProxies.aspx
services.Configure<ForwardedHeadersOptions>(options =>
{
options.ForwardedHeaders = ForwardedHeaders.All;
options.AllowedHosts = Configuration.GetValue<string>("AllowedHosts")?.Split(';').ToList<string>();
});
services.AddAuthentication(CookieAuthenticationDefaults.AuthenticationScheme).AddCookie(cookieOptions =>
{
cookieOptions.LoginPath = "/";
});
services.AddMvc().AddRazorPagesOptions(options =>
{
options.Conventions.AuthorizeFolder("/admin");
}).SetCompatibilityVersion(CompatibilityVersion.Version_2_2);
services.AddDataProtection()
.SetApplicationName("app")
.PersistKeysToFileSystem(new DirectoryInfo(#"/var/dpkeys/"));
}
// This method gets called by the runtime. Use this method to configure the HTTP request pipeline.
public void Configure(IApplicationBuilder app, IHostingEnvironment env)
{
if (env.IsDevelopment())
{
app.UseDeveloperExceptionPage();
}
else
{
app.UseExceptionHandler("/Error");
// The default HSTS value is 30 days. You may want to change this for production scenarios, see https://aka.ms/aspnetcore-hsts.
app.UseHsts();
app.Use((context, next) =>
{
context.Request.PathBase = new PathString("/app");
return next.Invoke();
});
}
app.UseHttpsRedirection();
app.UseStaticFiles();
app.UseCookiePolicy();
app.UseAuthentication();
app.UseMvc();
}
Update:
One small detail. The cookie is created and I can see it within the Chrome's inspector. But the site/app doesn't see me as an authenticated user.
Seems I had problems with the cookie settings. One more difference between the two pages, that one if it uses font-awesome, which means I have some external cookies on my site. As a wild guess, first I set
options.MinimumSameSitePolicy = SameSiteMode.Lax;
since the other cookies had that mode.
And just like that it started to work on the hosting server as well! Now the app recognises the cookie created after the log in.
It seems to set up OpenIdConnect authentication from .NET Core 2.2 to IdentityServer3 I have to setup through generic AddOpenIdConnect() call, and in order for scope policy to work, I have overridden OnTokenValidated, where I parse the access token received, and add the scopes in it to the ClaimsPrincipal object.
I have found no other way of getting scope policy to work. This seems a bit hackish though. Is there a better or simpler way, so I don't need to override events, or at least not parse the access token? It is parsed in the framework anyhow, so I would suspect there were other functionality available to get scopes into the claims principal.
Moving our code from .NET 4.5.2 to .NET Core 2.2, I need to set up authentication towards our IdentityServer3 server in a very different way.
I was hoping new functionality in later framework allowed for simple setup of authentication towards IdentityServer3, but I've found no fitting example.
I saw someone saying that IdentityServer4.AccessTokenValidation NuGet package could work towards IdentityServer3, but only example I've found has been with simple JWT authentication not allowing implicit user login flow.
Consequently, I've ended up using standard ASP.NET Core libraries to set up openidconnect, and then I need to tweak the code to make it work.
Not sure if the code below handles all it needs to, but at least I've gotten where I can log in and use the new web site, and write cypress tests. Any suggestions on how to do this better or simpler would be appreciated.
public void Configure(IApplicationBuilder app, IHostingEnvironment env)
{
app.UseAuthentication();
app.UseMvc();
}
public void ConfigureServices(IServiceCollection services)
{
// Without this, I get "Correlation failed." error from Microsoft.AspNetCore.Authentication.RemoteAuthenticationHandler`1.HandleRequestAsync()
services.Configure<CookiePolicyOptions>(options =>
{
options.CheckConsentNeeded = context => true;
options.MinimumSameSitePolicy = SameSiteMode.None;
});
services.AddAuthentication(o => {
o.DefaultScheme = CookieAuthenticationDefaults.AuthenticationScheme;
o.DefaultChallengeScheme = OpenIdConnectDefaults.AuthenticationScheme;
}).AddCookie().AddOpenIdConnect(o =>
{
o.Authority = "https://myidentityserver3.myfirm.com";
o.ClientId = "myidentityserver3clientname";
o.SignedOutRedirectUri = "https://localhost:50011/signout";
o.ResponseType = "id_token token";
o.SaveTokens = true;
o.Scope.Add("openid");
o.Scope.Add("roles");
o.Scope.Add("profile");
o.Scope.Add("customrequiredscopeforapi");
o.GetClaimsFromUserInfoEndpoint = false;
{
var old = o.Events.OnTokenValidated;
o.Events.OnTokenValidated = async ctx =>
{
if (old != null) await old(ctx);
var token = MyCustomAuthUtils.ParseBearerToken(ctx.ProtocolMessage.AccessToken);
foreach (var scope in token.Scopes)
{
ctx.Principal.AddIdentity(new ClaimsIdentity(new[] { new Claim("Scope", scope) }));
}
// Our controllers need access token to call other web api's, so putting it here.
// Not sure if that is a good way to do it.
ctx.Principal.AddIdentity(new ClaimsIdentity(new[] { new Claim("access_token", ctx.ProtocolMessage.AccessToken) }));
};
}
});
var mvcBuilder = services.AddMvc(o =>
{
o.Filters.Add(new AuthorizeFilter(ScopePolicy.Create("customrequiredscopeforapi")));
});
services.AddAuthorization();
}
The first thing is you don't need to manally decode the access token , just use ctx.SecurityToken.Claims in OnTokenValidated event to get all claims included in the token .
I'm not sure why you need to use scope to identify the permission . The scope parameter in the OIDC-conformant pipeline determines:
The permissions that an authorized application should have for a given resource server
Which standard profile claims should be included in the ID Token (if the user consents to provide this information to the application)
You can use role to identify whether current login user could access the protected resource . And the OpenID Connect middleware will help mapping the role claim to claim principle .
My SPA application (using Aurelia) calls my ASP.NET Core 2 Web API. I need to authenticate users with Google OIDC provider and also secure the Web API with the same method.
Currently I'm able to authenticate user on the client (SPA) side and retrieve id token and access token. With each API call I send the access token in the header.
Now I'm not sure how to handle the server side to validate the token and grant or deny the access to the API. I followed official docs how to add external login providers, but it seem to work only for server-side MVC applications.
Is there any easy way how to do this?
I think for instance IdentityServer4 can support this scenario, but it seems to me too complex for what I need to do. I don't need my own identity/authorization server after all.
Update:
Based on Miroslav Popovic answer, my configuration for ASP.NET Core 2.0 looks like this:
public void ConfigureServices(IServiceCollection services)
{
services.AddAuthentication(JwtBearerDefaults.AuthenticationScheme).AddJwtBearer(o =>
{
o.Authority = "https://accounts.google.com";
o.TokenValidationParameters = new TokenValidationParameters
{
ValidIssuer = "accounts.google.com",
ValidAudience = "xxxxxxxxxxxxx.apps.googleusercontent.com",
ValidateAudience = true,
ValidateIssuer = true
};
});
services.AddMvc();
}
And in Configure() I call app.UseAuthentication().
When using this setup I get failure message No SecurityTokenValidator available for token.
Update 2:
I made it work. The server configuration is correct. The problem was I was sending access_token to the API instead of id_token.
Since you already have the access token, it shouldn't be too hard to use it to add authentication. You would need something along these lines (not tested):
// Inside Startup.cs, ConfigureServices method
services
.AddAuthentication(JwtBearerDefaults.AuthenticationScheme)
.AddJwtBearer(
options =>
{
var tokenValidationParameters = new TokenValidationParameters
{
ValidIssuer = "accounts.google.com",
ValidateAudience = false
};
options.MetadataAddress = "https://accounts.google.com/.well-known/openid-configuration";
options.TokenValidationParameters = tokenValidationParameters;
});
// Inside Startup.cs, Configure method
app.UseAuthentication(); // Before MVC middleware
app.UseMvc();
// And of course, on your controllers:
[Authorize]
public class MyApiController : Controller
This post from Paul Rowe might help some more, but note that it's written for ASP.NET Core 1.x and authentication APIs changed a bit in 2.0.
There is also a lot of info here on SO, like this question.