I tried to feet the v-treeview component in vuetify with an object, wrapped in an array, as an template literal.
<template lang="pug">
v-container.media-lib-container
v-treeview(:items="[media]" dense)
v-btn(#click="test") test
</template>
The page is loading normal but when I try to open the tree view, I get an type error in vuetify.js.
TypeError: Cannot set property 'vnode' of undefined
at VueComponent.register (vuetify.js?ce5b:30786)
Weirdly when I compute the data, and return it as an template literal it works fine.
computed: {
mediaArr() {
return [this.media];
},
},
Does anyone know if this is a bug or if I miss something? and if this is caused by vue or by vuetify?
I think I know at least where my problem hides.
I get my object from npm directory-tree module and than add an id property to every child for the v-treeview. Also it stopped working again(maybe never has).
The original json:
{
"path": "../uploads",
"name": "uploads",
"children": [
{ "path": "../uploads/parsed", "name": "parsed", "children": [], "size": 0, "type": "directory" },
{
"path": "../uploads/test",
"name": "test",
"children": [
{ "path": "../uploads/test/test2", "name": "test2", "children": [], "size": 0, "type": "directory" }
],
"size": 0,
"type": "directory"
},
{
"path": "../uploads/uploads",
"name": "uploads",
"children": [
{
"path": "../uploads/uploads/public",
"name": "public",
"children": [
{
"path": "../uploads/uploads/public/projectA",
"name": "projectA",
"children": [],
"size": 0,
"type": "directory"
},
{
"path": "../uploads/uploads/public/projectB",
"name": "projectB",
"children": [],
"size": 0,
"type": "directory"
}
],
"size": 0,
"type": "directory"
}
],
"size": 0,
"type": "directory"
}
],
"size": 0,
"type": "directory"
}
The parsed object with the added id:
path: "../uploads",
name: "uploads",
children: [
{
path: "../uploads/parsed",
name: "parsed",
children: [],
size: 0,
type: "directory",
id: 1,
},
{
path: "../uploads/test",
name: "test",
children: [
{
path: "../uploads/test/test2",
name: "test2",
children: [],
size: 0,
type: "directory",
id: 3,
},
],
size: 0,
type: "directory",
id: 2,
},
{
path: "../uploads/uploads",
name: "uploads",
children: [
{
path: "../uploads/uploads/public",
name: "public",
children: [
{
path: "../uploads/uploads/public/projectA",
name: "projectA",
children: [],
size: 0,
type: "directory",
id: 6,
},
{
path: "../uploads/uploads/public/projectB",
name: "projectB",
children: [],
size: 0,
type: "directory",
id: 7,
},
],
size: 0,
type: "directory",
id: 5,
},
],
size: 0,
type: "directory",
id: 4,
},
],
size: 0,
type: "directory",
id: 0,
},
The code in mounted to add id:
mounted() {
let id = 0;
function recur(obj) {
obj.id = id;
++id;
obj.children.map((child) => recur(child));
}
recur(this.media);
},
The thing I don't understand is, that when I console.log(JSON.stringify(this.media) and put it directly in vue data it works. Both as a template literal in the attribute binding and as computed.
Related
I am creating azure-devops release pipeline with API, but getting error. I have validated the json as well and is correct from https://jsonlint.com/ Any help would be really appreciated
I have followed this issue as well and retention policy is correctly passed
Azure DevOps API release definition
error: "message": "VS402982: A retention policy is not set for the stage ‘Test-New-2’. Retention policies at the release pipeline level are deprecated. Use a retention policy at the stage level
POST https://vsrm.dev.azure.com/{{organization}}/{{project}}/_apis/release/definitions?api-version=6.0
json body:
"retentionPolicy": {
"daysToKeep": 30,
"releasesToKeep": 3,
"retainBuild": true
},
Yes, it should be the syntax issue, to create a release definition, you could refer to this sample.
Reruest URL:
POST https://vsrm.dev.azure.com/{organization}/{project}/_apis/release/definitions?api-version=6.0
Request Body:
{
"source": "undefined",
"revision": 1,
"description": null,
"createdBy": null,
"createdOn": "0001-01-01T00:00:00",
"modifiedBy": null,
"modifiedOn": "0001-01-01T00:00:00",
"isDeleted": false,
"variables": {},
"variableGroups": [],
"environments": [
{
"id": 0,
"name": "PROD",
"variables": {},
"variableGroups": [],
"preDeployApprovals": {
"approvals": [
{
"rank": 1,
"isAutomated": false,
"isNotificationOn": false,
"approver": {
"displayName": null,
"id": "aeb95c63-4fac-4948-84ce-711b0a9dda97"
},
"id": 0
}
]
},
"postDeployApprovals": {
"approvals": [
{
"rank": 1,
"isAutomated": true,
"isNotificationOn": false,
"id": 0
}
]
},
"deployPhases": [
{
"deploymentInput": {
"parallelExecution": {
"parallelExecutionType": "none"
},
"skipArtifactsDownload": false,
"artifactsDownloadInput": {},
"queueId": 15,
"demands": [],
"enableAccessToken": false,
"timeoutInMinutes": 0,
"jobCancelTimeoutInMinutes": 1,
"condition": "succeeded()",
"overrideInputs": {}
},
"rank": 1,
"phaseType": "agentBasedDeployment",
"name": "Run on agent",
"workflowTasks": []
}
],
"environmentOptions": {
"emailNotificationType": "OnlyOnFailure",
"emailRecipients": "release.environment.owner;release.creator",
"skipArtifactsDownload": false,
"timeoutInMinutes": 0,
"enableAccessToken": false,
"publishDeploymentStatus": false,
"badgeEnabled": false,
"autoLinkWorkItems": false,
"pullRequestDeploymentEnabled": false
},
"demands": [],
"conditions": [],
"executionPolicy": {
"concurrencyCount": 0,
"queueDepthCount": 0
},
"schedules": [],
"retentionPolicy": {
"daysToKeep": 30,
"releasesToKeep": 3,
"retainBuild": true
},
"properties": {},
"preDeploymentGates": {
"id": 0,
"gatesOptions": null,
"gates": []
},
"postDeploymentGates": {
"id": 0,
"gatesOptions": null,
"gates": []
},
"environmentTriggers": []
}
],
"artifacts": [],
"triggers": [],
"releaseNameFormat": null,
"tags": [],
"properties": {},
"id": 0,
"name": "Fabrikam-web",
"projectReference": null,
"_links": {}
}
I test it on my side, it works for me.
I try to create a circle packing chart. My data is already in tree form. This is what I tried:
{
"width": 932,
"height": 932,
"data": {
"name": "tree",
"values": {
"name": "root",
"children" : [
{"name" : "leaf1", "value" : 100},
{"name" : "branch",
"children" : [
{"name" : "leaf2", "value" : 200},
{"name" : "leaf3", "value" : 300}
]}
]
},
"transform": [
{
"type": "pack",
"field": "value",
"size": [{"signal": "width"}, {"signal": "height"}]
}
]
},
"scales": [
{
"name": "color",
"type": "ordinal",
"domain": {"data": "tree", "field": "value"},
"range": {"data": "tree", "field": "value"}
}
]
}
Results in an Error [Error] w transform requires a backing tree data source. Any pointers are appreciated.
Corresponding to the Vega documentation, the Pack Transform
processes a collection of special tree node objects generated by an
upstream nest or stratify transform.
therefore, I examined the stratify-test in the Vega repo and this is the generated data:
{
data: {
id: "a",
},
height: 2,
depth: 0,
parent: null,
id: "a",
children: [
{
data: {
id: "b",
pid: "a",
},
height: 0,
depth: 1,
parent: [Circular],
id: "b",
},
{
data: {
id: "c",
pid: "a",
},
height: 1,
depth: 1,
parent: [Circular],
id: "c",
children: [
{
data: {
id: "d",
pid: "c",
},
height: 0,
depth: 2,
parent: [Circular],
id: "d",
},
],
},
],
lookup: {
a: [Circular],
b: {
data: {
id: "b",
pid: "a",
},
height: 0,
depth: 1,
parent: [Circular],
id: "b",
},
c: {
data: {
id: "c",
pid: "a",
},
height: 1,
depth: 1,
parent: [Circular],
id: "c",
children: [
{
data: {
id: "d",
pid: "c",
},
height: 0,
depth: 2,
parent: [Circular],
id: "d",
},
],
},
d: {
data: {
id: "d",
pid: "c",
},
height: 0,
depth: 2,
parent: {
data: {
id: "c",
pid: "a",
},
height: 1,
depth: 1,
parent: [Circular],
id: "c",
children: [
[Circular],
],
},
id: "d",
},
},
}
I am currently building a web application where you can create setlists (arrays) with an array of lyric objectId's inside, that you can then sort / order into how you want it. So if you would like the 3rd list item to become the first, then you simply drag and drop it to the first line.
I now have a problem in my mongoose schema. I am looking for a way to implement an order attribute or something that would allow me to add a order value such as 0 or 1 depending on the position of the lyrics. Does any of you know how to best implement such order?
Here is a copy of my schema. Currently lyrics is an array of lyric objectId's. But in there i would need an "Order" as well, so that i can sort the array according to the order value.
const mongoose = require("mongoose");
const SetlistSchema = new mongoose.Schema({
setlistName: { type: String, required: true },
lastEdited: { type: Date },
createdAt: { type: Date, default: Date.now },
lyrics: [{
type: mongoose.Schema.Types.ObjectId,
ref: 'Lyric'
}],
author: {
id: {
type: mongoose.Schema.Types.ObjectId,
ref: "User"
},
username: String
}
});
module.exports = mongoose.model("Setlist", SetlistSchema);
Here is the Lyrics schema.
const mongoose = require("mongoose");
const LyricSchema = new mongoose.Schema({
lyricName: { type: String, required: true },
lyricContent: { type: String, required: true },
lastEdited: { type: Date },
createdAt: { type: Date, default: Date.now },
author: {
id: {
type: mongoose.Schema.Types.ObjectId,
ref: "User"
},
username: String
}
});
module.exports = mongoose.model("Lyric", LyricSchema);
If adding an order number isn't the best practice, what can you then recommend as a way of keeping track of which order the user would like the lyrics to show up?
You can use aggregation framework to sort lyrics by order field. You first need to add a sort field with Number type.
Setlist.aggregate([
{
$unwind: "$lyrics"
},
{
$lookup: {
from: "lyrics", // MUST be the PHYSICAL collection name
localField: "lyrics",
foreignField: "_id",
as: "lyrics"
}
},
{
$sort: {
"lyrics.order": 1
}
},
{
"$group": {
"_id": "$_id",
"lyrics": {
"$push": "$lyrics"
},
"allFields": {
"$first": "$$ROOT"
}
}
},
{
"$replaceRoot": {
"newRoot": {
"$mergeObjects": [
"$allFields",
{
"lyrics": "$lyrics"
}
]
}
}
}
])
Playground
Sample documents:
db={
"lists": [
{
"_id": ObjectId("5a934e000102030405000000"),
"setlistName": "list1",
"lastEdited": ISODate("2020-03-18T23:11:56.443+03:00"),
"createdAt": ISODate("2020-03-15T23:11:56.443+03:00"),
"lyrics": [
ObjectId("6a934e000102030405000000"),
ObjectId("6a934e000102030405000001"),
ObjectId("6a934e000102030405000002")
]
},
{
"_id": ObjectId("5a934e000102030405000001"),
"setlistName": "list2",
"lastEdited": ISODate("2020-03-11T23:11:56.443+03:00"),
"createdAt": ISODate("2020-03-11T23:11:56.443+03:00"),
"lyrics": [
ObjectId("6a934e000102030405000003"),
ObjectId("6a934e000102030405000004")
]
}
],
"lyrics": [
{
"_id": ObjectId("6a934e000102030405000000"),
"name": "Lyric 1",
"order": 3
},
{
"_id": ObjectId("6a934e000102030405000001"),
"name": "Lyric 2",
"order": 1
},
{
"_id": ObjectId("6a934e000102030405000002"),
"name": "Lyric 3",
"order": 2
},
{
"_id": ObjectId("6a934e000102030405000003"),
"name": "Lyric 4",
"order": 2
},
{
"_id": ObjectId("6a934e000102030405000004"),
"name": "Lyric 5",
"order": 1
}
]
}
Output: (as you see lyrics are sorted by order field value)
[
{
"_id": ObjectId("5a934e000102030405000000"),
"createdAt": ISODate("2020-03-15T20:11:56.443Z"),
"lastEdited": ISODate("2020-03-18T20:11:56.443Z"),
"lyrics": [
[
{
"_id": ObjectId("6a934e000102030405000001"),
"name": "Lyric 2",
"order": 1
}
],
[
{
"_id": ObjectId("6a934e000102030405000002"),
"name": "Lyric 3",
"order": 2
}
],
[
{
"_id": ObjectId("6a934e000102030405000000"),
"name": "Lyric 1",
"order": 3
}
]
],
"setlistName": "list1"
},
{
"_id": ObjectId("5a934e000102030405000001"),
"createdAt": ISODate("2020-03-11T20:11:56.443Z"),
"lastEdited": ISODate("2020-03-11T20:11:56.443Z"),
"lyrics": [
[
{
"_id": ObjectId("6a934e000102030405000004"),
"name": "Lyric 5",
"order": 1
}
],
[
{
"_id": ObjectId("6a934e000102030405000003"),
"name": "Lyric 4",
"order": 2
}
]
],
"setlistName": "list2"
}
]
I would like to be able to maintain different stores from the same json where the model for each store is the same. Each store would need to be updated based on its root property assignment. Please see below for a sample json, store, and model, in which case each store would be updated based on the json's root property value (category 1, category 2, etc.). The goal is to be able to bind a nested list in my application to different stores on the fly, rather than call setProxy to change the url setting on a single store. Also, the json needs to be in this format. Thanks for your help and please let me know if I can provide clarification or answer any questions.
Json:
{
"items": [
{
"name": "category 1",
"status": "",
"displaytext": "",
"items": [
{
"name": "",
"status": "",
"displaytext": "",
"items": [
{
"name": "",
"status": "",
"displaytext": "",
"items": [
{
"name": "",
"status": "",
"displaytext": "",
"leaf": true
}
]
}
]
}
]
},
{
"name": "category 2",
"status": "",
"displaytext": "",
"items": [
{
"name": "",
"status": "",
"displaytext": "",
"items": [
{
"name": "",
"status": "",
"displaytext": "",
"leaf": true
}
]
}
]
},
{
"name": "cateory 3",
"status": "",
"displaytext": "",
"items": []
},
{
"name": "category 4",
"status": "",
"displaytext": "",
"items": []
}
]
}
Model:
Ext.define('MyApp.model.myModel', {
extend: 'Ext.data.Model',
config: {
fields: [
{
name: 'name',
type: 'string'
},
{
name: 'status',
type: 'string'
},
{
name: 'displaytext',
type: 'string'
}
]
}
});
Store 1, 2, 3, etc:
Ext.define('MyApp.store.storeCategory1', {
extend: 'Ext.data.TreeStore',
requires: [
'MyApp.model.myModel'
],
config: {
model: 'MyApp.model.myModel',
storeId: 'myStore',
autoLoad: false,
proxy: {
type: 'ajax',
url: '/path/to/file.json',
reader: {
type: 'json',
rootProperty: 'items'
}
}
}
});
I think you best bet would be to make a server request independent of the Store's proxy. On success, split up the data into the different stores as needed. It's fine to preprocess data this way, especially if you need to split one large data response into multiple data stores. For example:
Ext.Ajax.request({
url: 'path/to/file.json',
success: function(response){
// process server response here
var json = Ext.decode(response.responseText);
for(var i=0, l=json.items.length, i<l; i++){
// start distributing the data to your different stores here
}
}
});
Hope this helps.
I am trying to use the rootProperty value in a Sencha Touch 2 store to load some JSON I retrieved from the Foursquare Venues API and for the life of me I cannot get it to work.
According to the docs I should setup my rootProperty in dot notation to equal "response.venues" but it does not populate the list. I put the json in a separate file and removed the "response" and "venues" headers and it worked fine. There must be something blatantly obvious I'm missing here as I can't find a straight answer anywhere.
My model:
Ext.define('App.model.4SqVenue', {
extend: 'Ext.data.Model',
config: {
fields: [
{name: 'name', id: 'id'}
]
}
});
My store:
Ext.define('App.store.4SqVenues', {
extend: 'Ext.data.Store',
requires: [
'App.model.4SqVenue'
],
config: {
model: 'App.model.4SqVenue',
storeId: '4SqVenuesStore',
proxy: {
type: 'jsonp',
url: 'foursquare venue request',
reader: {
type: 'json',
rootProperty: 'response.venues'
}
}
}
});
My view:
Ext.define('App.view.4SqVenues', {
extend: 'Ext.List',
xtype: '4SqVenuesCard',
requires: [
'App.store.4SqVenues'
],
config: {
fullscreen: true,
itemTpl: '{name}',
store: '4SqVenuesStore'
}
});
The response from the 4sq API:
{
"meta": {
"code": 200
},
"response": {
"venues": [
{
"id": "4a3ad368f964a52052a01fe3",
"name": "Four Peaks Brewing Company",
"contact": {
"phone": "4803039967",
"formattedPhone": "(480) 303-9967",
"twitter": "4PeaksBrewery"
},
"location": {
"address": "1340 E 8th St",
"crossStreet": "at Dorsey Ln.",
"lat": 33.4195052281187,
"lng": -111.91593825817108,
"distance": 1827,
"postalCode": "85281",
"city": "Tempe",
"state": "AZ",
"country": "United States"
},
"categories": [
{
"id": "4bf58dd8d48988d1d7941735",
"name": "Brewery",
"pluralName": "Breweries",
"shortName": "Brewery",
"icon": {
"prefix": "https://foursquare.com/img/categories/nightlife/brewery_",
"sizes": [
32,
44,
64,
88,
256
],
"name": ".png"
},
"primary": true
}
],
"verified": true,
"stats": {
"checkinsCount": 24513,
"usersCount": 8534,
"tipCount": 235
},
"url": "http://www.fourpeaks.com",
"likes": {
"count": 0,
"groups": []
},
"menu": {
"type": "foodAndBeverage",
"url": "https://foursquare.com/v/four-peaks-brewing-company/4a3ad368f964a52052a01fe3/menu",
"mobileUrl": "https://foursquare.com/v/4a3ad368f964a52052a01fe3/device_menu"
},
"specials": {
"count": 0,
"items": []
},
"hereNow": {
"count": 1,
"groups": [
{
"type": "others",
"name": "Other people here",
"count": 1,
"items": []
}
]
}
}
]
}
}
I have a very similar issue. Basically all is good if I load the json without the rootProperty defined. But once I define it things stop working (bad configuration error reported in Architect).
So the belwo works opnlu until I define the rootProperty as 'records'
{ "records" : [ { "artist" : "Champion",
"index" : 1,
"recordid" : "r00899659",
"trackname" : "1 To 2"
},
{ "artist" : "Champion",
"index" : 2,
"recordid" : "r00899668",
"trackname" : "Is Anybody There?"
}
.......
],
"rowcount" : 10,
"timestamp" : "1/07/2012 5:05:19 AM"
}
first, you have to wrap it in a function call as Per documentation for the response. Then you may have to use a convert function inside your model. Such as setting the root property to response, and then using convert to bring in all the other data from the venue property.