I have downloaded fresh Mulesoft studio and changed configuration to point Open JRE- 11 and compiler to point 11.
Studio version - 7.8
When I try creating the mule project it is now also adding module-info.java along with mule.xml files.
Wonder why it is creating module-info.java I don't used to see when i was working with 1.8 version or before.
Any Idea ?? Thanks in advance.
Java 9 introduced a whole new level of encapsulation. Larger than packages, and more robust too. These are modules.
Chances are you should in the long term, migrate your project to use modules (for additional security, and for better code organization). However, the chances are also high that you won't want to do it right now, just because.
In that latter case, it would be reasonable to simply delete the module-info.java file. Provided you don't have any other module-info.java files in the system, and provided you run with everything on the classpath rather than module path (there's a good chance that's your default anyway) you should not have any problem.
Meanwhile, you have some homework to do, so you can decide if you will migrate to modules, and if so, how to do it.
Related
Pentaho Data Integration 8.0.x is using Janino 2.5.16, released in 2010 for compiling the User Defined Java Class step. There is a JIRA in pentaho for updating this to use a newer Janino version which would bring new java 8 related features in pentaho v8.2.0 GA. But there is no info on when will this be released.
Is there any other way I can use a newer janino version (janino-3.0.8.jar) with exiting pentaho for UDJC? I tried to copy updated jar in the lib and also added commons-compiler-3.0.8.jar to fulfill dependency. Now when I open Spoon, I get the following error:
Please advise on how this can be achieved. I understand that just replacing the jar may not be enough but just want if something else can be done.
This is not easy. Even now, since you got ClassNotFound, public api of janino is changed. Some classes are removed some are changed. What is actual needs to update it?
If you need really complicated business logic, then create custom plugin. Documentation and tutorials are available and you can look into sources of current builtin plugins (sources are available on github).
What important new version of janino has, that old doesn't (beside java8 support)? Checkout kettle engine, look into sources of UserDefinedClass step, change code to support new janino version, test and make own build of pdi kettle, and try to send push request to maintainers of repository.
Any of this quite complicated, This plugin is builtin into engine, and you have to make own build. Own build means, you have to support it by yourself. This is non trivial, project is huge and now even bigger and continue evolving, I spent several days to make my first custom build (version of 4, was in ivy) just for purpose to know better and debug complicated cases, and it used never in production.
Maintainers of repository must have good reason to include your changes into stream, it must be well tested and it is long procedure and most probably doesn't worth it. A lots of changed since 2010, I probable have seen in release notes, new version of java already have abilities to compile at runtime.
My advice is to make you own plugin.
I'm using Mule Server 3.8 EE which brings commons-lang 2.4 with it. A third-party library in my project needs commons-lang 2.6, because it uses a method that was introduced in this version.
So when I just start my application, I get a java.lang.NoSuchMethodError
Is there a way to update the dependency in the runtime? What I tried so far:
including commons-lang 2.6 in my app -> no effect, the one from the runtime is picked up first
replacing the jar directly in the runtime -> errors in studio, that the 2.4 jar is missing
so maybe i am late BUT -- this is your answer. Add the libraries that are newer in the jar distribution to the Build Path. Under Java Build Path screen you should see the libraries listed. I needed to use Apache http-client 4.5.6 and that's very interesting because it brings with it a lot of other dependencies, so your question was VERY relevant. The solution is to rely on JAVA (and not mule -- oops Anypoint or whatever) conventions and make sure the JVM loads my class files first. Then, it won't load the old ones from mule's jar. And so I went to the tab Order and Export, and moved Mule to the bottom. This simple, trivial change makes it work. I think if we would work with command line and vim, we would all know this. But all the IDE gui and everything else makes us forget the simplest things. Please use it in good health. :)
What is the right way to make an RCP application that is “ready for plugins”? I have struggled to do this basic concept and am trying to accomplish this in Eclipse 3.7 (latest 3.x version).
Step 1
I would like to explore this by using 3 eclipse plugin projects:
• HelloWorldRCP
• HelloWorldPluginA
• HelloWorldPluginB
Would it make sense to make HelloWorldRCP with all the common things such as a menu-bar with an Edit menu including cut, copy and paste menu items? The HelloWorldPluginA could add an additional menu-item called “Alpha” and HelloWorldPluginB could add yet another menu-item called “Beta”? However, the cut, copy and paste functionality could still work within Plugin A and B?
Step 2
Next, how do I deploy this as a “product”? I have made a new product configuration and defined the dependencies from the default runtime configuration that was made. I do notice that there are a lot of dependency jars that are included, but I don’t think I use them. For example, I don’t use data-binding to my knowledge, but it keeps coming up as a required dependency.
I go to Export | Eclipse Product and an executable environment is created in my desired folder. However, when I copy this to another machine it seems to keep referencing the original machines Java installation location. How does one get around this?
I have tried to bundle a jre with the Product Export but nothing is created. I have also just tried copying my jre6 as a jre folder. This does seem to work.
Next problem here is the 32/64 bit Java execution environments. What is advised here? I have been aiming to build on 32 bit only and then hopefully that will run on 32 or 64bit platforms. Is this correct?
Step 3
I need to web-start this now. The old way of initiating an Eclipse 3.5 application, using a startup.jar has changed. I now use the equinox launcher and reference it in the jnlp instead of the startup.jar. However, I keep getting an exception which seems related to the 32/64 bit equinox win32_64 jar. I notice that the export writes a folder and not a jar. I read somewhere that this is a “clever trick” to allow compatibility for both 32 and 64bit runtime environments.
The problem here is that I need a jar and not a folder so that I can sign the jars required and deploy accordingly.
Does anyone have a Java Web-start example for and Eclipse 3.7 RCP application? Or any advice?
You are going to need a lot of time to learn everything you've asked about here.
Here is one of the best places to start... http://www.vogella.com/eclipse.html
That site covers a lot of basics. But you need a little more than basics.
The best example of a working RCP product with some of the features you require can be found at ... http://max-server.myftp.org/trac/mp3m
This guy (Kai) makes all of the source code available via SVN, and he has some very advanced stuff going on in his application. He also has a good blog with some advanced RCP tips and tricks. http://www.toedter.com/blog/
Another thing you'll want to investigate is Tycho. I realize that you didn't mention anything about building your application, but I've found that using Tycho for building has made my most recent foray into Eclipse RCP 100 times better than the other times I've done RCP work. So, my advice, get to know Tycho. http://wiki.eclipse.org/Tycho/Reference_Card
The learning curve of Eclipse RCP is somewhat steep, but I think it's worth the effort.
Good Luck!
I want to bundle JRE 6.0 together with my java application. All my source code reside in CVS. My client will check-out the code and build it themselves. Should I store JRE in CVS?
I normally advocate putting most everything in source control, but this seems a little excessive. Why ?
the JRE is readily available from http://java.sun.com
it doesn't change that often. I'd expect you to specify a minimum version for your code to run against (e.g. 1.5, 1.6 etc.)
I would not put a JDK or JRE into a source code repository:
It is bad practice to put externally versioned things into your version control because it usually leads to over-constraining, obscuring and/or hard-wiring your app's external dependencies. (Maven or Ivy are good solutions for dealing with external dependencies, though not in this case,)
Putting binaries into version control is a bad idea for some version control systems.
But I think your real problem (actually, your user's organization's problem) is the IT folks who refuse to contemplate upgrading the JRE:
They need to be made aware of the
fact that they can install multiple
JRE versions on the one machine, and
configure apps to launch with the JRE
version they require. (It is trivial
on Linux ...)
They need to be made aware of the fact
that their policy is an impediment to
progress.
They need to be made aware of the fact
that their policy is a potential security
issue. If they force users to deploy their
own copies of JDKs / JREs in random places,
it will be difficult to ensure that JRE security
patches get applied. (Besides, 1.4.2 is due
to be end-of-life'd soonish, and security
patches for it will cease.)
EDIT: and there is also the legal question of whether "redistributing" a JRE out of your source code repository is a violation of Sun's click-through JRE/JDK download license. (I don't know ...)
As best practice, you shouldn't keep any binary files in the source control system. For Java developers there is maven that does it's work better in versioning jar files. The reason is that we want to keep our source repository as small as possible so it is faster for those that checks out our code for the first time.
But if you still want to keep binary files in the source control, it would be best to avoid using CVS, because CVS is bad in versioning binary files. You can search with google, why it is bad. If you use SVN, then it still okay because SVN handles binary files much better than CVS.
I see nothing wrong with storing the JRE in CVS.
However, it's not so important whether you do or not as long as your script can pull it as part of the build. For example, if you want to host a downloadable jre.zip on an HTTP server, or point to it in a Maven repo, that's just as good.
Well won't your client all ready have the JRE if you expect him to compile the code before running it? The JDK contains the JRE.
Depends a lot on what you use to handle dependencies. If you use Maven, then create a maven package with the stuff you need, and host it on a local repository.
If you just have CVS (like we do) then it is fine to create big binary packages (since you will need them) which you can then put in CVS. Just be aware that they should be static for best CVS performance.
ALso note that the jsmooth package can create an EXE file of your jar with an JRE embedded in it. This might solve your deployment problem.
For remote compilation, Eclipse can work with a plain JRE. You just need to tell Eclipse where JRE you already have prepared above is located on the disk. There is also a folder inside the Eclipse distribution where the launcher looks automatically.
I'm wondering about the client building the application themselves. It will require some kind of Java compiler, most probably javac wich is part of the JDK. So your client will not only need a JRE, but a JDK as well (unless they will be using Jikes or another alternative compiler).
javac is capable of generating bytecode for previous versions of Java, so using a newer compiler should not pose any problems.
Personally, I would not include large binaries like a JRE as part of my own repository. The JRE can be considered very stable and just listing the minimum version required should be enough. Installing a JRE is also something quite different than installing a single Java application. The two activities should not be mixed.
I am to migrate a Websphere machine (including the applications which run on it) to a new machine. They wanted a clean install of the OS and WebSphere, so I did that. I also took a full file backup of all of the applications they had on the old server. The problem is that to re-install them on the new server, the WebSphere dialog asks me for the JAR/EAR/WAR file, which I don't have.
Is there any reasonably easy way to simply extract the backup of the WebSphere application files I have taken from the old maching, and simply configure the new machine to use them? WAR, etc. is a nice feature to have, but to be forced to use it seems silly.
Edit: The existing WebSphere server is still up and running in production.
Edit: The old server is WAS 3.5, which means it doesn't even have an export function, sadly. Also, the directory where it actually runs the content from has a completely different structure (consisting of like a a %/Web and %/Servlet, where % is the context path of the application). In the "Install" section, it doesn't even mention EAR or WAR, only JAR. I am currently thinking that perhaps the best thing to do might be to just copy the directory over to another WAS 3.5 system and then upgrade that system (and hope it converts the folder structure and updated the config as part of the upgrade).
Edit: The closest thing I have found to a solution so far is this link:
http://www.javazoom.net/services/newsletter/was4.html (though I am not sure if that tool is available or relevant for WAS 7.x).
This has to be a problem other people have run into before, but I can't find a solution anywhere on the WEB.
Thank you!
Here do they have sample Jacl scripts one can use to export/import appserver's configuration. So that is what you can start with. If your new bow uses the same version of WAS (and the same topology if it is not a standalone box) as the old one, it might be a (relatively) safe process.
Migration between different versions of Websphere might be somewhat more tricky, but I'm sure IBM published at least one redbook on that topic.
If you still have the old server running, than just export the apps and you have the war/ear files. However, If you don't know the configuration for the apps, you are screwed. However, I am sure IBM has tools that you can use. Some of the paid tools look even nice and user friendly (at least according to their sales demos). I can't tell you what you need, since I don't know what documentation you have for your apps. But as it looks like there is not much there, otherwise you would just install the application the same way they were installed on your old server and use the binaries (war, ear, jar) that are archived somewhere.