I have two really long selects that are both nested
(SELECT MAX(u.Username) as Identification,max(cht.SentOn) NewestMessage
from Chats cht
JOIN(some other select as u that has u.username))
union
(select Max(GC.Identification)Identification,Min(cht.SentOn) NewestMessage
from Chats cht
join(some other select as GC that has GC.Identification))
How can I order these (both queries combined into one table results) by NewestMessage which is a type of datetime?
I would slightly alter your query to:
SELECT Identification, NewestMessage
FROM
(
SELECT MAX(u.Username) AS Identification, MAX(cht.SentOn) AS NewestMessage
FROM Chats cht
INNER JOIN (some other select as u that has u.username)
UNION -- maybe UNION ALL if you don't mind duplicates?
SELECT MAX(GC.Identification), MIN(cht.SentOn)
FROM Chats cht
INNER JOIN (some other select as GC that has GC.Identification)
) t
ORDER BY NewestMessage
I am basically replacing your union of tuples to a subquery on a union query, using an ORDER BY with the column you want. Note that aliases in the second half of the union query are not necessary, and in fact will be ignored by SQL Server.
Add an order by class on the last SQL with the column name on the first SQL.
see my example here: order by TeamId at the end, in this the TeamId is from the first SQL
SELECT TeamId, TeamName
FROM [dbo].[Teams]
union
SELECT PlayerID, FirstName
FROM [dbo].[Players]
order by TeamId asc
Related
I am trying to display the records,order as in the where clause..
example:
select name from table where name in ('Yaksha','Arun','Naveen');
It displays Arun,Naveen,Yaksha (alphabetical order)
I want display it as same order i.e 'Yaksha''Arun','Naveen'
how to display this...
I am using oracle db.
Add this ORDER BY at the query's end:
order by case name when 'Yaksha' then 1
when 'Arun' then 2
when 'Naveen' then 3
end
(There's no other way to get that order. You need an ORDER BY to get a specific result set order.)
It may be a bit clunky, but you can create a custom ordering with a case expression:
SELECT *
FROM my_table
WHERE name IN ('Yaksha', 'Arun','Naveen')
ORDER BY CASE name WHEN 'Yaksha' THEN 1
WHEN 'Arun' THEN 2
WHEN 'Naveen' THEN 3
END ASC
A slightly longer option, but one that prevents duplication of the string literals is to use a subquery:
SELECT m.*
FROM my_table m
JOIN (SELECT 'Yaksha' AS name, 1 AS name_order FROM dual
UNION ALL
SELECT 'Arun' AS name, 2 AS name_order FROM dual
UNION ALL
SELECT 'Naveen' AS name, 3 AS name_order FROM dual) o
ON o.name = m.name
ORDER BY o.name_order ASC
You can try with something like the following:
SELECT *
FROM test
WHERE name IN ( 'Yaksha', 'Arun', 'Naveen' )
ORDER BY instr ( q'['Yaksha', 'Arun', 'Naveen']', name ) ASC
This way could be useful if your IN list is somehow dynamic.
If the list of values is dynamic or you just don't want to repeat the values you could use (or abuse, depending on your point of view) a table collection, and join your real table to a table collection expression instead of using IN:
select your_table.name
from table(sys.odcivarchar2list('Yaksha','Arun','Naveen')) t
join your_table on your_table.name = t.column_value;
Which will generally work, but of course without an order-by clause is not guaranteed to work, so you can use an inline view to assign the order:
select your_table.name from (
select row_number() over (order by null) as rn, column_value as name
from table(sys.odcivarchar2list('Yaksha','Arun','Naveen'))
) t
join your_table on your_table.name = t.name
order by t.rn;
This still relies on row_number() over (order by null) using the order of the elements in the collection; which relies on collection unnesting preserving the element order. I don't think that's guaranteed either, so there is still some risk involved.
I am attempting to perform the following query:
SELECT
author, link_id, COUNT(link_id) as cnt
FROM
[fh-bigquery:reddit_comments.2015_12],
[fh-bigquery:reddit_comments.2015_11]
WHERE link_id IN (
SELECT posts.name
FROM [fh-bigquery:reddit_posts.full_corpus_201512] AS posts
WHERE posts.subreddit = 'politics'
ORDER BY posts.created_utc DESC
LIMIT 300
)
GROUP BY author, link_id
ORDER BY author
I receive this error message upon execution: JOIN (including semi-join) and UNION ALL (comma, date range) may not be combined in a single SELECT statement. Either move the UNION ALL to an inner query or the JOIN to an outer query.
Removing one of the comments tables works fine however I can't seem to figure out how BigQuery's Comma as UNION ALL works. I've attempted to move the union to an inner query but I still get the same error.
The error was in my misunderstanding of move the UNION ALL to an inner query. The resolve the error, I had to put the two tables in a basic select * from .... The working query is as follows:
SELECT
author, link_id, COUNT(link_id) as cnt
FROM (
SELECT *
FROM
[fh-bigquery:reddit_comments.2015_12],
[fh-bigquery:reddit_comments.2015_11]
)
WHERE link_id IN (
SELECT posts.name
FROM [fh-bigquery:reddit_posts.full_corpus_201512] AS posts
WHERE posts.subreddit = 'politics'
ORDER BY posts.created_utc DESC
LIMIT 300
)
GROUP BY author, link_id
ORDER BY author
I am trying to display the records,order as in the where clause..
example:
select name from table where name in ('Yaksha','Arun','Naveen');
It displays Arun,Naveen,Yaksha (alphabetical order)
I want display it as same order i.e 'Yaksha''Arun','Naveen'
how to display this...
I am using oracle db.
Add this ORDER BY at the query's end:
order by case name when 'Yaksha' then 1
when 'Arun' then 2
when 'Naveen' then 3
end
(There's no other way to get that order. You need an ORDER BY to get a specific result set order.)
It may be a bit clunky, but you can create a custom ordering with a case expression:
SELECT *
FROM my_table
WHERE name IN ('Yaksha', 'Arun','Naveen')
ORDER BY CASE name WHEN 'Yaksha' THEN 1
WHEN 'Arun' THEN 2
WHEN 'Naveen' THEN 3
END ASC
A slightly longer option, but one that prevents duplication of the string literals is to use a subquery:
SELECT m.*
FROM my_table m
JOIN (SELECT 'Yaksha' AS name, 1 AS name_order FROM dual
UNION ALL
SELECT 'Arun' AS name, 2 AS name_order FROM dual
UNION ALL
SELECT 'Naveen' AS name, 3 AS name_order FROM dual) o
ON o.name = m.name
ORDER BY o.name_order ASC
You can try with something like the following:
SELECT *
FROM test
WHERE name IN ( 'Yaksha', 'Arun', 'Naveen' )
ORDER BY instr ( q'['Yaksha', 'Arun', 'Naveen']', name ) ASC
This way could be useful if your IN list is somehow dynamic.
If the list of values is dynamic or you just don't want to repeat the values you could use (or abuse, depending on your point of view) a table collection, and join your real table to a table collection expression instead of using IN:
select your_table.name
from table(sys.odcivarchar2list('Yaksha','Arun','Naveen')) t
join your_table on your_table.name = t.column_value;
Which will generally work, but of course without an order-by clause is not guaranteed to work, so you can use an inline view to assign the order:
select your_table.name from (
select row_number() over (order by null) as rn, column_value as name
from table(sys.odcivarchar2list('Yaksha','Arun','Naveen'))
) t
join your_table on your_table.name = t.name
order by t.rn;
This still relies on row_number() over (order by null) using the order of the elements in the collection; which relies on collection unnesting preserving the element order. I don't think that's guaranteed either, so there is still some risk involved.
EDITED:
I have this query wherein I want to SELECT the first instance of a record from the table petTable.
SELECT id,
pet_ID,
FIRST(petName),
First(Description)
FROM petTable
GROUP BY pet_ID;
The problem is I have huge number of records and this query is too slow. I discovered that GROUP BY slows down the query. Do you have any idea that could make this query faster? or better, a query wherein I don't need to use GROUP BY?
"The problem is I have huge number of records and this query is too slow. I discovered that GROUP BY slows down the query. Do you have any idea that could make this query faster?"
And an index on pet_ID, then create and test this query:
SELECT pet_ID, Min(id) AS MinOfid
FROM petTable
GROUP BY pet_ID;
Once you have that query working, you can join it back to the original table --- then it will select only the original rows which match based on id and you can retrieve the other fields you want from those matching rows.
SELECT pt.id, pt.pet_ID, pt.petName, pt.Description
FROM
petTable AS pt
INNER JOIN
(
SELECT pet_ID, Min(id) AS MinOfid
FROM petTable
GROUP BY pet_ID
) AS sub
ON pt.id = sub.MinOfid;
Your Query could change as,
SELECT ID, pet_ID, petName, Description
FROM petTable
WHERE ID IN
(SELECT Min(ID) As MinID FROM petTable GROUP BY pet_ID);
Or use the TOP clause,
SELECT petTable.petID, petTable.petName, petTable.[description]
FROM petTable
WHERE petTable.ID IN
(SELECT TOP 1 ID
FROM petTable AS tmpTbl
WHERE tmpTbl.petID = petTable.petID
ORDER BY tmpTbl.petID DESC)
ORDER BY petTable.petID, petTable.petName, petTable.[description];
I have the following query
select * from
(
SELECT distinct
rx.patid
,rx.fillDate
,rx.scriptEndDate
,MAX(datediff(day, rx.filldate, rx.scriptenddate)) AS longestScript
,rx.drugClass
,COUNT(rx.drugName) over(partition by rx.patid,rx.fillDate,rx.drugclass) as distinctFamilies
FROM [I 3 SCI control].dbo.rx
where rx.drugClass in ('h3a','h6h','h4b','h2f','h2s','j7c','h2e')
GROUP BY rx.patid, rx.fillDate, rx.scriptEndDate,rx.drugName,rx.drugClass
) r
order by distinctFamilies desc
which produces results that look like
This should mean that between the two dates in the table the patID that there should be 5 unique drug names. However, when I run the following query:
select distinct *
from rx
where patid = 1358801781 and fillDate between '2008-10-17' and '2008-11-16' and drugClass='H4B'
I have a result set returned that looks like
You can see that while there are in fact five rows returned for the second query between the dates of 2008-10-17 and 2009-01-15, there are only three unique names. I've tried various ways of modifying the over clause, all with different levels of non-success. How can I alter my query so that I only find unique drugNames within the timeframe specified for each row?
Taking a shot at it:
SELECT DISTINCT
patid,
fillDate,
scriptEndDate,
MAX(DATEDIFF(day, fillDate, scriptEndDate)) AS longestScript,
drugClass,
MAX(rn) OVER(PARTITION BY patid, fillDate, drugClass) as distinctFamilies
FROM (
SELECT patid, fillDate, scriptEndDate, drugClass,rx.drugName,
DENSE_RANK() OVER(PARTITION BY patid, fillDate, drugClass ORDER BY drugName) as rn
FROM [I 3 SCI control].dbo.rx
WHERE drugClass IN ('h3a','h6h','h4b','h2f','h2s','j7c','h2e')
)x
GROUP BY x.patid, x.fillDate, x.scriptEndDate,x.drugName,x.drugClass,x.rn
ORDER BY distinctFamilies DESC
Not sure if DISTINCT is really necessary - left it in since you've used it.