i am new on VB.Net and dont know the methode for my purpose.
i have application called Monitor.exe running on command line(cmd.exe) with parameter
monitor.exe -o -i
and the output on command line have 3 line like this on success status
status device ready
device running 344 times
complete
or output like this if the process have an error
device error 3
please check the connection cable
My purpose is :
i want run this command line running with ordinary cmd.exe without showing the cmd.exe window with button
then i want to grab the result like "complete 344 times" when the status is complete as label text
or grab "error" word when the status have and error as a label text
your help would be very appriciate.
thanks
Related
I am struggling with this problem. In Asterisk, I need to execute an external script after leaving a voicemail message. For this, I enabled externnotify in voicemail.conf but it was not working. So I searched in C code and found the related code. The command that executes the external script is:
execl("/bin/sh", "/bin/sh", "-c", s, (char *) NULL);
in which s is /usr/bin/myscript.sh default 2000 12 8 0 &.
excel runs in child process successfully but the script myscript.sh which is:
#!/bin/sh
CONTEXT=$1
EXTEN=$2
NUMVMS=$3
echo "$CONTEXT $EXTEN $NUMVMS" > /home/testfile
is not executed. The strange part is I wrote another C file and put the execl command in it and it executes my script successfully. I replaced execl with system command but no success again. Which part have I done wrong?
First of all i have say you, that voicemail ALREADY have notify functionality and it works ok.
About why your script not work - likly you tested it under root user, while most asterisk running under asterisk user, so you have permission issue on write to your log file.
i run a simulation with udp connection and cbr application in ns2.
I run an awk file to show some results. I have 10 nodes and 2 of them (n0 and n10) send packets to each other. My problem is that i run these 2 codes to get result for both nodes but only the first one runs smoothly (n0 => n10):
1)gawk -f stats.awk src=0 dst=10 flow=0 pkt=512 file.tr
2) gawk -f stats .awk src=10 dst=0 flow=0 pkt=512 file.tr
The second code gives "division by zero attempted" error"
I don't include the stats.awk file here because it works in the first example so i guess the problem is something else? eg the flow in the second line is 0? i tried other numbers too but nothing happened.
Thanks in advance.
I have a test script I'm running that generates some errors,shown below, I expect these errors. Is there anyway I can prevent them from showing on the screen however? I use the
$ write sys$output
to display if there is an expected error.
I tried to use
$ DEFINE SYS$ERROR ERROR.LOG
but this then changed my entire error output log to this, if this is the correct way to handle it can I unset this at the end of my script somehow?
[error example]
%DCL-E-OPENIN, error opening TEST$DISK:[AAA]NOTTHERE.TXT; as input
-RMS-E-FNF, file not found
%DCL-E-OPENIN, error opening TEST$DISK:[AAA]NOTTHERE.TXT; as input
-RMS-E-FNF, file not found
%DCL-W-UNDFIL, file has not been opened by DCL - check logical name
DEFINE/USER creates a logical name that disappears when the next image exits.
So if you use that just before a command just to protect that command, then fine.
Otherwise I would prefer SET MESSAGE to control the output.
And of course yoy want to grab $STATUS and verify it after the command for success or for the expected error, reporting any unexpected error.
Better still... if you expect certain error conditions to occur,
then why not test for them?
For example:
$ file = F$SEARCH("TEST$DISK:[AAA]NOTTHERE.TXT")
$ IF file.NES."" THEN TYPE 'file'
Cheers,
Hein
To suppress Error message inside a script. try this command
$ DEFINE/USER SYS$ERROR NL:
NL: is a null device, so you don`t see any error messages displayed on your terminal.
good luck
This works interactively and in batch.
$ SET MESSAGE /NOTEXT /NOSEV /NOFAC /NOID
$ <DCL_Command>
$ SET MESSAGE /TEXT /SEV /FAC/ ID
In a DOS batch script, I'm running a single command on a remote (also windows) computer using plink. Formerly, this command was only run on the local machine, and was relying on the return code to determine success. Is there a way to easily get this information back through plink?
That's not possible with plink. The current consensus is to have the remote script echo its exit code to a log file, then use pscp to transfer the log file to the local machine.
See http://fixunix.com/ssh/74235-errorlevel-capturing-plink.html.
with plink 0.66
C:\Code>echo Y | "C:\Program Files (x86)\PuTTY\plink.exe" bob#myserver exit 42
C:\Code>echo %ERRORLEVEL%
42
Also for #John Wiersba's concern about when a connection cannot be made, this appears to be fixed
C:\CodeMisc>echo Y | "C:\Program Files (x86)\PuTTY\plink.exe" bob#garbageservername exit 42
Unable to open connection:
Host does not exist
C:\Code>echo %ERRORLEVEL%
1
Also note the piping of echo Y ... this enables you to accept the server fingerprint automatically (a little dangerous to say the least ... but our login server is load balanced, so you are always getting different fingerprints :( )
However as #LeonBloy notes, plink still has some connection conditions which return a zero exit code. If you know your exit code range and you don't have a good way of communicating back to windows via a file. You could either +3 to the exit code (if you know the exit code will never == 253-255) or you could apply a bitwise OR (I'd suggest exit $(($?|128)) - in bash).
Or if you don't care about the exact exit code, you could return 2 for success, and zero for failure. Thus a non-two exit code would indicate failure. In bash this would be: echo $((($?==0) << 1)). This would be by far the most robust general purpose solution, but you should make sure your exit code is logged for debug-ability.
What is the meaning of return value 127 from $? in UNIX.
Value 127 is returned by /bin/sh when the given command is not found within your PATH system variable and it is not a built-in shell command. In other words, the system doesn't understand your command, because it doesn't know where to find the binary you're trying to call.
Generally it means:
127 - command not found
but it can also mean that the command is found,
but a library that is required by the command is NOT found.
127 - command not found
example: $caat
The error message will
bash:
caat: command not found
now you check using echo $?
A shell convention is that a successful executable should exit with the value 0. Anything else can be interpreted as a failure of some sort, on part of bash or the executable you that just ran. See also $PIPESTATUS and the EXIT STATUS section of the bash man page:
For the shell’s purposes, a command which exits with a zero exit status has succeeded. An exit status
of zero indicates success. A non-zero exit status indicates failure. When a command terminates on a
fatal signal N, bash uses the value of 128+N as the exit status.
If a command is not found, the child process created to execute it returns a status of 127. If a com-
mand is found but is not executable, the return status is 126.
If a command fails because of an error during expansion or redirection, the exit status is greater than
zero.
Shell builtin commands return a status of 0 (true) if successful, and non-zero (false) if an error
occurs while they execute. All builtins return an exit status of 2 to indicate incorrect usage.
Bash itself returns the exit status of the last command executed, unless a syntax error occurs, in
which case it exits with a non-zero value. See also the exit builtin command below.
It has no special meaning, other than that the last process to exit did so with an exit status of 127.
However, it is also used by bash (assuming you're using bash as a shell) to tell you that the command you tried to execute couldn't be executed (i.e. it couldn't be found). It's unfortunately not immediately deducible though, if the process exited with status 127, or if it couldn't found.
EDIT:
Not immediately deducible, except for the output on the console, but this is stack overflow, so I assume you're doing this in a script.
If you're trying to run a program using a scripting language, you may need to include the full path of the scripting language and the file to execute. For example:
exec('/usr/local/bin/node /usr/local/lib/node_modules/uglifycss/uglifycss in.css > out.css');
This error is also at times deceiving. It says file is not found even though the files is indeed present. It could be because of invalid unreadable special characters present in the files that could be caused by the editor you are using. This link might help you in such cases.
-bash: ./my_script: /bin/bash^M: bad interpreter: No such file or directory
The best way to find out if it is this issue is to simple place an echo statement in the entire file and verify if the same error is thrown.
If the IBM mainframe JCL has some extra characters or numbers at the end of the name of unix script being called then it can throw such error.
In addition to the given answers, note that running a script file with incorrect end-of-line characters could also result in 127 exit code if you use /bin/sh as your shell.
As an example, if you run a shell script with CRLF end-of-line characters in a UNIX-based system and in the /bin/sh shell, it is possible to encounter some errors like the following I've got after running my script named my_test.sh :
$ ./my_test.sh
sh: 2: ./my_test.sh: not found
$ echo $?
127
As a note, using /bin/bash, I got 126 exit code, which is in accordance with gnu.org documentation about the bash :
If a command is not found, the child process created to execute it returns a status of 127. If a command is found but is not executable, the return status is 126.
Finally, here is the result of running my script in /bin/bash :
arman#Debian-1100:~$ ./my_test.sh
-bash: ./my_test.sh: /bin/bash^M: bad interpreter: No such file or directory
arman#Debian-1100:~$ echo $?
126
go to C:\Program Files\Git\etc
open gitconfig with notepad
change
[core]
autocrlf = true
To
[core]
autocrlf = false