SQL: How to use WHERE instead of OUTER JOIN - sql

I am using an old database call Centura Gupta that doesn't have the join clauses (left join, right join, inner join, outer join). So I need to use where to replace the outer join that I need:
SELECT *
FROM table1
OUTER JOIN table2
ON table1.id_person table2.id_person;
I think that where can only replaces inner join:
SELECT *
FROM table1
WHERE table1.id_person = table2.id_person;

You could try to use subqueries instead of join
SELECT *
FROM table1 t1
WHERE id_Person IN
(
SELECT id_Person
FROM table2
)

I used this kind of implementation when I didn't know JOINs. May not be exactly right but something which can get you close:
SELECT *
FROM table1 t1, table2 t2
WHERE t1.id_Person=t2.id_Person;

I don't know about that particular database, but you might be able to use a correlated subquery to get "joined" data. This will pull all records from table1 and the related info from table2, or NULL for whatever4 and whatever5 if there's no matching id_person in table2:
SELECT t1.whatever1
, t1.whatever2
, t1.whatever3
, (SELECT whatever4 FROM table2 AS t2 WHERE t2.id_person = t1.id_person) AS whatever4
, (SELECT whatever5 FROM table2 AS t2 WHERE t2.id_person = t1.id_person) AS whatever5
FROM table1 AS t1

'Old database called Centura Gupta' ??
Maybe you actually mean OpenText Gupta SQLBase - which is by no means 'old'.
You may be running an 'old' version of SQLBase - but it is now up to v12.2 native 64bit, and outer joins are certainly supported.
You can either use the native Gupta outer joins - similar to Oracle (+) or standard ANSI outer joins.
If you want to use ANSI OUTER joins, specify 'ANSIJoinSyntax=1' in your Server side Sql.ini
Go here for more SQLBase Join syntax: Gupta SQLBase Manuals
Native Gupta Outer Join:
SELECT t1.id_person, t2.id_person
From table1 t1 , table t2
Where t1.id_person = t2.id_person(+)
ANSI Outer Join:
SELECT t1.person_id, t2.person_id
From table1 t1
Left Outer Join table2 t2 ON t1.id_person = t2.id_person
Where <what ever filter you want>
Go here for more SQLBase Join syntax: Gupta SQLBase Manuals

Related

what operation does "select from table1, table2 " imply? [duplicate]

This question already has answers here:
Select from Table1, Table2
(3 answers)
Closed 4 years ago.
I know different joins, but I wanted to know which of them is being used when we run queries like this:
select * from table1 t1, table2 t2
is it full outer join or natural join for example?
Also does it have a unique meaning among different databases or all do the same?
UPDATE: what if we add where clause ? will it be always inner join?
The comma in the from clause -- by itself -- is equivalent to cross join in almost all databases. So:
from table1 t1, table2 t2
is functionally equivalent to:
from table1 t1 cross join table2 t2
They are not exactly equivalent, because the scoping rules within the from clause are slightly different. So:
from table1 t1, table2 t2 join
table3 t3
on t1.x = t3.x
generates an error, whereas the equivalent query with cross join works.
In general, conditions in the WHERE clause will always result in the INNER JOIN. However, some databases have extended the syntax to support outer joins in the WHERE clause.
I can think of one exception where the comma does not mean CROSS JOIN. Google's BigQuery originally used the comma for UNION ALL. However, that is only in Legacy SQL and they have removed that in Standard SQL.
Commas in the FROM clause have been out of fashion since the 1900s. They are the "original" form of joining tables in SQL, but explicit JOIN syntax is much better.
To me, they also mean someone who learned SQL decades ago and refused to learn about outer joins, or someone who has learned SQL from ancient materials -- and doesn't know a lot of other things that SQL does.
demo: db<>fiddle
This is a CROSS JOIN (cartesian product). So both of the following queries are equal
SELECT * FROM table1, table2 -- implicit CROSS JOIN
SELECT * FROM table1 CROSS JOIN table1 -- explicit CROSS JOIN
concerning UPDATE
A WHERE clause makes the general CROSS JOIN to an INNER JOIN. An INNER JOIN can be got by three ways:
SELECT * FROM table1, table2 WHERE table1.id = table2.id -- implicit CROSS JOIN notation
SELECT * FROM table1 CROSS JOIN table2 WHERE table1.id = table2.id -- really unusual!: explicit CROSS JOIN notation
SELECT * FROM table1 INNER JOIN table2 ON (table1.id = table2.id) -- explicit INNER JOIN NOTATION
Further reading (wikipedia)

Can the SQL JOIN 'USING()' clause be used with one or more 'AND ON()' clauses for a single join..?

In a DB2-400 SQL join, can the USING() clause be used with one or more AND ON clauses for a single join..? This is for a situation where some field names are the same, but not all, so USING() would only apply to part of the join.
I could have sworn I've done this before and it worked, but now it eludes me.
I've tried various combinations as shown below, but none of them work. Perhaps I'm simply mistaken and it's not possible:
SELECT * FROM T1 INNER JOIN T2 USING (COL1,COL2) AND ON (T1.COL3=T2.COL4)
SELECT * FROM T1 INNER JOIN T2 ON (T1.COL3=T2.COL4) AND USING (COL1,COL2)
SELECT * FROM T1 INNER JOIN T2 ON (T1.COL3=T2.COL4), USING (COL1,COL2)
SELECT * FROM T1 INNER JOIN T2 USING (COL1,COL2,(1.COL3=T2.COL4))
Checking the syntax diagram here https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/ssw_ibm_i_72/db2/rbafzjoinedt.htm
I suggest that the only options for JOIN USING are a comma separated list of columns
JOIN table-reference USING ( column-name [, column-name] ... )
and you can't mix USING with ON
You can use where:
SELECT *
FROM T1 INNER JOIN
T2 USING (COL1, COL2)
WHERE T1.COL3 = T2.COL4;
Another alternative would be to use a subquery to rename the column in one of the tables.

How to simplify to use ISNULL with LEFT OUTER JOIN to merge tables

I need to merge below Table 1 & Table 2 as indicated in "Merge".
The query I wrote below works; but it is TOO SLOW! Is there any simpler way which returns it faster?
SELECT T1.Loc, T2.SO, T2.PO, T1.Item
FROM Table1 T1
LEFT OUTER JOIN Table2 T2
ON ISNULL(T1.[SO2],T1.[SO1]) = T2.[SO]
Never use commas in the FROM clause. Always use proper, explicit JOIN syntax:
SELECT *
FROM Table1 T1 LEFT OUTER JOIN
Table2 T2
ON COALESCE(T1.[SO2], T1.[SO1]) = T2.[SO];
There is no need to join to Table2 twice (much less getting a Cartesian product). I prefer COALESCE() to ISNULL() simply because the former is the ANSI standard function for replacing NULL values.
I should add that for performance, two joins might be preferable:
SELECT T1.Loc, COALESCE(T2_2.SO, T2_1.SO) as SO,
COALESCE(T2_2.PO, T2_1.PO) as PO, T1.Item
FROM Table1 T1 LEFT OUTER JOIN
Table2 T2_2
ON T1.[SO2] = T2_2.[SO] LEFT OUTER JOIN
Table2 T2_1
ON T1.[SO1] = T2_1.[SO] AND T1.[SO2] IS NULL;
It is easier for the SQL engine to optimize joins that use only equality and AND conditions, on the clean column references (that is, the columns are not the arguments to any function calls).
Hope this SQL full fill your requirement.
Select T2.Loc, T2.SO, T2.PO, T1.item from table 2 T2 join table1 T1
on T1.SO1 = T2.SO;

In Oracle, in regards to syntax - how do I convert the (+) syntax to modern conventional JOIN?

Suppose I have a FROM clause like so :
FROM
apps.po_requisition_lines_all prl,
apps.po_requisition_headers_all prha,
po.po_req_distributions_all prda,
po.po_distributions_all pda,
po.po_headers_all pha
where 1=1
and prl.requisition_header_id= prha.requisition_header_id
and prl.requisition_line_id= prda.requisition_line_id
and prda.distribution_id= pda.req_distribution_id(+)
and pha.po_header_id(+)=pda.po_header_id
Then how does this type of OUTER JOIN get converted if we want to use normal JOIN syntax ? thanks !
Without seeing the schema, I find it difficult but this should set you in the right direction:
FROM apps.po_requisition_lines_all prl
INNER JOIN apps.po_requisition_headers_all prha ON prl.requisition_header_id = prha.requisition_header_id
INNER JOIN po.po_req_distributions_all prda ON prda.requisition_line_id = prl.requisition_line_id
LEFT JOIN po.po_distributions_all pda ON prda.distribution_id = pda.req_distribution_id
-- I note from the example provided that this is a right join
-- Without seeing the schema, it looks to me as though it should be left
-- As I say say, without seeing the schema, I probably shouldn't pass comment
RIGHT JOIN po.po_headers_all pha ON pha.po_header_id = pda.po_header_id;
For an INNER JOIN you can just say JOIN although I think that explicitly saying INNER aids readability. I also note the example provided has WHERE 1=1 which is redundant.
The + is old version of Outer Joins, and it differs where the + comes after equality sign or before it, But now it's recommended to use Join keywords instead of +, about the + sign if it comes:
After =:
select * from t1, t2
where t1.id=t2.id(+)
This means Left Outer Join:
select * from t1
left outer join t2 on t1.id=t2.id
Before =:
select * from t1, t2
where t1.id(+)=t2.id
This means Right Outer Join:
select * from t1
Right outer join t2 on t1.id=t2.id
Without +:
select * from t1, t2
where t1.id=t2.id
This means Inner Join:
select * from t1
join t2 on t1.id=t2.id

Where Exists query returning incorrect results

The inner query here returns values that only appear in one of the tables. The outer query is supposed to return a count of those. Instead, it returns the entire table, not just the NULL values.
select count(*) from tblicd
where exists
(
select i.icd_id
from tblicd i left outer join icd_jxn on icd_jxn.icd_id=i.icd_id
where icd_jxn.icd_id is null
)
The inner query
select i.icd_id
from tblicd i left outer join icd_jxn on icd_jxn.icd_id=i.icd_id
where icd_jxn.icd_id is null
works and does what I want. I'd like (using a sub query method like this) to use the outer query to just return the number of rows that the inner query returns.
You need to join the two (outer and inner) tblicd tables in the subquery:
and i.icd_id = tblicd.icd_id
(or whatever the id of the tblicd table is)
The query you posted doesn't make any sense. However, from your description, it sounds like you've got two tables and you're trying to find any IDs that don't exist in both tables. If that's correct, you should try something like this:
select count(*) as cnt
from table1 t1
full outer join
table2 t2
on t1.id = t2.id
where t1.id is null
or t2.id is null
This may not work in the database you're using, but since you didn't tell us that, we can't tailor the solution to fit your dialect of SQL.
Based on the revised question, you could simplify this a number of ways:
select count(*)
from tblicd
where not exists (select i.icd_id
from icd_jxn
where icd_jxn.icd_id = tblicd)
select count(tblicd.icd_id)
from tblicd
left join
icd_jxn
on tblicd.icd_id = icd_jxn.icd_id
where icd_jxn.icd_id is null
select count(tblicd.icd_id)
from tblicd
where icd_id not in (select icd_id
from icd_jxn)
Basically, there's no reason to select from tblicd twice.