As part of becoming a better Vue programmer, I am trying to implement a popup similar to Popper with a clean and Vueish architecture. Here is a simple schematic that I came up with:
So basically there is a target component, which is the reference for the popup's position. The popup can be positioned above, below, right and left of the target, therefore I will need to have access to the target element in my popup. Also, the target can be an arbitrary component. It can be a simple button or span, but also something much more complex.
Then there is the popup itself, which will be put into a modal at the end of the body, It contains the actual content. The content again can be an arbitrary component.
I have a working implementation of the popup, but the basic structure seems to be far from perfect. I am using two slots, one for the target element and one for the content.
Here is what I have come up with so far for the template:
<template>
<div ref="targetContainer">
<slot name="target"></slot>
</div>
<teleport to="body">
<div v-show="show" class="modal" ref="modal">
<div ref="popover" class="popover" :style="{top: popoverTop + 'px', left: popoverLeft + 'px'}">
<slot name="content"></slot>
</div>
</div>
</teleport>
</template>
There are several issues with this that I am not really happy with.
Using the popup is not very simple
When using this popup in another component, two <template> tags are rquired. This is ungly and not very intuitive. A very simple use case looks like this:
<modal :show="showPopup" #close="showPopup=false">
<template v-slot:target>
<button #click="showPopup=true"></button>
</template>
<template v-slot:content>
<div>Hello World!</div>
</template>
</modal>
The target is wrapped in another <div>
This is done to get access to the target element, that I need for the layout. In mounted() I am referencing the target element like this:
let targetElement = this.$refs.targetContainer.children[0];
Is this really the best way to do this? I would like to get rid of the wrapping <div> element, which just asks for unintended side effects.
The best solution would be to get rid of one slot and somehow reference the target element in another way because I only need its layout information, it does not have to be rendered inside the popover component.
Can someone point me in the right direction?
Here is my solution, which was inspired by a comment on my question and which I think is worth sharing.
Instead of putting the target element into a slot, I am now passing its ref as a prop, which makes things much cleaner.
The popover component's template now looks like this.
<template>
<teleport to="body">
<div v-show="show" class="modal" ref="modal">
<div ref="popover" class="popover" :style="{top: popoverTop + 'px', left: popoverLeft + 'px'}">
<slot ref="content"></slot>
</div>
</div>
</teleport>
</template>
I has a targetRefprop, so the component can be simply used like this:
<div ref="myTargetElement" #click="isPopupVisible=true">
</div>
<modal :show="isPopupVisible" #close="isPopupVisible=false" targetRef="myTargetElement">
<!-- popup content goes here -->
</modal>
And after mounting I can access the target element like this:
let targetElement = this.$parent.$refs[this.targetRef];
I like this solution a lot. However, ideas, advice or words of caution are still highly welcome.
Related
I have a parent component, SearchComponent:
<template>
<div>
<div class="relative pl-8 pr-10 rounded bg-white border focus-within:bg-white focus-within:ring-1">
<input v-focus #keyup.escape="clearSearch" #keyup="doSearch" v-model="searchTerm"
class="w-full ml-4 h-12 pl-1 text-gray-700 text-lg rounded-full border-0 bg-transparent focus:outline-none placeholder-gray-400"
placeholder="Search..." autocomplete="off">
</div>
<ul class="bg-white mt-4">
<quick-search-item v-for="item in searchResults" :key="item.id" :item-data="item.itemData">
</quick-search-item>
</ul>
</div>
</template>
This is responsible for receiving user input and getting results from an ajax call, handling errors etc. and generating the result list.
What I'd like to do is to make this generic so that instead of having a quick-search-item child component I can pass in different types of child component (like car-search-item, person-search-item etc.) depending on the context of where the user is in the app and what they're searching for
I've read a number of tutorials and I couldn't find quite what I'm trying to do. This may mean I'm approaching this in the wrong way - but if anyone could point me in the right direction, or has a better approach, I'd be very grateful.
Thanks,
Lenny.
I would try to make use of the <slot> element. Check out the documentation here
<parent-component>
<slot></slot>
</parent-component>
Hope this can put you on the right path.
Schalk Pretorius was quite right: slots are the answer to this, specifically scoped slots. I found the Vue docs a little confusing as it refers to getting data from the child component and I wanted to do it the other way around, so as an aide memoire for myself and to help anyone else here's what I did:
In my parent component I defined the slot like this:
<slot name="results" v-bind:items="searchResults">
</slot>
The v-bind binds searchResults (a data item in the parent component) to the value 'items'. 'items' then becomes available in the slot.
In my child component I have a simple property setup called items:
props: {
items: {type: Array},
},
Then to hook it all together in my Blade file I did this:
<search-component endpoint="{{ route('quick_search.index') }}">
<template v-slot:results="props">
<food-results :items="props.items">
</food-results>
</template>
</search-component>
This creates the search-component. Inside that -as I'm using named slots - we need a template and use v-slot to tell it which slot to use (results), then the ="props" exposes all the properties we've defined on that slot (in this case just one, 'items').
Inside the template we put our child component and then we can bind items to props.items which will be the searchResults in our parent component.
I'm happy to have this working and I can now create lots of different results components while reusing the search component - and at least I learnt something today!
Cheers,
Lenny.
In my example I want to draw a border around an element after clicking on it. In this example it works perfectly:
<div v-for="(parent, index) in $store.getters.getInfo" :key="index">
<div #click="setClicked" :id="child.id" v-for="child in parent"
:style="[child.clicked ? {'border-color': 'black'} : {'border-color': 'white'}]">
</div>
</div>
But when i try with a bit more complicated structure and template tags the style binding fails to be triggered:
<div v-for="i in 12">
<template v-for="(user, index) in $store.getters.getSharedUsers">
<div :id="child.id" v-for="child in $store.getters.getSharedInfo[user[0]][i-1]"
:userID="child.userID" #click="setClicked"
:style="[child.clicked ? {'border-color': 'black'} : {'border-color': 'white'}]">
</div>
</template>
</div>
In my mutation I set the attribute with:
Vue.set(state.element_map[payload.uID][payload.dID], 'clicked', true);
When I debug I see the change in both code examples in my data structure after calling the setClicked function, but only in the first one the style binding is triggered and the border is drawn. The only difference I see is the use of the template tag and the more complicated data structure. But it should also work in the second example as the clicked attribute is set correctly. So what am I missing? Thanks!
I am making a Tinder clone type app in Vue. I am using the Vue2InteractDraggable component. This component works great for the use case. But I want to have a click event on the draggable portion, which does not fire (because it interprets the click as a start of a drag, as opposed to a click event).
I would like for it to use a click event if it's clicked and let go, but want it to use the current drag functionality if it's held for more than a certain amount of time. I can't figure out a way to do this, so any advice would be greatly appreciated. Here is an example of the Vue Component that I'm using. The #click on the detail section does not fire.
<Vue2InteractDraggable
v-if="cardVisible"
:interact-out-of-sight-x-coordinate="500"
:interact-max-rotation="15"
:interact-x-threshold="200"
:interact-y-threshold="9999"
#draggedRight="right()"
#draggedLeft="left()">
<div class="flex flex--center">
<img class="profilePicture" style="z-index: 4" :src="getImageSrc(current.image)"/>
</div>
<div class="rounded-borders card card--one">
<div class="userName">{{ Object.keys(this.users)[this.index] }}</div>
<div class="userAge">Age: {{current.age}}</div>
<div class="userDetailExpand" #click="expandDetails()">
<span>User Details</span>
<img class="carrot" src="../assets/svg/carrot_expand.svg"/>
</div>
</div>
</Vue2InteractDraggable>
Please let me know if you can think of any ideas. I've been hung up on this for a while and cannot find an answer.
Thank you for your help.
Try to add:
#touchstart="expandDetails()"
near:
#click="expandDetails()"
In other words one might have an html at some point which looks like this:
<bloglink blogposturl="http://a.link" blogposttitle="my title" ></bloglink>
And the template attribute like so:
...
template: '<h3><i><a style="text-decoration: underline; cursor: pointer;" v-on:click="load_blog_page(blogposturl)">{{blogposttitle}}</a></i></h3>',
...
But what if one wanted to express instead
<bloglink blogposturl="http://a.link" blogposttitle="my title" >
<p>.....complex html in here.... which is not dynamic....</p>
</bloglink>
One would want to keep this html when loading the webpage instead of being completely replaced.
One way would be to take this complex html and insert it as a parameter being careful with escaping properly etc. but this does not seem very elegant.
What is the recommended way?
Vue component slot.
for example:
ParentComponent:
<template>
<div>
<slot></slot>
</div>
</template>
SomeOtherComponent:
<template>
<div>
<parent>
<p>whatever</p>
</parent>
</div>
</template>
I have a component inside a .vue file that can benefit from reusing a chunk of code. I know I can move that code to a separate .vue file and import it as a new component. However, this component would not be used anywhere else and I'd like to avoid cluttering the directory. Is it possible to declare this component's template inside the parent without using the in-code template:"<div>.....</div>" stuff?
This is the idea:
<template>
<div>
...some html here...
<div v-for="item in items">
{{item.name}}:
<div v-if="item.available">YES!</div>
<div v-else>NO :(</div>
</div>
...some other components and data here...
<div v-for="item in items">
{{item.name}}:
<div v-if="item.available">YES!</div>
<div v-else>NO :(</div>
</div>
</div>
</template>
I would like to be able to do something like this:
<template>
<div>
...some html here...
<div v-for="item in items">
<itemizer inline-template v-model="item">
{{value.name}}:
<div v-if="value.available">YES!</div>
<div v-else>NO :(</div>
</itemizer>
</div>
...some other components and data here...
<div v-for="item in items">
<itemizer v-model="item"/>
</div>
</div>
</template>
However, from what I understand this is not possible.
Unfortunately this pattern does not appear to be supported by the creator of Vue:
I personally feel the syntax is less maintainable than [Single File Components]
Note that we want to keep the SFC syntax as consistent possible, because it involves a big ecosystem of tools that need to support any new features added (e.g. Vetur would need to do something very different for handling SFCs with multiple scripts/templates). The proposed syntax, IMO, does not justify adding the new syntax.
https://github.com/vuejs/vue/pull/7264#issuecomment-352452213
That's too bad, as even beyond flexibility and developer choice, there is a good argument for inlining small functions that are not used by other components in order to reduce complexity. It's a common pattern in React and does not inhibit Single File Components when they're needed. In fact it allows gradual migration as inline components grow.
Here's one of the only resources currently that offers some potential workarounds:
https://codewithhugo.com/writing-multiple-vue-components-in-a-single-file/
I've tried them all and am not satisfied with any of them at this time. At best you can set runtimerCompiler: true and use template strings, but it'll add 10KB to your bundle and you'll likely miss out on full syntax highlighting available in the <template> element. Maybe you can hack Teleport, but I have not made a dedicated attempt.
Actually, this should work. Just register your Vue inline-template like this in the section of your parent .vue file:
<template>
<div v-for="item in items">
<test-template :item="item">
<h1>{{item.text}}</h1>
</test-template>
</div>
</template>
<script>
Vue.component('test-template', {
template:'#hello-world-template',
props: {
item: Object
}
});
export default {...}
</script>
In your parent HTML file, put this:
<script type="text/x-template" id="hello-world-template">
<p>Hello hello hello</p>
</script>
With vue3 there are multiple options:
with vue-jsx you can just declare a component in your script setup section and use that
const Named = defineComponent(() => {
const count = ref(0)
const inc = () => count.value++
return () => (
<button class="named" onClick={inc}>
named {count.value}
</button>
)
})
There is another option described by Michael Thiessen here
Also you can have multiple render function components in one file:
https://staging.vuejs.org/guide/extras/render-function.html
Although it is not supported in Vue core yet, there is a way to use this through vue macros project. See discussion here