Good Day,
I have 3 Tables - Ticket, Ticket Batch (Multiple Ticket Rows To One Batch) and Ticket Staff (Multiple Staff Rows To One Ticket) and wish to ultimately UPDATE the ticket_batch table with the COUNT of all staff working on tickets per ticket batch.
The tables with applicable columns look as follows
ticket:
| ticket_number | recon_number |
ticket_batch:
| recon_number |
ticket_staff:
| ticket_number |
So I have written the following SQL query to essentially first if I do get the COUNT:
SELECT COUNT(*)
FROM ticket_staf
WHERE ticket_staff.ticket_number IN (SELECT GROUP_CONCAT(ticket.ticket_number) FROM ticket WHERE ticket.recon_number = 1);
Which the query just keeps running, but when I execute the queries separately:
SELECT GROUP_CONCAT(ticket.ticket_number)
FROM ticket
WHERE ticket.recon_number = 1;
I get 5 ticket numbers within split seconds and if I paste that string in the other portion of the query:
SELECT COUNT(*)
FROM ticket_staff
WHERE ticket_staff.ticket_number IN (1451,1453,1968,4457,4458);
It returns the correct COUNT.
So ultimately I guess can I not write queries with GROUP_CONCATS into another SELECT WHERE IN? And how should I structure my query?
Thanks for reading :)
I prefer Inner join as follows:
SELECT COUNT(distinct ts.*)
FROM ticket_staff ts
LEFT JOIN ticket t
ON ts.ticket_number = t.ticket_number
WHERE t.recon_number = 1;
GROUP_CONCAT() doesn't look right. I suspect you are confusing a list of values for IN with a string. They are not the same thing.
In general, I would recommend EXISTS over IN anyway:
SELECT COUNT(*)
FROM ticket_staff ts
WHERE EXISTS (SELECT 1
FROM ticket t
WHERE ts.ticket_number = t.ticket_number AND
t.recon_number = 1
);
For this query, you want an index on ticket(ticket_number, recon_number). However, I am guessing that ticket(ticket_number) is the primary key, which is enough of an index by itself.
Related
Amateur SQL writer here having a problem with building out table based on values from an existing one.
The MASTER table logs a record with an ID every time a service is used. ID remains the same per user, but will repeat to track relevant information during that usage. Table holds about 2m records and 20k DISTINCT IDs.
*Example -
USER ID | Used_Amount
USER_1998 | 9GB,
USER_1999 | 4GB,
USER_1999 | 1GB,
USER_1999 |0.5 GB*
Would like for the new table is create column that SUMS the usage and organizes based on DISTINCT ID.
Goal -
ID . TOTAL USAGE
USER_1998 - 9GB
USER_1999 - 5.5GB
Code below is my attempt...
UPDATE ml_draft
SET true_usage = (
SELECT SUM(true_usage)
FROM table2 t2
INNER JOIN ml_draft ON
ml_draft.subscription_id = t2.subscription_id);
Let me know if there are any additional details to add. Errors vary
You want a correlated subquery. So, there is no need to use JOIN in the subquery:
UPDATE ml_draft d
SET true_usage = (SELECT SUM(t2.true_usage)
FROM table2 t2
WHERE d.subscription_id = t2.subscription_id
);
For performance, you want an index on table2(subscription_id, true_usage).
Despite my internet searching, I've not found a solution to what I think is a simple SQL problem.
I have a simple table as such:
zip | location | transit
------------------------
10001 | 1 | 5
10001 | 2 | 2
This table of course has a large number of zip codes, but I'd like to make s simple query by zip code and instead of returning all rows with the zip, return only a single row (with all 3 columns), that contains the lowest transit value.
I've been playing with the aggregate function min(), but haven't gotten it right.
Using Postgres SQL DB 9.6
Thanks!
Use ORDER BY along with LIMIT :
SELECT t.*
FROM mytable t
WHERE t.zipcode = ?
ORDER BY t.transit
LIMIT 1
How about
select * from table where zip = ‘10001’ order by transit limit 1
I would use distinct on:
select distinct on (zip) t.*
from t
order by zip, transit;
This is usually the most efficient method in Postgres, particularly with an index on (zip, transit).
Of course if you have only one zip code that you care about, then where/order by/limit is also totally reasonable.
Assuming that you also want to return the location value associated with the minimum transit value, then here is one possible solution using an inner join:
select t.*
from
yourtable t inner join
(select u.zip, min(u.transit) as mt from yourtable u group by u.zip) v
on t.zip = v.zip and t.transit = v.mt
Change all references to yourtable to the name of your table.
I have two tables which are joined by an ID...
table 1
- Assessment ID
- Module ID
- Assessment Weighting
table 2
- ID
- AssessmentID
- ModuleID
- UserID
- MarkFrom100
An assessment can have many students taking the assessment.
For example
A module has two assessments, one worth 60% and the other worth 40%. in table 2, I want to take the weighting value from table 1 and multiply it against the mark from 100.
SELECT * FROM Assessment, ModuleAssessmentUser WHERE
INNER JOIN moduleassementuser.assessmentID on Assessment.assessmentID
MULTIPLY AssessmentWeighting BY MarkFrom100 AS finalmark
UserID = 1
I know this is way off, but I really don't know how else to go about it.
My SQL knowledge is limited, so any help is appreciated!
You may use a SUM function in your query which will sum all the data of a certain group in a sub query wich will allow you to multiply the sum to the weight
sub query :
SELECT ModuleID, AssessmentID, UserID, SUM(MarkFrom100) as Total
FROM Table_2
GROUP BY ModuleID
Then use this sub query as a table in a main query :
SELECT T1.Assessment_ID, T1.ModuleID, Q1.UserID (Q1.Total * T1.Assessment_Weighting) as FinalMark
FROM (SELECT ModuleID, UserID, SUM(MarkFrom100) as Total
FROM Table_2
GROUP BY ModuleID) AS Q1
INNER JOIN Table_1 as T1 on T1.ModuleID = Q1.ModuleID
-- WHERE T1.ModuleID = 2 -- a particular module ID
GROUP BY ModuleID;
Note that the WHERE statement is in comment. If you want the whole data, remove it, if you want a particular data, use it ^^
NOTE :
I don't have your database, so it may need some tweeks, but the main idea is there
How can i show which tutor teach the least subject?
this is my syntax but I'm getting
Error code 42607
select
tut_id,
min(count(session_code)) as subject_taught
from
tutor,
class
where
tutor.tutor id = class.tut_id
group by tut_id
Expected output:
tut_id subject_taught
id2 1
This is pretty simple:
WITH Subjects_Taught AS (SELECT tutor_id, COUNT(*) AS subjects_taught
FROM Class
GROUP BY tutor_id)
SELECT tutor_id, subjects_taught
FROM Subjects_Taught
WHERE subjects_taught = (SELECT MIN(subjects_taught)
FROM Subjects_Taught)
SQL Fiddle Example
So what's going on in the statement?
First, the Common Table Expression ->
WITH Subjects_Taught AS (SELECT tutor_id, COUNT(*) AS subjects_taught
FROM Class
GROUP BY tutor_id)
This defines an in-query view or temporary table. These are handy for abstracting certain details away, or when you end up referring to the same info twice in a statement (as we do here). Essentially, you end up with a table that looks like this:
id1 | 2
id2 | 1
id3 | 2
... so then the only thing left is to restrict ourselves to rows of this table that meet the minimum:
WHERE subjects_taught = (SELECT MIN(subjects_taught)
FROM Subjects_Taught)
... we reference our virtual table a second time, getting the minimum, as if it were a normal table.
I don't have a DB2 available now but as far as I can see here you cannot nest aggregate functions in DB2:
$... min(count(session_code))...
2 records in above image are from Db, in above table Constraint are (SID and LINE_ITEM_ID),
SID and LINE_ITEM_ID both column are used to find a unique record.
My issues :
I am looking for a query it should fetch the recored from DB depending on conditions
if i search for PART_NUMBER = 'PAU43-IMB-P6'
1. it should fetch one record from DB if search for PART_NUMBER = 'PAU43-IMB-P6', no mater to which SID that item belong to if there is only one recored either under SID =1 or SID = 2.
2. it should fetch one record which is under SID = 2 only, from DB on search for PART_NUMBER = 'PAU43-IMB-P6', if there are 2 items one in SID=1 and other in SID=2.
i am looking for a query which will search for a given part_number depending on Both SID 1 and 2, and it should return value under SID =2 and it can return value under SID=1 only if the there are no records under SID=2 (query has to withstand a load of Million record search).
Thank you
Select *
from Table
where SID||LINE_ITEM_ID = (
select Max(SID)||Max(LINE_ITEM_ID)
from table
where PART_NUMBER = 'PAU43-IMB-P6'
);
If I understand correctly, for each considered LINE_ITEM_ID you want to return only the one with the largest value for SID. This is a common requirement and, as with most things in SQL, can be written in many different ways; the best performing will depend on many factors, not least of which is the SQL product you are using.
Here's one possible approach:
SELECT DISTINCT * -- use a column list
FROM YourTable AS T1
INNER JOIN (
SELECT T2.LINE_ITEM_ID,
MAX(T2.SID) AS max_SID
FROM YourTable AS T2
GROUP
BY T2.LINE_ITEM_ID
) AS DT1 (LINE_ITEM_ID, max_SID)
ON T1.LINE_ITEM_ID = DT1.LINE_ITEM_ID
AND T1.SID = DT1.max_SID;
That said, I don't recall seeing one that relies on the UNION relational operator. You could easily rewrite the above using the INTERSECT relational operator but it would be more verbose.
Well in my case it worked something like this:
select LINE_ITEM_ID,SID,price_1,part_number from (
(select LINE_ITEM_ID,SID,price_1,part_number from Table where SID = 2)
UNION
(select LINE_ITEM_ID,SID,price_1,part_number from Table SID = 1 and line_item_id NOT IN (select LINE_ITEM_ID,SID,price_1,part_number from Table SID = 2)))
This query solved my issue..........