(Disclaimer: There are a ton of questions which arise from people asking about data being null/incorrect when using asynchronous operations through requests such as facebook,firebase, etc. My intention for this question was to provide a simple answer for that problem to everyone starting out with asynchronous operations in android)
I'm trying to get data from one of my operations, when I debug it using breakpoints or logs, the values are there, but when I run it they are always null, how can I solve this ?
Firebase
firebaseFirestore.collection("some collection").get()
.addOnSuccessListener(new OnSuccessListener<QuerySnapshot>() {
#Override
public void onSuccess(QuerySnapshot documentSnapshots) {
//I want to return these values I receive here...
});
//...and use the returned value here.
Facebook
GraphRequest request = GraphRequest.newGraphPathRequest(
accessToken,
"some path",
new GraphRequest.Callback() {
#Override
public void onCompleted(GraphResponse response) {
//I want to return these values I receive here...
}
});
request.executeAsync();
//...and use the returned value here.
Kotlin coroutine
var result: SomeResultType? = null
someScope.launch {
result = someSuspendFunctionToRetrieveSomething()
//I want to return the value I received here...
}
Log.d("result", result.toString()) //...but it is still null here.
Etc.
What is a Synchronous/Asynchronous operation ?
Well, Synchronous waits until the task has completed. Your code executes "top-down" in this situation.
Asynchronous completes a task in the background and can notify you when it is complete.
If you want to return the values from an async operation through a method/function, you can define your own callbacks in your method/function to use these values as they are returned from these operations.
Here's how for Java
Start off by defining an interface :
interface Callback {
void myResponseCallback(YourReturnType result);//whatever your return type is: string, integer, etc.
}
next, change your method signature to be like this :
public void foo(final Callback callback) { // make your method, which was previously returning something, return void, and add in the new callback interface.
next up, wherever you previously wanted to use those values, add this line :
callback.myResponseCallback(yourResponseObject);
as an example :
#Override
public void onSuccess(QuerySnapshot documentSnapshots) {
// create your object you want to return here
String bar = document.get("something").toString();
callback.myResponseCallback(bar);
})
now, where you were previously calling your method called foo:
foo(new Callback() {
#Override
public void myResponseCallback(YourReturnType result) {
//here, this result parameter that comes through is your api call result to use, so use this result right here to do any operation you previously wanted to do.
}
});
}
How do you do this for Kotlin ?
(as a basic example where you only care for a single result)
start off by changing your method signature to something like this:
fun foo(callback:(YourReturnType) -> Unit) {
.....
then, inside your asynchronous operation's result :
firestore.collection("something")
.document("document").get()
.addOnSuccessListener {
val bar = it.get("something").toString()
callback(bar)
}
then, where you would have previously called your method called foo, you now do this :
foo() { result->
// here, this result parameter that comes through is
// whatever you passed to the callback in the code aboce,
// so use this result right here to do any operation
// you previously wanted to do.
}
// Be aware that code outside the callback here will run
// BEFORE the code above, and cannot rely on any data that may
// be set inside the callback.
if your foo method previously took in parameters :
fun foo(value:SomeType, callback:(YourType) -> Unit)
you simply change it to :
foo(yourValueHere) { result ->
// here, this result parameter that comes through is
// whatever you passed to the callback in the code aboce,
// so use this result right here to do any operation
// you previously wanted to do.
}
these solutions show how you can create a method/function to return values from async operations you've performed through the use of callbacks.
However, it is important to understand that, should you not be interested in creating a method/function for these:
#Override
public void onSuccess(SomeApiObjectType someApiResult) {
// here, this `onSuccess` callback provided by the api
// already has the data you're looking for (in this example,
// that data would be `someApiResult`).
// you can simply add all your relevant code which would
// be using this result inside this block here, this will
// include any manipulation of data, populating adapters, etc.
// this is the only place where you will have access to the
// data returned by the api call, assuming your api follows
// this pattern
})
There's a particular pattern of this nature I've seen repeatedly, and I think an explanation of what's happening would help. The pattern is a function/method that calls an API, assigning the result to a variable in the callback, and returns that variable.
The following function/method always returns null, even if the result from the API is not null.
Kotlin
fun foo(): String? {
var myReturnValue: String? = null
someApi.addOnSuccessListener { result ->
myReturnValue = result.value
}.execute()
return myReturnValue
}
Kotlin coroutine
fun foo(): String? {
var myReturnValue: String? = null
lifecycleScope.launch {
myReturnValue = someApiSuspendFunction()
}
return myReturnValue
}
Java 8
private String fooValue = null;
private String foo() {
someApi.addOnSuccessListener(result -> fooValue = result.getValue())
.execute();
return fooValue;
}
Java 7
private String fooValue = null;
private String foo() {
someApi.addOnSuccessListener(new OnSuccessListener<String>() {
public void onSuccess(Result<String> result) {
fooValue = result.getValue();
}
}).execute();
return fooValue;
}
The reason is that when you pass a callback or listener to an API function, that callback code will only be run some time in the future, when the API is done with its work. By passing the callback to the API function, you are queuing up work, but the current function (foo() in this case) returns immediately before that work begins and before that callback code is run.
Or in the case of the coroutine example above, the launched coroutine is very unlikely to complete before the function that started it.
Your function that calls the API cannot return the result that is returned in the callback (unless it's a Kotlin coroutine suspend function). The solution, explained in the other answer, is to make your own function take a callback parameter and not return anything.
Alternatively, if you're working with coroutines, you can make your function suspend instead of launching a separate coroutine. When you have suspend functions, somewhere in your code you must launch a coroutine and handle the results within the coroutine. Typically, you would launch a coroutine in a lifecycle function like onCreate(), or in a UI callback like in an OnClickListener.
Other answer explains how to consume APIs based on callbacks by exposing a similar callbacks-based API in the outer function. However, recently Kotlin coroutines become more and more popular, especially on Android and while using them, callbacks are generally discouraged for such purposes. Kotlin approach is to use suspend functions instead. Therefore, if our application uses coroutines already, I suggest not propagating callbacks APIs from 3rd party libraries to the rest of our code, but converting them to suspend functions.
Converting callbacks to suspend
Let's assume we have this callback API:
interface Service {
fun getData(callback: Callback<String>)
}
interface Callback<in T> {
fun onSuccess(value: T)
fun onFailure(throwable: Throwable)
}
We can convert it to suspend function using suspendCoroutine():
private val service: Service
suspend fun getData(): String {
return suspendCoroutine { cont ->
service.getData(object : Callback<String> {
override fun onSuccess(value: String) {
cont.resume(value)
}
override fun onFailure(throwable: Throwable) {
cont.resumeWithException(throwable)
}
})
}
}
This way getData() can return the data directly and synchronously, so other suspend functions can use it very easily:
suspend fun otherFunction() {
val data = getData()
println(data)
}
Note that we don't have to use withContext(Dispatchers.IO) { ... } here. We can even invoke getData() from the main thread as long as we are inside the coroutine context (e.g. inside Dispatchers.Main) - main thread won't be blocked.
Cancellations
If the callback service supports cancelling of background tasks then it is best to cancel when the calling coroutine is itself cancelled. Let's add a cancelling feature to our callback API:
interface Service {
fun getData(callback: Callback<String>): Task
}
interface Task {
fun cancel();
}
Now, Service.getData() returns Task that we can use to cancel the operation. We can consume it almost the same as previously, but with small changes:
suspend fun getData(): String {
return suspendCancellableCoroutine { cont ->
val task = service.getData(object : Callback<String> {
...
})
cont.invokeOnCancellation {
task.cancel()
}
}
}
We only need to switch from suspendCoroutine() to suspendCancellableCoroutine() and add invokeOnCancellation() block.
Example using Retrofit
interface GitHubService {
#GET("users/{user}/repos")
fun listRepos(#Path("user") user: String): Call<List<Repo>>
}
suspend fun listRepos(user: String): List<Repo> {
val retrofit = Retrofit.Builder()
.baseUrl("https://api.github.com/")
.build()
val service = retrofit.create<GitHubService>()
return suspendCancellableCoroutine { cont ->
val call = service.listRepos(user)
call.enqueue(object : Callback<List<Repo>> {
override fun onResponse(call: Call<List<Repo>>, response: Response<List<Repo>>) {
if (response.isSuccessful) {
cont.resume(response.body()!!)
} else {
// just an example
cont.resumeWithException(Exception("Received error response: ${response.message()}"))
}
}
override fun onFailure(call: Call<List<Repo>>, t: Throwable) {
cont.resumeWithException(t)
}
})
cont.invokeOnCancellation {
call.cancel()
}
}
}
Native support
Before we start converting callbacks to suspend functions, it is worth checking whether the library that we use does support suspend functions already: natively or with some extension. Many popular libraries like Retrofit or Firebase support coroutines and suspend functions. Usually, they either provide/handle suspend functions directly or they provide suspendable waiting on top of their asynchronous task/call/etc. object. Such waiting is very often named await().
For example, Retrofit supports suspend functions directly since 2.6.0:
interface GitHubService {
#GET("users/{user}/repos")
suspend fun listRepos(#Path("user") user: String): List<Repo>
}
Note that we not only added suspend, but also we no longer return Call, but the result directly. Now, we can use it without all this enqueue() boilerplate:
val repos = service.listRepos(user)
TL;DR The code you pass to these APIs (e.g. in the onSuccessListener) is a callback, and it runs asynchronously (not in the order it is written in your file). It runs at some point later in the future to "call back" into your code. Without using a coroutine to suspend the program, you cannot "return" data retrieved in a callback from a function.
What is a callback?
A callback is a piece of code you pass to some third party library that it will run later when some event happens (e.g. when it gets data from a server). It is important to remember that the callback is not run in the order you wrote it - it may be run much later in the future, could run multiple times, or may never run at all. The example callback below will run Point A, start the server fetching process, run Point C, exit the function, then some time in the distant future may run Point B when the data is retrieved. The printout at Point C will always be empty.
fun getResult() {
// Point A
var r = ""
doc.get().addOnSuccessListener { result ->
// The code inside the {} here is the "callback"
// Point B - handle result
r = result // don't do this!
}
// Point C - r="" still here, point B hasn't run yet
println(r)
}
How do I get the data from the callback then?
Make your own interface/callback
Making your own custom interface/callback can sometimes make things cleaner looking but it doesn't really help with the core question of how to use the data outside the callback - it just moves the aysnc call to another location. It can help if the primary API call is somewhere else (e.g. in another class).
// you made your own callback to use in the
// async API
fun getResultImpl(callback: (String)->Unit) {
doc.get().addOnSuccessListener { result ->
callback(result)
}
}
// but if you use it like this, you still have
// the EXACT same problem as before - the printout
// will always be empty
fun getResult() {
var r = ""
getResultImpl { result ->
// this part is STILL an async callback,
// and runs later in the future
r = result
}
println(r) // always empty here
}
// you still have to do things INSIDE the callback,
// you could move getResultImpl to another class now,
// but still have the same potential pitfalls as before
fun getResult() {
getResultImpl { result ->
println(result)
}
}
Some examples of how to properly use a custom callback: example 1, example 2, example 3
Make the callback a suspend function
Another option is to turn the async method into a suspend function using coroutines so it can wait for the callback to complete. This lets you write linear-looking functions again.
suspend fun getResult() {
val result = suspendCoroutine { cont ->
doc.get().addOnSuccessListener { result ->
cont.resume(result)
}
}
// the first line will suspend the coroutine and wait
// until the async method returns a result. If the
// callback could be called multiple times this may not
// be the best pattern to use
println(result)
}
Re-arrange your program into smaller functions
Instead of writing monolithic linear functions, break the work up into several functions and call them from within the callbacks. You should not try to modify local variables within the callback and return or use them after the callback (e.g. Point C). You have to move away from the idea of returning data from a function when it comes from an async API - without a coroutine this generally isn't possible.
For example, you could handle the async data in a separate method (a "processing method") and do as little as possible in the callback itself other than call the processing method with the received result. This helps avoid a lot of the common errors with async APIs where you attempt to modify local variables declared outside the callback scope or try to return things modified from within the callback. When you call getResult it starts the process of getting the data. When that process is complete (some time in the future) the callback calls showResult to show it.
fun getResult() {
doc.get().addOnSuccessListener { result ->
showResult(result)
}
// don't try to show or return the result here!
}
fun showResult(result: String) {
println(result)
}
Example
As a concrete example here is a minimal ViewModel showing how one could include an async API into a program flow to fetch data, process it, and display it in an Activity or Fragment. This is written in Kotlin but is equally applicable to Java.
class MainViewModel : ViewModel() {
private val textLiveData = MutableLiveData<String>()
val text: LiveData<String>
get() = textLiveData
fun fetchData() {
// Use a coroutine here to make a dummy async call,
// this is where you could call Firestore or other API
// Note that this method does not _return_ the requested data!
viewModelScope.launch {
delay(3000)
// pretend this is a slow network call, this part
// won't run until 3000 ms later
val t = Calendar.getInstance().time
processData(t.toString())
}
// anything out here will run immediately, it will not
// wait for the "slow" code above to run first
}
private fun processData(d: String) {
// Once you get the data you may want to modify it before displaying it.
val p = "The time is $d"
textLiveData.postValue(p)
}
}
A real API call in fetchData() might look something more like this
fun fetchData() {
firestoreDB.collection("data")
.document("mydoc")
.get()
.addOnCompleteListener { task ->
if (task.isSuccessful) {
val data = task.result.data
processData(data["time"])
}
else {
textLiveData.postValue("ERROR")
}
}
}
The Activity or Fragment that goes along with this doesn't need to know anything about these calls, it just passes actions in by calling methods on the ViewModel and observes the LiveData to update its views when new data is available. It cannot assume that the data is available immediately after a call to fetchData(), but with this pattern it doesn't need to.
The view layer can also do things like show and hide a progress bar while the data is being loaded so the user knows it's working in the background.
class MainActivity : AppCompatActivity() {
override fun onCreate(savedInstanceState: Bundle?) {
super.onCreate(savedInstanceState)
val binding = ActivityMainBinding.inflate(layoutInflater)
setContentView(binding.root)
val model: MainViewModel by viewModels()
// Observe the LiveData and when it changes, update the
// state of the Views
model.text.observe(this) { processedData ->
binding.text.text = processedData
binding.progress.visibility = View.GONE
}
// When the user clicks the button, pass that action to the
// ViewModel by calling "fetchData()"
binding.getText.setOnClickListener {
binding.progress.visibility = View.VISIBLE
model.fetchData()
}
binding.progress.visibility = View.GONE
}
}
The ViewModel is not strictly necessary for this type of async workflow - here is an example of how to do the same thing in the activity
class MainActivity : AppCompatActivity() {
private lateinit var binding: ActivityMainBinding
override fun onCreate(savedInstanceState: Bundle?) {
super.onCreate(savedInstanceState)
binding = ActivityMainBinding.inflate(layoutInflater)
setContentView(binding.root)
// When the user clicks the button, trigger the async
// data call
binding.getText.setOnClickListener {
binding.progress.visibility = View.VISIBLE
fetchData()
}
binding.progress.visibility = View.GONE
}
private fun fetchData() {
lifecycleScope.launch {
delay(3000)
val t = Calendar.getInstance().time
processData(t.toString())
}
}
private fun processData(d: String) {
binding.progress.visibility = View.GONE
val p = "The time is $d"
binding.text.text = p
}
}
(and, for completeness, the activity XML)
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<androidx.constraintlayout.widget.ConstraintLayout xmlns:android="http://schemas.android.com/apk/res/android"
xmlns:app="http://schemas.android.com/apk/res-auto"
xmlns:tools="http://schemas.android.com/tools"
android:layout_width="match_parent"
android:layout_height="match_parent"
tools:context=".MainActivity">
<TextView
android:id="#+id/text"
android:layout_margin="16dp"
android:layout_width="wrap_content"
android:layout_height="wrap_content"
app:layout_constraintLeft_toLeftOf="parent"
app:layout_constraintRight_toRightOf="parent"
app:layout_constraintTop_toTopOf="parent"/>
<Button
android:id="#+id/get_text"
android:layout_width="wrap_content"
android:layout_height="wrap_content"
android:layout_margin="16dp"
android:text="Get Text"
app:layout_constraintLeft_toLeftOf="parent"
app:layout_constraintRight_toRightOf="parent"
app:layout_constraintTop_toBottomOf="#+id/text"
/>
<ProgressBar
android:id="#+id/progress"
android:layout_width="match_parent"
android:layout_height="wrap_content"
android:padding="48dp"
app:layout_constraintLeft_toLeftOf="parent"
app:layout_constraintRight_toRightOf="parent"
app:layout_constraintTop_toBottomOf="#+id/get_text"
/>
</androidx.constraintlayout.widget.ConstraintLayout>
I try to achieve something similar to this: How to call a lambda callback with mockk
I pass a mocked service to my real object. How can I get the myService.get callback called? This code gets never called and my test stops at this request.
Here is some sample code:
class MyObject(private val myService: MyService){
fun getSomeStuff() {
myService.get(object: MyService.Callback<MyServiceResponse>{
override fun onResponse(response: MyServiceResponse?) {
// check response and do some stuff
// I want to continue my tests here, but this gets never called
}
})
}
How can I create a test that continues inside the callback?
Here is what I trie in my test:
#Test
fun `get some stuff - success`() {
val myService = mockk<MyService>() {
every { get(any()) } answers {
firstArg<() -> MyService.Callback<MyServiceResponse>>().invoke()
}
}
val myObject = MyObject(myService)
myObject.getSomeStuff()
}
You should be able to call onResponse() by using:
every { get(any()) }
answers {
firstArg<MyService.Callback<MyServiceResponse>>().onResponse(aMyServiceResponse)
}
By the way, as you are using a callback, I guess that the implementation is asynchronous, so you'll probably need to use the coEvery / coAnswer variant.
HTH
When creating APIs in Kotlin, what is the idiomatic way to handle async actions?
We could create apis that require normal blocking calls, forcing application code to use something like runBlocking.
////
//// Plain functions
////
// library code
fun registerHandler(block: (it: Foo) -> String) {
// save a reference to call when an action happens later
}
// application code
registerHandler {
runBlocking {
handleItSuspend(it)
}
}
We could make use of suspend more which looks nicer for the application code but requires that we execute our callbacks from suspend functions or coroutine contexts, which may or may not be inconvenient for us.
////
//// Suspend functions
////
// library code
fun registerHandler(block: suspend (it: Foo) -> String) {
// save a reference to call when an action happens later
}
// application code
registerHandler {
handleItSuspend(it)
}
Or we could take functions that return deferred results
////
//// Deferred functions
////
// library code
// This handler can be called from anywhere without needing suspend.
fun registerHandler(block: (it: Foo) -> Deferred<String>) {
// save a reference to call when an action happens later
}
// application code
registerHandler {
// Function that isn't suspend but returns a deferred
handleItAsync(it)
}
Is there a consensus or an official stance on what we should be doing?
As #msrd0 alluded to in a comment, you can easily convert between arguments for the second and third approaches, so they are equivalent:
val block1: suspend (Foo) -> String = ...
val block2: (Foo) -> Deferred<String> = { x -> async { block1(x) } }
val block3: suspend (Foo) -> String = { x -> block2(x).await() }
But I'd expect most calls to the Deferred version to look like
registerHandler { foo -> async { doSomethingSuspend(foo) } }
in which case the suspend version is easier to use, it will be just
registerHandler { foo -> doSomethingSuspend(foo) }
Of course, your code base may already use Deferred generally enough that this assumption doesn't hold.
requires that we execute our callbacks from suspend functions or coroutine contexts, which may or may not be inconvenient for us.
I don't think it can be too inconvenient, since it's just a simple async (or another coroutine builder) call inside registerHandler.
Or did you mean that registerHandler needs to be called there? That would only be true if it was itself declared suspend.
I am looking for a mockk equivalent of doReturn(...).when(...).*
I am working on writing some unit tests (testing contracts) that involves a lot of system classes and so need to intercept the methods that I don't control and return some call backs (which the method in code would have eventually returned). In mockito, I could do something like doReturn(...).when(...).*
I Wasn't able to find a similar thing in mockK. Seems like every{} always runs the block before answers or returns.
class Vehicle: Listener {
fun displayCar(listener:Listener){
OtherClass().fetchCar(listener)
}
override fun showCarSuccessful() {
//do something
}
}
class OtherClass {
//assume its an outside function that returns nothing but invokes a method of listener call back
fun fetchCar(listener: Listener) {
//... Some system level operations that I don't have control to generate mock objects but in the test I want to use the listener to call some method so that I can
// test some contracts
listener.showCarSuccessful()
}
}
class Tests {
#Test
fun testCarSuccess() {
val listener: Listener = mockk(relaxed = true)
val vehicle = Vehicle()
//also tried with mockkClass and others
val other: OtherClass = mockk(relaxed = true)
every { other.fetchCar(listener) } returns {listener.showCarSuccessful()}
vehicle.displayCar(listener)
//do some verification checks here
}
}
interface Listener {
fun showCarSuccessful()
}
The every{} block is your when clause. You can set up multiple conditions for returning different results. See the example of setting up fixed returns and performing progrommatic answers
import io.mockk.MockKException
import io.mockk.every
import io.mockk.mockk
import org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions
import org.junit.jupiter.api.Test
class MyClass {
fun add(operand1: Int, operand2: Int): Int {
TODO()
}
}
class MockkTest {
#Test
fun testMocking() {
val myClassMock = mockk<MyClass> {
every { add(1, 2) } returns 3 // Set behaviour
every { add(2, 2) } returns 4 // Set behaviour
every { add(3, 4)} answers {args[0] as Int * args[1] as Int} // Programmatic behaviour
}
Assertions.assertEquals(3, myClassMock.add(1, 2))
Assertions.assertEquals(4, myClassMock.add(2, 2))
Assertions.assertEquals(12, myClassMock.add(3, 4))
Assertions.assertThrows(MockKException::class.java) {
myClassMock.add(5, 6) // This behaviour has not been set up.
}
}
}
But, in your example in particular, I find this line:
every { other.fetchCar(listener) } returns listener.showCarSuccessful()
very strange. First it is not doing what you think it is doing - it is going to make that call as you set this behaviour up you are telling your mock to return the result of that call, not to do that cal. To do what you want to do, you should rather do this:
every { other.fetchCar(listener) } answers {listener.showCarSuccessful()}
But even then, this line is setting up the mock behaviour after you have called your class under test - set up your mock behaviour first.
Also, it is strange that you are setting up side effects in a top level mock in a nested mock. Surely for testing your Vehicle class all you want to do is verify that its inner class was called with the correct arguments. Also, how does Vehicle get a reference to your OtherClass mock, it is instantiating a new one and calling that function.
Here is an attempt to make your example work:
import io.mockk.mockk
import io.mockk.verify
import org.junit.jupiter.api.Test
interface Listener {
fun showCarSuccessful()
}
class Vehicle(val other: OtherClass) : Listener {
fun displayCar(listener: Listener) {
other.fetchCar(listener)
}
override fun showCarSuccessful() {
//do something
}
}
class OtherClass {
//assume its an outside function that returns nothing but invokes a method of listener call back
fun fetchCar(listener: Listener) {
}
}
class VehicleTest{
#Test
fun testDisplayCar(){
val listener: Listener = mockk(relaxed = true)
val other: OtherClass = mockk(relaxed = true) //also tried with mockkClass and others
val vehicle = Vehicle(other)
vehicle.displayCar(listener)
verify{ other.fetchCar(listener) }
}
}
Even this I think is maybe still a bit off - I suspect that the listener you want Vehicle to pass to OtherClass is itself, not an argument...
You should also then write a separate test for OtherClass to make sure it does what you expect it to when you call fetchCar
I create a mock of a class with mockk.
On this mock I now call a method that gets a lambda as a parameter.
This lambda serves as a callback to deliver state changes of the callback to the caller of the method.
class ObjectToMock() {
fun methodToCall(someValue: String?, observer: (State) -> Unit) {
...
}
}
How do I configure the mock to call the passed lambda?
You can use answers:
val otm: ObjectToMock = mockk()
every { otm.methodToCall(any(), any())} answers {
secondArg<(String) -> Unit>().invoke("anything")
}
otm.methodToCall("bla"){
println("invoked with $it") //invoked with anything
}
Within the answers scope you can access firstArg, secondArg etc and get it in the expected type by providing it as a generic argument. Note that I explicitly used invoke here to make it more readable, it may also be omitted.
I had to look for a bit more example for the callback and found some example in Kotlin Test with Mockk. In my case, it's a bit more specific.
I wanted to check and mock the onFailure and onSuccess case of a a custom callback implementation MyCustomCallback implementing the ListenableFutureCallback.
The code would look like that for my ExampleProducer class that would have a send function:
fun send(data: String) {
val responseFuture = kafkaTemplate.send(topic, data)
responseFuture.addCallback(MyCustomCallback())
}
So here who would the test go:
#Test
fun onFailureTest() {
kafkaTemplate: KafkaTemplate<String, String> = mockk()
val captureCallback = slot<ListenableFutureCallback<SendResult<String, String>>>()
every { callback.addCallback(capture(captureCallback)) } answers {
captureCallback.captured.onFailure(Throwable())
}
every { kafkaTemplate.send(any()) } returns callback
val prod: ExampleProducer = ExampleProducer()
prod.send("test")
// Then you can verify behaviour or check your captureCallback.captured
verify { kafkaTemplate.send(any()) }
assertNotNull(captureCallback.captured)
}
Maybe not exactly what you ask about, but you can use the funciton type for the mock:
val observerMock = mockk<(State) -> Unit>()