Using Optaplanner for VRPPD - optaplanner

I am trying to run the example "optaplanner-mixedvrp-experiment" developed by Geoffrey De Smet and when I run it it throws me the following error:
Caused by: java.lang.IllegalStateException: The entity (MY) has a
variable (previousStandstill) with value (MUNO) which has a
sourceVariableName variable (nextVisit) with a value (WERBOMONT) which
is not null. Verify the consistency of your input problem for that
sourceVariableName variable.
I have not made any change, I have only cloned and executed it, I import and solve it and it throws me this error.
Do you know what could be happening?
I am applying it in the development of a variant of VRP with multiple deliveries and collections, but it throws me the same error. I have activated the FULL_ASSERT mode and nextVisit, previousStandstill, visitIndex are always null

It's been a long time since I looked at that code, so it's using an old version of optaplanner. Our goal is still to clean it up and offer an out of the box example for VRPPD (and probably remove some boilerplate along the way, using the upcoming #CollectionPlanningVariabe etc). That being said, we have multiple users&customers who used that optaplanner-mixedvrp-experiment to successfully build VRPPD implementations.
Which dataset did you try?
FWIW, that IllegalStateException says that when A.previous = B, the B.next is not A. So either the dataset importer didn't import it correctly - before calling solve() - especially if it fails before the first CH step in FULL_ASSERT. Or one of the custom moves corrupted the model.

Related

org.jenkinsci.plugins.scriptsecurity.sandbox.RejectedAccessException: Scripts not permitted to use method hudson.model.Item getName

I was trying to delete the old history of builds using a groovy script, and earlier it was working fine and without any changes now I am facing issue as below:
ERROR: Build step failed with exception
org.jenkinsci.plugins.scriptsecurity.sandbox.RejectedAccessException: Scripts not permitted to use method hudson.model.Item getName
at org.jenkinsci.plugins.scriptsecurity.sandbox.whitelists.StaticWhitelist.rejectMethod(StaticWhitelist.java:175)
at org.jenkinsci.plugins.scriptsecurity.sandbox.groovy.SandboxInterceptor.onMethodCall(SandboxInterceptor.java:137)
at org.kohsuke.groovy.sandbox.impl.Checker$1.call(Checker.java:155)
at org.kohsuke.groovy.sandbox.impl.Checker.checkedCall(Checker.java:159)
at org.kohsuke.groovy.sandbox.impl.Checker$checkedCall.callStatic(Unknown Source)
at org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.callsite.CallSiteArray.defaultCallStatic(CallSiteArray.java:56)
at org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.callsite.AbstractCallSite.callStatic(AbstractCallSite.java:194)
at Script1.deleteBuildHistory(Script1.groovy:71)
at Script1$deleteBuildHistory.call(Unknown Source)
at org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.callsite.CallSiteArray.defaultCall(CallSiteArray.java:48)
at org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.callsite.AbstractCallSite.call(AbstractCallSite.java:113)
at org.kohsuke.groovy.sandbox.impl.Checker$1.call(Checker.java:157)
at org.kohsuke.groovy.sandbox.GroovyInterceptor.onMethodCall(GroovyInterceptor.java:23)
at org.jenkinsci.plugins.scriptsecurity.sandbox.groovy.SandboxInterceptor.onMethodCall(SandboxInterceptor.java:133)
at org.kohsuke.groovy.sandbox.impl.Checker$1.call(Checker.java:155)
at org.kohsuke.groovy.sandbox.impl.Checker.checkedCall(Checker.java:159)
at org.kohsuke.groovy.sandbox.impl.Checker$checkedCall.callStatic(Unknown Source)
at org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.callsite.CallSiteArray.defaultCallStatic(CallSiteArray.java:56)
at org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.callsite.AbstractCallSite.callStatic(AbstractCallSite.java:194)
at Script1.run(Script1.groovy:58)
at org.jenkinsci.plugins.scriptsecurity.sandbox.groovy.GroovySandbox.run(GroovySandbox.java:141)
at org.jenkinsci.plugins.scriptsecurity.sandbox.groovy.SecureGroovyScript.evaluate(SecureGroovyScript.java:333)
at hudson.plugins.groovy.SystemGroovy.run(SystemGroovy.java:95)
at hudson.plugins.groovy.SystemGroovy.perform(SystemGroovy.java:59)
at hudson.tasks.BuildStepMonitor$1.perform(BuildStepMonitor.java:20)
at hudson.model.AbstractBuild$AbstractBuildExecution.perform(AbstractBuild.java:744)
at hudson.model.Build$BuildExecution.build(Build.java:206)
at hudson.model.Build$BuildExecution.doRun(Build.java:163)
at hudson.model.AbstractBuild$AbstractBuildExecution.run(AbstractBuild.java:504)
at hudson.model.Run.execute(Run.java:1798)
at hudson.model.FreeStyleBuild.run(FreeStyleBuild.java:43)
at hudson.model.ResourceController.execute(ResourceController.java:97)
at hudson.model.Executor.run(Executor.java:429)
Build step 'Execute system Groovy script' marked build as failure
Finished: FAILURE
In my groovy I am using the API "hudson.model.Hudson.instance.getItem(envVar.get("JOB_NAME"));" to get the Jenkins job name. Since it is working earlier, now I am facing this issue and not sure how to resolve the same. Kindly provide inputs.
You are using a rather generic way to access data from an object, which might be exploited somehow, so it got blacklisted or rather not whitelisted in Jenkins Groovy Sandbox.
You have several options here:
Just add an exception using in-process script approval
Use a less generic and therefore saver syntax like env.JOB_NAME.
I would definitely go for the second option in your case for it has no disadvantages and is simpler then your current code.
As for why it worked before: three might have been an approval, which somehow got lost –happened to me once– or the call you are using got un-whitelisted in an update of the security plugin.

DoubleClick Offline Conversion API Deleting on duplicate records?

Trying to use the DoubleClick API with the Google Client PHP SDK described here https://developers.google.com/doubleclick-advertisers/v3.1/conversions/batchupdate
I'm finding that instead of an update happening, these conversions are being removed from our reports. I suspect something with De-duplication, but I wouldn't expect that the conversion be completely removed.
I'm basically doing this:
$conversion = new Google_Service_Dfareporting_Conversion();
$conversion->setKind("dfareporting#conversion");
$conversion->setGclid($clickId);
$conversion->setFloodlightActivityId($this->getActivityId());
$conversion->setFloodlightConfigurationId($this->getConfigId());
$conversion->setOrdinal($conversionId);
$conversion->setTimestampMicros($conversionTimestamp);
$conversion->setQuantity(1);
$conversion->setValue($revenue);
$doubleClickSearch = new Google_Service_Dfareporting($this->getGoogleApiClient());
$conversionList = new Google_Service_Dfareporting_ConversionsBatchUpdateRequest();
$conversionList->setKind("dfareporting#conversionsBatchUpdateRequest");
$conversionList->setConversions([$conversion]);
return $doubleClickSearch->conversions->batchupdate($this->getUserProfileId(), $conversionList);
And when this gets run, it works as expected:
{"hasFailures":false,
"kind":"dfareporting#conversionsBatchUpdateResponse",
"status":[
{"kind":"dfareporting#conversionStatus",
"conversion":{
"childDirectedTreatment":null,
"encryptedUserId":null,
"encryptedUserIdCandidates":null,
"floodlightActivityId":"redacted",
"floodlightConfigurationId":"redacted",
"gclid":"redacted",
"kind":"dfareporting#conversion",
"limitAdTracking":null,
"mobileDeviceId":null,
"ordinal":"redactedConversionId",
"quantity":"1",
"timestampMicros":"1532697843000000",
"value":885
}
}
]
}
But then when we run the report afterwards, this particular conversion is no longer part of it: It doesn't just not take the update, the conversion has been completely removed.
I've verified that the Ordinal, timestamp, gclid, activityId, and configuration IDs all match. Any idea where my conversions are going?
I will note that we are running the batchUpdate command for creations as well. I'm not sure if that would have anything to do with it, but the records do get created as normal.

Corrupted MD-SAL queries when trying to read flows on tables: missing flow rules

I am experiencing a glitch from OpenDaylight (using Mininet).
Essentially, I am querying flow rules on specific nodes and on specific tables. The relevant code is the following, and is run by 1 separate thread per node that I am polling:
public static final InstanceIdentifier<Nodes NODES_II = InstanceIdentifier
.builder(Nodes.class).build();
public static InstanceIdentifier<Table> makeTableIId(NodeId nodeId, Short tableId) {
return NODES_IID.child(Node.class, new NodeKey(nodeId))
.augmentation(FlowCapableNode.class)
.child(Table.class, new TableKey(tableId));
}
and
InstanceIdentifier<Table> tableIId = makeTableIId(nodeId, tableId);
Optional<Table> tableOptional = dataBroker.newReadOnlyTransaction()
.read(LogicalDatastoreType.OPERATIONAL, tableIId).get();
if(!tableOptional.isPresent()) {
continue;
}
List<Flow> flows = tableOptional.get().getFlow();
The behavior: tableOptional is present, and getFlow() returns an empty list.
The observation: there ARE flow rules installed on ALL nodes on the tables I am querying, but for some reason, some of these nodes show none of these flows on none of the tables (here, tables 3, 4, 5, and 6).
The weirdness: On one of the problematic nodes, I have four rules, installed on tables 9, 13, 17 and 22 respectively. They timeout simultaneously after 150 seconds. After they disappear, the query suddenly begins to "see" the flows installed on tables 3, 4, 5, and 6, returning these for each table.
Question: How is this even possible?
EDIT I just realized that the rules whose timeout "suddenly fix everything" were also rules that generated warnings in ODL's log (OpenFlowPlugin to be more specific). I did not observe any obvious issue, so I'd sort of brushed it aside.
Here is the code relevant to the error:
https://pastebin.com/yJDZesXU
Here are the errors I get every time I install a rule that walks through these lines:
https://pastebin.com/c9HYLBt6
I must stress that these rules work as intended, and that printing them out reveals no evident formatting issue. Again, they appear fine when dumped.
My hypothesis is that this warning is a symptom of ODL "messing up" trying to store the rules in MD-SAL, which ends up messing a lot of rule-reading queries. On uninstallation of the garbage that ensues, rule-reading queries become functional again.
This makes sense to me, but then... I haven't understood how to fix these warnings, or what these warnings were about in the first place.
EDIT 2: By commenting lines suspecting of causing the warnings in the above pastebin:
//ipv4MatchBuilder.setIpv4SourceAddressNoMask(...);
//ipv4MatchBuilder.setIpv4SourcenArbitraryBitmask(...);
The warnings disappear, AND the flows appear correctly on all tables, when pinged. This confirms my hypothesis that somewhere, something wrong happens in the data store.
EDIT 3: I have found that by setting any non-trivial arbitrary bitmask, this error goes away. That is, I have tried setting an arbitrary bitmask which was neither null nor "255.255.255.255", and this error has gone away. The problem is I might like having a bitmask for the source, but an exact match on the destination. Even setting the bitmask to "127.255.255.255" (as I tried) is still unnerving. It really feels to me like this is an OpenFlowPlugin glitch, though.
EDIT 4: Steps for reproducing the bug
Install a rule with ipv4 arbitrary bitmask match, with the destination ip set, and the destination arbitrary bitmask either null or set to 255.255.255.255.
Ipv4MatchArbitraryBitMaskBuilder ipv4MatchBuilder = new Ipv4MatchArbitraryBitMaskBuilder();
ipv4MatchBuilder.setIpv4DestinationAddressNoMask(new Ipv4Address("10.0.0.1"));
ipv4MatchBuilder.setIpv4DestinationArbitraryBitmask(new DottedQuad("255.255.255.255"));
matchBuilder = new MatchBuilder().setEthernetMatch(ethernetMatchBuilder.build()).setLayer3Match(ipv4MatchBuilder.build());
... and so on ...
Extra optional steps: Install one such rule for the destination, one such rule for the source, and install equivalent rules where the bitmask is set to something else, like 127.255.255.255.
Make a query to MDSal to fetch flow information from the node on which you installed the flow rule.
Now, do "log:display" inside your ODL controller. You should have a warning about a malformed destination address. Additionally, the Table object you queried should contain no flows, so tableObject.getFlow() should return an empty list.

I am getting 'Local Search phase started with an uninitialized Solution' when I run on a larger dataset

I am developing a solver using Optaplanner 6.1.0, similar to the Vehicle Routing Problem. When I run my solver on 700 installers and 200 bookings, it will successfully solve the planning problem. But, when I used against a larger dataset (700 installers and 1220 bookings), I get
Caused by: java.lang.IllegalStateException: Local Search phase started with an uninitialized Solution. First initialize the Solution. For example, run a Construction Heuristic phase first.
but right before the exception,
16:10:40,378 INFO [DefaultConstructionHeuristicPhase] [http-listener-1(4)] Construction Heuristic phase (0) ended: step total (194), time spent (30693), best score (-1hard/-688803soft).
I am using <constructionHeuristicType>FIRST_FIT_DECREASING</constructionHeuristicType>
in my config.
Am I using it wrong?
Maybe the value range for a planning variable is empty. Especially with value range provider from entity, this is more likely. Feel free to file a jira that the error message should improve in such a case.
Diagnostic todo: Comment out the local solver phase, run the solver (so it only does the construction heuristic) and then iterate through the planning entities and print out the value for each planning value. Check if there are any nulls in there.
The fact that you have 194 steps, instead 200 steps in your CH indicates this. (If those other 6 planning entities are immovable, this won't trigger this exception (more info), so that's not the problem.)

Getting "Can not convert the given object to query." with ColdFusion ORM

This is happening intermittently (usually at start up). I get the above error message when executing the following code.
var arr = ORMExecuteQuery( "FROM priority WHERE active = 1 ORDER BY sortOrder" );
var qry = entityToQuery( arr );
The first line executes fine, but the second line blows up. The solution is to run ormreload();
The problem keeps coming up in an unpredictable way though. Even when no changes have been made to the beans or gateways that are using ORM. Completely unpredictable and impossible to replicate on purpose. Is there something else that can mess with the hibernate mappings that could cause this type of problem.
Other info that may be pertinent:
This is a MURA plugin based on a recent version of FW/1.
ormreload() is a persistent fix (until it fails again)
My current solution is to put ormreload() in the setupApplication() method of application.cfc
I just want to understand better what could be causing this problem.