I have a large dataframe (14,000 rows). The columns include 'title', 'x' and 'y' as well as other random data.
For a particular title, I've written a code which basically performs an analysis using the x and y values for a subset of this data (but the specifics are unimportant for this).
For this title (which is something like "Part number Y1-17") there are about 80 rows.
At the moment I have only worked out how to get my code to work on 1 subset of titles (i.e. one set of rows with the same title) at a time. For this I've been making a smaller dataframe out of my big one using:
df = pd.read_excel(r"mydata.xlsx")
a = df.loc[df['title'].str.contains('Y1-17')]
But given there are about 180 of these smaller datasets I need to do this analysis on, I don't want to have to do it manually.
My question is, is there a way to make all of the smaller dataframes automatically, by slicing the data by the unique 'title' value? All the help I've found, it seems like you need to specify the 'title' to make a subset. I want to subset all of it and I don't want to have to list all the title names to do it.
I've searched quite a lot and haven't found anything, however I am a beginner so it's very possible I've missed some really basic way of doing this.
I'm not sure if its important information but the modules I'm working with pandas, and numpy
Thanks for any help!
You can use Pandas groupby
For example:
df_dict = {key: title for key, title in df.copy().groupby('title', sort=False)}
Which creates a dictionary of DataFrames each containing all the columns and only the rows pertaining to each unique value of title.
Related
I have a pandas dataframe that I've extracted from a json object using pd.json_normalize.
It has 4 rows and over 60 columns, and with the exception of the 'ts' column there are no columns where there is more than one value.
Is it possible to merge the four rows togather to give one row which can then be written to a .csv file? I have searched the documentation and found no information on this.
To give context, the data is a one time record from a weather station, I will have records at 5 minute intervals and need to put all the records into a database for further use.
I've managed to get the desired result, it's a little convoluted, and i would expect that there is a much more succint way to do it, but I basically manipulated the dataframe, replaced all nan's with zero, replaced some strings with ints and added the columns together as shown in the code below:
with open(fname,'r') as d:
ws=json.loads(next(d))
df=pd.json_normalize(ws['sensors'], record_path='data')
df3=pd.concat([df.iloc[0],df.iloc[1], df.iloc[2],
df.iloc[3]],axis=1)
df3.rename(columns={0 :'a', 1:'b', 2 :'c' ,3 :'d'}, inplace=True)
df3=df3.fillna(0)
df3.loc['ts',['b','c','d']]=0
df3.loc[['ip_v4_gateway','ip_v4_netmask','ip_v4_address'],'c']=int(0)
df3['comb']=df3['a']+df3['b']+df3['c']+df3['d']
df3.drop(columns=['a','b','c','d'], inplace=True)
df3=df3.T
As has been said by quite a few people, the documentation on this is very patchy, so I hope this may help someone else who is struggling with this problem! (and yes, i know that one line isn't indented properly, get over it!)
Note my question is a bit different here:
I am working with pandas on a dataset that has a lot of data (10M+):
q = "SELECT COUNT(*) as total FROM `<public table>`"
df = pd.read_gbq(q, project_id=project, dialect='standard')
I know I can do with pandas function with a frac option like
df_sample = df.sample(frac=0.01)
however, I do not want to generate the original df with that size. I wonder what is the best practice to generate a dataframe with data already sampled.
I've read some sql posts showing the sample data was generated from a slice, that is absolutely not accepted in my case. The sample data needs to be evenly distributed as much as possible.
Can anyone shed me with more light?
Thank you very much.
UPDATE:
Below is a table showing how the data looks like:
Reputation is the field I am working on. You can see majority records have a very small reputation.
I don't want to work with a dataframe with all the records, I want the sampled data also looks like the un-sampled data, for example, similar histogram, that's what I meant "evenly".
I hope this clarifies a bit.
A simple random sample can be performed using the following syntax:
select * from mydata where rand()>0.9
This gives each row in the table a 10% chance of being selected. It doesn't guarantee a certain sample size or guarantee that every bin is represented (that would require a stratified sample). Here's a fiddle of this approach
http://sqlfiddle.com/#!9/21d1ee/2
On average, random sampling will provide a distribution the same as that of the underlying data, so meets your requirement. However if you want to 'force' the sample to be more representative or force it to be a certain size we need to look at something a little more advanced.
I'm using elasticsearch_dsl to make make queries for and searches of an elasticsearch DB.
One of the fields I'm querying is an address, which as a structure like so:
address.first_line
address.second_line
address.city
adress.code
The returned documents hold this in JSON structures, such that the address is held in a dict with a field for each sub-field of address.
I would like to put this into a (pandas) dataframe, such that there is one column per sub-field of the address.
Directly putting address into the dataframe gives me a column of address dicts, and iterating the rows to manually unpack (json.normalize()) each address dict takes a long time (4 days, ~200,000 rows).
From the docs I can't figure out how to get elasticsearch_dsl to return flattened results. Is there a faster way of doing this?
Searching for a way to solve this problem, I've come across my own answer and found it lacking, so will update with a better way
Specifically: pd.json_normalize(df['json_column'])
In context: pd.concat([df, pd.json_normalize(df['json_column'])], axis=1)
Then drop the original column if required.
Original answer from last year that does the same thing much more slowly
df.column_of_dicts.apply(pd.Series) returns a DataFrame with those dicts flattened.
pd.concat(df,new_df) gets the new columns onto the old dataframe.
Then delete the original column_of_dicts.
pd.concat([df, df.address.apply(pd.Series)], axis=1) is the actual code I used.
I am relatively new to Pandas and to python and I am trying to find out how to turn all content(all fields are strings) of a Pandas Dataframe to categorical one.
All the values from rows and columns have to be treated as a big unique data set before turning them to categorical numbers.
So far I was able to write the following piece of code
for col_name in X.columns:
if(X[col_name].dtype == 'object'):
X[col_name]= X[col_name].astype('category')
X[col_name] = X[col_name].cat.codes
that works on a data frame X of multiple columns. It takes the strings and turns them to unique numbers.
What I am not sure for the code above is that my for loop only works per column and I am not sure if the codes assigned are unique per column or per whole data frame (the latter is the desired action).
Can you please provide advice on how I can turn my code to provide unique numbers considering all the values of the data frame?
I would like to thank you in advance for your help.
Regards
Alex
Use DataFrame.stack with Series.unstack for set MultiIndex Series to unique values:
cols = df.select_dtypes('object').columns
df[cols] = df[cols].stack().astype('category').cat.codes.unstack()
One struggle I have with using Python Pandas is to repeat the same coding scheme for a large number of columns. For example, below is trying to create a new column age_b in a data frame called data. How do I easily loop through a long (100s or even 1000s) of numeric columns, do the exact same thing, with the newly created column names being the existing name with a prefix or suffix string such as "_b".
labels = [1,2,3,4,5]
data['age_b'] = pd.cut(data['age'],bins=5, labels=labels)
In general, I have many simply data frame column manipulations or calculations, and it's easy to write the code. However, so often I want to repeat the same process for dozens of columns, that's when I get bogged down, because most functions or manipulations would work for one column, but not easily repeatable to many columns. It would be nice if someone can suggest a looping code "structure". Thanks!