I have a table:
date
user_id
state
8/12/2021
1
visit
9/12/2021
1
registered
12/12/2021
1
order
In this table I only have updated of state of users, but I don't see the state by some particular date. How can I add rows with missing dates and fill them with previous value, so that the table will be:
date
user_id
state
8/12/2021
1
visit
9/12/2021
1
registered
10/12/2021
1
registered
11/12/2021
1
registered
12/12/2021
1
order
Here's one attempt. The cte user_dates gets min and max dates for each user that is then fed to generate_series. I.e. each user is associated with all dates between there first and last date.
In the inner select we create a group for each first_value and consecutive null states.
In the outer select we pick the first_value for each such grp.
with user_dates(f, t, user_id) as (
select min(T.dt), max(T.dt), user_id
from T
group by user_id
)
select user_id, dt, grp, first_value(state) over (partition by user_id, grp order by dt)
from (
select ud.user_id
, cal.dt::date
, state
, count(T.state) over (partition by user_id
order by cal.dt) as grp
from user_dates ud
cross join generate_series(ud.f::timestamp, ud.t::timestamp , interval '1 day') cal (dt)
left join T
using (dt, user_id)
) as tmp
order by user_id, dt
;
user_id dt grp first_value
1 2021-12-08 1 visit
1 2021-12-09 2 registered
1 2021-12-10 2 registered
1 2021-12-11 2 registered
1 2021-12-12 3 order
You can remove grp from the select, it's merely there for informative purposes.
Fiddle
I have a table with the following info
|date | user_id | week_beg | month_beg|
SQL to create table with test values:
CREATE TABLE uniques
(
date DATE,
user_id INT,
week_beg DATE,
month_beg DATE
)
INSERT INTO uniques VALUES ('2013-01-01', 1, '2012-12-30', '2013-01-01')
INSERT INTO uniques VALUES ('2013-01-03', 3, '2012-12-30', '2013-01-01')
INSERT INTO uniques VALUES ('2013-01-06', 4, '2013-01-06', '2013-01-01')
INSERT INTO uniques VALUES ('2013-01-07', 4, '2013-01-06', '2013-01-01')
INPUT TABLE:
| date | user_id | week_beg | month_beg |
| 2013-01-01 | 1 | 2012-12-30 | 2013-01-01 |
| 2013-01-03 | 3 | 2012-12-30 | 2013-01-01 |
| 2013-01-06 | 4 | 2013-01-06 | 2013-01-01 |
| 2013-01-07 | 4 | 2013-01-06 | 2013-01-01 |
OUTPUT TABLE:
| date | time_series | cnt |
| 2013-01-01 | D | 1 |
| 2013-01-01 | W | 1 |
| 2013-01-01 | M | 1 |
| 2013-01-03 | D | 1 |
| 2013-01-03 | W | 2 |
| 2013-01-03 | M | 2 |
| 2013-01-06 | D | 1 |
| 2013-01-06 | W | 1 |
| 2013-01-06 | M | 3 |
| 2013-01-07 | D | 1 |
| 2013-01-07 | W | 1 |
| 2013-01-07 | M | 3 |
I want to calculate the number of distinct user_id's for a date:
For that date
For that week up to that date (Week to date)
For the month up to that date (Month to date)
1 is easy to calculate.
For 2 and 3 I am trying to use such queries:
SELECT
date,
'W' AS "time_series",
(COUNT DISTINCT user_id) COUNT (user_id) OVER (PARTITION BY week_beg) AS "cnt"
FROM user_subtitles
SELECT
date,
'M' AS "time_series",
(COUNT DISTINCT user_id) COUNT (user_id) OVER (PARTITION BY month_beg) AS "cnt"
FROM user_subtitles
Postgres does not allow window functions for DISTINCT calculation, so this approach does not work.
I have also tried out a GROUP BY approach, but it does not work as it gives me numbers for whole week/months.
Whats the best way to approach this problem?
Count all rows
SELECT date, '1_D' AS time_series, count(DISTINCT user_id) AS cnt
FROM uniques
GROUP BY 1
UNION ALL
SELECT DISTINCT ON (1)
date, '2_W', count(*) OVER (PARTITION BY week_beg ORDER BY date)
FROM uniques
UNION ALL
SELECT DISTINCT ON (1)
date, '3_M', count(*) OVER (PARTITION BY month_beg ORDER BY date)
FROM uniques
ORDER BY 1, time_series
Your columns week_beg and month_beg are 100 % redundant and can easily be replaced by
date_trunc('week', date + 1) - 1 and date_trunc('month', date) respectively.
Your week seems to start on Sunday (off by one), therefore the + 1 .. - 1.
The default frame of a window function with ORDER BY in the OVER clause uses is RANGE BETWEEN UNBOUNDED PRECEDING AND CURRENT ROW. That's exactly what you need.
Use UNION ALL, not UNION.
Your unfortunate choice for time_series (D, W, M) does not sort well, I renamed to make the final ORDER BY easier.
This query can deal with multiple rows per day. Counts include all peers for a day.
More about DISTINCT ON:
Select first row in each GROUP BY group?
DISTINCT users per day
To count every user only once per day, use a CTE with DISTINCT ON:
WITH x AS (SELECT DISTINCT ON (1,2) date, user_id FROM uniques)
SELECT date, '1_D' AS time_series, count(user_id) AS cnt
FROM x
GROUP BY 1
UNION ALL
SELECT DISTINCT ON (1)
date, '2_W'
,count(*) OVER (PARTITION BY (date_trunc('week', date + 1)::date - 1)
ORDER BY date)
FROM x
UNION ALL
SELECT DISTINCT ON (1)
date, '3_M'
,count(*) OVER (PARTITION BY date_trunc('month', date) ORDER BY date)
FROM x
ORDER BY 1, 2
DISTINCT users over dynamic period of time
You can always resort to correlated subqueries. Tend to be slow with big tables!
Building on the previous queries:
WITH du AS (SELECT date, user_id FROM uniques GROUP BY 1,2)
,d AS (
SELECT date
,(date_trunc('week', date + 1)::date - 1) AS week_beg
,date_trunc('month', date)::date AS month_beg
FROM uniques
GROUP BY 1
)
SELECT date, '1_D' AS time_series, count(user_id) AS cnt
FROM du
GROUP BY 1
UNION ALL
SELECT date, '2_W', (SELECT count(DISTINCT user_id) FROM du
WHERE du.date BETWEEN d.week_beg AND d.date )
FROM d
GROUP BY date, week_beg
UNION ALL
SELECT date, '3_M', (SELECT count(DISTINCT user_id) FROM du
WHERE du.date BETWEEN d.month_beg AND d.date)
FROM d
GROUP BY date, month_beg
ORDER BY 1,2;
SQL Fiddle for all three solutions.
Faster with dense_rank()
#Clodoaldo came up with a major improvement: use the window function dense_rank(). Here is another idea for an optimized version. It should be even faster to exclude daily duplicates right away. The performance gain grows with the number of rows per day.
Building on a simplified and sanitized data model
- without the redundant columns
- day as column name instead of date
date is a reserved word in standard SQL and a basic type name in PostgreSQL and shouldn't be used as identifier.
CREATE TABLE uniques(
day date -- instead of "date"
,user_id int
);
Improved query:
WITH du AS (
SELECT DISTINCT ON (1, 2)
day, user_id
,date_trunc('week', day + 1)::date - 1 AS week_beg
,date_trunc('month', day)::date AS month_beg
FROM uniques
)
SELECT day, count(user_id) AS d, max(w) AS w, max(m) AS m
FROM (
SELECT user_id, day
,dense_rank() OVER(PARTITION BY week_beg ORDER BY user_id) AS w
,dense_rank() OVER(PARTITION BY month_beg ORDER BY user_id) AS m
FROM du
) s
GROUP BY day
ORDER BY day;
SQL Fiddle demonstrating the performance of 4 faster variants. It depends on your data distribution which is fastest for you.
All of them are about 10x as fast as the correlated subqueries version (which isn't bad for correlated subqueries).
Without correlated subqueries. SQL Fiddle
with u as (
select
"date", user_id,
date_trunc('week', "date" + 1)::date - 1 week_beg,
date_trunc('month', "date")::date month_beg
from uniques
)
select
"date", count(distinct user_id) D,
max(week_dr) W, max(month_dr) M
from (
select
user_id, "date",
dense_rank() over(partition by week_beg order by user_id) week_dr,
dense_rank() over(partition by month_beg order by user_id) month_dr
from u
) s
group by "date"
order by "date"
Try
SELECT
*
FROM
(
SELECT dates, count(user_id), 'D' as timesereis FROM users_data GROUP BY dates
UNION
SELECT max(dates), count(user_id), 'W' FROM users_data GROUP BY date_part('year',dates)+date_part('week',dates)
UNION
SELECT max(dates), count(user_id), 'M' FROM users_data GROUP BY date_part('year',dates)+date_part('week',dates)
) tEMP order by dates, timesereis
SQLFIDDLE
Try queries like this
SELECT count(distinct user_id), date_format(date, '%Y-%m-%d') as date_period
FROM uniques
GROUP By date_period
There is a table with visits data:
uid (INT) | created_at (DATETIME)
I want to find how many days in a row a user has visited our app. So for instance:
SELECT DISTINCT DATE(created_at) AS d FROM visits WHERE uid = 123
will return:
d
------------
2012-04-28
2012-04-29
2012-04-30
2012-05-03
2012-05-04
There are 5 records and two intervals - 3 days (28 - 30 Apr) and 2 days (3 - 4 May).
My question is how to find the maximum number of days that a user has visited the app in a row (3 days in the example). Tried to find a suitable function in the SQL docs, but with no success. Am I missing something?
UPD:
Thank you guys for your answers! Actually, I'm working with vertica analytics database (http://vertica.com/), however this is a very rare solution and only a few people have experience with it. Although it supports SQL-99 standard.
Well, most of solutions work with slight modifications. Finally I created my own version of query:
-- returns starts of the vitit series
SELECT t1.d as s FROM testing t1
LEFT JOIN testing t2 ON DATE(t2.d) = DATE(TIMESTAMPADD('day', -1, t1.d))
WHERE t2.d is null GROUP BY t1.d
s
---------------------
2012-04-28 01:00:00
2012-05-03 01:00:00
-- returns end of the vitit series
SELECT t1.d as f FROM testing t1
LEFT JOIN testing t2 ON DATE(t2.d) = DATE(TIMESTAMPADD('day', 1, t1.d))
WHERE t2.d is null GROUP BY t1.d
f
---------------------
2012-04-30 01:00:00
2012-05-04 01:00:00
So now only what we need to do is to join them somehow, for instance by row index.
SELECT s, f, DATEDIFF(day, s, f) + 1 as seq FROM (
SELECT t1.d as s, ROW_NUMBER() OVER () as o1 FROM testing t1
LEFT JOIN testing t2 ON DATE(t2.d) = DATE(TIMESTAMPADD('day', -1, t1.d))
WHERE t2.d is null GROUP BY t1.d
) tbl1 LEFT JOIN (
SELECT t1.d as f, ROW_NUMBER() OVER () as o2 FROM testing t1
LEFT JOIN testing t2 ON DATE(t2.d) = DATE(TIMESTAMPADD('day', 1, t1.d))
WHERE t2.d is null GROUP BY t1.d
) tbl2 ON o1 = o2
Sample output:
s | f | seq
---------------------+---------------------+-----
2012-04-28 01:00:00 | 2012-04-30 01:00:00 | 3
2012-05-03 01:00:00 | 2012-05-04 01:00:00 | 2
Another approach, the shortest, do a self-join:
with grouped_result as
(
select
sr.d,
sum((fr.d is null)::int) over(order by sr.d) as group_number
from tbl sr
left join tbl fr on sr.d = fr.d + interval '1 day'
)
select d, group_number, count(d) over m as consecutive_days
from grouped_result
window m as (partition by group_number)
Output:
d | group_number | consecutive_days
---------------------+--------------+------------------
2012-04-28 08:00:00 | 1 | 3
2012-04-29 08:00:00 | 1 | 3
2012-04-30 08:00:00 | 1 | 3
2012-05-03 08:00:00 | 2 | 2
2012-05-04 08:00:00 | 2 | 2
(5 rows)
Live test: http://www.sqlfiddle.com/#!1/93789/1
sr = second row, fr = first row ( or perhaps previous row? ツ ). Basically we are doing a back tracking, it's a simulated lag on database that doesn't support LAG (Postgres supports LAG, but the solution is very long, as windowing doesn't support nested windowing). So in this query, we uses a hybrid approach, simulate LAG via join, then use SUM windowing against it, this produces group number
UPDATE
Forgot to put the final query, the query above illustrate the underpinnings of group numbering, need to morph that into this:
with grouped_result as
(
select
sr.d,
sum((fr.d is null)::int) over(order by sr.d) as group_number
from tbl sr
left join tbl fr on sr.d = fr.d + interval '1 day'
)
select min(d) as starting_date, max(d) as end_date, count(d) as consecutive_days
from grouped_result
group by group_number
-- order by consecutive_days desc limit 1
STARTING_DATE END_DATE CONSECUTIVE_DAYS
April, 28 2012 08:00:00-0700 April, 30 2012 08:00:00-0700 3
May, 03 2012 08:00:00-0700 May, 04 2012 08:00:00-0700 2
UPDATE
I know why my other solution that uses window function became long, it became long on my attempt to illustrate the logic of group numbering and counting over the group. If I'd cut to the chase like in my MySql approach, that windowing function could be shorter. Having said that, here's my old windowing function approach, albeit better now:
with headers as
(
select
d,lag(d) over m is null or d - lag(d) over m <> interval '1 day' as header
from tbl
window m as (order by d)
)
,sequence_group as
(
select d, sum(header::int) over (order by d) as group_number
from headers
)
select min(d) as starting_date,max(d) as ending_date,count(d) as consecutive_days
from sequence_group
group by group_number
-- order by consecutive_days desc limit 1
Live test: http://www.sqlfiddle.com/#!1/93789/21
In MySQL you could do this:
SET #nextDate = CURRENT_DATE;
SET #RowNum = 1;
SELECT MAX(RowNumber) AS ConecutiveVisits
FROM ( SELECT #RowNum := IF(#NextDate = Created_At, #RowNum + 1, 1) AS RowNumber,
Created_At,
#NextDate := DATE_ADD(Created_At, INTERVAL 1 DAY) AS NextDate
FROM Visits
ORDER BY Created_At
) Visits
Example here:
http://sqlfiddle.com/#!2/6e035/8
However I am not 100% certain this is the best way to do it.
In Postgresql:
;WITH RECURSIVE VisitsCTE AS
( SELECT Created_At, 1 AS ConsecutiveDays
FROM Visits
UNION ALL
SELECT v.Created_At, ConsecutiveDays + 1
FROM Visits v
INNER JOIN VisitsCTE cte
ON 1 + cte.Created_At = v.Created_At
)
SELECT MAX(ConsecutiveDays) AS ConsecutiveDays
FROM VisitsCTE
Example here:
http://sqlfiddle.com/#!1/16c90/9
I know Postgresql has something similar to common table expressions as available in MSSQL. I'm not that familiar with Postgresql, but the code below works for MSSQL and does what you want.
create table #tempdates (
mydate date
)
insert into #tempdates(mydate) values('2012-04-28')
insert into #tempdates(mydate) values('2012-04-29')
insert into #tempdates(mydate) values('2012-04-30')
insert into #tempdates(mydate) values('2012-05-03')
insert into #tempdates(mydate) values('2012-05-04');
with maxdays (s, e, c)
as
(
select mydate, mydate, 1
from #tempdates
union all
select m.s, mydate, m.c + 1
from #tempdates t
inner join maxdays m on DATEADD(day, -1, t.mydate)=m.e
)
select MIN(o.s),o.e,max(o.c)
from (
select m1.s,max(m1.e) e,max(m1.c) c
from maxdays m1
group by m1.s
) o
group by o.e
drop table #tempdates
And here's the SQL fiddle: http://sqlfiddle.com/#!3/42b38/2
All are very good answers, but I think I should contribute by showing another approach utilizing an analytical capability specific to Vertica (after all it is part of what you paid for). And I promise the final query is short.
First, query using conditional_true_event(). From Vertica's documentation:
Assigns an event window number to each row, starting from 0, and
increments the number by 1 when the result of the boolean argument
expression evaluates true.
The example query looks like this:
select uid, created_at,
conditional_true_event( created_at - lag(created_at) > '1 day' )
over (partition by uid order by created_at) as seq_id
from visits;
And output:
uid created_at seq_id
--- ------------------- ------
123 2012-04-28 00:00:00 0
123 2012-04-29 00:00:00 0
123 2012-04-30 00:00:00 0
123 2012-05-03 00:00:00 1
123 2012-05-04 00:00:00 1
123 2012-06-04 00:00:00 2
123 2012-06-04 00:00:00 2
Now the final query becomes easy:
select uid, seq_id, count(1) num_days, min(created_at) s, max(created_at) f
from
(
select uid, created_at,
conditional_true_event( created_at - lag(created_at) > '1 day' )
over (partition by uid order by created_at) as seq_id
from visits
) as seq
group by uid, seq_id;
Final Output:
uid seq_id num_days s f
--- ------ -------- ------------------- -------------------
123 0 3 2012-04-28 00:00:00 2012-04-30 00:00:00
123 1 2 2012-05-03 00:00:00 2012-05-04 00:00:00
123 2 2 2012-06-04 00:00:00 2012-06-04 00:00:00
One final note:
num_days is actually number of rows of the inner query. If there are two '2012-04-28' visits in the original table (i.e. duplicates), you might want to work around that.
The following should be Oracle friendly, and not require recursive logic.
;WITH
visit_dates (
visit_id,
date_id,
group_id
)
AS
(
SELECT
ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY TRUNC(created_at)),
TRUNC(SYSDATE) - TRUNC(created_at),
TRUNC(SYSDATE) - TRUNC(created_at) - ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY TRUNC(created_at))
FROM
visits
GROUP BY
TRUNC(created_at)
)
,
group_duration (
group_id,
duration
)
AS
(
SELECT
group_id,
MAX(date_id) - MIN(date_id) + 1 AS duration
FROM
visit_dates
GROUP BY
group_id
)
SELECT
MAX(duration) AS max_duration
FROM
group_duration
Postgresql:
with headers as
(
select
d,
lag(d) over m is null or d - lag(d) over m <> interval '1 day' as header
from tbl
window m as (order by d)
)
,sequence_group as
(
select d, sum(header::int) over m as group_number
from headers
window m as (order by d)
)
,consecutive_list as
(
select d, group_number, count(d) over m as consecutive_count
from sequence_group
window m as (partition by group_number)
)
select * from consecutive_list
Divide-and-conquer approach: 3 steps
1st step, find headers:
with headers as
(
select
d,
lag(d) over m is null or d - lag(d) over m <> interval '1 day' as header
from tbl
window m as (order by d)
)
select * from headers
Output:
d | header
---------------------+--------
2012-04-28 08:00:00 | t
2012-04-29 08:00:00 | f
2012-04-30 08:00:00 | f
2012-05-03 08:00:00 | t
2012-05-04 08:00:00 | f
(5 rows)
2nd step, designate grouping:
with headers as
(
select
d,
lag(d) over m is null or d - lag(d) over m <> interval '1 day' as header
from tbl
window m as (order by d)
)
,sequence_group as
(
select d, sum(header::int) over m as group_number
from headers
window m as (order by d)
)
select * from sequence_group
Output:
d | group_number
---------------------+--------------
2012-04-28 08:00:00 | 1
2012-04-29 08:00:00 | 1
2012-04-30 08:00:00 | 1
2012-05-03 08:00:00 | 2
2012-05-04 08:00:00 | 2
(5 rows)
3rd step, count max days:
with headers as
(
select
d,
lag(d) over m is null or d - lag(d) over m <> interval '1 day' as header
from tbl
window m as (order by d)
)
,sequence_group as
(
select d, sum(header::int) over m as group_number
from headers
window m as (order by d)
)
,consecutive_list as
(
select d, group_number, count(d) over m as consecutive_count
from sequence_group
window m as (partition by group_number)
)
select * from consecutive_list
Output:
d | group_number | consecutive_count
---------------------+--------------+-----------------
2012-04-28 08:00:00 | 1 | 3
2012-04-29 08:00:00 | 1 | 3
2012-04-30 08:00:00 | 1 | 3
2012-05-03 08:00:00 | 2 | 2
2012-05-04 08:00:00 | 2 | 2
(5 rows)
This is for MySQL, the shortest, and uses minimal variable (one variable only):
select
min(d) as starting_date, max(d) as ending_date,
count(d) as consecutive_days
from
(
select
sr.d,
IF(fr.d is null,#group_number := #group_number + 1,#group_number)
as group_number
from tbl sr
left join tbl fr on sr.d = adddate(fr.d,interval 1 day)
cross join (select #group_number := 0) as grp
) as x
group by group_number
Output:
STARTING_DATE ENDING_DATE CONSECUTIVE_DAYS
April, 28 2012 08:00:00-0700 April, 30 2012 08:00:00-0700 3
May, 03 2012 08:00:00-0700 May, 04 2012 08:00:00-0700 2
Live test: http://www.sqlfiddle.com/#!2/65169/1
For PostgreSQL 8.4 or later, there is a short and clean way with window functions and no JOIN.
I'd expect this to be the fastest solution posted so far:
WITH x AS (
SELECT created_at AS d
, lag(created_at) OVER (ORDER BY created_at) = (created_at - 1) AS nu
FROM visits
WHERE uid = 1
)
, y AS (
SELECT d, count(NULLIF(nu, TRUE)) OVER (ORDER BY d) AS seq
FROM x
)
SELECT count(*) AS max_days, min(d) AS seq_from, max(d) AS seq_to
FROM y
GROUP BY seq
ORDER BY 1 DESC
LIMIT 1;
Returns:
max_days | seq_from | seq_to
---------+------------+-----------
3 | 2012-04-28 | 2012-04-30
Assuming that created_at is a date and unique.
In CTE x: for every day our user visits, check if he was here yesterday, too.
To calculate "yesterday" just use created_at - 1 The first row is a special case and will produce NULL here.
In CTE y: calculate a running count of "days without yesterday so far" (seq) for every day. NULL values don't count, so count(NULLIF(nu, TRUE)) is the fastes and shortest way, also covering the special case.
Finally, group days per seq and count the days. While being at it I added first and last day of the sequence.
ORDER BY length of the sequence, and pick the longest one.
Upon seeing OP's query approach for their Vertica database, I tried making the two joins run at the same time:
These Postgresql and Sql Server query versions shall both work in Vertica
Postgresql version:
select
min(gr.d) as start_date,
max(gr.d) as end_date,
date_part('day', max(gr.d) - min(gr.d))+1 as consecutive_days
from
(
select
cr.d, (row_number() over() - 1) / 2 as pair_number
from tbl cr
left join tbl pr on pr.d = cr.d - interval '1 day'
left join tbl nr on nr.d = cr.d + interval '1 day'
where pr.d is null <> nr.d is null
) as gr
group by pair_number
order by start_date
Regarding pr.d is null <> nr.d is null. It means, it's either the previous row is null or next row is null, but they can never both be null, so this basically removes the non-consecutive dates, as non-consecutive dates' previous & next row are nulls (and this basically gives us all dates that are just headers and footers only). This is also called an XOR operation
If we are left with consecutive dates only, we can now pair them via row_number:
(row_number() over() - 1) / 2 as pair_number
row_number() starts with 1, we need to subtract it with 1 (we can also add with 1 instead), then we divide it by two; this makes the paired date adjacent to each other
Live test: http://www.sqlfiddle.com/#!1/fc440/7
This is the Sql Server version:
select
min(gr.d) as start_date,
max(gr.d) as end_date,
datediff(day, min(gr.d),max(gr.d)) +1 as consecutive_days
from
(
select
cr.d, (row_number() over(order by cr.d) - 1) / 2 as pair_number
from tbl cr
left join tbl pr on pr.d = dateadd(day,-1,cr.d)
left join tbl nr on nr.d = dateadd(day,+1,cr.d)
where
case when pr.d is null then 1 else 0 end
<> case when nr.d is null then 1 else 0 end
) as gr
group by pair_number
order by start_date
Same logic as above, except for artificial differences on date functions. And sql Server requires an ORDER BY clause on its OVER, while Postgresql's OVER can be left empty.
Sql Server has no first class boolean, that's why we cannot compare booleans directly:
pr.d is null <> nr.d is null
We must do this in Sql Server:
case when pr.d is null then 1 else 0 end
<> case when nr.d is null then 1 else 0 end
Live test: http://www.sqlfiddle.com/#!3/65df2/17
There have already been several answers to this question. However the SQL statements all seem too complex. This can be accomplished with basic SQL, a way to enumerate rows, and some date arithmetic.
The key observation is that if you have a bunch of days and have a parallel sequence of integers, then the difference is a constant date when the days are in a sequence.
The following query uses this observation to answer the original question:
select uid, min(d) as startdate, count(*) as numdaysinseq
from
(
select uid, d, adddate(d, interval -offset day) as groupstart
from
(
select uid, d, row_number() over (partition by uid order by date) as offset
from
(
SELECT DISTINCT uid, DATE(created_at) AS d
FROM visits
) t
) t
) t
Alas, mysql does not have the row_number() function. However, there is a work-around with variables (and most other databases do have this function).