How do I get the below options like test details (to add BDD scenario) when creating test cases?
enter image description here
On my one it just looks like this. I have imported the 6 test type from Xray into my JIRA project. Is there more configuration that needs to be done? Once created, I can click on the test case and insert the scenario there, but surely I should be able to do this whilst creating in the first place. I can't find anything on this new layout online.
enter image description here
If you are using Xray on Jira server/Data Center, then you can fill out the Cucumber Scenario details right away as mentioned here.
If you're using Jira Cloud then you can't do this due to current limitations on Jira/Atlassian side; in this case, you have to create the Test first and then edit the scenario/scenario outline from the Test issue screen.
Related
I add a new category in the admin panel and want to ensure that the category is available in the dropdown on the user's part of the website. Recorded test in the Selenium IDE works fine. But the thing is, the task that I execute is of course not a pure frontend thing - the category is saved in the database and is loaded from it to show it to the user. So if something goes wrong on the database-side, the test will fail.
My question is: is it bad practice to do such tests that depend on backend-behavior ? Should I go for Selenium Webdriver ?
If you use Selenium Webdriver, your test will not change in a main thing. It still will check database side. Selenium Webdriver is just anouther tool for testing that is more flexible and allows to make more complex test then in Selenium IDE.
I don't think that it is bad practice, because it is just one of the tests that chould be executed to enshure you that this part of your project works correctly. In this case I would check back-end part(get all categories from DB or admin's panel and check that there is no extra or missing ones) and than check user's panel(all categories are the same as set in DB and admin's panel).
I want some Testing information about my application.
Which testing method is suitable for my application page.
In my page contains 200 check boxes. on click on check box, one new page open with different URL.
*Note: all check boxes having different URL.
So, please anyone help me out to find which testing method is suitable.
and how can i test my this page with less effort.
For testing techniques, I think here are some expectation.
Techniques should focus on functional testing and reduce efforts of regression testing. From my experience, You should focus on Manual and Automation techniques.
Manual Efforts
If page have more than 200 check box, First question is it necessary to have 200 check box on one page, It will not good user experience. You can filed defect against requirement and product development team. Discussion begin
To verify look and feel of 200 checkbox and page, I will always focus on some QA notes that help everyone team to understand testing efforts that include browser specification and if page is responsive than which are different size of screen you are going to test
I will prefer to write Cucumber Scenario in Gherkin Language using Given/When and Then Cucumber Source
Scenario should be written in way that can help you to automate
Automation Efforts
I would recommand you to use selenium and choose any programming lanague(C#,PHP,Java,JavaScript,perl,Ruby,Python and other many) for automation.
You already have scenario and You can automate easily
Few things should be part of automation like deep verification that page is loaded successfully, title of page are matching and take snapshot if page is not loaded or during exception. Automation code should execute against any browser.
This is good starting point.
One possibility for you is to use RSpec and capybara-webkit, but i don't know if you are familiar with the Rubylanguage as you didn't talk about any programming language you'd like to use.
In order to achieve this workflow (click on a checkbox and check for the url), you should do something like this
describe "A test to", :js => true do
it "click on a checkbox and check for the url" do
visit("http://your_url") //to visit your page
page.check('the ID or the NAME of the checkbox') //to click on the checkbox
within_window(switch_to_window(windows.last)) do //to focus on the new opened page
expect(current_url).to eq('http://the_expected_url') //to check the url
end
end
end
I want to Email my TestNG report to other users as well but when they are clicking on the screenshot link. They are not able to see the screenshot as it is stored in my local machine.
String SaveandReturn = ScreenShot.takeScreenShot("SaveAndReturnverification");
Reporter.log("<a href=\"" + SaveandReturn + "\"><p align=\"left\"> Add Sub Service in LFA Services screenshot at " + new Date()+ "</p>");
}
How can I attach the screenshot so that other people can also view the report.
If you are able to implement the following it would be quite useful if you have a lot of people who need to see the results of the tests at a given time, its what I have implemented in my enviornment.
I have created a web server using XAMPP. I then created a web page which has links to all the TestNG reports.
Might not suit your environment but its a good solution if it does.
I would suggest you to go for Extentreports which has good UI when compared to TestNG. it is an extended version of testNG reporting framework.
It also suits your requirement of sending the screenshots by keeping at local if you have hosted in your local machine using MongoDB.
Suppose I have a web page with several links on it. Also it has few buttons which execute some JavaScript.
So should I create one Java class for testing each of these links and elements or should I test all the links in just one test method and other elements in another one(so ending up with two Scripts).
Is there a another way of gouping these tests.
Thank you.
I have found that writing test cases based on actions is much more useful than writing based on pages.
Obviously, we would love to have everything automated. But realistically, this isn't possible. So we test what is most important...which happens to be: 1. The primary purposes of the product you are testing, and 2. The security of the product.
To make this easier to understand, lets say I have a Checkout page.
If I were to test based on a page, I would make sure every link on the page would work. I would verify that I can type in a new number in the quantity field, and make sure that the page verifies that the credit card number I type in is correct.
This method would somewhat test Security, but beyond that, it would test the UI. What would happen if I clicked on the Checkout button, and I was sent to the right page, but the item I was trying to checkout disappeared? That is a huge problem, but the test based on the page would work.
However, if I were to test based on actions (go to this page, add to cart, type in personal information, and then checkout), now I have made sure that the most important part of your program works, checked security, and even a little UI testing.
All in all, write your testing to do what the average user would do. No normal person is going to sit on the same page, testing out every little feature on that page.
It depends on whether you like to see 1/1 tests passed or 2/2 tests passed.
How do I know what should be a test case and what a test suite in Selenium?
Is there any general rule for it? I've read the seleniumhq site any several others, but
they only have some basic examples while I want to test a whole website.
My questions are for example:
Say I'm testing some multi-step web form. Should I make it one test suite and each
step (in web form) would be a single test case or all steps should be one test case?
Say I've built a web forum and I want to test several features in it. Do I make one
test suite and each test case tests each feature (or several cases per each feature) OR
I'll have many test suites and each suite tests one feature with a few test cases.
What to do if I have a form which contains 5 checkboxes - each of them can be obviously clicked
or not. This may have some consequences when I submit the form. So - theoretically there are 2^5=32
possible execution flows. Should I test all 32? Or maybe should I just test each checkbox separately
to simplify things. When can/should I simplify, when not? (assuming that checkboxes MAY be
somehow related).
Should each feature have test cases which test both positive and negative results?
For example should I just focus on correct workflows - i.e. submit valid form and see if the
website did what I asked for (worked) OR also submit empty form and check if error message
appeared.
Can you answer these giving some practical examples (if needed)? - maybe using some (StackOverflow?)
site as example site.
Answer to 1 and 2:
I think this is more an issue about test design than selenium. Consider Selenium as a tool which controls the browser/website like a user would do. It simulates a user clicking through the page. To know what a test case is and what a test suite is you should think of the functionalities of your web application you want to test. Let's say you have web shop than one test case could test the following use case:
user puts articles in cart
user enters his data (name etc)
user gets a summary of his order
user confirms the order
It depends on your application which workflows or functionality you want to test.
I would consider a test suite for a whole project so one suite for one web application. And this application has a lot of test cases. Every test case is a use case.
When building a test suite, consider some design patterns like ui-mapping, page object design and consider the advantages of a test management system (like TestNG in Java).
here are some links to that:
http://www.shino.de/2011/07/26/on-the-pageobject-pattern/
http://www.theautomatedtester.co.uk/tutorials/selenium/page-object-pattern.htm
http://www.cheezyworld.com/2010/11/09/ui-tests-not-brittle/
http://hedleyproctor.com/2011/07/automating-selenium-testing-with-testng-ant-and-cruisecontrol/
Answer to 3 and 4:
It is similar to 1 and 2. It is always a question WHAT you want to test. Or a question what your project leader wants you to test (or customer). Every functionality which is important and should work should be tested.