Is there any way I could build an API which reads data from a third party system which doesn't provide an Api? I am planning to build an app for parents and I have no clue how the school management system of the school was made but I need to get data from it, is there any way I could get data by building my custom Api and not touching the school management system?
By not touching the School management system. I understand by not accessing any of their resources like database etc.
We can think of using a web scraper that scrapes data from the school's website which scrapes data regularly and maintaining a database of its own.
Related
What i mean by the title is: we have a system with different submodules, each with their own (MVC web) application. I thought about creating a REST service that accesses the database and gives data to the applications so no application themselves can access a database directly. The API calls on all the methods that access the database and an application chooses, which to use etc. Basically the web application's models aren't themselves mapped to any database entities which is commonly done in MVC applications (like in ASP.net with entityframework).
Why i thought about this idea in the first place is because i couldn't figure out how to map models to database tables without having to map to all of the tables and their attributes (switching some off for some applications, we're using Phalcon) and have hundreds of unused models in each application. How bad of an idea is creating a REST API for this?
If each application will access the same database you will have to maintain a lot of boilerplate model code (sql/orm). In case of some changes in database you'll have to propagate changes to every application.
In terms of maintenance it is better to expose business operations through web service which will be the only point of contact with database.
In case of web service changes inside database are not visible in applications
On the other hand without web service in front each change to database requires change in each application.
as part of an application I am trying to create, I am looking to data storage solutions. However, I have found many solutions that I can not quite directly apply to the position I am in.
Basically, I want to display in my app, a directory of the staff of my organization. About 100 or so individuals. I want to have generic attributes such as name, email, office#, etc.
However, my goal is to not end up with a static representation of the staff here! (people come and go, switch offices,etc.)
I am looking for the best way (if possible) to maintain a small database that I can administer, and if perhaps, something were to change to someone here, I can make the change and the change will be reflected accordingly.
Please help! I tried submitting my first app but got rejected because I relied on a webview to accomplish this task. This is an internship opportunity and my first real chance at development. Any help will be GREATLY appreciated.
Thanks!!!!!
The iPhone directory app can be used to store data in any format you want (xml, json or a proprietary format), because all you do is save a file. But if you choose to use the iPhone app directory to store data you have to write code to read the file (very simple to do) and parse the information (not so simple because the dificulty scales based on the information complexity).
SQLite is a tool to store structured data, providing you a set of tools to access and use the information. You don't need to parse the information, because SQLite does it for you by using transact sql queries.
By now, because you have a list of individuals, and these people are relationed to offices, I think you should use SQLite.
The Code Data is a object graph management, it's a tool to give you more options over data manipulation, and can make your life very easy if you have a lot of data and very complex data models. I don't think you need that for your particular problem, but I think you should learn it at some point.
UPDATE 1
You application will have something like:
A core database (sql server, oracle, my sql, etc) will hold your individuals information (your cloud database).
A web page (php, asp.net, etc) will display the core database information in json or xml format (your api).
A iphone app will download the information from the web page and store it in the local SQLite. (you have to decide when you will update the local sql lite, like when is opened, once a week, once a moth, twice a day, etc) (your local storage method).
Display the local SQLite individuals information in the app.
Our team (QA) is facing the following problem:
We have a database that is accessed only by our Core application which is a WCF services app. Our client applications are using the Core to access the database.
At some point we were provided with a new Version of our Core application and of our Database. The Dev department also gave us a sql script which is altering a big part of our database Core data. The core data are used by the Core Application to describe the Logic of our system, so every change on that data may have affects on any of our client application's functionality.
My questions are:
Should we test all of our applications again (even if they are
already fully tested) or is there is a more efficient way to test the
SQL script?
Is there a testing technique/tool for data integrity/migration testing?
I am looking for a quick validity/integrity testing of the database after running a migration script. That will prevent us losing time by testing it through the applications. If the validity/integrity testing is successful then we can test the apps.
There are unit testing frameworks available for T-SQL. The TSQLUnit project is one such framework. You can use it to set up automated testing, just like you would in the applications.
as #Tim Lentine already posted, I would recomend testing the full application. As you commented, the new sql script your team received has made important changes on the core of your database development, according to your description, both on the structure and the data itself. So in order to be sure that everything is still on one piece I would preferably do a full application test. As for a tool or technique I can recomend the new RedGate (no, I do not work for them) addon on the SSMS called "SQL Test". It uses the unit testing open source tSQLt for its purposes. It only has the drawback that someone will need to first learn how to work with tSQLt but is prettu straightforward.
From the description you gave:
We have a database that is accessed only by our Core application ...
we were provided with a new Version of our Core application and of
our Database ...
tells me it is not your team's responsibility to test the database in isolation, but you can test the Core service from your client's perspective and therefore assume the database is correct.
Treat the Core application and the database as a black box and test using Unit Tests. These test should not require you to go poking around in the database as for all intents and purposes any application using your Core application doesn't know, nor should care, that the information is actually stored in to a database. You development team could decide in 6 months they are going to store the data in the Cloud in which case all your database test will be broken.
If you do have to look in the database to check data has been stored correctly then there is a problem with your Core service's interface as any data you put in should be retrievable via the same interface (I just know someone is going to comment that their app does store data which cannot be read back but without a more detailed description of your app it's easier to generalise).
Back in the real world I am assuming you are part of the QA team and unless the database developers are doing some testing (they are, aren't they?) you are more than likely going to have to validate the database changes.
To the end you may be interested to read a question I posted on the DBA Stack Exchage site about performing a data comparison between two different schemas. Spoiler: there's no easy answer.
show below links :
http://www.simple-talk.com/sql/t-sql-programming/sql-server-unit-testing-with-tsqlt/
http://www.red-gate.com/products/sql-development/sql-test/
I am developing a framework for various in-house CRUD apps. I've considered several MS technologies (WPF, Access, WinForms, ASP.NET) and have settled on ASP.NET MVC with HTA+Jquery for the client. My reason for doing so is that I need a way to write and deploy quick one-off GUI apps as well as maintaining more robust apps that are expected to have a long life time.
Firstly, I would appreciate some thoughts on the relative merits of using ADODB on the client side versus ADO.NET on the server side. I'm leaning towards ADODB since I'll have client side access to the SQL Server (I've already written a js library that handles interacting with ADODB). However, I can see how developing a RESTful service may eventually be useful.
Secondly, I need to incorporate reporting capability into the system. I can use SQL Server reporting services or crystal reports but the users have grown accustomed to some older applications that use VBA to write reports in Word; so I'm considering using WordML to write the reports.
Thanks.
Database Access
If you need a thin client, then it's probably better to stay away from directly accessing the database from within the client.
The main issue is that you will introduce a high dependency on a specific network architecture and both your ASP.Net application and the HTA will be highly dependent on the database.
Instead I would prefer to sever the dependency on direct line of sight to the DB and have the data to be handled by the server.
This has a few advantages:
for many small changes to the db, you're probably only going to have to update the ASP app.
if you ever need your client app to be functional over the internet (say because some users are going to an outside meeting, need to work from work or your company open a new branch) then you won't have to rewrite your thin client.
you keep better control over access to the resources: only let the ASP app talk to the database and filter what comes in/out of it.
This will saves you having to implement all security on the client: the ASP app becomes the guardian of the database. It's a much better way to secure information and it gives you a lot more control.
Reporting
For reporting I'd use the server again rather than implement complex reporting capabilities in the client itself.
The problem is that you'll always going to get limited on the client if you're using an HTA and don't want to start having to install dependencies on each user's machine.
You'll end-up building a thick client in no time...
If you're using ASP.Net there are plenty of really good reporting tools that will make your life much easier and allow your users to get nice reports in Excel, Word, PDF, etc without you having to code these features yourself.
Crystal Reports is ok, but there are better and simpler alternatives, for example the Developer Express Report engine is pretty easy to use.
We need to make our enterprise ASP.NET/NHibernate browser-based application able to function when connected to or disconnected from the customer's server. Has anyone done this? If so, how did you do it? (Technology, architecture, etc.)
Background:
We develop and sell an enterprise browser-based application used by construction field personnel to enter timesheet information. Currently, it requires a connection to the server back in the customer's office and we'd like to build an occasionally-connected version of the application for those clients without wireless Internet availability.
Our application is an ASP.NET application using NHibernate for O/R mapping. Being a Microsoft shop, the Microsoft Sync Framework is attractive, but we don't know whether it "plays well" with NHibernate.
Any insight would be greatly appreciated.
Dave T
Maybe you could operate some kind of offline version using a small version database (I hear good things about vistadb - http://www.vistadb.net/ which I believe does play well with NHibernate). With a syncing tool to copy data in when they are back on line. A click-once launcher could handle installation and integration.
Want to be careful with anything involving syncing though - if it is just single user timesheets that might be OK - but if there are any chances of conflicts in the online-offline data you might be better considering the problem from a different angle for pain-avoidance...
Why not couple it with Google Gears? People put their data in while offline, and then they can sync it when they reconnect to the server.
In a modern world, using the HTML5 data store:
http://www.webreference.com/authoring/languages/html/HTML5-Client-Side/