The goal is to get an access token with a custom set of roles.
My scenario is that I have an User Storage Provider SPI that looks into an Oracle DB for authentication. It also checks users permissions defined in other tables of that DB. I would set that permissions into the UserModel object returned by the SPI.
Now I would like to define in Keycloak (using the administration application) custom roles and configure them so they are included in the access token of the user depending on some rules over the user's permissions that I've set previously into the UserModel. The idea is to be flexible and allow to change the configuration between roles and the user's permissions found in DB.
I've read the theory about mappers and policies but I'm not sure how to manage it and I can't find an example that ilustrates the process.
Related
Is it possible to manage the password by keycloak with federated users? I have users
federated from external database and currently also the password is being checked from the external database.
Is there a possibility to register a password in keycloak for the user just after that user is created in the external database and then federated to keycloak?
My motivation is having the built in password reset functionality of keycloak not building extra SPI code for this on federated users.
It is not really clear from your question, but since you have federated users from an external database, I assume you have implemented your custom UserStorageProvider. You are also validating passwords against your external database. So, I assume you have also implemented CredentialInputValidator interface. If you have not implemented CredentialInputUpdater, I would assume what you are trying to achieve should work out of the box.
If you have implemented CredentialInputUpdater, you could try to do the following:
Within you implementation of CredentialInputValidator.isvalid first check if the user has a local password configured, e.g. like this
keycloakSession.userCredentialManager().isConfiguredLocally(realm, user, credentialInput.getType())
If this is the case (returns true), simply have isValid return false. In this case Keycloak should use other CredentialInputValidators and check for the locally configured password.
If this is not the case (returns false), do the password check against your external database. Iff the password is valid, silently migrate the password to Keycloak's local credential store. This could look something similar to this:
CredentialProvider passwordProvider = keycloakSession.getProvider(CredentialProvider.class, PasswordCredentialProviderFactory.PROVIDER_ID);
if (passwordProvider instanceof CredentialInputUpdater) {
((CredentialInputUpdater) passwordProvider).updateCredential(realm, user, credentialInput);
}
Within CredentialInputUpdater.updateCredential make sure to update the local store in addition to the password in your database.
Now your user's passwords will be stored in Keycloak's local database / credential store and the built in password reset functionality should work as expected.
Is there a possibility to register a passward in keycloak for the user
just after the user is created in external database and then federated
to keycloak?
From the Keycloak Documentation itself:
By default, Keycloak will import users from LDAP into the local
Keycloak user database. This copy of the user is either synchronized
on demand, or through a periodic background task. The single exception
to this is the synchronization of passwords. Passwords are never
imported. Their validation is always delegated to the LDAP server. The
benefits of this approach is that all Keycloak features will work as
any extra per-user data that is needed can be stored locally. The
downside of this approach is that each time that a specific user is
queried for the first time, a corresponding Keycloak database insert
is performed.
since anypoint platform url anypoint.mulesoft.com is publicly accessible anyone can access the resources. Is there anyway i can restrict access to my org users apart from creating access roles.
Can i create org specific url with org secific access so that others cant access?
Can put some network related restrictions?
I think you confusing two different things:
Accessing a public URL (ie https://anypoint.mulesoft.com)
Authorization inside your organization's account
You can not restrict access to a site that you don't own, it is publicly accessible and needs to be accessed by other users. It doesn't even make sense really. Would you attempt to restrict access by others to google.com or twitter.com (or their API URLs)? It is not the right approach and it is just not possible.
What makes sense however is to manage permissions inside your organization in Anypoint Platform. It means when an user belonging to your organization logs in you can manage what of the available roles are permissions that user will have. You can do that in the Access Management page. You can also create custom roles with specific permissions and teams to better organize your users.
As mentioned you are not able to change MuleSoft's main URL (ie https://anypoint.mulesoft.com), one option being to control from Access Management page, both mentioned by #aled
There are two main ways you can get what you need:
If your organization already has some MFA tool that requires you to be in your corporate VPN, you could use that MFA as the MFA for the Anypoint Platform e.g. Users will need Username/Password, connect to the VPN to be able to get access to the MFA generator/auth and then use that code to finish logging into the platform. As Admin in Anypoint Platform you can enforce EVERYONE to have MFA set up (keep in mind ClientApps authorization for your automation users)
If your company already has an Identity Provider you can configure identity management in Anypoint Platform to set up users for single sign-on (SSO). The fragments below extracted from the official docs external-identity:
After configuring identity management, you must add new SSO users using your external identity management solution and internal provisioning process. If you use the Invite User feature to add users to your organization after you have configured an identity provider, the credentials for these users are stored locally in your organization rather than with the identity provider.
Users that log in with SSO are new users to the system. If the new user has the same username as a user that already exists in your Anypoint Platform organization, the new user co-exists with the original user with the same username. Users with the same username are managed independently from one another.
I want to know if it's possible to create an Active Directory user account that confers no access or privileges to that user.. simply to authenticate a set of credentials..
As we are hybridised AD/Azure organisation, I want this 'account' to replicate to Azure through the connector.
The reason for this is that:
We manage all our users through AD so I don't want some accounts managed only in Azure.. it would be very confusing. Centralised managemnent and support is good!
The account would ONLY be used for authenticating users into Zoom via SAML2, or any another cloud service for that matter that can use Azure as an authentication service.
No capacity to access anything within our firewall.
Your ideas would be greatly appreciated.
Gus
It depends how you define "access". By default, the Authenticated Users group is able to read everything in AD, but not write. If you're ok with that, then you're done. Just create a user and don't add any access to it.
If you don't want it to read anything on the domain, then you'll have trouble. The Authenticated Users group is described as:
A group that includes all users whose identities were authenticated when they logged on. Membership is controlled by the operating system.
Since there is no way to not have a user be part of Authenticated Users, then you would have to modify the permissions on your domain to exclude Authenticated Users. But that may cause other issues for other users.
As far as I know, the most basic permissions that any user is created can also view other users or groups in AAD. If you want to turn off this basic permission, just set Restrict access to Azure AD administration portal to Yes, then the user will not have any access rights.
Go to azure portal->click Azure Active Direcotory->User settings
I am trying to protect a Java servlet with OpenAM + J2EE tomcat agent. I got this part working by using embedded OpenDJ of OpenAM.
Now I am trying to authenticate against a LDAP server, so I added a LDAP module instance for OpenAM, but I get "User has no profile in this organization" when I am trying use uid/password of an user from that LDAP store.
I checked OpenAM administration guide on this the description is rather brief. I am wondering if it is even possible to do this without using the data store configured for OpenAM?
The login process in OpenAM is made of two stages:
Verifying credentials based on the authentication chain and individual authentication module configurations
User profile lookup
By configuring the LDAP authentication module you took care of the authentication part, however the profile lookup fails as you haven't configured the user data store (see data stores tab). Having a configured data store allows you to potentially expose additional user details across your deployment (e.g. include user attributes in SAML assertions or map them to HTTP headers with the agent), so in most of the scenarios having a data store configured is necessary.
In case you still don't want to configure a data store, then you can prevent the user profile lookup failure by going to Access Control -> <realm> -> Authentication -> All Core Settings -> User Profile Mode and set it to Ignore.
This is unrelated to authentication but it's related to authorization ... you have to configure appropriate policies ... see OpenAM docs.
Agents will enforce authorization, OpenAM determines if the user has the permission to access a protected resource.
As Bernhard has indicated authentication is only part of the process of granting access to a user. He is referring to using a Policy to control access.
Another method is to check if the authenticated user is a member of the desired group programmatically. This can be useful when you want access control over resources that OpenAM doesn't know about (e.g. specific data).
For example, lets say that you want different groups to have access to different rows in a table in a database. You can retrieve the group information associated with the user and add that to your database query, thus restricting the data returned.
I'm sure that you could do this with OpenAM as well using custom modules to allow the policy to use information in the database as resource, but I've found it is much simpler to perform this fine grained access control in your code, and is in all likelihood significantly faster.
I would like to create a user similar to admin, but with restricted privs. The user would be able to create/read/delete objects under a certain DN in the directory, but not others.
Typically, the native server providing the LDAP service has an ACL model.
Within that system, you can create users with appropriate trustee rights/ACLs.
For example, in eDirectory, you would grant this new user object BCRDI rights to the container of interest, then have your LDAP app authenticate as that user.
In Active Directory you can do the same thing.
In Open LDAP you can do the same thing.
The specific details depend on the server providing the LDAP service. (I like others, hate saying LDAP server, since really they are not LDAP servers. They are offering an LDAP service on top of whatever database they store objects in.)