full-text search does not work with MATCH() and AGAINST() - sql

I tried full text search by postgresql with this code
SELECT * FROM test_table WHERE MATCH (discription) AGAINST ('remote controller');
name of column is "discription"
keyword is "remote controller"
error message is here
ERROR: syntax error at or near "AGAINST"
1: ...LECT * FROM test_table WHERE MATCH (discription) AGAINST ('...
I can not figure out what's wrong??

As Gordon Linoff said, you are using MySQL syntax in Postrgres. The alternative query for Pstgreses is the following:
SELECT *
FROM test_table
WHERE to_tsvector(discription) ## to_tsquery('remote controller');
In a nutshell... the ts_vector data type is provided for storing preprocessed documents (is a sorted list of distinct lexemes, which are words that have been normalized to merge different variants of the same word). When the tsquery is used to represent processed queries.
more information you can find in the following links:
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/12/textsearch-tables.html#TEXTSEARCH-TABLES-SEARCH
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/12/textsearch.html
Note: to improve the search performance you can use also index on this:
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/12/textsearch-tables.html#TEXTSEARCH-TABLES-INDEX

This query will work:
SELECT * FROM test_table WHERE
difference(discription, 'remote controller') > 2;
The Soundex system is a method of matching similar-sounding names by converting them to the same code.
The soundex function converts a string to its Soundex code. The difference function converts two strings to their Soundex codes and then reports the number of matching code positions. Since Soundex codes have four characters, the result ranges from zero to four, with zero being no match and four being an exact match.
NOTE : the difference function gives the difference between the soundex code of two string.

Related

How run Select Query with LIKE on thousands of rows

Newbie here. Been searching for hours now but I can seem to find the correct answer or properly phrase my search.
I have thousands of rows (orderids) that I want to put on an IN function, I have to run a LIKE at the same time on these values since the columns contains json and there's no dedicated table that only has the order_id value. I am running the query in BigQuery.
Sample Input:
ORD12345
ORD54376
Table I'm trying to Query: transactions_table
Query:
SELECT order_id, transaction_uuid,client_name
FROM transactions_table
WHERE JSON_VALUE(transactions_table,'$.ordernum') LIKE IN ('%ORD12345%','%ORD54376%')
Just doesn't work especially if I have thousands of rows.
Also, how do I add the order id that I am querying so that it appears under an order_id column in the query result?
Desired Output:
Option one
WITH transf as (Select order_id, transaction_uuid,client_name , JSON_VALUE(transactions_table,'$.ordernum') as o_num from transactions_table)
Select * from transf where o_num like '%ORD12345%' or o_num like '%ORD54376%'
Option two
split o_num by "-" as separator , create table of orders like (select 'ORD12345' as num
Union
Select 'ORD54376' aa num) and inner join it with transf.o_num
One method uses OR:
WHERE JSON_VALUE(transactions_table, '$.ordernum') LIKE IN '%ORD12345%' OR
JSON_VALUE(transactions_table, '$.ordernum') LIKE '%ORD54376%'
An alternative method uses regular expressions:
WHERE REGEXP_CONTAINS(JSON_VALUE(transactions_table, '$.ordernum'), 'ORD12345|ORD54376')
According to the documentation, here, the LIKE operator works as described:
Checks if the STRING in the first operand X matches a pattern
specified by the second operand Y. Expressions can contain these
characters:
A percent sign "%" matches any number of characters or
bytes.
An underscore "_" matches a single character or byte.
You can escape "\", "_", or "%" using two backslashes. For example, "\%". If
you are using raw strings, only a single backslash is required. For
example, r"\%".
Thus , the syntax would be like the following:
SELECT
order_id,
transaction_uuid,
client_name
FROM
transactions_table
WHERE
JSON_VALUE(transactions_table,
'$.ordernum') LIKE '%ORD12345%'
OR JSON_VALUE(transactions_table,
'$.ordernum') LIKE '%ORD54376%
Notice that we specify two conditions connected with the OR logical operator.
As a bonus information, when querying large datasets it is a good pratice to select only the columns you desire in your out output ( either in a Temp Table or final view) instead of using *, because BigQuery is columnar, one of the reasons it is faster.
As an alternative for using LIKE, you can use REGEXP_CONTAINS, according to the documentation:
Returns TRUE if value is a partial match for the regular expression, regex.
Using the following syntax:
REGEXP_CONTAINS(value, regex)
However, it will also work if instead of a regex expression you use a STRING between single/double quotes. In addition, you can use the pipe operator (|) to allow the searched components to be logically ordered, when you have more than expression to search, as follows:
where regexp_contains(email,"gary|test")
I hope if helps.

Similar to with regex in Postgresql

In Postgresql database I have a column called names where I have some names which need to be parsed using regex to clean up punctuation parts. I am able to get a clean name using regexp_replace as follows:
select regexp_replace(name,'\.COM|''[A-Z]|[^a-zA-Z0-9 -]+|\s(?=&)|(?<!\w\w)(?:\s+|-)(?!\w\w)','','g')
from tableA
However, I would like to compare with some strings that are also cleaned of punctuation. How can I use similar to with the formed regular expression?
select name
from tableA
where (lower(name) ~ '\.COM|''[A-Za-z]|[^a-zA-Z0-9 -]+|\s(?=&)|(?<!\w\w)(?:\s+|-)(?!\w\w)') as nameParsed similar to '(fg )%' and
(lower(name) ~ '\.COM|''[A-Za-z]|[^a-zA-Z0-9 -]+|\s(?=&)|(?<!\w\w)(?:\s+|-)(?!\w\w)') as nameParsed similar to '%( cargo| carrier| cartage )%'
With the previous query I am getting this error:
LINE 3: ...-zA-Z0-9 -]+|\s(?=&)|(?<!\w\w)(?:\s+|-)(?!\w\w)') as namePar...
I have tried in where clause like this and it seems to be working:
select name
from tableA
where (select lower(regexp_replace(name,'\.COM|''[A-Z]|[^a-zA-Z0-9 -]+|\s(?=&)|(?<!\w\w)(?:\s+|-)(?!\w\w)','','g'))) similar to '(fg )%'
Is this the best approach? The execution time went to 46 seconds :(
Thanks in advance
You're trying to get a column name in a WHERE clause (is a comparison, not a column). So, you can use as follows:
SELECT name
FROM "tableA"
WHERE (regexp_replace(name,'\.COM|''[A-Z]|[^a-zA-Z0-9 -]+|\s(?=&)|(?<!\w\w)(?:\s+|-)(?!\w\w)','','g') similar to '(fg )%'
OR regexp_replace(name,'\.COM|''[A-Z]|[^a-zA-Z0-9 -]+|\s(?=&)|(?<!\w\w)(?:\s+|-)(?!\w\w)','','g') similar to '%( cargo| carrier| cartage )%');
Alternatively, you can use ilike instead of similar to if you want to find a specific word.

Too big number for repeat range when using regexp_like in where clause

I tried to run the following query:
select * from table where regexp_like('^{{', text_field)
And got the following error:
too big number for repeat range
Thinking perhaps regexp_like is confusing { for the repeat count operator, I also tried the following variations:
select * from table where regexp_like('^\{\{', text_field)
select * from table where regexp_like('^[{][{]', text_field)
select * from table where regexp_like('^[[:punct:]]{2}', text_field)
None of which worked. For now, text_field like '{{' suffices, but I may want to include a more flexible version of this that would require regular expressions. What's wrong with my approach here? And what does this error message mean?
You are using the prestodb regex_like function in the wrong way:
regexp_like(string, pattern)
Evaluates the regular expression pattern and determines if it is
contained within string. This function is similar to the LIKE
operator, expect that the pattern only needs to be contained within
string, rather than needing to match all of string. In other words,
this performs a contains operation rather than a match operation. You
can match the entire string by anchoring the pattern using ^ and $:
SELECT regexp_like('1a 2b 14m', '\d+b'); -- true

Finding first and second word in a string in SQL Developer

How can I find the first word and second word in a string separated by unknown number of spaces in SQL Developer? I need to run a query to get the expected result.
String:
Hello Monkey this is me
Different sentences have different number of spaces between the first and second word and I need a generic query to get the result.
Expected Result:
Hello
Monkey
I have managed to find the first word using substr and instr. However, I do not know how to find the second word due to the unknown number of spaces between the first and second word.
select substr((select ltrim(sentence) from table1),1,
(select (instr((select ltrim(sentence) from table1),' ',1,1)-1)
from table1))
from table1
Since you seem to want them as separate result rows, you could use a simple common table expression to duplicate the rows, once with the full row, then with the first word removed. Then all you have to do is get the first word from each;
WITH cte AS (
SELECT value FROM table1
UNION ALL
SELECT SUBSTR(TRIM(value), INSTR(TRIM(value), ' ')) FROM table1
)
SELECT SUBSTR(TRIM(value), 1, INSTR(TRIM(value), ' ') -1) word
FROM cte
Note that this very simple example assumes that there is a second word, if there isn't, NULL will be returned for both words.
An SQLfiddle to test with.
While Joachim Isaksson's answer is a robust and fast approach, you can also consider splitting the string and selecting from the resulting pieces set. This is just meant as hint for another approach, if your requirements alter (e.g. more than two string pieces).
You could split finally by the regex /[ ]+/, and so getting the words between the blanks.
Find more about splitting here: How do I split a string so I can access item x?
This will strongly depend on the SQL dialect you are using.
Try this with REGEXP_SUBSTR:
SELECT
REGEXP_SUBSTR(sentence,'\w+\s+'),
REGEXP_SUBSTR(sentence,'\s+(\w+)\s'),
REGEXP_SUBSTR(sentence,'\s+(\w+)\s+(\w+)'),
REGEXP_SUBSTR(REGEXP_SUBSTR(sentence,'\s+(\w+)\s+(\w+)'),'\w+$'),
REGEXP_SUBSTR(sentence,'\s+(\w+)\s+$')
FROM table1;
result:
1 2 3 4 5
Hello Monkey Monkey this this is_me
Learn more about REGEXP_SUBSTR reference to Using Regular Expressions With Oracle Database
Test use SqlFiddle: http://sqlfiddle.com/#!4/8e9ef/9
If you only want to get the first and the second word, use REGEXP_INSTR to get second word start position :
SELECT
REGEXP_SUBSTR(sentence,'\w+\s+') AS FIRST,
REGEXP_SUBSTR(sentence,'\w+\s',REGEXP_INSTR(sentence,'\w+\s+')+length(REGEXP_SUBSTR(sentence,'\w+\s+'))) AS SECOND
FROM table1;

SQL String contains ONLY

I have a table with a field that denotes whether the data in that row is valid or not. This field contains a string of undetermined length. I need a query that will only pull out rows where all the characters in this field are N. Some possible examples of this field.
NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN
NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN
NNNNNEEEENNNNNNNNNNNN
NNNNNOOOOOEEEENNNNNNNNNNNN
Any suggestions on a postcard please.
Many thanks
This should do the trick:
SELECT Field
FROM YourTable
WHERE Field NOT LIKE '%[^N]%' AND Field <> ''
What it's doing is a wildcard search, broken down:
The LIKE will find records where the field contains characters other than N in the field. So, we apply a NOT to that as we're only interested in records that do not contain characters other than N. Plus a condition to filter out blank values.
SELECT *
FROM mytable
WHERE field NOT LIKE '%[^N]%'
I don't know which SQL dialect you are using. For example Oracle has several functions you may use. With oracle you could use condition like :
WHERE LTRIM(field, 'N') = ''
The idea is to trim out all N's and see if the result is empty string. If you don't have LTRIM, check if you have some kind of TRANSLATE or REPLACE function to do the same thing.
Another way to do it could be to pick length of your field and then construct comparator value by padding empty string with N. Perhaps something like:
WHERE field = RPAD('', field, 'N)
Oracle pads that empty string with N's and picks number of pad characters from length of the second argument. Perhaps this works too:
WHERE field = RPAD('', LENGTH(field), 'N)
I haven't tested those, but hopefully that give you some ideas how to solve your problem. I guess that many of these solutions have bad performance if you have lot of rows and you don't have other WHERE conditions to select proper index.