I am a beginner in vuejs and vuetify and I try to add and remove nodes in a treeview.
When I do a .push(item) the treeview updates but when I delete an item from my array, the treeview does not update.
Here is an example of my code
My treeview
<v-treeview
[...]
:items="formatedItems"
item-key="slug"
[...]
>
[...]
</v-treeview>
formatedItems is declared in the data like this :
data: () => ({
[...]
formatedItems: [{
id: 0,
slug: null,
name: i18n.t(****),
children: []
}]
[...]
}),
This code correctly adds a child in my treeview :
this.formatedItems[0].children.push({
id: element.id,
slug: element.slug,
name: element.name,
children: []
});
On the other hand, this code removes the item from my array but doesn't update the treeviews :
_.remove(this.formatedItems[0].children, function(n) {
return n.slug == element.slug;
});
this.formatedItems = this.formatedItems; // I tried this to trigger a potential magical update of vuejs but nothing...
I don't know what to try anymore, that's why I come to ask you the question:
.push being a build-in function and knowing that I use a lodash function for deletion, is there something I didn't understand about the use of vuejs that causes my treeview not to be updated?
Thank you for your attention
Looks like the problem somewhere else. I've tried a basic example and all works fine.
Except I used filter method for deletion.
codepen.io/DavidGolodetsky/pen/eYZMbgm
Related
Keeping the table as basic as possible to figure this out. I am struggling to learn how to create server side sorting/pagination to function in vuetify. When I add the :options or :server-items-length bind the table no longer sorts or paginates.
Without either of those, I get a default listing of 10 items per row - and the sorting all works perfectly fine as well the pagination. However, parameters in the api require a page item count thus forcing a hardcoded number or using the :options bind. If i just place a hard coded number things work fine, but when I bind I get proper items per page but no sorting and pagination.
Very simple data table:
<v-data-table
:items="ItemResults.items"
:headers="TableData.TableHeaders"
:loading="TableData.isLoading"
>
</v-data-table>
//Base data returns, with headers and options as well the array that items are stored in.
data() {
return {
ItemResults:[],
TableData: {
isLoading: true,
TableHeaders: [
{ value: "title", text: "Title" },
{ value: 'artist', text: 'Artist' },
{ value: 'upc', text: 'UPC' },
{ value: "retailPrice", text: "Price/Quantity"},
],
},
options:
{
page: 1,
itemsPerPage: 15
},
}
},
//Then last, my async method to grab the data from the api, and place it in the itemresults array.
async getProducts(){
this.TableData.isLoading = true;
const { page, itemsPerPage } = this.options;
var temp = await this.$axios.get(`Inventory/InventoryListing_inStock/1/${page}/${itemsPerPage}`);
this.ItemResults = temp.data;
this.TableData.isLoading = false;
return this.ItemResults;
},
I have tried following Vuetify Pagination and sort serverside guide, but I'm not sure where they are recommending to make the axios call.
The lead backend dev is working on setting a sorting function up in the api for me to call paramaters to as well - Im not sure how that will function along side.
but I dont know how to have this controlled by vuetify eithier, or the best practice here.
EDIT:
I've synced the following:
:options.sync="options"
:sort-by.sync="sortBy"
:sort-desc.sync="sortDesc"
but i think I dont need to sync the last two. My options:
options:
{
page: 1,
itemsPerPage: 15,
sortBy: ['title'],
sortDesc: [false]
},
and in my data I put the array for sort by and sort desc
sortBy: [
'title', 'artist', 'upc', 'retailPrice'
],
sortDesc:[true, false],
pagination is now working, and sort ascending is now working, but when I click to descend the header I get an error that the last two params are empty on update to / / instead of /sortBy/sortDesc result. So its not listing the values on changes.
When your component mounts, you need to fetch the total number of items available on the server and the first page of data, and set these as :items and :server-items-length. The latter will (as you observed) disable paging and sorting, as your server will take care of it, and it is used to calculate the total number of pages given a selected page size.
Now you need to know when to reload data. For this, you either bind options to the v-data-table with two-way binding (.sync) and set a watcher on it, or you listen to the update:options event. And whenever options change, you fetch the selected data from the server.
That's basically all it takes.
In your template:
<v-data-table
:items="items"
:headers="headers"
:loading="true"
:server-items-length="numberOfItemsOnServer"
#update:options="options => loadPage(options)"
/>
In your component:
methods: {
async loadPage(options){
this.items = [] // if you want to show DataTable's loading-text
this.items = await fetch('yourUrl' + new URLSearchParams({
// build url params from the options object
offset: (options.page - 1) * options.itemsPerPage,
limit: options.itemsPerPage,
orderBy: options.sortBy.map((sb,ix) => [sb, options.sortDesc[ix] ? 'desc' : 'asc'])
}))
}
}
I have the following component tree:
App
List
ItemDetails
Widget1
...
the List component has a filters form, those are applied on button press
Widget1 has a button which applies another filter (by id) to the list, applying that one removes filters from the filter form and vice versa
the list is also live-updated via polling (later will be via WebSockets), so I have to separate v-model of the filter fields in List and the actually applied filters (those are in the store)
Currently, I've put the following state to the VueX store:
state: {
filters: {
// these come from the List's filter panel
result: '',
name: '',
date: '',
// this one comes from Widget1
id: '',
},
pagination: {
perPage: 10,
page: 0,
total: 0,
},
items: [],
selectedItem: null,
},
and both filters from the List and from the button in Widget1 are applied via dispatching the following action to the store:
applyFilters ({ state, commit, dispatch }, filters) {
if(filters.id) {
for(let filterName in state.filters)
if(filterName !== 'id')
filters[filterName] = '';
} else {
filters.id = '';
}
commit('setFilters', filters);
commit('setPage', 0);
dispatch('loadExaminations');
},
But here's the problem: the List component has its model of filter fields (on press of the button those are gathered and applyFilters is dispatched). This works well except when the id filter (from Widget1) is applied, the filter fields in the List component are not emptied.
One obvious option to handle this is to move the model of those filter fields to the store as well. That doesn't look that nice since for each field (that uses v-model) I have to create a computed (in the List component) and write a setter and a getter from the store. It seems nicer to send an event from applyFilters to List saying "empty the filter fields", but I'm not sure if VueX can do this. Is this possible? Or should I stick with the "move filter fields' model to the store" plan? Or do you know a nice alternative? I'm aware of the event bus concept, but that one uses Vue instance which shouldn't be used in store, I guess.
You can listen to vuex's actions by using subscribeAction.
// List.vue
mounted() {
this.$store.subscribeAction({
before: (action, state) => {
if (action.type === "applyFilters" && action.payload.id) {
this.emptyComponentFields();
}
},
after: (action, state) => {}
});
}
CodeSandbox.
I am using sencha touch 2 and not getting help inside sencha forum, so I hope you guys can help me.
I want to create a list with custom items. In this custom item i want to have a horizontal scrollable listview with buttons as items.
I tried to do it component.DataItem but it does no work for me.
I tried also to add an custom xtype als an item in a list, but this does not work.
I think this is a simple task but sencha touch makes it a challenge for me.
So please help me and show me, how can I get a view like shown in this picture.
Instead of a standard list you are going to want to use Component DataView. Essentially, you are going to need to first define an Ext.dataview.component.DataItem, which is then implemented into the DataView. Below is a simple example of a buttons in a DataView as referenced from the DataView guide: http://docs.sencha.com/touch/2-0/#!/guide/dataview
First create the DataItem:
Ext.define('MyApp.view.DataItemButton', {
extend: 'Ext.dataview.component.DataItem',
requires: ['Ext.Button'],
xtype: 'dataitembutton',
config: {
nameButton: true,
dataMap: {
getNameButton: {
setText: 'name'
}
}
},
applyNameButton: function(config) {
return Ext.factory(config, Ext.Button, this.getNameButton());
},
updateNameButton: function(newNameButton, oldNameButton) {
if (oldNameButton) {
this.remove(oldNameButton);
}
if (newNameButton) {
this.add(newNameButton);
}
}
});
We must extend Ext.dataview.component.DataItem for each item. This is an abstract class which handles the record handling for each item.
Below the extend we require Ext.Button. This is simply because we are going to insert a button inside our item component.
We then specify the xtype for this item component.
Inside our config block we define nameButton. This is a custom configuration we add to this component which will be transformed into a button by the class system. We set it to true by default, but this could also be a configuration block. This configuration will automatically generate getters and setters for our nameButton.
Next we define the dataMap. The dataMap is a map between the data of a record and this view. The getNameButton is the getter for the instance you want to update; so in this case we want to get the nameButton configuration of this component. Then inside that block we give it the setter for that instance; in this case being setText and give it the field of the record we are passing. So, once this item component gets a record it will get the nameButton and then call setText with the name value of the record.
Then we define the apply method for our nameButton. The apply method uses Ext.factory to transform the configuration passed into an instance of Ext.Button. That instance is then returned, which will then cause updateNameButton to be called. The updateNameButton method simply removes the old nameButton instance if it exists, and adds the new nameButton instance if it exists.
Now create the DataView:
Ext.create('Ext.DataView', {
fullscreen: true,
store: {
fields: ['name', 'age'],
data: [
{name: 'Jamie Avins', age: 100},
{name: 'Rob Dougan', age: 21},
{name: 'Tommy Maintz', age: 24},
{name: 'Jacky Nguyen', age: 24},
{name: 'Ed Spencer', age: 26}
]
},
useComponents: true,
defaultType: 'dataitembutton'
});
In your case, rather than using a button for the DataItem, you'll want to use a horizontal scrolling list. Here is an example that I found from this answer: Horizontal scrolling list
var list = Ext.create('Ext.DataView',{
store: store,
itemTpl: new Ext.XTemplate('<img src="{icon}" />'),
inline: { wrap: false },
scrollable: {
direction: 'horizontal',
directionLock: true
}
});
Note that you will probably have to use components in the second dataview as well in order to achieve your buttons with image
I'm trying to create programatically an EnahncedGrid with a menu. I've got the grid to work, but I've been unable to use the menu. It just not shows up. The code is as follows:
<script>
sMenu = new dijit.Menu({});
sMenu.addChild(new dijit.MenuItem({
label: "Delete Record",
iconClass: "dijitEditorIcon dijitEditorIconCancel",
onClick : function(){
alert(1);
}
}));
sMenu.startup();
/**
* El grid propiamente dicho
*/
var grid = new dojox.grid.EnhancedGrid({
id: "grid_"+i,
query: {
idDocument: '*'
},
plugins: {
nestedSorting: true,
indirectSelection: true,
menus: {rowMenu:sMenu}
},
onRowDblClick: openFile,
structure: layout
})
</script>
Any idea what I'm doing wrong?
I haven't used this myself, but I have two possible suggestions:
First, make sure you're dojo.require-ing "dojox.grid.enhanced.plugins.Menu" and are only instantiating the widgets within a dojo.addOnLoad or dojo.ready.
If you've already done that, the second thing I'd suggest is giving your menu an id, and passing that id to the rowMenu property of the menus object (in other words, pass a string, not the widget itself). Although, the way you're doing it seems like it should work, judging from the code.
You can see a test page with working menus here: http://archive.dojotoolkit.org/nightly/dojotoolkit/dojox/grid/tests/enhanced/test_enhanced_grid_menus.html
I'm trying to use a dijit.form.Select as the editor for my dijit.InlineEditBox. Two problems / unexpected behavior seem to occur:
Inconsistently, the InLineEditBox doesn't have the initial value set as selected
Consistently, after selecting a choice, the value that should be hidden is shown instead of the label.
The width isn't set to 130px
Here's working code: http://jsfiddle.net/mimercha/Vuet8/7/
The jist
<span dojoType="dijit.InlineEditBox" editor="dijit.form.Select"
editorParams="{
options: [
{label:'None',value:'none'},
{label:'Student',value:'stu'},
{label:'Professor',value:'prof',selected:true},
],
style:'width:1000px;',
}"
editorStyle="width: 1000px;"
>
</span>
Any help is greatly appreciated! Thanks!
Okay, after a few MORE hours struggling with the mess that is dijit.InlineEditBox, I think I have the solution to the remaining issue (#2).
EDIT: My first solution to #2 is still flawed; the implementation at http://jsfiddle.net/kfranqueiro/Vuet8/10/ will never return the actual internal value when get('value') is called.
EDIT #2: I've revamped the solution so that value still retains the real (hidden) value, keeping displayedValue separate. See if this works better:
http://jsfiddle.net/kfranqueiro/Vuet8/13/
First, to recap for those who weren't on IRC:
Issue #1 was happening due to value not being properly set as a top-level property of the InlineEditBox itself; it didn't pick it up properly from the wrapped widget.
Issue #3 was happening due to some pretty crazy logic that InlineEditBox executes to try to resolve styles. Turns out though that InlineEditBox makes setting width particularly easy by also exposing it as a top-level numeric attribute. (Though IINM you can also specify a percentage as a string e.g. "50%")
Now, issue #2...that was the killer. The problem is, while InlineEditBox seems to have some logic to account for widgets that have a displayedValue attribute, that logic is sometimes wrong (it expects a displayedValue property to actually exist on the widget, which isn't necessarily the case), and other times missing entirely (when the InlineEditBox initializes). I've worked around those as best I could in my own dojo.declared extensions to InlineEditBox and the internal widget it uses, _InlineEditor - since generally it's a good idea to leave the original distribution untouched.
It's not pretty (neither is the underlying code I dug through to understand and come up with this), but it seems to be doing its job.
But man, this was rather interesting. And potentially pertinent to my interests as well, as we have used this widget in our UIs as well, and will be using it more in the future.
Let me know if anything backfires.
hm...
<span dojoType="dijit.InlineEditBox" editor="dijit.form.Select"
editorParams="{
options: [
{label:'None',value:'none'},
{label:'Student',value:'stu'},
{label:'Professor',value:'prof',selected:true},**<<<<** and this comma is for?
],
style:'width:1000px;',**<<<<** and this comma is for?
}"
editorStyle="width: 1000px;"
>
</span>
Also, when using dijit.form.Select, selected value is not attr "selected" but value.
And if you enter prof inside <span ...blah > prof </span> than your proper selected option will be selected ;)
Dijit select checks for VALUE, not attr.
This may be fixed in recent Dojo - see http://bugs.dojotoolkit.org/ticket/15141 - but using 1.7.3 I found this worked:
In my app directory, at the same level as dojo, dijit and dojox, I created a file InlineSelectBox.js which extends InlineEditBox with code to set the HTML on the associated domNode from the value of the Dijit, and which wires up that code to the onChange() event:
define(["dijit/InlineEditBox",
"dijit/form/Select",
"dojo/on",
"dojo/_base/declare",
"dojo/_base/array"
],
function(InlineEditBox, Select, on, declare, array){
return declare(InlineEditBox, {
_setLabel: function() {
array.some(this.editorParams.options, function(option, i){
if (option.value == this.value) {
this.domNode.innerHTML = option.label;
return true;
}
return false;
}, this);
},
postMixInProperties: function(){
this.inherited(arguments);
this.connect(this, "onChange", "_setLabel");
},
postCreate: function(){
this.inherited(arguments);
this._setLabel();
}
});
});
Then, in my view script:
require(["dojo/ready",
"app/InlineSelectBox",
"dijit/form/Select"
],
function(ready, InlineSelectBox, Select){
ready(function(){
// Add code to set the options array
var options = [];
// Add code to set the initial value
var initialValue = '';
var inlineSelect = new InlineSelectBox({
editor: Select,
editorParams: {options: options},
autoSave: true,
value: initialValue
}, "domNodeToAttachTo");
});
});
I was dealing with this situation a few months ago, and not finding a resolution i made my own algorithm.
I put a div with an event on Onclick that build programatically a Filtering Select on that div with the store i want to use.
function create(id,value){
var name = dojo.byId(id).innerHTML;
dojo.byId(id).parentNode.innerHTML = '<div id="select"></div>';
new dijit.form.FilteringSelect({
store: store,
autoComplete: true,
invalidMessage:"Invalid Selection",
style: "width: 80px;",
onBlur: function(){ },
onChange: function(){ },
required: true,
value: value,
disabled: false,
searchAttr: "name",
id: "status"+id,
name: "status"
},"select");
dijit.byId('status'+id).focus();
}
I used the onBlur event to destroy the widget and the onchange to save by xhr the new value.
The focus is below because the onBlur was not working properly.
note: the function is not complete.