it is possible to access & control my remote machine screen by using webRTC?? if possible can you please share the information regarding the above problem
Yes the WebRTC protocol allows it. The APIs in the browser don't provide this though.
webrtc-remote-screen is a project that does this today.
Related
I'm trying to build a live video streaming application from a usb camera to an application running on a remote desktop. I've researched protocols like RTMP, RTSP, WebRTC. According to my understanding I can't use webRTC since it's only compatible in the browser and I'm not building my application for a browser here. Please help me choose the right protocol and also the media server.
You can, and many applications do, use WebRTC outside the browser. WebRTC implementations are available for many different platforms including iOS, Android and embedded systems.
You can even use Headless Chrome if you want to use the Chrome APIs without the visual parts of the browser.
I'm building out an IoT solution for a client and the network admins are insisting that the devices only connect through the guest network, which has a captive portal with terms of service that must be accepted with a UI button press before gaining external internet access. Most IoT Solutions I've looked at so far (electric imp, Spark core) explicitly state that they cannot connect to a captive portal. I've seen other higher-level code for automatically interacting with a captive portal but I have not found a solution that allows an embedded wifi device (like the CC3000) to automatically accept terms on a captive portal.
Has anyone seen or built a custom wifi stack for something like the CC3000 that can recognize and interact with a captive portal? is there another embedded wifi solution (xbee wifi maybe?) that has had success in this area?
I wouldn't solve this problem in the stack. I would go for a high-level code executed automatically after connecting to the network. Some simple script for example which automatically "presses the UI button" for you. Depending on the design of that page this may be as simple as a single http-request.
Another solution (maybe): Depending on the Wifi-Modules you've chosen the MAC-Addresses of your devices are predicable. Maybe the network admins can add a rule to their config to allow these devices on their guest network without the need of that captive portal.
After considering all options, I believe we are going to go embed the behavour into the SparkCore firmware and insert a captive portal check in the wifi connection code.
spark_utilities.cpp line 807 (Internet_Test function)
https://github.com/spark/firmware/blob/master/src/spark_utilities.cpp#L807
I know the page containing the supported devices for the Camera Remote API Beta. But I wonder if maybe it is possible to use the Remote API Beta with the DSC-H300/DSC-H400 as well, even though they are not declared as supporting the API.
Thanks for your help.
Cameras DSC-H300 & DSC-H400 do not support Camera Remote API beta.
Both DSC-HX60 & DSC-HX400 long zoom cameras support the Remote API.
More info:
https://developer.sony.com/devices/cameras/
Best Regards, Prem, Developer World
On my mac I have two kinds of networks available - Ethernet, WiFi.
While making a server call, can I somehow control which network channel to use for making the server call? So, before making server call, I want to specify the network channel to be used for that call - Ethernet or WiFi.
How can this be achieved using objective C. I am working on a cocoa application.
I assume both NIC's are connected to Internet (so both have a IP):
I don't think you can solve it within code (not 100% sure). But what you could do is setup some local routes, configuring which traffic goes over what NIC.
Look at the route command ('man route').
This might help you:
https://serverfault.com/questions/100613/public-traffic-to-go-over-1-nic-and-private-traffic-to-use-another-nic
You can modify the routes available with the System Configuration framework. In scutil(8) you can see the routes that are presently installed in the State:/Network/Service/* dictionaries, and in order to manipulate these programmatically you have to us the SCDynamicStore framework, which is C.
However, if you were trying to just do some ad-hoc service on WLAN only, you could use the CoreWLAN framework, which is in Objective-C.
I have a piece of software I have written that talks to a web service over it's Wifi connection on a Casio WinCE handheld.
Unfortunately the Wifi network and the network created by WMDC (or ActiveSync) to host the debugger connection clash, they are both 192.168.55.0/24. So I can't have them both connected at the same time.
Does anybody know if you can reconfigure WMDC to use a different address range?
I've hunted through the registry but can't see anything obvious, and Google is not turning up anything useful.
Thanks,
James.
Is the development PC on teh same network as the WiFi connection? If so, I'd abandon ActiveSync/WMDC altogetehr and just use ethernet debugging over the same connection that it's using for the web service calls.