I have an SQL file containing several commands, when I need to make a correction to my application database that the application can't yet do, I use DBVis to select and execute the command I need (e.g. to delete an incorrect entry). Problem is, the button to run the whole page is right next to the button to run a selected command. So I just dropped and re-created my table, losing all my data. Is there a way to undo this?
I'm looking to either 'undo' each command until I get back to the right place, or revert back to yesterday, where I know everything was correct.
Thanks!
Yes, you can if...
your administration tool did set autocommit=OFF by default, you can
just execute a ROLLBACK (or just shutdown your administration tool)
If latter doesn't work, check if your binary log was enabled, and restore with mysqlbin log tool
If none of the above mentioned solution works, use your (probably not existent) backup for restoring
Related
My problem is like this: I had a copy of SqlServer 2012 installed on my machine. It's been there for over 3 years without any glitches at all. Just 4-5 days ago, a problem sprouted up. When I started Management Studio it told me that
msdb got corrupted so it cannot be opened.
The complete message is something like this:
Cannot display policy health state at the server level, becuase the user doesn't have permission. Permission to the database msdb is required for this feature to work correctly.
So what could be wrong here? What sudden changes/anomalies could have crept in that has made this unstable? Someone told me it could be due to a wide range of possibilities. The reason could be anything. Even some nuget packages affect the database. Initially I though this could have been an issue with login, permissions etc. So I tried to run as administrator also. No, it did not cure this problem. If you try to create a new database it simply tells me, that I can't do it. The message is something like this:
An exception occurred while executing a T-SQL statement or batch.[Microsoft.SqlServer.ConnectionInfo]. Database msdb cannot be opened. It has been marked as SUSPECT by recovery. [Microsoft Sql Server, Error:926]
How do I recover from this? Can you provide me some guidance? Or a clue where precisely to look for the hints of problem? All my work is stalled. Any kind of assistance in recovering my ailing sqlserver installation will be humbly received.
So, I'm requesting you all to show me the way.
Thanks in anticipation.
I fixed mine with Solution C from the following website. my MSDB was corrupt and not loading so I stopped the services and replaced it with the files from the template in the SQL Server directory.
https://www.mssqltips.com/sqlservertip/3191/how-to-recover-a-suspect-msdb-database-in-sql-server/
"The templates are saved in "C:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\MSSQL11.MSSQLSERVER\MSSQL\Binn\Templates" (the path varies by version and install choices, this is the default for SQL Server 2012). By shutting down the instance and replacing the bad MSDB data (msdbdata.mdf) and transaction log (msdblog.ldf) files with the template files I was able to restart the instance without error!" (just incase the website link doesn't work I have quoted it here).
Fissh
If your MSDB is corrupted, restore from your most recent backup. That's the safest thing to do and that's why we have backups to begin with.
If you do not have a backup of MSDB, you have a couple of options.
Recreate it. Detailed instructions here: https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd207003(v=sql.110).aspx#CreateMSDB. This is the best way to ensure you get a clean, functional MSDB and is the fastest way to get up and running again. IMPORTANT: Doing this means you lose all jobs, backup history, etc... that is stored in MSDB. Remember to recreate all maintenance jobs after you're done else you're just waiting for the next thing to fall over (e.g. transaction log backups no longer run, tlogs grow till you run out of disk space - now you can't run any queries that will commit transactions).
DBCC CHECKDB WITH Repair_allow_data_loss is another option which you'll probably find if you google/bing the issue. This might work but it is not recommended. The problem is you don't really know what will be lost. It works by deleting what it can't read then fix the links to get the database physically functional again. Once that's done, you'll have to go back and figure out what remains and is still functional. That is tedious and error prone. Besides, if you're gonna do this very thorough manual check to ensure all your jobs are intact, you're better off just re-creating them on a new, clean MSDB.
There is a postgresql installation on my server that worked fine so far. However now there is a single table (all other tables work fine) which I cannot open through pgadmin3 or drop.
I've tried restarting the server. Didn't help. I also tried dropping the table with DROP TABLE from the command line on the server. It's just stuck. I've executed the command and it has been just hanging in the console for the past hour.
I don't know what to do. Is there a file I could erase in the data directory perhaps?
Most probably explanation: some other open transaction is holding an exclusive lock on the table.
You are using pgAdmin, so you can check with Tools -> Server Status. The activity pane lists all current connections. For instance, there is one (or more) listings for every open SQL window. Look for long running connections.
You can also try to issue a DROP TABLE and check this list. With any luck you'll see what blocks it. Once you have identified the troublemaker and made sure, it's not needed, you might be able to kill the process. Might be vacuuming gone haywire because of bad settings ..
That, or something is seriously broken.
You could try taking a dump of the database and see if that works? Also have a look at the http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/static/runtime-config-logging.html#GUC-CLIENT-MIN-MESSAGES and log_min_messages options. Change that to debug and see what is happening when you try to drop the table.
In Case of Windows Users. Try restarting Postgresql by follwowing these steps: Start -> Run -> (then type in:) services.msc. Select Local postgresql Server and then press "Restart." Now, go ahead and try deleting the database or the table you wanted to delete (Via pgAdmin). Hope it helps.
Why isn't it standard behavior for Accurev to automatically run an "Update" upon opening the program? "Update" updates a user's local sandbox with the latest files from the building/promoted area.
It seems like expected functionality that the most recent files should be synchronized first.
I'm not claiming that it should always update, but curious as to why an auto-Update wouldn't be correct.
Auto-updating could produce some very unwanted results.
Take this scenario: you're in the middle of a development task, but you've made a mistake and need to revert a file that you just modified. So you open AccuRev, but before you have a chance to "revert to most recent version", you are bombarded with 100 files that have been changed upstream including the one you want to revert. You are now forced into the position of resolving all the merge conflicts before your solution will build, including the merge of your (possibly unstable) code in progress.
Requiring the user to manually update keeps a protective 'bubble' around the developer, allowing them to commit (keep) changes within their own workspace without bringing down code changes that could destabilise the work in their sandbox. When the developer gets to a point where his code is ready to share with others, that is the appropriate time to do an update and subsequently build/retest the merged codebase before promoting.
However there is one scenario that I do believe auto-updating could be useful: after a workspace is reparented. i.e. when a developer's workspace is moved from one part of the stream hierarchy to another. Every time we reparent we have to do a little dance:
Accept the confirmation dialog that reminds us (rather verbosely) that we need to update our workspace before we can promote any changes.
Double-click the workspace to view its files.
Wait for AccuRev to do a "Pending" search, to determine whether any file changes are waiting to be committed.
And finally, perform the Update.
Instead of just giving us a confirmation dialog, it would be nice if AccuRev could just ask us if we want to Update immediately.
I guess it depends on preference. I for one wouldn't like the auto-update feature.
Imagine you have a huge project and you don't want to build it every time you start Accurev. But you also can't debug because the source files and debugging info no longer correspond.
I altered a stored procedure and unknowingly overwrote some changes that were made to it by another developer. Is there a way to undo the changes and get the old script back?
Unfortunately I do not have a backup of that database, so that option is ruled out.
The answer is YES, you can get it back, but it's not easy. All databases log every change made to it. You need to:
Shutdown the server (or at least put it into read-only mode)
Take a full back up of the server
Get a copy of all the db log files going back to before when the accident happened
Restore the back up onto another server
Using db admin tools, roll back through the log files until you "undo" the accident
Examine the restored code in the stored proc and code it back into your current version
And most importantly: GET YOUR STORED PROCEDURE CODE UNDER SOURCE CONTROL
Many people don't grok this concept: You can only make changes to a database; you can't roll back the stored proc version like you can with application code by replacing files with their previous versions. To "roll back", you must make more changes that drop/define your stored proc.
Note to nitpickers: By "roll back" I do not mean "transaction roll back". I mean you've made your changes and decide once the server is back up that the change is no good.
"Is there a way to undo the changes and get the old script back?"
Short answer: Nope.
:-(
In addition to the sound advice to either use a backup or recover from source control (and if you're doing neither of those things, you need to start), you could also consider getting SSMS Tools Pack from #MladenPrajdic. His Management Studio add-in allows you to keep a running history of all the queries you've worked on or executed, so it is very easy to go back in time and see previous versions. While that doesn't help you if someone else worked on the last known good version, if your entire team is using it, anyone can go back and see any version that was executed. You can dictate where it is saved (to your own file system, a network share, or a database), and fine-tune how often auto-save kicks in. Really priceless functionality, especially if you're lazy about backups and/or source control (though again, I stress, you should be doing these things before you touch your production server again).
You could look through the cached execution plans and try to find the one where your colleague made his changes and run the relevant parts again.
EDIT
Although Bohemian looks to have a good answer if you've got the changes in the TL, this is what I'm talking about. Review the SQL text for the plan.
SELECT cached.*,
sqltext.*
FROM sys.dm_exec_cached_plans cached
CROSS APPLY sys.dm_exec_sql_text (cached.plan_handle) AS sqltext
But as squillman points out, there is no execution plan for DDL.
You won't be able to get it back from the database side of things. Your options at this point are pretty much limited to 1) recover from backup, 2) go to source control or 3) hope that someone else has a copy still up in an editor somewhere or saved to a file.
If neither of these are an option for you, then here's the obligatory "you should take regular backups and use source control"....
I'm way late to the game on this but I did this same thing this morning and found I had forgot to save my script at some point in the past and needed to recover it. (It will be in source control after I get done fixing this!!!)
Some people mentioned restoring from a backup but no one really mentioned how easy this is if you have a back up. Moreover, you aren't locked into rolling back the production database. I think this is key and assuming you have a back up I would say this is a much better alternative to what has been voted up to the best answer.
All you have to do is take your back up and restore it to a new database. Pull out the sp you are looking for and voila, you've recovered the missing code.
Don't forget to drop the newly created database after you've recovered the missing file.
I had the same problem, and I don't have the confidence to go restoring from log files to another server. I was pretty distraught until I realised the solution was very simple...
Press Ctrl-Z over and over until I had undone my changes and the run the ALTER PROCEDURE again.
Admittedly I was pretty lucky that I still had it there to revert to but it really is the easiest fix. Probably a bit late now though.
If you have scripted the stored procedure out from management studio object explorer this will work.
Before expand and collapse the object explorer just scroll and point to the stored procedure you have opened. Script the stored procedure as create or alter to then you can get the previous version of the proc since the object explorer doesn't refreshed yet. This is always my life saver.
I'm writing a WLST script to deploy some WAR's and an EAR. However, intermittently, the script will time out because it can't seem to get an edit lock (this script is part of a chain of many other scripts). I was wondering, is there a way to override or stop any current locks on the server? This is only a temporary solution, but in the interest of time, it will do for now.
Thanks.
You could try setting a wait period and timeout:
startEdit([waitTimeInMillis], [timeoutInMillis], [exclusive]).
Are other scripts erroring out, leaving the session locked? You could try adding exception handling around those. Also, if you have 'Automatically acquire lock" enabled in the Admin Console and you use the admin console sometimes it can cause problems if you are running scripts at the same time, even though you are not making "lock-requiring" changes.
Also, are you using the same user for the chained scripts?
Within WLST, you can pass a number as a parameter to gain an exclusive lock. This allows the script to grab a different lock than the regular one that's used whenever an administrator locks from the console. It also prevents two instances of the same script from stepping on each other.
However, this creates complex change merge scenarios that are best avoided (by processes).
Oracle's documentation on configuration locks can be found here.
Alternatively, if you want the script to temporarily relieve any existing locks regardless of the pending changes, you may as well disable change management from the console, minimizing the inconvenience caused.
WLST also contains the cancelEdit command that you could run before you startEdit. Hope one of these options pan out!
To take the configuration change lock from another administrator:
If another administrator already has the configuration lock, the following message appears: Another user already owns the lock. You will need to either wait for the lock to be released, or take the lock.
Locate the Change Center in the upper left corner of the
Administration Console.
Click Take Lock & Edit.
Make your configuration changes.
In the Change Center, click Activate Changes. Not all changes take
effect immediately. Some require a restart (see Use the Change
Center).
As long as you're running WLST as an administrative user, you should be able to jump into an existing edit session with the edit() command - I've done a quick test with two admin users, one in the Admin Console, and one using WLST, and it appears to work fine - I can see the changes in the Admin Console session inside the WLST interpreter.
You could put a very simple exception handler around your calls to startEdit that will log the exception's stack trace, but do nothing else. And then rely on the edit call to pop you into the change session.
Relying on that is going to be tricky though if another script has started an edit session and is expecting to be able to commit that change session itself - you'll be getting exceptions and unreliable behaviour across multiple invocations.