I have a question regarding a conditional insert.
I want to be able to add the same ID in the ("tafelID" = tableID) column, ONLY if the ("betaalstatus" = pay status) is equal to true. What query do i have to use ?
I'm new to SQL. my query is below.
INSERT INTO Rekening (tafelID, betaalstatus) Select ('7', 'False')
WHERE not exists ( select 'False' )
you can replace "<...>" with the data in the nested select statement in FROM clause. you can use nested Case When statement for complex conditions.
INSERT INTO Rekening (tafelID, betaalstatus)
Select Case WHEN betaalstatus = true THEN tableID ELSE tafelID END tafelID, betaalstatus
FROM (SELECT <betaalstatus> AS betaalstatus, <tableID> AS tableID, <tafelID> AS tafelID)
-- i.e. (SELECT true AS betaalstatus, 7 AS tableID, 8 AS tafelID)
I'm currently trying to do an SQL query that can detect if a SELECT query returns nothing, and then do another one if that is the case.
Here is what I mean:
IF SELECT * FROM table WHERE criteria = criteria RETURNS NO ROWS
THEN SELECT * FROM table WHERE criteria2 = criteria2
Is this possible? I don't think that an empty reply counts as "null" so I have a bit of a trouble with that.
You can do this in one statement, assuming the columns are the same:
SELECT *
FROM table
WHERE criteria = criteria
UNION ALL
SELECT *
FROM table
WHERE criteria2 = criteria2 AND
NOT EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM table WHERE criteria = criteria);
You can use NOT EXISTS:
SELECT * FROM table WHERE criteria2 = criteria2
and not exists (
SELECT * FROM table WHERE criteria = criteria
)
union all
SELECT * FROM table WHERE criteria = criteria;
Here NOT EXISTS ensures that either part of the UNION ALL is returned. If the second criteria = criteria passes, then NOT EXISTS will return false and hence, only second part of the above query returns result. If it doesn't, it means, there are no rows with criteria = criteria and NOT EXISTS will return true and hence, only the first part return data.
I Did it like this
WITH
First AS (
SELECT t1.<field1>
FROM <schema1>.<table1> t1
WHERE
<criteria1>
[Other SQL Queries Options]
OFFSET 0
LIMIT 1
),
Second AS (
SELECT t2.<field2>
FROM <schema2>.<table2> t2
WHERE
<criteria2>
[Other SQL Queries Options]
OFFSET 0
LIMIT 1
)
SELECT <field1>
FROM First
UNION ALL
SELECT <field2> as <same name as field1>
FROM Second
WHERE NOT exists(
SELECT 1 FROM First
)
;
I am writing down a view in SQL server (DWH) and the use case pseudo code is:
-- Do some calculation and generate #Temp1
-- ... contains other selects
-- Select statement 1
SELECT * FROM Foo
JOIN #Temp1 tmp on tmp.ID = Foo.ID
WHERE Foo.Deleted = 1
-- Do some calculation and generate #Temp2
-- ... contains other selects
-- Select statement 2
SELECT * FROM Foo
JOIN #Temp2 tmp on tmp.ID = Foo.ID
WHERE Foo.Deleted = 1
The result of the view should be:
Select Statement 1
UNION
Select Statement 2
The intended behavior is the same as the yield returnin C#. Is there a way to tell the view which SELECT statements are actually part of the result and which are not? since the small calculations preceding what I need also contain selects.
Thank you!
Yield return in C# returns rows one at a time as they appear in some underlying function. This concept does not exist in SQL statements. SQl is set-based, returning the entire result set, conceptually as a unit. (That said, sometimes queries run slowly and you will see rows returned slowly or in batches.)
You can control the number of rows being returns using TOP (in SQL Server). You can select particular rows to be returned using WHERE statements. However, you cannot specify a UNION statement that conditionally returns rows from some components but not others.
The closest you may be able to come is something like:
if UseTable1Only = 'Y'
select *
from Table1
else if UseTable2Only = 'Y'
select *
from Table2
else
select *
from table1
union
select *
from table2
You can do something similar using dynamic SQL, by constructing the statement as a string and then executing it.
I found a better work around. It might be helpful for someone else. It is actually to include all the calculation inside WITH statements instead of doing them in the view core:
WITH Temp1 (ID)
AS
(
-- Do some calculation and generate #Temp1
-- ... contains other selects
)
, Temp2 (ID)
AS
(
-- Do some calculation and generate #Temp2
-- ... contains other selects
)
-- Select statement 1
SELECT * FROM Foo
JOIN Temp1 tmp on tmp.ID = Foo.ID
WHERE Foo.Deleted = 1
UNION
-- Select statement 2
SELECT * FROM Foo
JOIN Temp2 tmp on tmp.ID = Foo.ID
WHERE Foo.Deleted = 1
The result will be of course the UNION of all the outiside SELECT statements.
I have a sql query that I run against a sql server database eg.
SELECT * FROM MyTable WHERE Id = 2
This may return a number of records or may return none. If it returns none, I would like to alter my sql query to return a default record, is this possible and if so, how? If records are returned, the default record should not be returned. I cannot update the data so will need to alter the sql query for this.
Another way (you would get an empty initial rowset returned);
SELECT * FROM MyTable WHERE Id = 2
IF (##ROWCOUNT = 0)
SELECT ...
SELECT TOP 1 * FROM (
SELECT ID,1 as Flag FROM MyTable WHERE Id = 2
UNION ALL
SELECT 1,2
) qry
ORDER BY qry.Flag ASC
You can have a look to this post. It is similar to what you are asking
Return a value if no rows are found SQL
I hope that it can guide you to the correct path.
if not exists (SELECT top 1 * FROM mytable WHERE id = 2)
select * from mytable where id= 'whatever_the_default_id_is'
else
select * from mytable where id = 2
If you have to return whole rows of data (and not just a single column) and you have to create a single SQL query then do this:
Left join actual table to defaults single-row table
select
coalesce(a.col1, d.col1) as col1,
coalesce(a.col2, d.col2) as col2,
...
from (
-- your defaults record
select
default1 as col1,
default2 as col2,
...) as d
left join actual as a
on ((1 = 1) /* or any actual table "where" conditions */)
The query need to return the same number of fields, so you shouldn't do a SELECT * FROM but a SELECT value FROM if you want to return a default value.
With that in mind
SELECT value FROM MyTable WHERE Id = 2
UNION
SELECT CASE (SELECT count(*) FROM MyTable WHERE Id = 2)
WHEN 0 THEN 'defaultvalue'
END
An alternative title might be:
Check for existence of multiple rows?
Using a combination of SQL and C# I want a method to return true if all products in a list exist in a table. If it can be done all in SQL that would be preferable. I have written a method that returns whether a single productID exists using the following SQL:
SELECT productID FROM Products WHERE ProductID = #productID
If this returns a row, then the c# method returns true, false otherwise.
Now I'm wondering if I have a list of product IDs (not a huge list mind you, normally under 20). How can I write a query that will return a row if all the product id's exist and no row if one or more product id's does not exist?
(Maybe something involving "IN" like:
SELECT * FROM Products WHERE ProductID IN ('1', '10', '100', 'ABC'))
EDIT:
How the result is expressed is not important to me. Whether the query returns a 1 or 0, an empty resultset or a non-empty one, true or false doesn't matter. I'd prefer the answer that is 1) easy to read and understand and 2) performant
I was envisioning concatenating the list of product id's with the SQL. Obviously this opens the code up to SQL injection (the product id's are actually varchar. in this case the chance is slim but still want to avoid that possibility). So if there is a way around this that would be better. Using SQL Server 2005.
Product ID's are varchar
Here's how I usually do it:
Just replace your query with this statement SELECT * FROM table WHERE 1
SELECT
CASE WHEN EXISTS
(
SELECT * FROM table WHERE 1
)
THEN 'TRUE'
ELSE 'FALSE'
END
Given your updated question, these are the simplest forms:
If ProductID is unique you want
SELECT COUNT(*) FROM Products WHERE ProductID IN (1, 10, 100)
and then check that result against 3, the number of products you're querying (this last part can be done in SQL, but it may be easier to do it in C# unless you're doing even more in SQL).
If ProductID is not unique it is
SELECT COUNT(DISTINCT ProductID) FROM Products WHERE ProductID IN (1, 10, 100)
When the question was thought to require returning rows when all ProductIds are present and none otherwise:
SELECT ProductId FROM Products WHERE ProductID IN (1, 10, 100) AND ((SELECT COUNT(*) FROM Products WHERE ProductID IN (1, 10, 100))=3)
or
SELECT ProductId FROM Products WHERE ProductID IN (1, 10, 100) AND ((SELECT COUNT(DISTINCT ProductID) FROM Products WHERE ProductID IN (1, 10, 100))=3)
if you actually intend to do something with the results. Otherwise the simple SELECT 1 WHERE (SELECT ...)=3 will do as other answers have stated or implied.
#Mark Hurd, thanks for pointing out the error.
this will work (if you are using Postgresql, Sql Server 2008):
create table products
(
product_id int not null
);
insert into products values(1),(2),(10),(100);
SELECT
CASE
WHEN EXISTS(
SELECT 1
FROM (values(1),(10),(100)) as x(id)
WHERE x.id NOT IN (select product_id from products))
THEN 0 --'NOT ALL'
ELSE 1 -- 'ALL'
END
If you are using MySQL, make a temporary memory table(then populate 1,10,100 there):
create table product_memory(product_id int) engine=MEMORY;
insert into product_memory values(1),(10),(100);
SELECT
CASE
WHEN EXISTS(
SELECT 1
FROM product_memory
WHERE product_memory.id NOT IN (select product_id from products))
THEN 0 -- 'NOT ALL'
ELSE 1 -- 'ALL'
END
On your C# code:
bool isAllExist = (int)(new SqlCommand(queryHere).ExecuteScalar()) == 1;
[EDIT]
How can I write a query that will
return a row if all the product id's
exist and no row if one or more
product id's does not exist?
Regarding, returning a row(singular) if all rows exists, and no row to be returned if one or more product id does not exists:
MySql:
SELECT 1
WHERE
NOT EXISTS(
SELECT 1
FROM product_memory
WHERE product_memory.id NOT IN (select product_id from products) )
Posgresql, Sql Server 2008:
SELECT 1
WHERE
NOT EXISTS(
SELECT 1
FROM (values(1),(10),(100)) as x(id)
WHERE x.id NOT IN (select product_id from products) )
Then on your C# code:
var da = new SqlDataAdapter(queryhere, connectionhere);
var dt = new DataTable();
da.Fill(dt);
if (dt.Rows.Count > 0)
return true;
else
return false;
Or just make the condition shorter:
return dt.Rows.Count > 0;
Assuming you're using SQL Server, the boolean type doesn't exist, but the bit type does, which can hold only 0 or 1 where 0 represents False, and 1 represents True.
I would go this way:
select 1
from Products
where ProductId IN (1, 10, 100)
Here, a null or no row will be returned (if no row exists).
Or even:
select case when EXISTS (
select 1
from Products
where ProductId IN (1, 10, 100)
) then 1 else 0 end as [ProductExists]
Here, either of the scalar values 1 or 0 will always be returned (if no row exists).
DECLARE #values TABLE (ProductId int)
INSERT #values (1)
INSERT #values (10)
INSERT #values (100)
SELECT CASE WHEN (SELECT COUNT(*) FROM #values v) =
(SELECT COUNT(*) FROM Products p WHERE p.ProductId IN
(SELECT v.ProductId FROM #values v))
THEN CAST(1 AS bit)
ELSE CAST(0 AS bit)
END [AreAllFound]
I know this is old but I think this will help anyone else who comes looking...
SELECT CAST(COUNT(ProductID) AS bit) AS [EXISTS] FROM Products WHERE(ProductID = #ProductID)
This will ALWAYS return TRUE if exists and FALSE if it doesn't (as opposed to no row).
You can use a SELECT CASE statement like so:
select case when EXISTS (
select 1
from <table>
where <condition>
) then TRUE else FALSE end
It returns TRUE when your query in the parents exists.
For PostgreSQL:
SELECT COUNT(*) = 1 FROM (
SELECT 1 FROM $table WHERE $condition LIMIT 1
) AS t
// not familiar with C#, but C#'s equivalent of PHP's:
$count = count($productIds); // where $productIds is the array you also use in IN (...)
SELECT IF ((SELECT COUNT(*) FROM Products WHERE ProductID IN (1, 10, 100)) = $count, 1, 0)
If the IN clause is a parameter (either to SP or hot-built SQL), then this can always be done:
SELECT (SELECT COUNT(1)
FROM product_a
WHERE product_id IN (1, 8, 100)
) = (number of commas in product_id as constant)
If the IN clause is a table, then this can always be done:
SELECT (SELECT COUNT(*)
FROM product_a
WHERE product_id IN (SELECT Products
FROM #WorkTable)
) = (SELECT COUNT(*)
FROM #WorkTable)
If the IN clause is complex then either spool it into a table or write it twice.
If you have the IDs stored in a temp table (which can be done by some C# function or simple SQL) then the problem becomes easy and doable in SQL.
select "all exist"
where (select case when count(distinct t.id) = (select count(distinct id) from #products) then "true" else "false" end
from ProductTable t, #products p
where t.id = p.id) = "true"
This will return "all exists" when all the products in #products exist in the target table (ProductTable) and will not return a row if the above is not true.
If you are not willing to write to a temp table, then you need to feed in some parameter for the number of products you are attempting to find, and replace the temp table with an 'in'; clause so the subquery looks like this:
SELECT "All Exist"
WHERE(
SELECT case when count(distinct t.id) = #ProductCount then "true" else "false"
FROM ProductTable t
WHERE t.id in (1,100,10,20) -- example IDs
) = "true"
If you are using SQL Server 2008, I would create a stored procedure which takes a table-valued parameter. The query should then be of a particularly simple form:
CREATE PROCEDURE usp_CheckAll
(#param dbo.ProductTableType READONLY)
AS
BEGIN
SELECT CAST(1 AS bit) AS Result
WHERE (SELECT COUNT(DISTINCT ProductID) FROM #param)
= (SELECT COUNT(DISTINCT p.ProductID) FROM #param AS p
INNER JOIN Products
ON p.ProductID = Products.ProductID)
END
I changed this to return a row, as you seem to require. There are other ways to do this with a WHERE NOT EXISTS (LEFT JOIN in here WHERE rhs IS NULL):
CREATE PROCEDURE usp_CheckAll
(#param dbo.ProductTableType READONLY)
AS
BEGIN
SELECT CAST(1 AS bit) AS Result
WHERE NOT EXISTS (
SELECT * FROM #param AS p
LEFT JOIN Products
ON p.ProductID = Products.ProductID
WHERE Products.ProductID IS NULL
)
END
Your c# will have to do just a bit of work (counting the number of IDs passed in), but try this:
select (select count(*) from players where productid in (1, 10, 100, 1000)) = 4
Edit:
4 can definitely be parameterized, as can the list of integers.
If you're not generating the SQL from string input by the user, you don't need to worry about attacks. If you are, you just have to make sure you only get integers. For example, if you were taking in the string "1, 2, 3, 4", you'd do something like
String.Join(",", input.Split(",").Select(s => Int32.Parse(s).ToString()))
That will throw if you get the wrong thing. Then just set that as a parameter.
Also, be sure be sure to special case if items.Count == 0, since your DB will choke if you send it where ParameterID in ().
Where is this list of products that you're trying to determine the existence of? If that list exists within another table you could do this
declare #are_equal bit
declare #products int
SELECT #products =
count(pl.id)
FROM ProductList pl
JOIN Products p
ON pl.productId = p.productId
select #are_equal = #products == select count(id) from ProductList
Edit:
Then do ALL the work in C#. Cache the actual list of products in your application somewhere, and do a LINQ query.
var compareProducts = new List<Product>(){p1,p2,p3,p4,p5};
var found = From p in GetAllProducts()
Join cp in compareProducts on cp.Id equals p.Id
select p;
return compareProducts.Count == found.Count;
This prevents constructing SQL queries by hand, and keeps all your application logic in the application.
This may be too simple, but I always use:
SELECT COUNT(*)>0 FROM `table` WHERE condition;
Example:
SELECT iif(count(id)=0,'false','true') FROM table WHERE id = 19