I have a select query which combined several tables. PRODUCTION_ORDER_RESULTS, PRODUCTION_ORDERS and SERVICE_GUARANTY_NEW have common value however STOCKS table does not.
SELECT PR_ORDERS.ARRIVED_CITY,
PR_ORDERS.MONTAJ_DATE,
PR_ORDER_RESULT.TRANSFER_DATE,
PR_ORDERS.P_ORDER_ID,
PR_ORDER_RESULT.P_ORDER_ID,
SG.SALE_CONSUMER_ID,
SG.IS_SERI_SONU,
S.BRAND_ID,
S.PROPERTY
FROM workcube_test_1.PRODUCTION_ORDER_RESULTS PR_ORDER_RESULT,
workcube_test_1.PRODUCTION_ORDERS PR_ORDERS,
workcube_test_1.SERVICE_GUARANTY_NEW SG,
workcube_test_1.STOCKS S
WHERE PR_ORDER_RESULT.P_ORDER_ID = PR_ORDERS.P_ORDER_ID
AND PR_ORDER_RESULT.PR_ORDER_ID = SG.PROCESS_ID
when I run the query, it shows the output as below.
The problem here is there are four data rows returned from PRODUCTION_ORDER_RESULTS, PRODUCTION_ORDERS, SERVICE_GUARANTY_NEW and once I have added the STOCKS table, arrived_city, montaj_date, transfer_date columns are side by side with STOCKS table's rows, but the columns value should be null, not filled with data.
The way I tried is UNION of STOCKS table, however unioned table values are ignored, can not use them in html blocks.
there needs to be at least one more join condition among tables where there's for STOCKS table, I think there might exist such a column STOCK_ID within a table such as PRODUCTION_ORDER_RESULTS in order to join with STOCKS table. I think this should be the reason for multiple returning rows. If there's no common column, then the returning data will be produced as many as the number of records within STOCK table due to existing CROSS JOIN logic within the current query. So rearrange your query as
SELECT PR_ORDERS.ARRIVED_CITY,
PR_ORDERS.MONTAJ_DATE,
PR_ORDER_RESULT.TRANSFER_DATE,
PR_ORDERS.P_ORDER_ID,
PR_ORDER_RESULT.P_ORDER_ID,
SG.SALE_CONSUMER_ID,
SG.IS_SERI_SONU,
S.BRAND_ID,
S.PROPERTY
FROM workcube_test_1.PRODUCTION_ORDER_RESULTS PR_ORDER_RESULT
JOIN workcube_test_1.PRODUCTION_ORDERS PR_ORDERS
ON PR_ORDER_RESULT.P_ORDER_ID = PR_ORDERS.P_ORDER_ID
JOIN workcube_test_1.SERVICE_GUARANTY_NEW SG
ON PR_ORDER_RESULT.PR_ORDER_ID = SG.PROCESS_ID
JOIN workcube_test_1.STOCKS S
ON PR_ORDER_RESULT.STOCK_ID = S.ID
Related
I am working on ABAP program - user input is to query column ANLAGE and output is to get all records from table EADZ (and only fields of EADZ) based on ANLAGE.
Statement and joins should work like this:
Input ANLAGE, find in table EASTL, gets LOGIKNR
Input LOGIKNR, find in table EGERR, gets EQUNR
Input EQUNR, find in table ETDZ, gets LOGIKZW
Input LOGIKZW, find in table EADZ, gets all records (this is the final output)
Here is the code I tried:
DATA: gt_cas_rezy TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF eadz,
lv_dummy_eanl LIKE eanl-anlage.
SELECT-OPTIONS: so_anl FOR lv_dummy_eanl NO INTERVALS NO-EXTENSION.
SELECT * FROM eadz
INNER JOIN etdz ON eadz~logikzw EQ etdz~logikzw
INNER JOIN egerr ON etdz~equnr EQ egerr~equnr
INNER JOIN eastl ON egerr~logiknr EQ eastl~logiknr
INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE #gt_cas_rezy
WHERE eastl~anlage IN #so_anl.
I got the records from table EADZ except that the date fields are empty (even though, they are filled in database table). I am assuming there is a problem with JOINs since in statement like this I join all the fields of all 4 tables into one "record" and then to corresponding fields of internal table.
How to get the values of date fields?
You can find the answer in the documentation.
If a column name appears multiple times and no alternative column name was granted, the last column listed is assigned.
In your case, at least two tables share the same column name. Therefore the values from the last mentioned table are used in the join.
You can solve this by listing the columns explicitly (or eadz~* in your case), giving an alias if required.
SELECT EADZ~* FROM EADZ INNER JOIN ETDZ ON EADZ~LOGIKZW = ETDZ~LOGIKZW
INNER JOIN EGERR ON ETDZ~EQUNR = EGERR~EQUNR
INNER JOIN EASTL ON EGERR~LOGIKNR = EASTL~LOGIKNR
INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE #gt_cas_rezy
WHERE EASTL~ANLAGE IN #SO_ANL.
If you require additional fields, you can add them explicily with e.g. EADZ~*, EASTL~A.
I have two tables
tblData_VendorMasterSSPaymentTerms
tblData_VendorMasterSSPaymentTermsCLM
tblData_VendorMasterSSPaymentTerms contains a field labled VMSSPayTerms_AribaContractID which the values exist in table tblData_VendorMasterSSPaymentTermsCLM
So in table tblData_VendorMasterSSPaymentTermsCLM I want to create a calculated column that counts how many records in tblData_VendorMasterSSPaymentTerms contains the Contract ID for that record.
This is what I have put together so far but it is still coming up with an error
SELECT Count(VMSSPayTerms_AribaContractID)
From tblData_VendorMasterSSPaymentTerms
Where VMSSPayTerms_AribaContractID=VMSSPayTermsCLM_ContractID
Can someone help me identify what I am doing wrong here?
You must join the tables, group by VMSSPayTermsCLM_ContractID and count:
select
c.VMSSPayTermsCLM_ContractID,
count(t.VMSSPayTerms_AribaContractID) counter
from tblData_VendorMasterSSPaymentTermsCLM c inner join tblData_VendorMasterSSPaymentTerms t
on t.VMSSPayTerms_AribaContractID = c.VMSSPayTermsCLM_ContractID
group by c.VMSSPayTermsCLM_ContractID
I noticed that the number of rows has increased after running the queries below.
The table data.consolidated_billing_journal has about 15,883,000 rows but the result of this query was 15,900,000 rows.
I had taken care such that all joined tables cluster_profit_center(profit_center), cname_fixed_match(cname) are joined on their primary keys, hence no duplicate.
SELECT l.*, cl0, cl1, cl2, cl_tag, std_cname
FROM data.consolidated_billing_journal l
LEFT JOIN ref.cluster_profit_center cpc
ON l.cluster_profit_center = cpc.profit_center
LEFT JOIN cname.cname_fixed_match cfm
ON l.cust_acc_name = cfm.cname OR l.billing_acc_name = cfm.cname
What could be the reason where additional rows were added? I'm imagining it to be similar to Excel VLOOKUP where the fact table remains with fixed number of rows.
I have two tables: Company and Contact, with a relationship of one-to-many.
I have another table Track which identifies some of the companies as parent companies to other companies.
I want to write a SQL query that selects the parent companies from Track and the amount of contacts that each parent has.
SELECT Track.ParentId, Count(Contact.companyId)
FROM Track
INNER JOIN Contact
ON Track.ParentId = Contact.companyId
GROUP BY Track.ParentId
however The result holds less records than when I run the following query:
SELECT DISTINCT Track.ParentId
FROM Track
I tried the first query with an added DISTINCT and it returned the same results (less then what it was meant to).
You're performing an INNER JOIN with the Contact table, which means that any rows from the first table (Track in this case) with no matches to the JOINed table will not show up in your results. Try using a LEFT OUTER JOIN instead.
The COUNT with Contact.companyId will only count rows where there is a match (Contact.companyId is not NULL). Since you're counting contacts that's fine as they will count as 0. If you were trying to count some other set of data and tried to do a COUNT on a specific column (rather than COUNT(*)) then any NULL values in that column would not count towards your total, which might or might not be what you want.
I used an INNER JOIN which returns only records that are identical in both tables.
To return all records from Track table, and records that match in the Contact table, I need to use LEFT JOIN.
I have two tables, Invoices and members, connected by PK/FK relationship through the field InvoiceNum. I have created the following sql and it works fine, and pulls 44 records as expected.
SELECT
INVOICES.InvoiceNum,
INVOICES.GroupNum,
INVOICES.DivisionNum,
INVOICES.DateBillFrom,
INVOICES.DateBillTo
FROM INVOICES
INNER JOIN MEMBERS ON INVOICES.InvoiceNum = MEMBERS.InvoiceNum
WHERE MEMBERS.MemberNum = '20032526000'
Now, I want to replace INVOICES.GroupNum and INVOICES.DivisionNum in the above query with GroupName and DivisionName. These values are present in the Groups and Divisions tables which also have the corresponding Group_num and Division_num fields. I have created the following sql. The problem is that it now pulls 528 records instead of 44!
SELECT
INVOICES.InvoiceNum,
INVOICES.DateBillFrom,
INVOICES.DateBillTo,
DIVISIONS.DIVISION_NAME,
GROUPS.GROUP_NAME
FROM INVOICES
INNER JOIN MEMBERS ON INVOICES.InvoiceNum = MEMBERS.InvoiceNum
INNER JOIN GROUPS ON INVOICES.GroupNum = GROUPS.Group_Num
INNER JOIN DIVISIONS ON INVOICES.DivisionNum = DIVISIONS.Division_Num
WHERE MEMBERS.MemberNum = '20032526000'
Any help is greatly appreciated.
You have at least one relation between your tables which is missing in your query. It gives you extra records. Find all common fields. Say, are divisions related to groups?
The statement is fine, as far as the SQL syntax goes.
But the question you have to ask yourself (and answer it):
How many rows in Groups do you get for that given GroupNum?
Ditto for Divisions - how many rows exist for that DivisionNum?
It would appear that those numbers aren't unique - multiple rows exist for each number - therefore you get multiple rows returned