I am designing a SQL database for sales person of a firm, where each customer will order multiple items from the firm. I want to store this order uniquely to the customer. Which will be linked to customer table.
Customer Table :
Cust_id
Cust_name
Cust_phone
Currently I am thinking of making a separate order table for each order
Order Table:
Product_id
Prod_quantity
Total_amt
but can't figure out how to link it back to customer. Or how to uniquely identify each order table.
I would have done it in NoSQL but data has to be locally stored in SQLite.
Customer may order multiple times so I should be able to identify current and previous orders
Do not create a separate table for each order! That's a very bad design. Relational tables aren't spreadsheets!
Have one table for the orders with a foreign key pointing to the customers. For the items of orders have a linking table with a foreign key to the order and another to the item. That's fairly standard thing (I'm pretty certain you'll find such a classic example in many tutorials about relational database design.). Something along the lines of:
CREATE TABLE customer
(id integer,
name varchar(64),
...
PRIMARY KEY (id));
CREATE TABLE product
(id integer,
name varchar(64),
...
PRIMARY KEY (id));
CREATE TABLE order
(id integer,
customer integer,
...
PRIMARY KEY (id),
FOREIGN KEY (customer)
REFERENCES customer
(id));
CREATE TABLE order_product
(order integer,
product integer,
amount integer,
...
PRIMARY KEY (order,
product),
FOREIGN KEY (order)
REFERENCES order
(id),
FOREIGN KEY (customer)
REFERENCES customer
(id));
(order might be a bad choice for a table or column name in some DBMS as it's also a keyword and thus required quoting. So probably chose something else. I used it just for the sake of clarity.)
Related
I created a table in SQL using PostgreSQL called "tenants". Below is the code for the tenants:
create table tentants (
id bigserial not null primary key,
tenant_name varchar(1000) not null,
offices int not null,
number int not null,
email varchar(1000)
I want to include the ability to add multiple values to "office" in case a tenant rents more than one office. I don't want to use JSON for this. I tried creating a related table called "offices" but That could only allow me to add one office per tenant.
What is the best approach for this?
You can use text, that works for me with ids separated by commas like this
4,3,67,2
Anyway the proper approach would be another table and name it tenant_offices
tenant_offices
columns >
tenant_id
office_id (well ofcourse you should have atleast an office table)
You can create an "tenant_offices" table (like you did before), having as structure :
id, tenant_id, office_id,... where id is the primary key of the "tenant_offices" table and tenant_id and office_id are foreign keys.
tenant_id which refers to your tenants table and office_id which refers to your offices table.
Here, the tenant can therefore rent several offices.
Hoping to have enlightened you, or helped !
I assume that the relationship is one-to-many tenant to office (that is, office can be rented only by one tenant)
Then you have to create table offices with a foreign key that points to the tenant:
CREATE TABLE offices (
id bigserial not null primary key,
tenant_id bigserial foreign key references tenants(id))
additional columns if needed
note that in this version you will not retain history of rents (you will have to run update on offices to change tenant_id)
EDIT: In case of a many-to-many relationship (that will also allow us to retain history of rents) we need to create a relationship table:
CREATE TABLE TenantsOffices (
id bigserial not null primary key
tenant_id bigserial foreign key references tenants(id),
office_id bigserial foreign key references offices(id),
start_date datetime,
end_date datetime)
Useful information: https://www.sqlshack.com/learn-sql-types-of-relations/
I have a table that I need to insert data into.
The table Sales has 4 columns
CustomerValueType_id (int)
Customer_id (int)
Value (NVARCHAR)
Customer_name (NVARCHAR)
The CustomerValueType_id, Customer_id are foreign keys that are not-unique, CustomerValueType_id matches to a value type, while Customer_id matches to the Customer_name.
I need to add additional customer data into the Valuecolumn but how do I ensure that the data matches to the correct CustomerValueType_id and Customer_id and each customer name has to be repeated in the Customer_name
Sales Table
You are trying to do denormalization.
Ideally, in the normalized design, you will just store, parent_ids in
the child table. If you want to see parent_name fields, you have to
get them based on JOIN conditions.
But, here as you are storing both id, name in the child table, I would suggest you to create composite Foreign key in the child table, so that the combination is always present. Also, make this combination as composite primary key in the parent table.
-- Parent Table PRIMARY KEY
ALTER TABLE dbo.CustomerValueType
ADD CONSTRAINT PK_CustomerValueType
PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED (CustomerValueType_id, Value);
GO
--Child Table FOREIGN KEY
ALTER TABLE dbo.Sales
ADD CONSTRAINT FK_Sales_CustomerValueType
FOREIGN KEY (CustomerValueType_id,Value)
REFERENCES dbo.CustomerValueType(CustomerValueType_id,Value);
GO
I have a main large table which I have had to put into 3rd normal form and into smaller tables (with primary and foreign keys linking them). The table is about renting books.
I have a customer table which I need to create a primary key for. In the main large table there are duplicates of the customer_id, as the table as a whole is for renting the books, so one customer may have more than one renting.
The table I am currently trying to add a primary key for will not have any nulls or duplicates, however i am unsure how to create the primary key for this without the error- unsure how to make it unique.
CREATE TABLE customer AS
SELECT cust_id, country_id, name, address, postcode
FROM BOOKS
WHERE cust_id != 0;
ALTER TABLE customer
ADD PRIMARY KEY (cust_id);
Is anyone able to help me in how to create the primary key on my customer table, but just taking each unique cust_id from the main table.
In SQL Server the straightforward way to add unique keys is to use IDENTITY. Identity fields are integer fields that auto populate successive values by a specified start value and interval. If you don't specify the interval it will start at 1 and increase the value by 1 each time a value is assigned.
While it's usually done when creating a table, you can do it in your ALTER TABLE step, and it will assign values when added to an existing table. I've explicitly specified the start value and interval that matches the default to show the syntax :
ALTER TABLE customer
ADD cust_id int not null PRIMARY KEY IDENTITY(1,1)
I have two tables named ORDER_HEAD and ORDER_DETAIL, following is their structure.
ORDER_HEAD:
ORD_ID (PK)
ORD_TYPE (PK)
ORD_DATE
ORD_NET_TOTAL
ORDER_DETAIL:
ODD_ID
ODD_LINE_NO
ODD_PRODUCT_ID
ODD_QTY
I want to form a relationship between the ORD_ID in ORDER_HEAD & ODD_ID in ORDER_DETAIL table. But SQL Server shows an error message:
primary key or unique constraint must be defined for table before it can participate in a relationship
Why am I getting this error ? Is there a way to perform a join between these two columns or is there a problem in my db design ?
If you want to create a relationship from Composite primary key then any reference should also include all the column's in Composite primary key
Schema of ORDER_DETAIL should be
ORDER_DETAIL
============
ODD_ID (Fk)
ORD_TYPE(Fk) -- you need to add this column
ODD_LINE_NO
ODD_PRODUCT_ID
ODD_QTY
Create Foreign key like this.
ALTER TABLE ORDER_DETAIL
ADD CONSTRAINT FK_ORDER_DETAIL
FOREIGN KEY(ODD_ID, ORD_TYPE) REFERENCES ORDER_HEAD(ODD_ID, ORD_TYPE)
UPDATE
After rethinking the problem I think you should achieve your goal by adding reference column ODD_TYPE (like user #NoDisplayName stated) and creating composite PK for your table ORDER_DETAIL consisting of 3 columns (ODD_ID, ODD_TYPE, ODD_LINE_NO), then it would be:
ORDER_DETAIL
============
ODD_ID (PK)
ODD_TYPE (PK)
ODD_LINE_NO (PK)
ODD_PRODUCT_ID
ODD_QTY
in SQL it could be:
ALTER TABLE ORDER_DETAIL ADD CONSTRAINT PK_Order_Detail PRIMARY KEY NONCLUSTERED (ODD_ID, ODD_TYPE, ODD_LINE_NO)
Then, in ORDER_DETAIL table for specific pair (ODD_ID, ODD_TYPE) you would have records being its order lines.
I think that after removing the previous PK, adding the column and setting the above key (even in visual editor) you shouldn't have problems when creating FK between the two tables and mapping the proper columns together.
I am having a problem in modeling relation between a company and suppliers and clients. Basically in my system the supplier and the client are companies too so I made this schema:
table.company:
id
name
//other fields
table.company_suppliers:
company_id FK table.company.id
supplier_id FK table.company.id
table.company_clients:
company_id FK table.company.id
client_id FK table.company.id
Is this ok?
I would use only one table which will contains all the company and a bit field (called by instance Supplier )which will tell you which are are suppliers too.
Company
Id
Name
IsSupplier (bit)
Fk_IdSupplier --it will relate this supplier to a company on the same table
Or you can create a junction table (many to many)
Company
Id
Name
IsSupplier (bit)
CompanySupplier
fk_IdCompany
fk_IdSupplier
Your basic insight is right--you don't want unrelated tables of clients and suppliers. But you have too many ID numbers.
create table companies (
company_id integer primary key,
company_name varchar(35) not null
);
create table suppliers (
supplier_id integer primary key references companies (company_id)
-- Other supplier columns go here.
);
create table clients (
client_id integer primary key references companies (company_id)
-- Other client columns go here.
);
If you're using MySQL, you'll need to adjust the syntax a little. MySQL doesn't support all the standard SQL syntax for declaring primary keys and foreign keys.