I have a .Net Core 3.1 Web Api application and use the ResponseCache attribute on a controller action.
[HttpGet]
[ResponseCache(Location = ResponseCacheLocation.Any, Duration = 30, VaryByQueryKeys = new[] { "id"})]
public string Get([FromQuery] int id)
{...}
While this is working fine with the hardcoded value for Duration, I need to set this dynamically from the config somehow.
I already tried:
Configuring it in Response Caching Middleware, but then it applies to all controller actions.
Deriving from ResponseCacheAttribute does not work, as it's internal.
Is there a simple way to achieve what I want, or do I have to write the whole thing (custom ResponseCacheAtrribute + ResponseCacheFilter + ResponseCacheFilterExecutor) by myself ?
I make a new attribute which inherits from the ResponseCacheAttribute which adds most of what I need. For example -
public class ResponseCacheTillAttribute : ResponseCacheAttribute
{
public ResponseCacheTillAttribute(ResponseCacheTime time = ResponseCacheTime.Midnight)
{
DateTime today = DateTime.Today;
switch (time)
{
case ResponseCacheTime.Midnight:
DateTime midnight = today.AddDays(1).AddSeconds(-1);
base.Duration = (int)(midnight - DateTime.Now).TotalSeconds;
break;
default:
base.Duration = 30;
break;
}
}
}
The Enum looks like
public enum ResponseCacheTime
{
Midnight
}
This allows me to build in specific times that I may need. I haven't fully tested this but confirmed I see the information in the response output.
You should be able to add any arguments or information you need into the attribute.
Related
Upgrading to asp.net core 2.2 in my hobby project there is a new routing system I want to migrate to. Previously I implemented a custom IRouter to be able to set the controller for the request dynamically. The incoming request path can be anything. I match the request against a database table containing slugs and it looks up the a matching data container class type for the resolved slug. After that I resolve a controller type that can handle the request and set the RouteData values to the current HttpContext and passing it along to the default implementation for IRouter and everything works ok.
Custom implementaion of IRouter:
public async Task RouteAsync(RouteContext context)
{
var requestPath = context.HttpContext.Request.Path.Value;
var page = _pIndex.GetPage(requestPath);
if (page != null)
{
var controllerType = _controllerResolver.GetController(page.PageType);
if (controllerType != null)
{
var oldRouteData = context.RouteData;
var newRouteData = new RouteData(oldRouteData);
newRouteData.Values["pageType"] = page.PageType;
newRouteData.Values["controller"] = controllerType.Name.Replace("Controller", "");
newRouteData.Values["action"] = "Index";
context.RouteData = newRouteData;
await _defaultRouter.RouteAsync(context);
}
}
}
A controller to handle a specific page type.
public class SomePageController : PageController<PageData>
{
public ActionResult Index(PageData currentPage)
{
return View("Index", currentPage);
}
}
However I got stuck when I'm trying to figure out how I can solve it using the new system. I'm not sure where I'm suppose to extend it for this behavior. I don't want to turn off the endpoint routing feature because I see an opportunity to learn something. I would aso appreciate a code sample if possible.
In ASP.NET 3.0 there is an new dynamic controller routing system. You can implement DynamicRouteValueTransformer.
Documentation is on the way, look at the github issue
I am quite new to ASP .NET core, so please help. I would like to avoid database round trip for ASP .NET core application. I have functionality to dynamically add columns in datagrid. Columns settings (visibility, enable, width, caption) are stored in DB.
So I would like to store List<,PersonColumns> on server only for actual session. But I am not able to do this. I already use JsonConvert methods to serialize and deserialize objects to/from session. This works for List<,Int32> or objects with simple properties, but not for complex object with nested properties.
My object I want to store to session looks like this:
[Serializable]
public class PersonColumns
{
public Int64 PersonId { get; set; }
List<ViewPersonColumns> PersonCols { get; set; }
public PersonColumns(Int64 personId)
{
this.PersonId = personId;
}
public void LoadPersonColumns(dbContext dbContext)
{
LoadPersonColumns(dbContext, null);
}
public void LoadPersonColumns(dbContext dbContext, string code)
{
PersonCols = ViewPersonColumns.GetPersonColumns(dbContext, code, PersonId);
}
public static List<ViewPersonColumns> GetFormViewColumns(SatisDbContext dbContext, string code, Int64 formId, string viewName, Int64 personId)
{
var columns = ViewPersonColumns.GetPersonColumns(dbContext, code, personId);
return columns.Where(p => p.FormId == formId && p.ObjectName == viewName).ToList();
}
}
I would like to ask also if my approach is not bad to save the list of 600 records to session? Is it better to access DB and load columns each time user wants to display the grid?
Any advice appreciated
Thanks
EDIT: I have tested to store in session List<,ViewPersonColumns> and it is correctly saved. When I save object where the List<,ViewPersonColumns> is property, then only built-in types are saved, List property is null.
The object I want to save in session
[Serializable]
public class UserManagement
{
public String PersonUserName { get; set; }
public Int64 PersonId { get; set; }
public List<ViewPersonColumns> PersonColumns { get; set; } //not saved to session??
public UserManagement() { }
public UserManagement(DbContext dbContext, string userName)
{
var person = dbContext.Person.Single(p => p.UserName == userName);
PersonUserName = person.UserName;
PersonId = person.Id;
}
/*public void PrepareUserData(DbContext dbContext)
{
LoadPersonColumns(dbContext);
}*/
public void LoadPersonColumns(DbContext dbContext)
{
LoadPersonColumns(dbContext, null);
}
public void LoadPersonColumns(DbContext dbContext, string code)
{
PersonColumns = ViewPersonColumns.GetPersonColumns(dbContext, code, PersonId);
}
public List<ViewPersonColumns> GetFormViewColumns(Int64 formId, string viewName)
{
if (PersonColumns == null)
return null;
return PersonColumns.Where(p => p.FormId == formId && p.ObjectName == viewName).ToList();
}
}
Save columns to the session
UserManagement userManagement = new UserManagement(_context, user.UserName);
userManagement.LoadPersonColumns(_context);
HttpContext.Session.SetObject("ActualPersonContext", userManagement);
HttpContext.Session.SetObject("ActualPersonColumns", userManagement.PersonColumns);
Load columns from the session
//userManagement build-in types are set. The PersonColumns is null - not correct
UserManagement userManagement = session.GetObject<UserManagement>("ActualPersonContext");
//The cols is filled from session with 600 records - correct
List<ViewPersonColumns> cols = session.GetObject<List<ViewPersonColumns>>("ActualPersonColumns");
Use list for each column is better than use database.
you can't create and store sessions in .net core like .net framework 4.0
Try Like this
Startup.cs
public void ConfigureServices(IServiceCollection services)
{
//services.AddDbContext<GeneralDBContext>(options => options.UseSqlServer(Configuration.GetConnectionString("DefaultConnection")));
services.AddMvc().AddSessionStateTempDataProvider();
services.AddSession();
}
Common/SessionExtensions.cs
sing Microsoft.AspNetCore.Http;
using Newtonsoft.Json;
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
using System.Threading.Tasks;
namespace IMAPApplication.Common
{
public static class SessionExtensions
{
public static T GetComplexData<T>(this ISession session, string key)
{
var data = session.GetString(key);
if (data == null)
{
return default(T);
}
return JsonConvert.DeserializeObject<T>(data);
}
public static void SetComplexData(this ISession session, string key, object value)
{
session.SetString(key, JsonConvert.SerializeObject(value));
}
}
}
Usage
==> Create Session*
public IActionResult Login([FromBody]LoginViewModel model)
{
LoggedUserVM user = GetUserDataById(model.userId);
//Create Session with complex object
HttpContext.Session.SetComplexData("loggerUser", user);
return Json(new { status = result.Status, message = result.Message });
}
==> Get Session data*
public IActionResult Index()
{
//Get Session data
LoggedUserVM loggedUser = HttpContext.Session.GetComplexData<LoggedUserVM>("loggerUser");
}
Hope this is helpful. Good luck.
This is an evergreen post, and even though Microsoft has recommended serialisation to store the object in session - it is not a correct solution unless your object is readonly, I have a blog explaining all scenario here and i have even pointed out the issues in GitHub of Asp.Net Core in issue id 18159
Synopsis of the problems are here:
A. Serialisation isn't same as object, true it will help in distributed server scenario but it comes with a caveat that Microsoft have failed to highlight - that it will work without any unpredictable failures only when the object is meant to be read and not to be written back.
B. If you were looking for a read-write object in the session, everytime you change the object that is read from the session after deserialisation - it needs to be written back to the session again by calling serialisation - and this alone can lead to multiple complexities as you will need to either keep track of the changes - or keep writing back to session after each change in any property. In one request to the server, you will have scenarios where the object is written back multiple times till the response is sent back.
C. For a read-write object in the session, even on a single server it will fail, as the actions of the user can trigger multiple rapid requests to the server and not more than often system will find itself in a situation where the object is being serialised or deserialised by one thread and being edited and then written back by another, the result is you will end up with overwriting the object state by threads - and even locks won't help you much since the object is not a real object but a temporary object created by deserialisation.
D. There are issues with serialising complex objects - it is not just a performance hit, it may even fail in certain scenario - especially if you have deeply nested objects that sometimes refer back to itself.
The synopsis of the solution is here, full implementation along with code is in the blog link:
First implement this as a Cache object, create one item in IMemoryCache for each unique session.
Keep the cache in sliding expiration mode, so that each time it is read it revives the expiry time - thereby keeping the objects in cache as long as the session is active.
Second point alone is not enough, you will need to implement heartbeat technique - triggering the call to session every T minus 1 min or so from the javascript. (This we anyways used to do even to keep the session alive till the user is working on the browser, so it won't be any different
Additional Recommendations
A. Make an object called SessionManager - so that all your code related to session read / write sits in one place.
B. Do not keep very high value for session time out - If you are implementing heartbeat technique, even 3 mins of session time out will be enough.
I've created a GitHub repo to better understand the problem here. I have two actions on two different controllers bound to the same route.
http://localhost/sameControllerRoute/{identifier}/values
[Route("sameControllerRoute")]
public class FirstController : Controller
{
public FirstController()
{
// different EF Core DataContext than SecondController and possibly other dependencies than SecondController
}
[HttpGet("{identifier}/values")]
public IActionResult Values(string identifier, DateTime from, DateTime to) // other parameters than SecondController/Values
{
return this.Ok("Was in FirstController");
}
}
[Route("sameControllerRoute")]
public class SecondController : Controller
{
public SecondController()
{
// different EF Core DataContext than FirstController and possibly other dependencies than FirstController
}
[HttpGet("{identifier}/values")]
public IActionResult Values(string identifier, int number, string somethingElse) // other parameters than FirstController/Values
{
return this.Ok("Was in SecondController");
}
}
Since there are two matching routes, the default ActionSelector fails with:
'[...] AmbiguousActionException: Multiple actions matched. [...]'
which is comprehensible.
So I thought I can implement my own ActionSelector. In there I would implement the logic that resolves the issue of multiple routes via same logic depending on the 'identifier' route value (line 27 in code)
If 'identifier' value is a --> then FirstController
If 'identifier' value is b --> then SecondController
and so on...
protected override IReadOnlyList<ActionDescriptor> SelectBestActions(IReadOnlyList<ActionDescriptor> actions)
{
if (actions.HasLessThan(2)) return base.SelectBestActions(actions); // works like base implementation
foreach (var action in actions)
{
if (action.Parameters.Any(p => p.Name == "identifier"))
{
/*** get value of identifier from route (launchSettings this would result in 'someIdentifier') ***/
// call logic that decides whether value of identifier matches the controller
// if yes
return new List<ActionDescriptor>(new[] { action }).AsReadOnly();
// else
// keep going
}
}
return base.SelectBestActions(actions); // fail in all other cases with AmbiguousActionException
}
But I haven't found a good solution to get access to the route values in ActionSelector. Which is comprehensible as well because ModelBinding hasn't kicked in yet since MVC is still trying to figure out the Route.
A dirty solution could be to get hold of IHttpContextAccessor and regex somehow against the path.
But I'm still hoping you could provide a better idea to retrieve the route values even though ModelBinding hasn't happend yet in the request pipeline.
Not sure that you need to use ActionSelector at all for your scenario. Accordingly, to provided code, your controllers works with different types of resources (and so they expect different query parameters). As so, it is better to use different routing templates. Something like this for example:
FirstController: /sameControllerRoute/resourceA/{identifier}/values
SecondController: /sameControllerRoute/resourceB/{identifier}/values
In the scope of REST, when we are talking about /sameControllerRoute/{identifier}/values route template, we expect that different identifier means the same resource type, but different resource name. And so, as API consumers, we expect that all of the following requests are supported
/sameControllerRoute/a/values?from=20160101&to=20170202
/sameControllerRoute/b/values?from=20160101&to=20170202
/sameControllerRoute/a/values?number=1&somethingElse=someData
/sameControllerRoute/b/values?number=1&somethingElse=someData
That is not true in your case
I ended up implementing the proposed solution by the ASP.NET team. This was to implement an IActionConstrain as shown here:
// Copyright (c) .NET Foundation. All rights reserved.
// Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0. See License.txt in the project root for license information.
using System;
using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.ActionConstraints;
namespace ActionConstraintSample.Web
{
public class CountrySpecificAttribute : Attribute, IActionConstraint
{
private readonly string _countryCode;
public CountrySpecificAttribute(string countryCode)
{
_countryCode = countryCode;
}
public int Order
{
get
{
return 0;
}
}
public bool Accept(ActionConstraintContext context)
{
return string.Equals(
context.RouteContext.RouteData.Values["country"].ToString(),
_countryCode,
StringComparison.OrdinalIgnoreCase);
}
}
}
https://github.com/aspnet/Entropy/blob/dev/samples/Mvc.ActionConstraintSample.Web/CountrySpecificAttribute.cs
I am trying to use a custom (derived) RazorViewEngine AND precompiled views using RazorGenerator.
Some context:
We have a base product that we use for multiple client implementations. With that we have a core set of base views. Most of the views work most of the time. Right now we end up copying existing views for each new solution and modifying as needed. This ends up with 95% of the views being the same between clients and 5% changed.
What I want to do take a base set of views, compile them into a DLL and re-use it across clients. So far I have that working well using RazorGenerator.
Now the next step is to allow for customization (overrides) of views. There is a caveat though. Our application has two "modes" that a user is in. The mode they are in could require a different view.
I have created a derived class from the RazorGeneratorView. This view basically inspects the "OrderingMode" from a UserProfile object that Autofac resolves. Based on the mode - the Path Locator is replaced for the view resolution.
The idea being individual client applications will attempt to resolve the view first in the traditional Views folder. Only I am adding in a sub-directory of Views/{OrderingMode}/{Controller}/{View}.cshtml.
If the view is not found - then it will look in the compiled library (the core views).
This allows me to override individual views / partials as need be for clients.
public PosViewEngine() : base()
{
//{0} = View Name
//{1} = ControllerName
//{2} = Area Name
AreaViewLocationFormats = new[]
{
//First look in the hosting application area folder / Views / ordering type
//Areas/{AreaName}/{OrderType}/{ControllerName}/{ViewName}.cshtml
"Areas/{2}/Views/%1/{1}/{0}.cshtml",
//Next look in the hosting application area folder / Views / ordering type / Shared
//Areas/{AreaName}/{OrderType}/{ControllerName}/{ViewName}.cshtml
"Areas/{2}/Views/%1/Shared/(0}.cshtml",
//Finally look in the IMS.POS.Web.Views.Core assembly
"Areas/{2}/Views/{1}/{0}.cshtml"
};
//Same format logic
AreaMasterLocationFormats = AreaViewLocationFormats;
AreaPartialViewLocationFormats = new[]
{
//First look in the hosting application area folder / Views / ordering type
//Areas/{AreaName}/{OrderType}/{ControllerName}/Partials/{PartialViewName}.cshtml
"Areas/{2}/Views/%1/{1}/Paritals/{0}.cshtml",
//Next look in the hosting application area folder / Views / ordering type / Shared
//Areas/{AreaName}/{OrderType}/{ControllerName}/{ViewName}.cshtml
"Areas/{2}/Views/%1/Shared/(0}.cshtml",
//Finally look in the IMS.POS.Web.Views.Core
"Areas/{2}/Views/{1}/{0}.cshtml"
};
ViewLocationFormats = new[]
{
"Views/%1/{1}/{0}.cshtml",
"Views/%1/Shared/{0}.cshtml",
"Views/{1}/{0}.cshtml",
"Views/Shared/{0}.cshtml"
};
MasterLocationFormats = ViewLocationFormats;
PartialViewLocationFormats = new[]
{
"Views/%1/{1}/Partials/{0}.cshtml",
"Views/%1/Shared/{0}.cshtml",
"Views/{1}/Partials/{0}.cshtml",
"Views/Shared/{0}.cshtml"
};
}
protected override IView CreatePartialView(ControllerContext controllerContext, string partialPath)
{
return base.CreatePartialView(controllerContext, partialPath.ReplaceOrderType(CurrentOrderingMode()));
}
protected override IView CreateView(ControllerContext controllerContext, string viewPath, string masterPath)
{
OrderType orderType = CurrentOrderingMode();
return base.CreateView(controllerContext, viewPath.ReplaceOrderType(orderType), masterPath.ReplaceOrderType(orderType));
}
protected override bool FileExists(ControllerContext controllerContext, string virtualPath)
{
return base.FileExists(controllerContext, virtualPath.Replace("%1/",string.Empty));
}
private OrderType CurrentOrderingMode()
{
OrderType result;
_profileService = DependencyResolver.Current.GetService<IUserProfileService>();
if (_profileService == null || _profileService.OrderingType == 0)
{
IApplicationSettingService settingService =
DependencyResolver.Current.GetService<IApplicationSettingService>();
result =
settingService.GetApplicationSetting(ApplicationSettings.DefaultOrderingMode)
.ToEnumTypeOf<OrderType>();
}
else
{
result = _profileService.OrderingType;
}
return result;
}
}
Here is the StartUp class RazorGenerator uses to Register the ViewEngine.
public static class RazorGeneratorMvcStart
{
public static void Start()
{
var engine = new PrecompiledMvcEngine(typeof(RazorGeneratorMvcStart).Assembly)
{
UsePhysicalViewsIfNewer = HttpContext.Current.Request.IsLocal
};
ViewEngines.Engines.Insert(0, engine);
// StartPage lookups are done by WebPages.
VirtualPathFactoryManager.RegisterVirtualPathFactory(engine);
}
}
The problem is:
This code is executed last (after I register the PosViewEngine) and it inserts the engine at the first position (meaning this is the engine that gets resolved 1st when serving up responses). This ends up finding a view - it is the core view.
If I change the code in the StartUp to Register my custom view engine first first and then the RazorGenerator engine
public static void Start()
{
var engine = new PrecompiledMvcEngine(typeof(RazorGeneratorMvcStart).Assembly)
{
UsePhysicalViewsIfNewer = HttpContext.Current.Request.IsLocal
};
ViewEngines.Engines.Clear();
ViewEngines.Engines.Insert(0, new PosViewEngine());
ViewEngines.Engines.Insert(1, engine);
// StartPage lookups are done by WebPages.
VirtualPathFactoryManager.RegisterVirtualPathFactory(engine);
}
I end up with an exception on the FileExists(ControllerContext controllerContext, string virtualPath) method - "The relative virtual path 'Views/Account/LogOn.cshtml' is not allowed here."
It obviously has something to do with both physical and virtual paths being mixed together.
It looks like someone else was trying to do the same thing here but I didn't see an answer on this.
For anyone else wanting to try this approach I'll post the answer. Basically you need to implement a custom view engine that derives from the PrecompiledMvcEngine found in the RazorGenerator assembly.
public class PosPrecompileEngine : PrecompiledMvcEngine
{
private IUserProfileService _profileService;
public PosPrecompileEngine(Assembly assembly) : base(assembly)
{
LocatorConfig();
}
public PosPrecompileEngine(Assembly assembly, string baseVirtualPath) : base(assembly, baseVirtualPath)
{
LocatorConfig();
}
public PosPrecompileEngine(Assembly assembly, string baseVirtualPath, IViewPageActivator viewPageActivator) : base(assembly, baseVirtualPath, viewPageActivator)
{
LocatorConfig();
}
protected override IView CreatePartialView(ControllerContext controllerContext, string partialPath)
{
return base.CreatePartialView(controllerContext, partialPath.ReplaceOrderType(CurrentOrderingMode()));
}
protected override IView CreateView(ControllerContext controllerContext, string viewPath, string masterPath)
{
OrderType orderType = CurrentOrderingMode();
return base.CreateView(controllerContext, viewPath.ReplaceOrderType(orderType), masterPath.ReplaceOrderType(orderType));
}
protected override bool FileExists(ControllerContext controllerContext, string virtualPath)
{
return base.FileExists(controllerContext, virtualPath.ReplaceOrderType(CurrentOrderingMode()));
}
}
In this class - I override the Locator Paths. Because I have the "base" compiled views in another assembly from the web application - we implemented a convention where the view engine will first look in a PosViews/{ordering mode}/{controller}/{view} path in the web application. If a view is not located -then it will look in the traditional /Views/controller/view. The trick here is the later is a virtual path located in another class library.
This allowed us to "override" an existing view for the application.
private void LocatorConfig()
{
//{0} = View Name
//{1} = ControllerName
//{2} = Area Name
AreaViewLocationFormats = new[]
{
//First look in the hosting application area folder / Views / ordering type
//Areas/{AreaName}/{OrderType}/{ControllerName}/{ViewName}.cshtml
"PosAreas/{2}/Views/%1/{1}/{0}.cshtml",
//Next look in the hosting application area folder / Views / ordering type / Shared
//Areas/{AreaName}/{OrderType}/{ControllerName}/{ViewName}.cshtml
"PosAreas/{2}/Views/%1/Shared/(0}.cshtml",
//Next look in the POS Areas Shared
"PosAreas/{2}/Views/Shared/(0}.cshtml",
//Finally look in the IMS.POS.Web.Views.Core assembly
"Areas/{2}/Views/{1}/{0}.cshtml"
};
//Same format logic
AreaMasterLocationFormats = AreaViewLocationFormats;
AreaPartialViewLocationFormats = new[]
{
//First look in the hosting application area folder / Views / ordering type
//Areas/{AreaName}/{OrderType}/{ControllerName}/Partials/{PartialViewName}.cshtml
"PosAreas/{2}/Views/%1/{1}/Partials/{0}.cshtml",
//Next look in the hosting application area folder / Views / ordering type / Shared
//Areas/{AreaName}/{OrderType}/{ControllerName}/{ViewName}.cshtml
"PosAreas/{2}/Views/%1/Shared/(0}.cshtml",
//Next look in the hosting application shared folder
"PosAreas/{2}/Views/Shared/(0}.cshtml",
//Finally look in the IMS.POS.Web.Views.Core
"Areas/{2}/Views/{1}/{0}.cshtml"
};
ViewLocationFormats = new[]
{
"~/PosViews/%1/{1}/{0}.cshtml",
"~/PosViews/%1/Shared/{0}.cshtml",
"~/PosViews/Shared/{0}.cshtml",
"~/Views/{1}/{0}.cshtml",
"~/Views/Shared/{0}.cshtml"
};
MasterLocationFormats = ViewLocationFormats;
PartialViewLocationFormats = new[]
{
"~/PosViews/%1/{1}/{0}.cshtml",
"~/PosViews/%1/Shared/{0}.cshtml",
"~/PosViews/Shared/{0}.cshtml",
"~/Views/{1}/{0}.cshtml",
"~/Views/Shared/{0}.cshtml"
};
}
Register this engine in your application start up events.
public static void Configure()
{
var engine = new PosPrecompileEngine(typeof(ViewEngineConfig).Assembly)
{
UsePhysicalViewsIfNewer = true,
PreemptPhysicalFiles = true
};
ViewEngines.Engines.Add(engine);
// StartPage lookups are done by WebPages.
VirtualPathFactoryManager.RegisterVirtualPathFactory(engine);
}
Here is the final key. When RazorGenerator gets installed view NuGet - you end up with this start-up class that will run on startup
[assembly: WebActivatorEx.PostApplicationStartMethod(typeof(Views.Core.RazorGeneratorMvcStart), "Start")]
public static class RazorGeneratorMvcStart
{
public static void Start()
{
var engine = new PrecompiledMvcEngine(typeof(RazorGeneratorMvcStart).Assembly)
{
UsePhysicalViewsIfNewer = true,
PreemptPhysicalFiles = true
};
ViewEngines.Engines.Add(engine);
// StartPage lookups are done by WebPages.
VirtualPathFactoryManager.RegisterVirtualPathFactory(engine);
}
}
By default - RazorGenerator adds ViewEngine to the first in the collection
ViewEngines.Engines.Insert(0,engine);
You need to change that to an add
ViewEngines.Engines.Add(engine);
So it is added to engines last - this way your custom ViewEngine is used FIRST in locating views.
This approach allows you to reuse views in multiple applications while allowing a means to override that view.
This may be overkill for most applications - bust as I mentioned in the question - this is base product that we use to develop multiple client applications. Trying achieve reuse while maintaining a level of flexibility on a per client basis is something we were trying to achieve.
I've had a MVC 4 / Entity web project dropped into my lap, and I've never used either before. I'm getting through it but the simple things are really tripping me up - Like hiding or displaying a link in my layout based on a parameter in the database.
I created a function in my HomeController that simply sets 2 bools in the ViewBag for whether or not a person is a manager or superuser. I call that function using
#Html.Action("SetupViewBag", "Home")
which sits right after the <body> tag in my layout. Here is the code for SetupViewBag:
public void SetupViewBag()
{
ViewBag.IsManager = ADAccess.IsManager(SessionManager.GetUserName());
ViewBag.IsSuper = SessionManager.SuperUser();
}
The bools are set properly and in the right order when I set up break points, but when I try to access them using the below code, I get a 'Cannot convert null to 'bool' because it is a non-nullable value type.'
#{
if((bool)#ViewBag.IsManager){
<li>#Html.ActionLink("Management", "Management", "Home",null, new { id = "managementLink" })</li>
}
}
There has to be something really simple I'm missing. Any help is greatly appreciated.
Based on your comment, #Dakine83, you should setup your ViewBag on the controller constructor method like so:
public class YourController : BaseController {
public YourController(){
}
}
The reason for that is because the Layout page is already rendered the time your action method has been called. The reason you have a null ViewBag.IsManager.
UPDATE: Use a base controller
public class BaseController : Controller {
public BaseController() {
ViewBag.IsManager = ADAccess.IsManager(SessionManager.GetUserName());
}
}
i hope this might work for you,please try it once
#Html.ActionLink("Management", "Management", "Home", new { id = false }, null);
Thanks