Below is my Postgres table:
Table:
+------+-----------------+---------+
| sku | properties | value |
|------+-----------------+---------|
| 1 | Family_ID | 21 |
| 1 | Class_ID | 21 |
| 2 | Family_ID | 20 |
| 2 | Class_ID | 21 |
| 3 | Family_ID | 21 |
| 3 | Class_ID | 21 |
+------+-----------------+---------+
How to query if I want to fetch data where the Family_ID and Class_ID is 21.
The expected return value:
+------+-----------------+---------+
| sku | properties | value |
|------+-----------------+---------|
| 1 | Family_ID | 21 |
| 1 | Class_ID | 21 |
| 3 | Family_ID | 21 |
| 3 | Class_ID | 21 |
+------+-----------------+---------+
How to query if I want to fetch data where the Family_ID is 20 and Class_ID is 21.
The expected return value:
+------+-----------------+---------+
| sku | properties | value |
|------+-----------------+---------|
| 2 | Family_ID | 20 |
| 2 | Class_ID | 21 |
+------+-----------------+---------+
This query:
select sku
from tablename
group by sku
having
max(case when properties = 'Family_ID' then value end) = 21
and
max(case when properties = 'Class_ID' then value end) = 21
returns all the skus that satisfy your conditions and you can use it with the operator IN like this:
select * from tablename
where sku in (
select sku
from tablename
group by sku
having
max(case when properties = 'Family_ID' then value end) = 21
and
max(case when properties = 'Class_ID' then value end) = 21
)
You could also use MAX() window function:
select t.sku, t.properties, t.value
from (
select *,
max(case when properties = 'Family_ID' then value end) over (partition by sku) family_id,
max(case when properties = 'Class_ID' then value end) over (partition by sku) class_id
from tablename
) t
where t.family_id = 21 and t.class_id = 21
See the demo.
Results:
> sku | properties | value
> --: | :--------- | ----:
> 1 | Family_ID | 21
> 1 | Class_ID | 21
> 3 | Family_ID | 21
> 3 | Class_ID | 21
To operate across rows you need to group, but the easiest thing here (given that you seem like you will want ever more variations of this theme) is probably to pivot your data:
WITH x as(
SELECT f.sku, c.value as class_value, f.value as family_value
FROM
(select sku, value FROM table WHERE properties = 'family_id') f
INNER JOIN
(select sku, value FROM table WHERE properties = 'class_id') c
ON f.sku = c.sku
)
You can now use a WHERE clause like normal:
SELECT * FROM x WHERE family_value = 20 and class_value = 21
If you need the data back in a column format, you can unpivot it again:
SELECT
sku,
'family_id' as properties,
family_value as value
FROM
x
UNION ALL
SELECT
sku,
'class_id' as properties,
class_value as value
FROM
x
But it might be easier to just work with the data in its pivoted form.
I wouldn't necessarily do this myself, but its a lot easier to understand this form of pivoting if you're used to regular joining, union and other similar "typical" database operations, so I'm recommending this as you may well find it easier to maintain and extend. Conditional aggregation to do a pivot is potentially more efficient but more complex to maintain:
WITH X as (
SELECT
sku,
MAX(CASE WHEN properties = 'Family_ID' THEN value END) as family_value,
MAX(CASE WHEN properties = 'Class_ID' THEN value END) as class_value
FROM
table
GROUP BY sku
)
The CASE WHENs spread the values across columns according to the properties value. The group by/max then collapse the rows removing the nulls leaving you with a unique sku and the values in named columns according to what kind of value they are
--case 1
select *
from tbl t
where exists (select *
from tbl t1
where t1.sku=t.sku
and t1.properties='Family_ID'
and t1.value=21)
and exists (select *
from tbl t1
where t1.sku=t.sku
and t1.properties='Class_ID'
and t1.value=21)
--case 2
select *
from tbl t
where exists (select *
from tbl t1
where t1.sku=t.sku
and t1.properties='Family_ID'
and t1.value=20)
and exists (select *
from tbl t1
where t1.sku=t.sku
and t1.properties='Class_ID'
and t1.value=21)
Related
I have a table:
| id | Number |Address
| -----| ------------|-----------
| 1 | 0 | NULL
| 1 | 1 | NULL
| 1 | 2 | 50
| 1 | 3 | NULL
| 2 | 0 | 10
| 3 | 1 | 30
| 3 | 2 | 20
| 3 | 3 | 20
| 4 | 0 | 75
| 4 | 1 | 22
| 4 | 2 | 30
| 5 | 0 | NULL
I need to get: the NUMBER of the last ADDRESS change for each ID.
I wrote this select:
select dh.id, dh.number from table dh where dh =
(select max(min(t.history)) from table t where t.id = dh.id group by t.address)
But this select not correctly handling the case when the address first changed, and then changed to the previous value. For example id=1: group by return:
| Number |
| -------- |
| NULL |
| 50 |
I have been thinking about this select for several days, and I will be happy to receive any help.
You can do this using row_number() -- twice:
select t.id, min(number)
from (select t.*,
row_number() over (partition by id order by number desc) as seqnum1,
row_number() over (partition by id, address order by number desc) as seqnum2
from t
) t
where seqnum1 = seqnum2
group by id;
What this does is enumerate the rows by number in descending order:
Once per id.
Once per id and address.
These values are the same only when the value is 1, which is the most recent address in the data. Then aggregation pulls back the earliest row in this group.
I answered my question myself, if anyone needs it, my solution:
select * from table dh1 where dh1.number = (
select max(x.number)
from (
select
dh2.id, dh2.number, dh2.address, lag(dh2.address) over(order by dh2.number asc) as prev
from table dh2 where dh1.id=dh2.id
) x
where NVL(x.address, 0) <> NVL(x.prev, 0)
);
I have the following data in a table, this is a single column shown from a table that has multiple columns, but only data from this column needs to be pulled into two column output using a query:
+----------------+--+
| DataText | |
| 1 DEC20 DDD | |
| 1 JUL20 DDD | |
| 1 JAN21 DDD | |
| 1 JUN20 DDD500 | |
| 1 JUN20 DDD500 | |
| 1 JUN20DDDD500 | |
| 1 JUN20DDDD500 | |
| 1 JUL20 DDD800 | |
| 1 JUL20 DDD800 | |
| 1 JUL20DDDD800 | |
| 1 JUL20DDDD400 | |
| 1 JUL20DDDD400 | |
+----------------+--+
Required result: distinct values based on the first 13 characters of the data, split into two columns based on "long data", and "short data", BUT only giving the first 13 characters in output for both columns:
+-------------+-------------+
| ShortData | LongData |
| 1 DEC20 DDD | 1 JUN20 DDD |
| 1 JUL20 DDD | 1 JUN20DDDD |
| 1 JAN21 DDD | 1 JUL20 DDD |
| | 1 JUL20DDDD |
+-------------+-------------+
Something like:
Select
(Select DISTINCT LEFT(DataText,13)
From myTable)
Where LEN(DataText)=13) As ShortData
,
(Select DISTINCT LEFT(DataText,13)
From myTable)
Where LEN(DataText)>13) As LongData
I would also like to query/"scan" the table only once if possible. I can't get any of the SO examples modified to make such a query work.
This is quite ugly, but doable. As a starter, you need a column that defines the order of the rows - I assumed that you have such a column, and that is called id.
Then you can select the distinct texts, put them in separate groups depending on their length, and finally pivot:
select
max(case when grp = 0 then dataText end) shortData,
max(case when grp = 1 then dataText end) longData
from (
select
dataText,
grp,
row_number() over(partition by grp order by id) rn
from (
select
id,
case when len(dataText) <= 13 then 0 else 1 end grp,
substring(dataText, 1, 13) dataText
from (select min(id) id, dataText from mytable group by dataText) t
) t
) t
group by rn
If you are content with ordering the records by the string column itself, it is a bit simpler (and, for your sample data, it produces the same results):
select
max(case when grp = 0 then dataText end) shortData,
max(case when grp = 1 then dataText end) longData
from (
select
dataText,
grp,
row_number() over(partition by grp order by dataText) rn
from (
select distinct
case when len(dataText) <= 13 then 0 else 1 end grp,
substring(dataText, 1, 13) dataText
from mytable
) t
) t
group by rn
Demo on DB Fiddle:
shortData | longData
:---------- | :------------
1 DEC20 DDD | 1 JUL20 DDD80
1 JAN21 DDD | 1 JUL20DDDD40
1 JUL20 DDD | 1 JUL20DDDD80
null | 1 JUN20 DDD50
null | 1 JUN20DDDD50
Consider the following dataset:
+---------------------+
| ID | NAME | VALUE |
+---------------------+
| 1 | a | 0.2 |
| 1 | b | 8 |
| 1 | c | 3.5 |
| 1 | d | 2.2 |
| 2 | b | 4 |
| 2 | c | 0.5 |
| 2 | d | 6 |
| 3 | a | 2 |
| 3 | b | 4 |
| 3 | c | 3.6 |
| 3 | d | 0.2 |
+---------------------+
I'm tying to develop a sql select statement that returns the top or distinct ID where NAME 'a' and 'b' both exist and both of the corresponding VALUE's are >= '1'. Thus, the desired output would be:
+---------------------+
| ID | NAME | VALUE |
+---------------------+
| 3 | a | 2 |
+----+-------+--------+
Appreciate any assistance anyone can provide.
You can try to use MIN window function and some condition to make it.
SELECT * FROM (
SELECT *,
MIN(CASE WHEN NAME = 'a' THEN [value] end) OVER(PARTITION BY ID) aVal,
MIN(CASE WHEN NAME = 'b' THEN [value] end) OVER(PARTITION BY ID) bVal
FROM T
) t1
WHERE aVal >1 and bVal >1 and aVal = [Value]
sqlfiddle
This seems like a group by and having query:
select id
from t
where name in ('a', 'b')
having count(*) = 2 and
min(value) >= 1;
No subqueries or joins are necessary.
The where clause filters the data to only look at the "a" and "b" records. The count(*) = 2 checks that both exist. If you can have duplicates, then use count(distinct name) = 2.
Then, you want the minimum value to be 1, so that is the final condition.
I am not sure why your desired results have the "a" row, but if you really want it, you can change the select to:
select id, 'a' as name,
max(case when name = 'a' then value end) as value
you can use in and sub-query
select top 1 * from t
where t.id in
(
select id from t
where name in ('a','b')
group by id
having sum(case when value>1 then 1 else 0)>=2
)
order by id
I've got a table TABLE1 like this:
|--------------|--------------|--------------|
| POS | TYPE | VOLUME |
|--------------|--------------|--------------|
| 1 | A | 34 |
| 2 | A | 2 |
| 1 | A | 12 |
| 3 | B | 200 |
| 4 | C | 1 |
|--------------|--------------|--------------|
I want to get something like this (TABLE2):
|--------------|--------------|--------------|--------------|--------------|
| POS | Amount_A | Amount_B | Amount_C | Sum_Volume |
|--------------|--------------|--------------|--------------|--------------|
| 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 46 |
| 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 200 |
| 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
|--------------|--------------|--------------|--------------|--------------|
My Code so far is:
SELECT
(SELECT COUNT(TYPE)
FROM TABLE1
WHERE TYPE = 'A') AS [Amount_A]
,(SELECT COUNT(TYPE)
FROM TABLE1
WHERE TYPE = 'B') AS [Amount_B]
,(SELECT COUNT(TYPE)
FROM TABLE1
WHERE TYPE = 'C') AS [Amount_C]
,(SELECT SUM(VOLUME)
FROM TABLE AS [Sum_Volume]
INTO [TABLE2]
Now two Questions:
How can I include the distinction concerning POS?
Is there any better way to count each TYPE?
I am using MSSQLServer.
What you're looking for is to use GROUP BY, along with your Aggregate functions. So, this results in:
USE Sandbox;
GO
CREATE TABLE Table1 (Pos tinyint, [Type] char(1), Volume smallint);
INSERT INTO Table1
VALUES (1,'A',34 ),
(2,'A',2 ),
(1,'A',12 ),
(3,'B',200),
(4,'C',1 );
GO
SELECT Pos,
COUNT(CASE WHEN [Type] = 'A' THEN [Type] END) AS Amount_A,
COUNT(CASE WHEN [Type] = 'B' THEN [Type] END) AS Amount_B,
COUNT(CASE WHEN [Type] = 'C' THEN [Type] END) AS Amount_C,
SUM(Volume) As Sum_Volume
FROM Table1 T1
GROUP BY Pos;
DROP TABLE Table1;
GO
if you have a variable, and undefined, number of values for [Type], then you're most likely going to need to use Dynamic SQL.
your first column should be POS, and you'll GROUP BY POS.
This will give you one row for each POS value, and aggregate (COUNT and SUM) accordingly.
You can also use CASE statements instead of subselects. For instance, instead of:
(SELECT COUNT(TYPE)
FROM TABLE1
WHERE TYPE = 'A') AS [Amount_A]
use:
COUNT(CASE WHEN TYPE = 'A' then 1 else NULL END) AS [Amount_A]
I have this table :
+------+-------+------------------------------------+
| id | rev | class |
+------+-------+------------------------------------+
| 1 | 10 | 2 |
| 1 | 10 | 5 |
| 2 | 40 | 6 |
| 2 | 50 | 6 |
| 2 | 52 | 1 |
| 3 | 33 | 3 |
| 3 | 63 | 5 |
+------+-------+------------------------------------+
I only need the rows where rev AND then class columns have max value.
+------+-------+------------------------------------+
| id | rev | class |
+------+-------+------------------------------------+
| 1 | 10 | 5 |
| 2 | 52 | 1 |
| 3 | 63 | 5 |
+------+-------+------------------------------------+
Query cost is important for me.
Just the rows that satisfy the condition that it has both max values?
Here's an SQL Fiddle;
SELECT h.id, h.rev, h.class
FROM ( SELECT id,
MAX( rev ) rev,
MAX( class ) class
FROM Herp
GROUP BY id ) derp
INNER JOIN Herp h
ON h.rev = derp.rev
AND h.class = derp.class;
The fastest way might be to have an index on t(id, rev) and t(id, class) and then do:
select t.*
from table t
where not exists (select 1
from table t2
where t2.id = t.id and t2.rev > t.rev
) and
not exists (select 1
from table t2
where t2.id = t.id and t2.class > t.class
);
SQL Server is pretty smart in terms of optimization, so the aggregation approach might be just as good. However, in terms of performance, this is just a bunch of index lookups.
Here is a SQL 2012 example. Very straight forward with the implied table and the PARTITION function.
Basically, with each ID as a partition/group, sort the values of the other fields in a descending order assigning each one an incrementing RowId, then only take the first one.
select id, rev, [class]
from
(
SELECT id, rev, [class],
ROW_NUMBER() OVER(PARTITION BY id ORDER BY rev DESC, [class] desc) AS RowId
FROM sample
) t
where RowId = 1
Here is the SQL Fiddle
Keep in mind, this works with the criteria in the example dataset, and not the MAX of two fields as stated in the question's title.
I guess you mean: the max of rev and the max of class. If not, please clarify what to do when there is no row where both fields have the highest value.
select id
, max(rev)
, max(class)
from table
group
by id
If you mean total value of rev and class use this:
select id
, max
, rev
from table
where id in
( select id
, max(rev + class)
from table
group
by id
)