Recently, I have been working on converting date suffixed tables into partitioned tables using ingestion time. However, in partition tables, how do we know whether certain date contains no data or the table was not created successfully?
Here is more details,
Previously, daily tables were created, but it is OK that some tables were empty because no result met the criteria. For example,
daily_table_20200601 (100 rows)
daily_table_20200602 (0 rows)
daily_table_20200603 (10 rows)
In this case, I can see table daily_table_20200602 exists, so I know my scheduled job runs successfully.
When switching to partitioned tables using ingestion time, I am writing into the table daily_table every day, for example,
daily_table$20200601 (100 rows)
daily_table$20200602 (0 rows)
daily_table$20200603 (10 rows)
But how do we know the whether table daily_table$20200602 was created successfully or it is just empty?
Also, there is something interesting. I am using API to check whether partition table exist, see the following code,
dataset_ref = client.dataset('dataset_name')
table_ref = dataset_ref.table("daily_table$20210101")
client.get_table(table_ref)
The result shows the table exist. So are we able to check whether the certain date table exist or not?
there's no separate (date table) for every partition, because the partitioning doesn't create a separate partition table, it's similar to relational database partitioning
ingestion time partitioning method adds a pseudo columns for day partitioning (_PARTITIONTIME,_PARTITIONDATE) and for hourly partitioning (_PARTITIONTIME) which will contains the timestamp of the beginning of the insertion data or hour and partition the table accordingly,
for this code:
dataset_ref = client.dataset('dataset_name')
table_ref = dataset_ref.table("daily_table$20210101")
client.get_table(table_ref)
This will success as long as the partitioned table exists
Related
I have an external hive table, partitioned on the date column. Each date has multiple AB test experiment’s data.
I need to create a job that drops experiments which have ended more than 6 months ago.
Since dropping data in an external hive partitioned table, drops the entire partition. In this case, data for one whole date. Is there a way to only drop part of a date?
I have schedule query which runs hourly I want to partition the table hourly so in the destinaltion I have provided this mytable_{run_time|"%Y%m%d%H"}, but this is creating a new table for every run in my BigQuery datasets , when I change the destination to mytable_{run_time|"%Y%m%d"}, it's partition the data correctly based on date
How to enable hourly partition in big query ?
What you are doing is aligned to table sharding, which you can do but it is not as performant and involves more management. In theory it acts similarly to a partition but is not the same. What you are likely seeing when you use the format mytable_{run_time|"%Y%m%d"} is that you're inserting multiple hours into the same day, and depending on what your table definition is may be partitioned within a single day.
You will want to define the partition in the creation of the table see below:
https://cloud.google.com/bigquery/docs/creating-partitioned-tables#create_a_time-unit_column-partitioned_table
I want to create such table:
CREATE TABLE sometable
(SELECT columns, columns, date_col)
PARTITIONED BY date_col
And I want it to be date partitioned with the date in table suffix: sometable$date_partition
I read the docs, but can't complete this neither with web UI nor with SQL.
The web UI shows such error "Missing argument for parameter DATE."
My table name is "daily_export_${DATE}"
My partitioning column isn't blank, it's date_col.
Can I have a simple example, please?
PARTITION BY goes earlier
The query needs to parse the table suffix into a DATE type.
For example:
CREATE OR REPLACE TABLE temp.so
PARTITION BY date_from_table_name
AS
SELECT PARSE_DATE('%Y%m%d', _table_suffix) date_from_table_name, event_timestamp, event_name, items
FROM `bingo-blast-174dd.analytics_151321511.events_*`
WHERE _table_suffix BETWEEN '20200530' AND '20200531'
LIMIT 10
As you can see in this documentation, BigQuery implements two different concepts: sharded tables and partitioned tables
The first one (sharded tables) is a way of dividing a whole table into many tables with a date suffix. You can query those tables individually or using wildcards. For example, instead of creating a single table named events, you can create many tables named events_20200101, events_20200102, [...]
When you do that, you are able to query any of those tables individually or you can query all of them by running some query like select * from events_*
The second concept (partitioned tables) is an approach to fragment your table in smaller pieces in order to improve the performance and reduce costs when querying data. Partitioned tables can be based on some column of your table or even on the ingestion time. When you table is partitioned by ingestion time you can access a pseudo column named _PARTITIONTIME
When comparing both approaches, the documentation says:
Date/timestamp partitioned tables perform better than tables sharded
by date. When you create date-named tables, BigQuery must maintain a
copy of the schema and metadata for each date-named table. Also, when
date-named tables are used, BigQuery might be required to verify
permissions for each queried table. This practice also adds to query
overhead and impacts query performance. The recommended best practice
is to use date/timestamp partitioned tables instead of date-sharded
tables.
In your case, you basically need to create a partitioned table without a date in its name.
Keep history data onto a partitioned table
Team,
I have scenario here - I have 2 tables - one is non partitioned and another one is partitioned table partition on one date field.
Have loaded the data from non-partitioned tables to a partitioned table and I have set the below parameter to load onto partition table.
write.partitionBy(“date”) \
.format(“orc”) \
.mode(“overwrite”) \
.saveAsTable(“schema.table1”)
Now both table count match which has 3 years of data. Which is as expected.
now I have refreshed only latest one year of data and try to load the partitioned table but it got loaded only with 1 year data, where as I need all 3 years data in the partitioned table.
What am I missing here.. I have to refresh only 1 year of data and load it to the partition table and keep building history.
Kindly suggest. Thanks
write.partitionBy(“date”)
.format(“orc”)
.mode(“overwrite”)
.saveAsTable(“schema.table1”)
Need to keep history with latest data refresh on each day basis.
My question is about table partitioning in SQL Server 2008.
I have a program that loads data into a table every 10 mins or so. Approx 40 million rows per day.
The data is bcp'ed into the table and needs to be able to be loaded very quickly.
I would like to partition this table based on the date the data is inserted into the table. Each partition would contain the data loaded in one particular day.
The table should hold the last 50 days of data, so every night I need to drop any partitions older than 50 days.
I would like to have a process that aggregates data loaded into the current partition every hour into some aggregation tables. The summary will only ever run on the latest partition (since all other partitions will already be summarised) so it is important it is partitioned on insert_date.
Generally when querying the data, the insert date is specified (or multiple insert dates). The detailed data is queried by drilling down from the summarised data and as this is summarised based on insert date, the insert date is always specified when querying the detailed data in the partitioned table.
Can I create a default column in the table "Insert_date" that gets a value of Getdate() and then partition on this somehow?
OR
I can create a column in the table "insert_date" and put a hard coded value of today's date.
What would the partition function look like?
Would seperate tables and a partitioned view be better suited?
I have tried both, and even though I think partition tables are cooler. But after trying to teach how to maintain the code afterwards it just wasten't justified. In that scenario we used a hard coded field date field that was in the insert statement.
Now I use different tables ( 31 days / 31 tables ) + aggrigation table and there is an ugly union all query that joins togeather the monthly data.
Advantage. Super timple sql, and simple c# code for bcp and nobody has complained about complexity.
But if you have the infrastructure and a gaggle of .net / sql gurus I would choose the partitioning strategy.