I have some local modules which are inhouse developed and I copy to my node_modules folder manually.
When I do this they work fine but after I install some other stuff via ng add or npm install the folder is removed. My question is how can I prevent this from happening so I don't have to copy the files again ?
You need to specify your dependencies in package.json or else you cannot rely on them being in node_modules. Various npm commands might remove it, notably npm ci but also others.
If your package is not publicly published, some options are:
Use a non-public registry and publish it there.
Publish it as a scoped package with limited visibility. You will need a paid or organization account on npm for this. Individual accounts are US$7 a month.
Use npm link to "install" it from your local file system.
Use a postinstall or other life cycle script to have npm copy in your packages for you each time after npm ci or npm install is run.
There are likely other options, but those are the ones that come to mind immediately.
I know pnpm and yarn reuse modules that we already installed, what, in not updated tutorials that i see, we see that this is something that pnpm and yarn came to fix in npm, which downloaded the modules from the internet every time we install it. This still a thing? Does modern npm save cache or something to speed up installation?
Yes, npm has a cache of package tarballs. It does not download the packages from the internet all the time. In fact, you can verify that by running npm install --offline.
The reason npm is slower than pnpm is because of other reasons:
pnpm uses a content-addressable store. Each file inside the node_modules directory is a hard link to the content-addressable store. This makes pnpm faster and more disk space-efficient.
also, pnpm is running the installation stages separately for every installed package. npm cannot do all these operations concurrently as of the current latest versions (v6 and v7).
There might be other reasons pnpm is faster but these 2 must be the most important ones. npm's cache is not one of the reasons.
I'm working with continuous integration and discovered the npm ci command.
I can't figure what the advantages are of using this command for my workflow.
Is it faster? Does it make the test harder, okay, and after?
From the official documentation for npm ci:
In short, the main differences between using npm install and npm ci are:
The project must have an existing package-lock.json or npm-shrinkwrap.json.
If dependencies in the package lock do not match those in package.json, npm ci will exit with an error, instead of updating the package lock.
npm ci can only install entire projects at a time: individual dependencies cannot be added with this command.
If a node_modules is already present, it will be automatically removed before npm ci begins its install.
It will never write to package.json or any of the package-locks: installs are essentially frozen.
Essentially,
npm install reads package.json to create a list of dependencies and uses package-lock.json to inform which versions of these dependencies to install. If a dependency is not in package-lock.json it will be added by npm install.
npm ci (also known as Clean Install) is meant to be used in automated environments — such as test platforms, continuous integration, and deployment — or, any situation where you want to make sure you're doing a clean install of your dependencies.
It installs dependencies directly from package-lock.json and uses package.json only to validate that there are no mismatched versions. If any dependencies are missing or have incompatible versions, it will throw an error.
Use npm install to add new dependencies, and to update dependencies on a project. Usually, you would use it during development after pulling changes that update the list of dependencies but it may be a good idea to use npm ci in this case.
Use npm ci if you need a deterministic, repeatable build. For example during continuous integration, automated jobs, etc. and when installing dependencies for the first time, instead of npm install.
npm install
Installs a package and all its dependencies.
Dependencies are driven by npm-shrinkwrap.json and package-lock.json (in that order).
without arguments: installs dependencies of a local module.
Can install global packages.
Will install any missing dependencies in node_modules.
It may write to package.json or package-lock.json.
When used with an argument (npm i packagename) it may write to package.json to add or update the dependency.
when used without arguments, (npm i) it may write to package-lock.json to lock down the version of some dependencies if they are not already in this file.
npm ci
Requires at least npm v5.7.1.
Requires package-lock.json or npm-shrinkwrap.json to be present.
Throws an error if dependencies from these two files don't match package.json.
Removes node_modules and install all dependencies at once.
It never writes to package.json or package-lock.json.
Algorithm
While npm ci generates the entire dependency tree from package-lock.json or npm-shrinkwrap.json, npm install updates the contents of node_modules using the following algorithm (source):
load the existing node_modules tree from disk
clone the tree
fetch the package.json and assorted metadata and add it to the clone
walk the clone and add any missing dependencies
dependencies will be added as close to the top as is possible
without breaking any other modules
compare the original tree with the cloned tree and make a list of
actions to take to convert one to the other
execute all of the actions, deepest first
kinds of actions are install, update, remove and move
npm ci will delete any existing node_modules folder and relies on the package-lock.json file to install the specific version of each package. It is significantly faster than npm install because it skips some features. Its clean state install is great for ci/cd pipelines and docker builds! You also use it to install everything all at once and not specific packages.
While everyone else has answered the technical differences none explain in what situations to use both.
You should use them in different situations.
npm install is great for development and in the CI when you want to cache the node_modules directory.
When to use this? You can do this if you are making a package for other people to use (you do NOT include node_modules in such a release). Regarding the caching, be careful, if you plan to support different versions of Node.js remember that node_modules might have to be reinstalled due to differences between the Node.js runtime requirements. If you wish to stick to one version, stick to the latest LTS.
npm ci should be used when you are to test and release a production application (a final product, not to be used by other packages) since it is important that you have the installation be as deterministic as possible, this install will take longer but will ultimately make your application more reliable (you do include node_modules in such a release). Stick with LTS version of Node.js.
npm i and npm ci both utilize the npm cache if it exists, this cache lives normally at ~/.npm.
Also, npm ci respects the package-lock.json file. Unlike npm install, which rewrites the file and always installs new versions.
Bonus: You could mix them depending on how complex you want to make it. On feature branches in git you could cache the node_modules to increase your teams productivity and on the merge request and master branches rely on npm ci for a deterministic outcome.
The documentation you linked had the summary:
In short, the main differences between using npm install and npm ci are:
The project must have an existing package-lock.json or npm-shrinkwrap.json.
If dependencies in the package lock do not match those in package.json, npm ci will exit with an error, instead of updating the package lock.
npm ci can only install entire projects at a time: individual dependencies cannot be added with this command.
If a node_modules is already present, it will be automatically removed before npm ci begins its install.
It will never write to package.json or any of the package-locks: installs are essentially frozen.
The commands are very similar in functionality however the difference is in the approach taken to install the dependencies specified in your package.json and package-lock.json files.
npm ci performs a clean install of all the dependencies of your app whereas npm install may skip some installations if they already exist on the system. A problem may arise if the version already installed on the system isn't the one your package.json intended to install i.e. the installed version is different from the 'required' version.
Other differences would be that npm ci never touches your package*.json files. It will stop installation and show an error if the dependency versions do not match in the package.json and package-lock.json files.
You can read a much better explanation from the official docs here.
Additionally, you may want to read about package locks here.
It is worth having in mind that light node docker images like alpine do not have Python installed which is a dependency of node-gyp which is used by npm ci.
I think it's a bit opinionated that in order to have npm ci working you need to install Python as dependency in your build.
More info here Docker and npm - gyp ERR! not ok
npm ci - install exactly what is listed in package-lock.json
npm install - without changing any versions in package.json, use package.json to create/update package-lock.json, then install exactly what is listed in package-lock.json
npm update - update package.json packages to latest versions, then use package.json to create/update package-lock.json, then install exactly what is listed in package-lock.json
Or said a different way, npm ci changes 0 package files, npm install changes 1 package file, and npm update changes 2 package files.
It does a clean install, use it in situations where you would delete node_modules and re-run npm i.
I have no idea why some people think it's short for "continuous integration". There is an npm install command that can be run as npm i and an npm clean-install command that can be run as npm ci.
npm install is the command used to install the dependencies listed in a project's package.json file, while npm ci is a command that installs dependencies from a package-lock.json or npm-shrinkwrap.json file. The npm ci command is typically used in continuous integration (CI) environments, where the package-lock.json or npm-shrinkwrap.json file is checked into version control and should not be modified. Because npm ci installs dependencies from a locked file, it is a faster and more reliable way to install dependencies than npm install, which could install different versions of dependencies based on the state of the package.json file.
Can someone explain to me what it means to --save-dev and how this impacts distribution and how NPM is aware of what you're trying to do?
First, see the answer to this question, What's the difference between dependencies, devDependencies and peerDependencies.
That will explain a TON.
Second, npm will install devDependencies by default unless one of two things is true, in which case devDependencies will be skipped. These things are:
You explicitly tell npm it's production with npm install --production
You set an environment variable that npm checks, NODE_ENVIRONMENT=production
In general, if you are distributing to something like Heroku, they will have the production flag set and your devDependencies will not be installed. So only install things with the --save-dev or -D flag (both do the same thing) if it is a module used for development, such as tests/mocks/scaffolding/etc.
--save-dev is useful for dependencies such as unit testing libraries. These dependencies are not required by the application to run in production; therefore if you published your package, consumers of your package would not get these dev dependencies in their node_modules folder.
NPM doesn't necessarily know that your in dev mode, it's just a package manager that allows you to install packages into your working directory and publish your own package from said directory.
My project references mocha, phantomjs, etc, which takes a lot of time to download during npm install. This is not a problem in my local machine because I only download them once and can use them forever unless I decide to manually upgrade them.
However, in my CI machine, my jenkins server need to download them every time that I did a git commit and git push to do the testing and deploy.
So can I just speed up that process by set the npm not to download these slow packages from the remote server? Rather, install them from local cache or not to install them if I installed them globally?
Anyone knows how to configure that?
I found some packages that might be helpful
npm-install-changed will run npm install only if the contents of package.json's devDependencies and dependencies were changed, note that it assumes that node_modules persists across different builds which might not be helpful if your CI server always start from scratch
npm-install-cache runs npm install and then copies your current node_modules folder (to somewhere in \tmp), if you call the script again it will verify any changes to package.json (instead of changes done on devDependencies or dependencies), if it didn't change then it will copy the node_modules folder stored in \tmp, the only limitation I see is that it's not cross platform and that the cache folder is \tmp which is erased on reboot (or maybe even when a is process finished!)
The second package might not work as it is but it seems like a good place to start :)
You can specify all of the packages you want to use locally in devDependencies in package.json, and then running npm install -d will install those instead of the main dependencies.