Using SSH ProxyJump with Coda - ssh

I am away from home, and need to proxy jump via my home server to connect to a number of sites.
The settings in .ssh/config work 100% of the time every time when executing from the command line, but coda simply refuses to use these connections.
Host home
Hostname my.home.server
Port 222
ProxyCommand bash -c '/usr/local/bin/knock -v %h $KNOCKS; sleep 1; exec /usr/bin/nc %h %p'
Host host1
Hostname host1.com
User root
Host home-host1
Hostname host1.com
User root
Host home-*
ProxyCommand ssh -W %h:%p home
So If I want to connect via home I:
ssh home-host1 and it jumps through my home to host1
Now this works all the time, every time for ssh via the console, but coda simply wont connect.
In the coda setup I have added home-host1 as the server and tried setting and clearing the user name and port so that just like ssh in a terminal everything comes from the config file.
I have also cleared known_hosts just in case it was caching something from there but no-go.
What am I doing wrong ??

Wow, after a lot more trial and error I succeeded.
coda does not appear to like ProxyJump but it will work with ProxyCommand
Host home-*
ProxyCommand ssh -W %h:%p home

Related

SSH Config ProxyJump - Port forwarding from proxy

i have a question regarding port forwarding in combination with proxy jump in my ssh config:
Is it possible to make use of DynamicForward from the host used as proxy? Here's my config:
Host proxy
HostName proxy.private.com
User user
IdentityFile ~/path/to/file
DynamicForward 3000
Host target
HostName target.somewhere.com
User user
IdentityFile ~/path/to/file
ProxyJump proxy
It does not work with this config, but this would be exactly what i need.
Any tips on how to get it to work?
If there is nothing preventing you from using ProxyCommand you can most likely use this approach:
In your ~/.ssh/config file:
Host target
HostName target.somewhere.com
User target-user
IdentityFile ~/path/to/target-user-file
ProxyCommand ssh -A <proxy-user>#<proxy-host> -i <proxy-user-key> -W %h:%p
DynamicForward 3000
You can then run this command on your local machine:
ssh target -D 3000
I was able to test this by running this command locally and retreiving public IP of the target host:
curl -x socks5h://localhost:3000 https://ifconfig.me/
Usefull links I read:
More details on these use cases can be found here
Detail on this very approach can be found on this site (sadly not in english nor HTTPS)
You can probably define another Host on top to avoid having to mess with ssh parameter each time. This would be done by using CanonicalizeHostname, but I couldn't manage to it. An alias might be more interesting at that point ?

sshfs with two consecutive ssh authentications

with two consecutive ssh authentications I mean the following:
I ssh to remote system A
from remote system A, I ssh to remote system B
There is no way to ssh to B directly.
I have no problems mounting directories from A using sshfs.
I thought about mounting directories from B on A but unfortunately A does not have sshfs installed. Even if, I would not know if it works.
Is there maybe another way to access directories on B in a convenient way?
My ~/.ssh/config looks like this now:
Host A
User user
HostName A.example.com
ControlMaster auto
ControlPath ~/.ssh/%r#%h:%p
Host B
User user
HostName B.example.com
ProxyCommand ssh -W %h:%p A
How would my sshfs command look like?
This does not work:
sshfs -o allow_other,defer_permissions -o user#B.example.com:/somedir ~/somedir
It outputs the error message:
remote host has disconnected
Use ProxyCommand or ProxyJump to do that transparently for the end application (sshfs). For example in ~/.ssh/config
Host A
# other configuration options needed
Host B
ProxyCommand ssh -W %h:%p A
Then you should be able to use sshfs transparently by directly specifying host B.

Connecting to a remote server from local machine via ssh-tunnel

I am running Ansible on my machine. And my machine does not have ssh access to the remote machine. Port 22 connection originating from local machine are blocked by the institute firewall. But I have access to a machine (ssh-tunnel), through which I can login to the remote machine. Now is there a way we can run ansible playbook from local machine on remote hosts.
In a way is it possible to make Ansible/ssh connect to the remote machine, via ssh-tunnel. But not exactly login to ssh-tunnel. The connection will pass through the tunnel.
Other way is I can install ansible on ssh-tunnel, but that is not the desired and run plays from there. But that would not be a desired solution.
Please let me know if this is possible.
There are two ways to achieve this without install the Ansible on the ssh-tunnel machine.
Solution#1:
Use these variables in your inventory:
[remote_machine]
remote ansible_ssh_host=127.0.0.1 ansible_ssh_port=2222 ansible_ssh_user='username' ansible_ssh_private_key_file='/home/user/private_key'
hope you understand above parameters, if need help please ask in comments
Solution#2:
Create ~/.ssh/config file and add the following parameters:
####### Access to the Private Server through ssh-tunnel/bastion ########
Host ssh-tunnel-server
HostName x.x.x.x
StrictHostKeyChecking no
User username
ForwardAgent yes
Host private-server
HostName y.y.y.y
StrictHostKeyChecking no
User username
ProxyCommand ssh -q ssh-tunnel-server nc -q0 %h %p
Hope that help you, if you need any help, feel free to ask
No request to install ansible on the jump and remote servers, ansible is ssh service only tool :-)
First make sure you can work it directly with SSH Tunnel.
On local machine (Local_A), you can login to Remote machine (Remote_B) via jump box (Jump_C).
login server Local_A
ssh -f user#remote_B -L 2000:Jump_C:22 -N
The other options are:
-f tells ssh to background itself after it authenticates, so you don't have to sit around running something on the remote server for the tunnel to remain alive.
-N says that you want an SSH connection, but you don't actually want to run any remote commands. If all you're creating is a tunnel, then including this option saves resources.
-L [bind_address:]port:host:hostport
Specifies that the given port on the local (client) host is to be forwarded to the given host and port on the remote side.
There will be a password challenge unless you have set up DSA or RSA keys for a passwordless login.
There are lots of documents teaching you how to do the ssh tunnel.
Then try below ansible command from Local_A:
ansible -vvvv remote_B -m shell -a 'hostname -f' --ssh-extra-args="-L 2000:Jump_C:22"
You should see the remote_B hostname. Let me know the result.
Let's say you can ssh into x.x.x.x from your local machine, and ssh into y.y.y.y from x.x.x.x, while y.y.y.y is the target of your ansible playbook.
inventory:
[target]
y.y.y.y
playbook.yml
---
- hosts: target
tasks: ...
Run:
ansible-playbook --ssh-common-args="-o ProxyCommand='ssh -W %h:%p root#x.x.x.x'" -i inventory playbook.yml

ssh -F configfile and ProxyCommand

I would like to use a ssh_config file instead of the traditional ~/.ssh/config. I have a simple configuration for accessing hosts through a bastion host (on port 23 for example).
ssh_config :
host bastion
hostname bastion.mydomain.com
port 23
host *.server
proxycommand ssh -W %h:%p bastion
ssh -F ssh_config test.server is not working and throw me "ssh: Could not resolve hostname bastion: Name or service not known".
But, if put this config in ~/.ssh/config, then ssh test.server works.
As I understand it, the proxycommand is unable to use the config file given in the command line.
If I want my command line config file to work, I need to put
proxycommand ssh -W %h:%p bastion.mydomain.com -p 23
but this seems to violate a simple DRY principle (the port and the domain are repeated). The config file I'm willing to build is much much longer and complex.
Is there a good way to achieve what I want, i.e. a simple, non-repeating, config file usable in command line for which proxycommand works ?
Half of an answer:
Rather than using the config file recursively, try not relying on the config at all for the proxy command.
host *.server
proxycommand ssh -W %h:%p bastion.mydomain.com -p 23
This allows it to be portable, but doesn't solve your other issue of having to do this on every line, and makes changing the bastion host address a difficult process.
you need to pass proxycommand ssh -W %h:%p bastion -F [your custom ssh config]

Better way to SSH through multiple machines

I currently have to SSH 3 times to get into the machine I need:
ssh gatekeeper
[passwd1]
ssh master_server
[passwd2]
ssh my_machine
[passwd3]
Is there a better way to do get into my_machine? Pretty cumbersome to have to do it every time.
Nice - this worked:
Host my_machine
Hostname my_machine
ProxyCommand ssh user2#master_server -W %h:%p
ProxyCommand ssh user1#gatekeeper -W %h:%p
I don't really know for 3 SSH, but here is my way for 2 (lets say : me -> master_server -> my_machine).
You need to add a configuration file in your home :
~/.ssh/config
Then you write in that file :
Host my_machine
Hostname my_machine.example.com
ProxyCommand ssh other_or_same_login#master_server -W %h:%p
And you call
ssh login#my_machine
Then you will have to enter twice your password (or 3 times in your case). If you don't want to type passwords, you can use the key access option.
For another ssh, I guess you need to write another section in the config file, but since I can't try I don't wan't to say something wrong.
Hope this helps.