Let's take a very short example of a class like this:
Public Class The_Class1
Public Property ID As Integer
Public Property Property1_Integer As Integer
Public Property Property2_Single As Single
End Class
Somewhere else, I have a dictionary containing instances of The_Class1, like this:
Public Dictionary_Class1 As New Dictionary(Of Integer, The_Class1)
I want to perform an operation over Property1_Integer on all of the members inside Dictionary_Class1. Also, I want to perform the very same operation over Property2_Single, so I would like to create a function to perform such operation, and somehow instruct VB to use a given property on every call.
Can you think of an elegant way to do that?
Edit: Let's say, for example, that the operation that I want to perform is the sum of every Property1_Integer or Property2_Single of the members inside the dictionary. What I really really want to do is to determine if all of the values are the same, or if there is at least one that is different.
You can use Reflection, but it's not as clean as you may imagine. Here's some skeleton code you can adapt to your needs:
Public Class The_Class1
Public Property ID As Integer
Public Property Property1_Integer As Integer
Public Property Property2_Single As Single
End Class
Private Sub SetProperty1_Integer()
Dim myClassInstance As New The_Class1
Dim myType As Type = GetType(The_Class1)
Dim propertyInfo As System.Reflection.PropertyInfo = myType.GetProperty("Property1_Integer")
propertyInfo.SetValue(myClassInstance, 1)
MessageBox.Show(myClassInstance.Property1_Integer.ToString)
End Sub
Have fun!
Related
One of the main problems in VBA are custom data structures and lists.
I have a loop which generates with each iteration multiple values.
So as an example:
Each loop iteration generates a string "name" an integer "price" and an integer "value".
In C# for example I'd create a class which can hold these three values and with each loop iteration I add the class object to a list.
How can I do the same thing in VBA if I want to store multiple sets of data when not knowing how many iterations the loop will have (I cant create an array with a fixed size)
Any ideas?
The approach I use very frequently is to use a class and a collection. I also tend to use an interface model to make things more flexible. An example would look something like this:
Class Module IFoo
Option Explicit
Public Sub Create(ByVal Name as String, ByVal ID as String)
End Property
Public Property Get Name() as String
End Property
Public Property Get ID() as String
End Property
This enforces the pattern I want for my Foo class.
Class Module Foo
Option Explicit
Private Type TFoo
Name as String
ID as String
End Type
Private this as TFoo
Implements IFoo
Private Sub IFoo_Create(ByVal Name as String, ByVal ID as String)
this.Name = Name
this.ID = Name
End Sub
Private Property Get IFoo_Name() as String
IFoo_Name = this.Name
End Property
Private Property Get IFoo_ID() as String
IFoo_ID = this.ID
End Property
We get intellisense from the Private Type TFoo : Private this as TFoo where the former defines the properties of our container, the latter exposes them privately. The Implements IFoo allows us to selectively expose properties. This also allows you to iterate a Collection using an IFoo instead of a Foo. Sounds pointless until you have an Employee and a Manager where IFoo_BaseRate changes depending on employee type.
Then in practice, we have something like this:
Code Module Bar
Public Sub CollectFoo()
Dim AllTheFoos as Collection
Set AllTheFoos = New Collection
While SomeCondition
Dim Foo as IFoo
Set Foo = New Foo
Foo.Create(Name, ID)
AllTheFoos.Add Foo
Loop
For each Foo in AllTheFoos
Debug.Print Foo.Name, Foo.ID
Next
End Sub
While the pattern is super simple once you learn it, you'll find that it is incredibly powerful and scalable if implemented properly. It also can dramatically reduce the amount of copypasta that exists within your code (and thus reduce debug time).
You can use classes in VBA as well as in C#: Class Module Step by Step or A Quick Guide to the VBA Class Module
And to to the problem with the array: you can create an array with dynamic size like this
'Method 1 : Using Dim
Dim arr1() 'Without Size
'somewhere later -> increase a size to 1
redim arr1(UBound(arr1) + 1)
You could create a class - but if all you want to do is hold three bits of data together, I would define a Type structure. It needs to be defines at the top of an ordinary module, after option explicit and before any subs
Type MyType
Name As String
Price As Integer
Value As Integer
End Type
And then to use it
Sub test()
Dim t As MyType
t.Name = "fred"
t.Price = 12
t.Value = 3
End Sub
To avoid getting into the weeds on my particular program, let me just create a simplified case.
I have a generic class that should work on a variety of objects. Each of those objects must implement a certain interface.
What I WANT to say is something like:
Public Interface GenThing
Shared Function thing_name() As String ' This doesn't work! Can't be shared!
Sub FillOne(row As DataRow)
End Interface
public class Thing1
implements GenThing
public shared function thing_name() as string implements GenThing.thing_name
return "thing number one"
end function
public sub FillOne(row as DataRow) implements GenThing.MakeOne
... bunch of work ...
end sub
end class
public class ThingUtil(of T as {GenThing,New})
public function GetList(id as integer) as List(of T)
dim name=T.thing_name() ' This doesn't work!
dim ds as DataSet=GetData(name,id) ' bunch of work here that's the whole point of the class but not relevant to the question
dim my_list = new List(of T)
for each row as DataRow in ds.tables(0).rows
dim my_t = new T()
my_t.FillOne(row)
my_list.add(my_t)
next
return my_list
end function
end class
Do you get my problem? I need every class that implements the interface to have a function that returns a "name" that is used to get the data that is needed to create an instance of the object. But I need to know this name BEFORE I create the instance, because I need it to be able to create the instance. But VB doesn't allow an interface to have a shared function, so what I want to write doesn't work.
So what I've done is this:
I make thing_name not shared.
Then instead of simply "dim name=T.thing_name()", I write
dim dummy = new T()
dim name = dummy.thing_name()
Okay, it works, but it seems really ugly. I create an instance of the object, with all the overhead that that involves, just to get a piece of constant text.
Is there a better way? Or am I making a big deal out of nothing?
Update
I see that two people voted to close this question on the grounds that it is the same as "Why can't we have shared functions in an interface?"
I am not asking why I can't have a shared. I am saying, GIVEN that I can't, how do I solve this particular problem?
There's no really simple way of fixing this, no.
Depending on what thing_name does, however, you might approach things in a different way. If each implementation just returns a constant value, then it's effectively metadata about the class - and could be described in an attribute instead, which can be fetched at execution time. (See Type.GetCustomAttributes.) Unfortunately you can't then enforce all types implementing the interface to be decorated with the attribute - but you could write a unit test to check this pretty easily.
If thing_name needs to really do work at execution time, that's tougher. You could potentially look for a well-known shared method name instead and execute that via reflection (and again have unit tests to check that it's implemented properly).
I realize this is from a few years ago, but running into a similar problem, I wanted to offer a different solution. Pass a delegate as parameter to the ThingUtil constructor. You avoid having to put a shared method in an interface, and the constructor will force you to include the parameter at compile time.
You can add more delegates if needed, or to make it even simpler in this case, just pass name as a string instead of get_name as a delegate.
Define the delegate in the interface:
Public Interface GenThing
Delegate Function ThingNameDelegate() As String
Sub FillOne(row As DataRow)
End Interface
Public Class Thing1
Implements GenThing
Public Shared Function thing_name() As String 'name this whatever you want
Return "thing number one"
End Function
Public Sub FillOne(row As DataRow) Implements GenThing.FillOne
'do stuff
End Sub
End Class
In ThingUtil, add a member to store the delegate, a constructor parameter to to accept, and call it with .Invoke():
Public Class ThingUtil(Of T As {GenThing, New})
Private m_thing_name As GenThing.ThingNameDelegate
Public Sub New(thing_name As GenThing.ThingNameDelegate)
m_thing_name = thing_name
End Sub
Public Function GetList(id As Integer) As List(Of T)
Dim name = m_thing_name.Invoke()
Dim ds As DataSet = GetData(name, id) ' bunch of work here that's the whole point of the class but not relevant to the question
Dim my_list = New List(Of T)
For Each row As DataRow In ds.Tables(0).Rows
Dim my_t = New T()
my_t.FillOne(row)
my_list.Add(my_t)
Next
Return my_list
End Function
End Class
Finally, use it like this:
Dim tu as new ThingUtil(Of Thing1)(AddressOf Thing1.get_name)
tu.GetList(1)
Been working a lot with custom classes lately and I love the power you can have with them but I have come across something that I'm not able to solve and/or find anything helpful online.
I have a list of a class with properties I'm looking to only store information pulled from a database into.
Public Class CustomClass
Public _Values As String
Public _Variables As String
Public ReadOnly Property Values() As String
Get
Return _Values
End Get
End Property
Public ReadOnly Property Variables() As String
Get
Return _Variables
End Get
End Property
Sub New(ByVal values As String, ByVal variables As String)
_Values = values
_Variables = variables
End Sub
End Class
I will be iterating through some database entries, and I'm looking to store them into the appropriate property when I hit them (since I won't have them all available immediately, which is part of my problem). I want to just be able to add either the value or the variable at a time and not both of them, but since I have the sub procedure 'New' passing two arguments, it will always require passing them both. I've found the only way around this is by making them optional fields which I don't feel is the right way to solve this. Is what I'm looking to do possible with a class or would it be simpler by using a structure?
You can overload the constructor:
Friend Class Foo
' using auto-implement props:
Public Property Name As String ' creates a _Name backing field
Public Property Value as Integer
Public Sub New(newN as String, newV as Integer)
' access "hidden" backing fields if you want:
_Name = newN
_Value = newV
End Sub
Public Sub New() ' simple ctor
End Sub
Public Sub New(justName As String)
' via the prop
Name = justName
End Sub
End Class
You now have 3 ways to create the object: with full initialization, partial (name only) or as a blank object. You will often need a "simple constructor" - one with no params - for other purposes: serializers, Collection editors and the like will have no idea how to use the parameterized constructors and will require a simple one.
If rules in the App were that there was no reason for a MyFoo to ever exist unless both Name and Value being defined, implementing only the New(String, Integer) ctor enforces that rule. That is, it is first about the app rules, then about coding convenience.
Dim myFoo As New Foo ' empty one
myFoo.Name = "ziggy" ' we only know part of it
Since the default of string is nothing, you could pass nothing for the value you don't have. IE
Collection.Add(New CustomClass("My Value",Nothing))
Every type has a default, so this works with more than just strings.
The following code
player2.getWeapon.ToString()
returns
'RockPaperScissors.Rock'
OR
'RockPaperScissors.Paper'
OR
'RockPaperScissors.Scissors'
I am just interested in the Class Name, i.e. Rock, Paper or Scissors. How can I achieve this?
Split was what came to my mind but not sure if its the best.
Yes, string.Split seems to be the appropriate way:
Dim tokens As String() = player2.getWeapon.ToString().Split("."c)
Dim className As String = tokens.Last() ' or simply tokens(1) without Linq
But if you can extend your Weapon class with a property that returns it directly i would do that.
ToString is just a regular overridable method defined by the base Object class. Therefore, you can easily override it to make it return whatever you want. For instance:
Public Class Rock
Public Overrides Function ToString() As String
Return "Rock"
End Function
End Class
Or, if you want to force your classes to implement it, you could do it in your base Weapon class, like this:
Public Class Weapon
Public Sub New(weaponName As String)
_weaponName = weaponName
End Sub
Private _weaponName As String
Public Overrides Function ToString() As String
Return _weaponName
End Function
End Class
Public Class Rock
Inherits Weapon
Public Sub New()
MyBase.New("Rock")
End Sub
End Class
Alternatively, if you don't want to require it in the constructor, you could add a protected MustOverride Function GetWeaponName() As String in your base class and then return that from ToString. Either way, the derived classes will be forced to provide the name so that it can be returned in ToString.
The reason I recommend doing it this way is because I suspect you are using this string as a description which is displayed to the user. If that's the case, it's not really the class name that you want, but a description of the weapon. So far, they just happen to be the same, but logically speaking, that's not alway going to be the case. For instance, if you had a class called SuperDuperRock, you aren't going to want to display it like that to the user. Rather, you'd want it to be properly formatted with spaces between the words.
If you really do not wish to use Split() you could use IndexOf (more performant)
Dim className as String
Dim weapon = player2.getWeapon.ToString()
Dim pos as Integer = weapon.IndexOf("."c)
if pos >= 0 Then
className = weapon.Substring(pos + 1)
End if
I have a requirement where I need to have a "type safe" way of accessing property names, without actually instantiating an object to get to the property. To give an example, consider a method that takes as arguments a list of IMyObject and a string that represents a property name (a property that exists in IMyObject).
The methods implementation will take the list and access all the objects in the list using the property name passed... for some reason or another, we won't dwell on that!!
Now, I know that you can do this using an instantiated object, something like ...
Dim x as MyObject = nothing
Dim prop As PropertyInfo = PropHelper.GetProperty(Of MyObject)(Function() x.MyProperty)
Where my helper method uses reflection to get the name of the property as a string - there are numerous examples of this flying around on the web!
But I don't want to have to create this pointless object, I just want to do something like MyObject.MyProperty! Reflection allows you to iterate through a types properties and methods without declaring an object of that type... but I want to access a specific property and retrieve the string version of its name without iteration and without declaring an object of that type!
The main point here is that although I am trying to get the property name as a string... this is done at run time... at compile time, I want this to be type safe so if someone changes the property name, the compilation will break.
Can anyone help in this quest!?!
So here is a quick code-listing to demonstrate the answer that I was looking for:
Imports System.Linq.Expressions
Public Class A
Public Prop1 As String
Public Prop2 As Integer
End Class
Public Class Form1
Public Function GetPropertyNameB(Of TModel, TProperty)(ByVal [property] As Expression(Of Func(Of TModel, TProperty))) As String
Dim memberExpression As MemberExpression = DirectCast([property].Body, MemberExpression)
Return memberExpression.Member.Name
End Function
Public Sub New()
InitializeComponent()
Dim propertyName As String = GetPropertyNameB(Function(myObj As A) myObj.Prop1)
Dim propertyName2 As String = GetPropertyNameB(Function(myObj As A) myObj.Prop2)
MsgBox(propertyName & " | " & propertyName2)
End
End Sub
End Class
You may be able to pass the property in as a simple lamdba expression, and take it in the method as an expression tree. You should be able to analyze the expression tree to get the string name of the property, but it the lambda expression will fail to compile if the property name changes. Check out this page for more details:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb397951.aspx
You can make use of the NameOf function:
Dim fieldName = nameOf(MyClass.MyField)