I want to some changes in jitsi and install from my own repository.
Actually after some changes, i want to install it in many servers with each servers have unique domain.
You can change the front-end with two options :
Option 1 (recommended)
Follow the manual installation documentation and replace «jitsi-meet» component which is in /srv/jitsi-meet
This directory must contain your version of jitsi-meet (you must build the project, follow this step but clone your repository instead official repository)
Option 2 (not recommended)
Follow the quick installation then replace the /usr/share/jitsi-meet
This is the same step but in another directory
Be careful, this option is faster but each update on jisti-meet package (apt) can break your installation and override the /usr/share/jitsi-meet directory
Related
Is it allowed to create local dbt deps repository so that "dbt deps" command should download libraries from local repository?
N.B: Our client is not interested to connect to external network.
Yes this is possible, provided that the repositories have already been locally cloned or copied.
dbt docs's page on Packages tells you exactly how to do this
Packages that you have stored locally can be installed by specifying the path to the project, like so:
packages:
- local: /opt/dbt/redshift # use a local path
Local packages should only be used for specific situations, for example, when testing local changes to a package.
Note: I think it is worth re-iterating the caveat given in the docs. You will now own downloading the cloning the correct versions of the packages along with the ongoing work of keeping the packages up-to-date.
As for how this works in practice. Consider the following example:
/Users/michelle/repos/my_dbt_project where my dbt project lives (that contains dbt_project.yml and packages.yml
/Users/michelle/repos/dbt_utils the location where I previously cloned the dbt-utils repo
In this example my packages.yml should look like
packages:
- local: /Users/michelle/repos/dbt_utils # use a local path
Please note that the external package does not live within my dbt project directory, but outside of it. While it should work to have it within the repo, this is not best practice. This external package development article goes even further in-depth.
I have a NPM package with a small user base, yesterday I created a new version and wanted to release it. I thought that I might as well make use of the new GitHub Packages and so I setup everything as GitHub suggested and released!
Now the problem is that I still have the old NPM page running on version 2.0.2 while everyone currently uses this as their dependency while the new GitHub package is on 2.0.4, Is there a way to 'synchronize' these two. Of course the GitHub Packages uses the <USER>/<PACKAGE> labeling while NPM just uses <NAME>.
Is the only thing I can do to publish on GitHub Packages and on NPM and just try to move users away from the NPM page?
If your publishing a public package, your better off just publishing it on NPM, as that is what most developers are used to.
I use GitHub Packages at work and the only advantage is that is effective free for hosting internal packages, as we are already paying for GitHub anyway. If it wasn’t for the zero price we wouldn’t be using it.
If you really want to force all your users to migrate to GitHub packages, and have to set up npm to work with it you could mark you old version npm deprecated and use that to point people to the new version.
https://docs.npmjs.com/cli/v6/commands/npm-deprecate
Here is another solution, but there is a catch.
Change your registry.npmjs.org package content to
index.js
export * from '#schotsl/my-package';
Now your registry.npmjs.org package is (almost) pointing to your npm.pkg.github.com package.
Only almost because any development directory for a project downstream of registry.npmjs.org/my-package, must configure the scope-to-server mapping for #schotsl/my-package to npm.pkg.github.com in a package manager config file.
In the case of package managers 'npm' and 'yarn' (v1) that can be done in
an .npmrc file at the same level as package.json.
The required .npmrc content is
#schotsl:registry=https://npm.pkg.github.com
# Github PAT token, packages:read authorization only ok
//npm.pkg.github.co/:_authToken="ghp_XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX"
The first line is the scope to server mapping.
The second line is a Github personal authorization token (PAT) with at least package:read permission. It is actually pretty liberal. A PAT with package:read issued from any github account will allow read access to every github accounts packages.
For the 'yarn' v2 package, the .npmrc file does not work, and instead a couple of keys need to be set in .yarnrc.yml.
Unfortunately there is no way to set the scope-to-server mapping and the token inside the registry.npmjs.org/my-package package itself.
Putting the .npmrc file in there doesn't work, it is ignored. And that wouldn't be a good solution anyway, because not all package managers read .npmrc files.
That is the 'catch' - using npm.pkg.github.com packages requires package manager specific config settings to be made by every downstream developer.
In addition, what if two different upstream packages have colliding scope names, each mapping to a different server? The current config methodology fails in that case.
Feature Proposal not current behavior
Ideally, there would be a common interface agreed upon by all package managers inside package.json - and the scope-to-server mapping would be defined in the package that directly references the scope. For example, in the package.json of my-package on registry.npmjs.org
{
dependencies:{
"#schotsl/my-package":"1.0.0"
},
registries:{
"#schotsl/my-package":"https://npm.pkg.github.com",
},
auths:{
"https://npm.pkg.github.com":"ghp_XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX",
},
}
Then downstream users would not need to config for each scope, and predictable (and risky) problems with scope name or package name collisions would not occur.
But that is not the way it is. Therefore Github Packages (npm.pkg.github.com) doesn't really seem to be a feasible way to provide public packages which may become dependencies of other public packages. No problem for private packages though.
Some modules can be auto-updated in backoffice by clicking the update button. However if the module is from an other source than prestashop itself (e.g. github) the module needs - afaik - to be updated manually.
So how should one handle updates?
Download ZIP and
unzip it over the corresponding modules folder (/modules/acme/)
unzip and rsync it to /modules/acme (rsync -trv /tmp/acme /modules)
Same as 2 but with --delete
Delete the folder completely and unzip the new one in place like rm -rf /modules/acme and cp -a /tmp/acme /modules/acme
Others ...
Side note: what about the config.xml and possibly other generated files?
Same applies for theme updates, how to handle these?
Concerning current version Prestashop 1.7+.
If the module upgrade is made correctly (you can check if module version is updated in main module class constructor and uses upgrade scripts in upgrades folder and files inside the module) you can unzip over it. Then visit the modules list page in backend and module upgrade will run. config.xml is auto (re)generated and used only for optimizing module list loading in the same backend page - it has no effect on module behaviour itself.
For themes you can also just unzip over the last one.
When I am in doubt with any upgrades I make a development copy of the store and do upgrades there first and see if everything is ok then do upgrades on live instance.
You can perform the upgrade automatically with this free module
https://www.prestashop.com/forums/topic/820013-migrate-or-upgrade-prestashop-16-or-other-versions-to-17-%E2%80%93-free-module/
Hope it helps
How to save/restore Sublime Text 2 configs/plugins to migrate to another computer? states that, to backup a Sublime Text 2 installation, a user should preserve the ~/Packages/User directory (from the user's local data folder on whatever OS they're using).
However, http://andrew.hedges.name/blog/2012/01/19/sublime-text-2-more-sublime-with-a-drop-of-dropbox and most other walkthroughs for using Dropbox to sync Sublime's settings specify three directories: ~/Packages, ~/Installed Packages and ~/Pristine Packages.
What is the functional difference between backing up just ~/Packages/User, and the other 3 directories?
I think that Packages/User is the one in which you are supposed to put settings (according to Sublime's official and unofficial documentation). However, some people put them in the other folders from time to time.
The Dropbox advice may be a hedge against poor practice.
From here:
Installed Packages is:
You will find this directory in the data directory. It contains a copy
of every sublime-package installed. Used to restore Packages.
These are the packages installed as sublime-packages. I don't think package control uses this, but if you install something as a sublime-package maybe you want to keep it?
Pristine Packages is:
You will find this directoy in the data directory. It contains a copy
of every shipped and core package. Used to restore Packages.
So essentially a list of .sublime-package files used to restore if you break something.
Packages is:
The packages used by Sublime Text, either installed as part of sublime, or the plugins.
User is:
The user directory is your personal directory, containing configurations, additional snippets, etc.
Below are my personal views on what to save, so feel free to ignore it if you would like.
I would have to agree with the post saying just save the User directory, as Package Control will grab all of the plugins in the list if they aren't already installed. I didn't see this mentioned in that post, but you can also add repositories (by specifying a URL) to Package Control, which allows you to install Packages outside of those submitted to Package Control, but still hosted somewhere. One of the arguments I can see to saving the Packages directory completely is if you are using plugins that aren't hosted anywhere (though these could probably be moved to the Packages directory without any problems).
The Installed Packages and Pristine Packages are used to restore packages, so I wouldn't think these would be needed, but I'm sure there is some use case where it is.
Anyways, realize I got off topic a bit at the end there, but hope everything before that helps clarify.
http://maven.apache.org/settings.html As per documentation the user specific settings can be either copied to the .m2 folder or under the maven installation. If a developer changes a machine or gets a new user id, such properties have to be copied manually to these newer machines.
Would it be possible to store user specific setting information in the repository itself (say SVN) and somehow have the mvn scripts load it on startup.
If the content of the settings.xml is not that user specific (e.g. for mirrors), you could store the whole Maven install in SVN with a customized conf/settings.xml and have the developers grab it from SVN to "install" it on a new machine as described in this previous answer.
If the content of the settings.xml is really user specific (e.g. it contains secret things like passwords), then it must be located in ~/.m2 and you will have to somehow make it available at the new location. If a developer logs on another machine, you could use "Roaming user profile". If a developer gets another id, then you'll really have to duplicate it. The technical solution may depend on the level of confidentiality required.
And if you have several developers sharing a userid but still need different settings.xml, then you'll have to pass it to Maven using the -s option. One could imagine storing these custom settings.xml in the project in that case (assuming it doesn't contain sensitive information). For example:
mvn -s settings-user1.xml <goal>
Nope, the whole point of having user settings is to store them outside the maven projects. There's nothing stopping you from creating your own svn repository and storing your configuration files there, though. You could write some shell scripts to bootstrap a new workstation from that repository, but it really depends how often you do this to make it worthwhile.
I would suggest that you setup your own repository such as Archiva, Nexus or Artifactory. Which will get your dependencies/plugins , then you can use mirror to specify explicitly just one repository to be used(the one you setup on your network). So whenever developer changes machine or dependencies are needed for multiple developers the internal mirror can be used as repo, your dependencies/plugins will download in no time to your local repository/ies