In ASP NET 6+ I need to make [FromQuery] replace underscores _ and minuses - before matching names.
So I want to plumb ASP to allow [FromQuery] bool testValue to be equivalent to all at once:
[FromQuery(Name="testValue")] bool testValue
[FromQuery(Name="test-value")] bool testValue
[FromQuery(Name="test_value")] bool testValue
Is there a place in the pipeline I can get in before names are compared (to remove _ and - myself)?
My current solution is just to replace the Request.Query with my own doctored QueryCollection that duplicates variables with fixed names in a middleware.
But I'm looking for any answer that's more... unhacky?!
public class RequeryMiddleware : IMiddleware
{
private static readonly char[] separators = new[] { '_', '-', '.', '|' };
private static bool Requery(ref string name)
{
bool changed = false;
if (name.IndexOfAny(separators) >= 0)
{
name = string.Concat(name.Split(separators, StringSplitOptions.None));
changed = true;
}
return changed;
}
public Task InvokeAsync(HttpContext context, RequestDelegate next)
{
Dictionary<string, StringValues> mods = new(
StringComparer.OrdinalIgnoreCase
);
foreach (var item in context.Request.Query)
{
string key = item.Key;
if (Requery(ref key))
{
mods.Add(key, item.Value);
}
}
if (mods.Count > 0)
{
Dictionary<string, StringValues> query = new(
context.Request.Query.Count + mods.Count
, StringComparer.OrdinalIgnoreCase
);
foreach (var item in context.Request.Query)
{
query.Add(item.Key, item.Value);
}
foreach (var mod in mods)
{
// if we get here it's bad...
query.TryAdd(mod.Key, mod.Value);
}
// replace the Query collection
context.Request.Query = new QueryCollection(query);
// change the QueryString too
QueryBuilder qb = new(context.Request.Query);
context.Request.QueryString = qb.ToQueryString();
}
return next(context);
}
}
my code :
public class MandatoryValidator : AbstractValidator<Entity.EigenSchema.AttributeSet>
{
private string Keyvalue = string.Empty;
public MandatoryValidator(string keyvalue)
{
Keyvalue = keyvalue;
RuleFor(record => record.Mandatory).Must(Mandatory);
}
protected bool Mandatory(bool val)
{
if (val)
{
if(Keyvalue!=null || Keyvalue!="")
{
return true;
}
return false;
}
else
{
return true;
}
}
}
this checks if the field is mandatory or not.
Now I need a function that takes more than one parameter to mandatory function, something like this..
protected bool Mandatory(bool val, string strval, int val)
{
//strval = record.LocalUnique
//val = record.Size
}
You can do it like this
RuleFor(record => record.Mandatory).Must(mandatoryField => Mandatory(mandatoryField, Keyvalue, 012));
You can also
RuleFor(record => record).Must(WholeObject=> Mandatory(WholeObject))
.WithName("Mandatory");
//.WithName(x => x.MandatoryFieldName) optional
//and now
private bool MandatorChecker(MyRecordType obj)
{
strval = obj.LocalUnique;
val = obj.Size;
}
This one will use the name you provided if this rule breaks.
My method toString() is supposed to return a string representation of the stack. The string representation consists of the stacks's elements in the order they are stored, enclosed in square brackets. My problem is that I am now returning [element0, element1, element2, element3, element4] so I wonder if there is there a simple way to return the string in reverse order i.e. to return [element4, element3, element2, element1, element0] instead?
public class Stack<E> implements IStack<E> {
public String toString() {
String str = "[";
if (head != null) {
str += head.getmElement();
Node<E> tempNode = head.getmNextNode();
while (tempNode != null) {
str += ", " + tempNode.getmElement();
tempNode = tempNode.getmNextNode();
}
}
str += "]";
return str; }
Node class:
public class Node<E> {
private E mElement;
private Node<E> mNextNode;
Node(E data) {
this.setmElement(data);
}
public E getmElement() {
return this.mElement;
}
public void setmElement(E element) {
this.mElement = element;
}
public Node<E> getmNextNode()
{
return this.mNextNode;
}
public void setmNextNode(Node<E> node)
{
this.mNextNode = node;
}}
You could use a StringBuilder and insert every element at the beginning instead of appending it:
public String toString() {
StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder("[");
if (head != null) {
sb.append(head.getmElement());
Node<E> tempNode = head.getmNextNode();
while (tempNode != null) {
sb.insert(1, ", ").inser(1, tempNode.getmElement());
tempNode = tempNode.getmNextNode();
}
}
sb.append("]");
return sb.toString();
}
Your list is only forward linked, so you could use a temporary ArrayList and add each element at the index 0.
I have this code here, to see if the items in both lists are identical:
for (final car in this.cars) {
bool found = false;
for (final car2 in garage2.cars) {
if (car2.id == car.id) {
found = true;
break;
}
}
if (!found) {
return false;
}
}
return true;
}
(I previously check if the 2 list lengths are equal). Is there a way to rewrite that so that I don't have O(n2) complexity?
As an option you can override quals and hashcode methods for class Car
something like this
class Car {
int id;
// other fields
#override
bool operator ==(Object o) => o is Car && id == o.id;
#override
int get hashCode => id.hashCode;
}
and then you can use the native method listEquals, which compares for deep equality.
import 'package:flutter/foundation.dart';
bool isEqual = listEquals<Car>(cars, garage2.cars);
I am trying to serialize Guava Range objects to JSON using Gson, however the default serialization fails, and I'm unsure how to correctly implement a TypeAdapter for this generic type.
Gson gson = new Gson();
Range<Integer> range = Range.closed(10, 20);
String json = gson.toJson(range);
System.out.println(json);
Range<Integer> range2 = gson.fromJson(json,
new TypeToken<Range<Integer>>(){}.getType());
System.out.println(range2);
assertEquals(range2, range);
This fails like so:
{"lowerBound":{"endpoint":10},"upperBound":{"endpoint":20}}
PASSED: typeTokenInterface
FAILED: range
java.lang.RuntimeException: Unable to invoke no-args constructor for
com.google.common.collect.Cut<java.lang.Integer>. Register an
InstanceCreator with Gson for this type may fix this problem.
at com.google.gson.internal.ConstructorConstructor$12.construct(
ConstructorConstructor.java:210)
...
Note that the default serialization actually loses information - it fails to report whether the endpoints are open or closed. I would prefer to see it serialized similar to its toString(), e.g. [10‥20] however simply calling toString() won't work with generic Range instances, as the elements of the range may not be primitives (Joda-Time LocalDate instances, for example). For the same reason, implementing a custom TypeAdapter seems difficult, as we don't know how to deserialize the endpoints.
I've implemented most of a TypeAdaptorFactory based on the template provided for Multimap which ought to work, but now I'm stuck on the generics. Here's what I have so far:
public class RangeTypeAdapterFactory implements TypeAdapterFactory {
public <T> TypeAdapter<T> create(Gson gson, TypeToken<T> typeToken) {
Type type = typeToken.getType();
if (typeToken.getRawType() != Range.class
|| !(type instanceof ParameterizedType)) {
return null;
}
Type elementType = ((ParameterizedType) type).getActualTypeArguments()[0];
TypeAdapter<?> elementAdapter = (TypeAdapter<?>)gson.getAdapter(TypeToken.get(elementType));
// Bound mismatch: The generic method newRangeAdapter(TypeAdapter<E>) of type
// GsonUtils.RangeTypeAdapterFactory is not applicable for the arguments
// (TypeAdapter<capture#4-of ?>). The inferred type capture#4-of ? is not a valid
// substitute for the bounded parameter <E extends Comparable<?>>
return (TypeAdapter<T>) newRangeAdapter(elementAdapter);
}
private <E extends Comparable<?>> TypeAdapter<Range<E>> newRangeAdapter(final TypeAdapter<E> elementAdapter) {
return new TypeAdapter<Range<E>>() {
#Override
public void write(JsonWriter out, Range<E> value) throws IOException {
if (value == null) {
out.nullValue();
return;
}
String repr = (value.lowerBoundType() == BoundType.CLOSED ? "[" : "(") +
(value.hasLowerBound() ? elementAdapter.toJson(value.lowerEndpoint()) : "-\u221e") +
'\u2025' +
(value.hasLowerBound() ? elementAdapter.toJson(value.upperEndpoint()) : "+\u221e") +
(value.upperBoundType() == BoundType.CLOSED ? "]" : ")");
out.value(repr);
}
public Range<E> read(JsonReader in) throws IOException {
if (in.peek() == JsonToken.NULL) {
in.nextNull();
return null;
}
String[] endpoints = in.nextString().split("\u2025");
E lower = elementAdapter.fromJson(endpoints[0].substring(1));
E upper = elementAdapter.fromJson(endpoints[1].substring(0,endpoints[1].length()-1));
return Range.range(lower, endpoints[0].charAt(0) == '[' ? BoundType.CLOSED : BoundType.OPEN,
upper, endpoints[1].charAt(endpoints[1].length()-1) == '[' ? BoundType.CLOSED : BoundType.OPEN);
}
};
}
}
However the return (TypeAdapter<T>) newRangeAdapter(elementAdapter); line has a compilation error and I'm now at a loss.
What's the best way to resolve this error? Is there a better way to serialize Range objects that I'm missing? What about if I want to serialize RangeSets?
Rather frustrating that the Google utility library and Google serialization library seem to require so much glue to work together :(
This feels somewhat like reinventing the wheel, but it was a lot quicker to put together and test than the time spent trying to get Gson to behave, so at least presently I'll be using the following Converters to serialize Range and RangeSet*, rather than Gson.
/**
* Converter between Range instances and Strings, essentially a custom serializer.
* Ideally we'd let Gson or Guava do this for us, but presently this is cleaner.
*/
public static <T extends Comparable<? super T>> Converter<Range<T>, String> rangeConverter(final Converter<T, String> elementConverter) {
final String NEG_INFINITY = "-\u221e";
final String POS_INFINITY = "+\u221e";
final String DOTDOT = "\u2025";
return new Converter<Range<T>, String>() {
#Override
protected String doForward(Range<T> range) {
return (range.hasLowerBound() && range.lowerBoundType() == BoundType.CLOSED ? "[" : "(") +
(range.hasLowerBound() ? elementConverter.convert(range.lowerEndpoint()) : NEG_INFINITY) +
DOTDOT +
(range.hasUpperBound() ? elementConverter.convert(range.upperEndpoint()) : POS_INFINITY) +
(range.hasUpperBound() && range.upperBoundType() == BoundType.CLOSED ? "]" : ")");
}
#Override
protected Range<T> doBackward(String range) {
String[] endpoints = range.split(DOTDOT);
Range<T> ret = Range.all();
if(!endpoints[0].substring(1).equals(NEG_INFINITY)) {
T lower = elementConverter.reverse().convert(endpoints[0].substring(1));
ret = ret.intersection(Range.downTo(lower, endpoints[0].charAt(0) == '[' ? BoundType.CLOSED : BoundType.OPEN));
}
if(!endpoints[1].substring(0,endpoints[1].length()-1).equals(POS_INFINITY)) {
T upper = elementConverter.reverse().convert(endpoints[1].substring(0,endpoints[1].length()-1));
ret = ret.intersection(Range.upTo(upper, endpoints[1].charAt(endpoints[1].length()-1) == ']' ? BoundType.CLOSED : BoundType.OPEN));
}
return ret;
}
};
}
/**
* Converter between RangeSet instances and Strings, essentially a custom serializer.
* Ideally we'd let Gson or Guava do this for us, but presently this is cleaner.
*/
public static <T extends Comparable<? super T>> Converter<RangeSet<T>, String> rangeSetConverter(final Converter<T, String> elementConverter) {
return new Converter<RangeSet<T>, String>() {
private final Converter<Range<T>, String> rangeConverter = rangeConverter(elementConverter);
#Override
protected String doForward(RangeSet<T> rs) {
ArrayList<String> ls = new ArrayList<>();
for(Range<T> range : rs.asRanges()) {
ls.add(rangeConverter.convert(range));
}
return Joiner.on(", ").join(ls);
}
#Override
protected RangeSet<T> doBackward(String rs) {
Iterable<String> parts = Splitter.on(",").trimResults().split(rs);
ImmutableRangeSet.Builder<T> build = ImmutableRangeSet.builder();
for(String range : parts) {
build.add(rangeConverter.reverse().convert(range));
}
return build.build();
}
};
}
*For inter-process communication, Java serialization would likely work just fine, as both classes implement Serializable. However I'm serializing to disk for more permanent storage, meaning I need a format I can trust won't change over time. Guava's serialization doesn't provide that guarantee.
Here is a Gson JsonSerializer and JsonDeserializer that generically supports a Range: https://github.com/jamespedwards42/Fava/wiki/Range-Marshaller
#Override
public JsonElement serialize(final Range src, final Type typeOfSrc, final JsonSerializationContext context) {
final JsonObject jsonObject = new JsonObject();
if ( src.hasLowerBound() ) {
jsonObject.add( "lowerBoundType", context.serialize( src.lowerBoundType() ) );
jsonObject.add( "lowerBound", context.serialize( src.lowerEndpoint() ) );
} else
jsonObject.add( "lowerBoundType", context.serialize( BoundType.OPEN ) );
if ( src.hasUpperBound() ) {
jsonObject.add( "upperBoundType", context.serialize( src.upperBoundType() ) );
jsonObject.add( "upperBound", context.serialize( src.upperEndpoint() ) );
} else
jsonObject.add( "upperBoundType", context.serialize( BoundType.OPEN ) );
return jsonObject;
}
#Override
public Range<? extends Comparable<?>> deserialize(final JsonElement json, final Type typeOfT, final JsonDeserializationContext context) throws JsonParseException {
if ( !( typeOfT instanceof ParameterizedType ) )
throw new IllegalStateException( "typeOfT must be a parameterized Range." );
final JsonObject jsonObject = json.getAsJsonObject();
final JsonElement lowerBoundTypeJsonElement = jsonObject.get( "lowerBoundType" );
final JsonElement upperBoundTypeJsonElement = jsonObject.get( "upperBoundType" );
if ( lowerBoundTypeJsonElement == null || upperBoundTypeJsonElement == null )
throw new IllegalStateException( "Range " + json
+ "was not serialized with this serializer! The default serialization does not store the boundary types, therfore we can not deserialize." );
final Type type = ( ( ParameterizedType ) typeOfT ).getActualTypeArguments()[0];
final BoundType lowerBoundType = context.deserialize( lowerBoundTypeJsonElement, BoundType.class );
final JsonElement lowerBoundJsonElement = jsonObject.get( "lowerBound" );
final Comparable<?> lowerBound = lowerBoundJsonElement == null ? null : context.deserialize( lowerBoundJsonElement, type );
final BoundType upperBoundType = context.deserialize( upperBoundTypeJsonElement, BoundType.class );
final JsonElement upperBoundJsonElement = jsonObject.get( "upperBound" );
final Comparable<?> upperBound = upperBoundJsonElement == null ? null : context.deserialize( upperBoundJsonElement, type );
if ( lowerBound == null && upperBound != null )
return Range.upTo( upperBound, upperBoundType );
else if ( lowerBound != null && upperBound == null )
return Range.downTo( lowerBound, lowerBoundType );
else if ( lowerBound == null && upperBound == null )
return Range.all();
return Range.range( lowerBound, lowerBoundType, upperBound, upperBoundType );
}
Here is a straight forward solution. Works very well
import com.google.common.collect.BoundType;
import com.google.common.collect.Range;
import com.google.gson.*;
import java.lang.reflect.Type;
public class GoogleRangeAdapter implements JsonSerializer, JsonDeserializer {
public static String TK_hasLowerBound = "hasLowerBound";
public static String TK_hasUpperBound = "hasUpperBound";
public static String TK_lowerBoundType = "lowerBoundType";
public static String TK_upperBoundType = "upperBoundType";
public static String TK_lowerBound = "lowerBound";
public static String TK_upperBound = "upperBound";
#Override
public Object deserialize(JsonElement json, Type typeOfT, JsonDeserializationContext context) throws JsonParseException {
JsonObject jsonObject = (JsonObject)json;
boolean hasLowerBound = jsonObject.get(TK_hasLowerBound).getAsBoolean();
boolean hasUpperBound = jsonObject.get(TK_hasUpperBound).getAsBoolean();
if (!hasLowerBound && !hasUpperBound) {
return Range.all();
}
else if (!hasLowerBound && hasUpperBound){
double upperBound = jsonObject.get(TK_upperBound).getAsDouble();
BoundType upperBoundType = BoundType.valueOf(jsonObject.get(TK_upperBoundType).getAsString());
if (upperBoundType == BoundType.OPEN)
return Range.lessThan(upperBound);
else
return Range.atMost(upperBound);
}
else if (hasLowerBound && !hasUpperBound){
double lowerBound = jsonObject.get(TK_lowerBound).getAsDouble();
BoundType lowerBoundType = BoundType.valueOf(jsonObject.get(TK_lowerBoundType).getAsString());
if (lowerBoundType == BoundType.OPEN)
return Range.greaterThan(lowerBound);
else
return Range.atLeast(lowerBound);
}
else {
double lowerBound = jsonObject.get(TK_lowerBound).getAsDouble();
double upperBound = jsonObject.get(TK_upperBound).getAsDouble();
BoundType upperBoundType = BoundType.valueOf(jsonObject.get(TK_upperBoundType).getAsString());
BoundType lowerBoundType = BoundType.valueOf(jsonObject.get(TK_lowerBoundType).getAsString());
if (lowerBoundType == BoundType.OPEN && upperBoundType == BoundType.OPEN)
return Range.open(lowerBound, upperBound);
else if (lowerBoundType == BoundType.OPEN && upperBoundType == BoundType.CLOSED)
return Range.openClosed(lowerBound, upperBound);
else if (lowerBoundType == BoundType.CLOSED && upperBoundType == BoundType.OPEN)
return Range.closedOpen(lowerBound, upperBound);
else
return Range.closed(lowerBound, upperBound);
}
}
#Override
public JsonElement serialize(Object src, Type typeOfSrc, JsonSerializationContext context) {
JsonObject jsonObject = new JsonObject();
Range<Double> range = (Range<Double>)src;
boolean hasLowerBound = range.hasLowerBound();
boolean hasUpperBound = range.hasUpperBound();
jsonObject.addProperty(TK_hasLowerBound, hasLowerBound);
jsonObject.addProperty(TK_hasUpperBound, hasUpperBound);
if (hasLowerBound) {
jsonObject.addProperty(TK_lowerBound, range.lowerEndpoint());
jsonObject.addProperty(TK_lowerBoundType, range.lowerBoundType().name());
}
if (hasUpperBound) {
jsonObject.addProperty(TK_upperBound, range.upperEndpoint());
jsonObject.addProperty(TK_upperBoundType, range.upperBoundType().name());
}
return jsonObject;
}
}