I have a table "table1" like this:
+------+--------------------+
| id | barcode | lot |
+------+-------------+------+
| 0 | ABC-123-456 | |
| 1 | ABC-123-654 | |
| 2 | ABC-789-EFG | |
| 3 | ABC-456-EFG | |
+------+-------------+------+
I have to extract the number in the center of the column "barcode", like with this request :
SELECT SUBSTR(barcode, 5, 3) AS ToExtract FROM table1;
The result:
+-----------+
| ToExtract |
+-----------+
| 123 |
| 123 |
| 789 |
| 456 |
+-----------+
And insert this into the column "lot" .
follow along the lines
UPDATE table_name
SET column1 = value1, column2 = value2, ...
WHERE condition;
i.e in your case
UPDATE table_name
SET lot = SUBSTR(barcode, 5, 3)
WHERE condition;(if any)
UPDATE table1 SET Lot = SUBSTR(barcode, 5, 3)
-- WHERE ...;
Many databases support generated (aka "virtual"/"computed" columns). This allows you to define a column as an expression. The syntax is something like this:
alter table table1 add column lot varchar(3) generated always as (SUBSTR(barcode, 5, 3))
Using a generated column has several advantages:
It is always up-to-date.
It generally does not occupy any space.
There is no overhead when creating the table (although there is overhead when querying the table).
I should note that the syntax varies a bit among databases. Some don't require the type specification. Some use just as instead of generated always as.
CREATE TABLE Table1(id INT,barcode varchar(255),lot varchar(255))
INSERT INTO Table1 VALUES (0,'ABC-123-456',NULL),(1,'ABC-123-654',NULL),(2,'ABC-789-EFG',NULL)
,(3,'ABC-456-EFG',NULL)
UPDATE a
SET a.lot = SUBSTRING(b.barcode, 5, 3)
FROM Table1 a
INNER JOIN Table1 b ON a.id=b.id
WHERE a.lot IS NULL
id | barcode | lot
-: | :---------- | :--
0 | ABC-123-456 | 123
1 | ABC-123-654 | 123
2 | ABC-789-EFG | 789
3 | ABC-456-EFG | 456
db<>fiddle here
Related
I'm struggling to find a value that might be in different tables but using UNION is a pain as there are a lot of tables.
[Different table that contains the suffixes from the TestTable_]
| ID | Name|
| -------- | -----------|
| 1 | TestTable1 |
| 2 | TestTable2 |
| 3 | TestTable3 |
| 4 | TestTable4 |
TestTable1 content:
| id | Name | q1 | a1 |
| -------- | ---------------------------------------- |
| 1 | goose | withFeather? |featherID |
| 2 | rooster| withoutFeather?|shinyfeatherID |
| 3 | rooster| age | 20 |
TestTable2 content:
| id | Name | q1 | a1 |
| -------- | ---------------------------------------------------|
| 1 | brazilian_goose | withFeather? |featherID |
| 2 | annoying_rooster | withoutFeather?|shinyfeatherID |
| 3 | annoying_rooster | no_legs? |dead |
TestTable3 content:
| id | Name | q1 | a1 |
| -------- | ---------------------------------------- |
| 1 | goose | withFeather? |featherID |
| 2 | rooster| withoutFeather?|shinyfeatherID |
| 3 | rooster| age | 15 |
Common columns: q1 and a1
Is there a way to parse through all of them to lookup for a specific value without using UNION because some of them might have different columns?
Something like: check if "q1='age'" exists in all those tables (from 1 to 50)
Select q1,*
from (something)
where q1 exists in (TestTable_*)... or something like that.
If not possible, not a problem.
You could use dynamic SQL but something I do in situations like this where I have a list of tables that I want to quickly perform the same actions on is to either use a spreadsheet to paste the list of tables into and type a query into the cell with something like #table then use the substitute function to replace it.
Alternative I just paste the list into SSMS and use SHIFT+ALT+ArrowKey to select the column and start typing stuff out.
So here is my list of tables
Then I use that key combo. As you can see my cursor has now selected all those rows.
Now I can start typing and all rows selected will get the input.
Then I just go to the other side of the table names and repeat the action
It's not a perfect solution but it's quick a quick and dirty way of doing something repetitive quickly.
If you want to find all the tables with that column name you can use information schema.
Select table_name from INFORMATION_SCHEMA.COLUMNS where COLUMN_NAME = 'q1'
Given the type of solution you are after I can offer a method that I've had to use on legacy systems.
You can query sys.columns for the name of the column(s) you need to find in N tables and join using object_id to sys.tables where type='U'. This will give you a list of table names.
From this list you can then build a working query for each table, and depending on your requirements (is this ad-hoc?) either just manually execute it yourself of build a procedure that will do it for you using sp_executesql
Eg
select t.name, c.name
into #workingtable
from sys.columns c
join sys.tables t on t.object_id=c.object_id
where c.name in .....
psudocode:
begin loop while rows exist in #working table
select top 1 row from #workingtable
set #sql=your query specific to that table and column(s)
exec(#sql) / sp_executesql / try/catch as necessary
delete row from working table
end loop
Hopefully that give ideas at least for how you might implement your requirements.
I would like to match the field values of "FORMULATION" from TABLE 1 to "C_TEST_ARTICLE" from table 2, that has mutiple of these formulation sepparated by commas.
Table 1:
+----------------+--------------------+
| SAMPLE_NUMBER | FORMULATION |
+----------------+-----------+--------+
| 84778 | S/200582/01-TA-002 |
| 84777 | S/200582/01-TA-002 |
| 81691 | S/200451/01-TA-011 |
| 81690 | S/200451/01-TA-011 |
+----------------+-----------+--------+
TABLE 2
+-----------------------+--------------------------------------+------------------+
| C_TEST_ARTICLE | C_REPORT_NUMBER |
+----------------+-----------+---------------------------------+------------------+
| S/200180/03-TA-001,S/200180/03-TA-002 | 16698 |
| S/200375/01-TA-001,S/200375/01-TA-002,S/200375/01-TA-003 | 15031 |
+--------------------------------------------------------------+------------------+
What I want form all of this, is that the each of these "C_TEST_ARTICLES" has a "C_REPORT_NUMBER", so I would like to get all those "SAMPLE_NUMBERS" from table 1, so in that way, I would have the samples related to the report number.
you could try using LIKE
select SAMPLE_NUMBER
from table1
INNER JOIN table2 ON c_test_article like concat('%', formulation , '%'')
select
C_TEST_ARTICLE
,C_REPORT_NUMBER
,b1.SAMPLE_NUMBER
from TABLE 2
INNER JOIN TABLE 1 as b1 on C_TEST_ARTICLE like '%'+FORMULATION+'%'
Try
SELECT
T1.SampleNumber
, T2.C_Report_Number
FROM Table1 T1
, Table2 T2
WHERE CHARINDEX(T1.Formulation, T2.C_Test_article) > 0
I have a dataset with big int array column in s3 and I want to filter rows efficiently based on array values. I know we can use gin index in sql table but need solution to work on s3 dataset. I am planning to use cluster id for each combinations of elements in array (as their cardinality is not huge. max 2500) and then store it as new column on which later on filter can applied.
Example,
Table A
+------+------+-----------+
| Col1 | Col2 | Col3 |
+------+------+-----------+
| 1 | 101 | [123,234] |
| 2 | 102 | [123] |
| 3 | 103 | [234,345] |
+------+------+-----------+
I am trying to add new column like,
Table B (column Col3 will be removed from actual schema)
+------+------+-----------+-----------+
| Col1 | Col2 | Col3 | Cid |
+------+------+-----------+-----------+
| 1 | 101 | [123,234] | 1 |
| 2 | 102 | [123] | 2 |
| 3 | 103 | [234,345] | 3 |
+------+------+-----------+-----------+
and there will be another table of mapping for col3 and Cid like,
Table C
+-----------+-----+
| Col3 | Cid |
+-----------+-----+
| [123,234] | 1 |
| [123] | 2 |
| [234,345] | 3 |
+-----------+-----+
This table C will be added a new entry if a new combination is created and B will be updated if any array element gets added or removed. Goal is to be able to filter out records from Table A based on values in array column efficiently. Queries like
123 = Any(Col3) can be served as Cid = 2 or queries like [123, 345] = Any(Col3) can be served as Cid in (2,3).
Is there any better way to do solve this problem?
Also I am thinking of creating required combinations at runtime to limit number of combinations. Is it a good idea to create minimum combinations?
In Postgres, you can create the table and use join to calculate the values:
create table array_dim as
select col3 as arr, row_number() over (order by min(col1)) as array_id
from t
group by col3;
You can then add the new column:
select a.*, ad.array_id
from a join
array_dim ad
on a.col3 = ad.arr
I have a dataset which looks like so
ID | PName | Node | Val |
1 | Tag | Name | XBA |
2 | Tag | Desc | Dec1 |
3 | Tag | unit | Int |
6 | Tag | tids | 100 |
7 | Tag | post | AAA |
1 | Tag | Name | XBB |
2 | Tag | Desc | Des9 |
3 | Tag | unit | Float |
7 | Tag | post | BBB |
6 | Tag | tids | 150 |
I would like the result in my report to be
Name | Desc | Unit | Tids | Post |
XBA | Dec1 | int | 100 | AAA |
XBB | Des9 | Float | 150 | BBB |
I have tried using a SSRS Matrix with
Row: PName
Data: Node
Value: Val
The results were simply one row with Name and next row with desc and next with unit etc. Its not all in the same rows and also the second row was missing. This is possibly because there is no grouping on the dataset.
What is a good way of achieving the expected results?
I would not recommend this for a production scenario but if you need to knock out a report quickly or something you can try this. I would just not feel comfortable that the order of the records you get will always be what you expect.
You COULD try to insert the results of the SP into a table (regular table, temp table, table variable...doesn't matter really as long as you can get an identity column added). Assuming that the rows always come out in the correct order (which is probably not a valid assumption 100% of the time) then add an identity column on the table to get a unique row number for each row. From there you should be able to write some math logic to "group" your values together and then pivot out what you want.
create table #temp (ID int, PName varchar(100), Node varhar(100), Val varchar(100))
insert #temp exec (your stored proc)
alter table #temp add UniqueID int identity
then use UniqueID (modulo on 5 perhaps?) to group records together and then pivot
http://sqlfiddle.com/#!4/24637/1
I have three tables, (better details/data shown in sqlfiddle link), one replacing another, and a cross reference table in between. One of the fields in each of the table uses the cross reference (version), and another one of the fields in each of the tables is the same (changeID).
I need a query that when passed a list of new_version + new_changeType, along with the equivalent original_version + old_changeType (if there is an old version equivalent) PLUS any old changeIDs that were 'missed' in the conversion of data.
TABLES (fields on the same line are equivalent)
OLD_table | XREF_table | NEW_Table
original_version | original_version |
changeID | | changeID
OLD_changeType | |
| new_version | new_version
| | NEW_changeType
DATA
111,1,CT1 | 111,AAA | AAA,1,ONE
111,2,CT2 | 222,BBB | AAA,2,TWO
222,1,CT1 | 333,DDD | BBB,1,ONE
222,2,CT2 | | BBB,2,TWO
222,3,CT3 | | CCC,1,ONE
333,1,CT1 | |
444,1,CT1 | |
If passed the following list, the result set should look like so. (order doesnt matter)
AAA,BBB,CCC
| NEW_VERSION | NEW_CHANGE_TYPE| ORIGINAL_VERSION | CHANGEID | OLD_CHANGE_TYPE |
|-------------|----------------|------------------|----------|-----------------|
| AAA | ONE | 111 | 1 | CT1 |
| AAA | TWO | 111 | 2 | CT2 |
| BBB | ONE | 222 | 1 | CT1 |
| BBB | TWO | 222 | 2 | CT2 |
| CCC | ONE | (null) | (null) | (null) |
| (null) | (null) | 222 | 3 | CT3 |
I'm having trouble getting ALL the data required. I've played with the following query, however I seem to either 1) miss a row or 2) get additional rows not matching the requirements.
The following queries I've played with are as follows.
select
a.new_version,
a.Change_type,
c.original_version,
c.changeID,
c.OLD_Change_type
from NEW_TABLE a
LEFT OUTER JOIN XREF_TABLE b on a.new_version = b.new_version
FULL OUTER JOIN OLD_TABLE c on
b.original_version = c.original_version and a.changeID = c.changeID
where (b.new_version in ('AAA','BBB','CCC') or b.new_version is null);
select
a.new_version,
a.Change_type,
c.original_version,
c.changeID,
c.OLD_Change_type
from NEW_TABLE a
FULL JOIN XREF_TABLE b on a.new_version = b.new_version
FULL JOIN OLD_TABLE c on
b.original_version = c.original_version and a.changeID = c.changeID
where (a.new_version in ('AAA','BBB','CCC'));
The first returns one 'extra' row with the 333,DDD data, which is not specified from the input.
The seconds returns one less row (with the changeID from the old table "missed" from when this data was converted over.
Any thoughts or suggestions on how to solve this?
First inner join old_table and xref_table, as you are not interested in any old_table entries without an xref_table entry. Then full outer join new_table. In your WHERE clause be aware that new_table.new_version can be null, so use coalesce to use xref_table.new_version in this case to limit your results to AAA, BBB and CCC. That's all.
select
coalesce(n.new_version, x.new_version) as new_version,
n.change_type,
o.original_version,
o.changeid,
o.old_change_type
from old_table o
inner join xref_table x
on x.original_version = o.original_version
full outer join new_table n
on n.new_version = x.new_version
and n.changeid = o.changeid
where coalesce(n.new_version, x.new_version) in ('AAA','BBB','CCC')
order by 1,2,3,4,5
;
Here is your fiddle: http://sqlfiddle.com/#!4/24637/11.
BTW: Better never use random aliases like a, b and c that don't indicate what table is meant. That makes the query harder to understand. Use the table's first letter(s) or an acronym instead.